|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kazzzi
Amarr Minmatar Ship Construction Services Damu'Khonde
|
Posted - 2010.08.31 20:49:00 -
[1]
A coalition based solely on ROE with no real defining principles, how quaint. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 21:49:00 -
[2]
I'm convinced Codo here has an NHB Ultra Happy ChipÖ
|
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.03 09:49:00 -
[3]
If your coalition is completely ignorant of politics in New Eden and is solely concerned with piracy, shouldn't this thread be moved to the Crime and Punishment forum?
Ah, but you aren't completely ignorant of politics are you? Looking at your member list and your own history, I'm seeing quite a bit of Imperial Amarrian bias. Go ahead and tell me you wouldn't be thrilled if CVA retook all of Providence and continued with Operation Deliverance.
I believe this coalition is merely a scheme to dupe rookie pilots into following Imperialist propaganda. It will take quite a lot to convince many of us otherwise. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.03 18:22:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Syyl'ara
Hasty Generalization Guilt-by-Association Straw Man Ad Hominem Biased Sampling Poisoning the Well Presumptive Claims Projection
Thank you for this list. Yes, each of these can be applied to statements put forth by the OP. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.03 19:15:00 -
[5]
Hey Syyl'ara, how's it feel to be in a coalition with Imperialists? Cause slavers are better than pirates amirite?
|
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.03 20:05:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Kazzzi on 03/01/2011 20:06:29 For the record, I do get quite upset when Imperial Amarrian interests are hidden under the guise of PR friendly terms like NRDS. Sometimes I even get upset enough to kill people. I suppose that makes me a pirate to report in your intel channel you share with several pro-Amarrian groups and even a pro-Khanid Kingdom one.
Though I admit I do admire Codo for his courage, drive and idealism, I still question his rationale, intentions and associations. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.04 21:12:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Codo Yagari
I can assure those that are in doubt that the NRDS Coalition has absolutely no interest in promoting slavery, in fact, my own corporation, the founder of the NRDS Coalition, has as a membership directive saying that slavery must not be supported.
This is indeed good to hear and a step in the right direction. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.06 04:03:00 -
[8]
On 12.10 of last year in the Saidusairos system, Amarr Navy Admiral Aerkon Verriam ordered Imperial forces to attack all non-Amarrian pilots.
So in NRDS/NBSI terms, how does the NRDS coalition feel about this?
How about the unprovoked assault at Vak Atioth?
Is this enough for you to set the Amarr Empire, or even just their navy, red? |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.07 01:34:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Kazzzi on 07/01/2011 01:37:15 No the NRDS Coalition itself does not have enforced standings, but it does have quite a bit of philosophy and code of ethics, so I'd still like to hear how Codo and the NRDS Coalition officially feels about what I asked. After all, Admiral Verriam and even Jamyl Sarum are indeed capsuleers.
This is not a loaded question. Codo has quelled my worst worries and I am glad to see him as a progressive Amarrian. I ask out of honest interest. I'm sure we could find examples of NBSI from all 4 of the major Concord protected powers. It's only that I had some Amarrian examples readily available.
Something else I was wondering, do you discourage Coalition members from maintaining standings enclosurism with their other allies in their own areas of operation? I'm wondering because you don't seem to want to interfere with the inner workings of member groups, but at the same time you do not enforce any enclosurism yourself. Which I view as a good thing |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.10 05:33:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Lyn Farel
Even if I despise the acts of admiral Verriam this day, you should not confuse an act of piracy with an act of war. To my knowledge, the Empire and the Federation are at war.
Concerning the link between the Empress and the days of Darkness / Vak'Atioth, I have to admit that I fail to see it.
The Admiral ordered Imperial forces to attack all non-Amarrians, not just the Federation. Regardless, if CONCORD sanctioned war is declared, does that automatically always remove any NBSI connotations?
I brought up Jamyl's name not because of any involvent with Vak Atioth, but because someone said the Amarr Empire is not a capsuleer entity, yet the Empress is indeed a capsuleer. |
|
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.10 20:06:00 -
[11]
Is faction war the only way a group can preemptively strike political enemies without suffering the NBSI stigma? |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 02:05:00 -
[12]
So you would consider our struggle noble if we set everyone we shot red just before shooting them?
NBSI works perfectly fine as long as you have active diplomats and a policy to set those truly innocent blue upon request.
NRDS means nothing when run by D-bags. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 02:40:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Kazzzi on 11/01/2011 02:41:45
Originally by: SpotlessBlade /me looks at kazzi. D-Bags? really? lol
Sure, not necessarily directed at Codo here, I just mean D-bags in general.
I have infinitely more respect for NBSI groups with reasonable diplomats than NRDS groups run by ****s. It's a misconception that when somebody slaps on that NRDS label that they are automatically more ethical.
Edit: BTW spot, when are you coming back? |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 01:50:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Codo Yagari
With NRDS, you send out a statement to unknown entities saying "We come in peace". The NRDS/NBSI topic IS a philosophical one.
Not when the NRDS entity in question are in fact D-bags. Four letters aren't going to change that. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 10:27:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Codo Yagari Edited by: Codo Yagari on 13/01/2011 06:39:45
Not only Amarrians and those who support slavery fly in the space controlled by pro-slavery Amarr, the civilizations of New Eden are quite mingled.
Of course, which is why we continuously seek out those who share our ideals who we may potentially run across in free-fire zones and make every attempt at negotiating positive relations beforehand. We're quite pro-active with diplomacy, whereas a universal NRDS entities method of diplomacy may possibly consist of nothing more than checking red boxes.
We take our standings very seriously and have a very detailed ROE. We do not abide by forced standing enclosurism. This has often angered allies in our long history, but we maintain our principles. We will not set reds without sufficient cause. Universal NRDS may not promote forced standings enclosurism, but it does tolerate it.
You may choose to ignore politics and consider your extremely broad definition of piracy to be of more importance than the war against slavery, but we'll just have to agree to disagree. |
Kazzzi
Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 18:57:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Horizonist I think it is regrettable.
I agree it is, feel free to contact me anytime to discuss it. |
|
|
|