Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
knobber Jobbler
Executive Intervention Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.10.18 11:28:00 -
[31]
Edited by: knobber Jobbler on 18/10/2010 11:31:53 Sorry to say it but resolution doesn't automatically mean better quality. It just means more pixels on screen. Plenty of large cheap LCD's look terrible because they colour band or wash out.
There isn't too much difference between a 1920x1200 image and a 1920x1080 image.
Even on a 1080p 50 inch TV you won't see the pixels from the correct viewing distance.
I've got two 32" TV's (a 720p Sony and a 1080p LG), a Benq FP241w (24 inch LCD)and a Dell 2408 WFP (24 inch LCD) both native 1920x1200, a Panasonic G20 (50 inch plasma).
The Sony 32 I have has a better image at 720p than the LG does at 1080p because of the contrast and response time.
My Benq 24 looks better than the Dell 24 despite using many of the same parts, again due to contrast and the blacks it can display. Its colour depth is also marginally better.
My 50 inch plasma, despite being 120 pixels smaller on one axis than my 24 inch screens beats them all on blacks, contrast and general image quality. It does greys better for a start and doesn't look washed out in some colours. Its calibration settings, white balance, ability to interpolate frames and the THX settings make it just better despite being 120 pixes on one axis smaller than my 24" screens.
|
Something Random
Gallente The Barrow Boys
|
Posted - 2010.10.18 12:32:00 -
[32]
Aside from the min/max gibber gibber gibber its ****e unless its worth more than a planet crowd.
42" plasma tried out last week for the first time... and ran into a problem, it was my ladies old comp with a NVidia 8600 driving it and it couldnt pump out the frames fast enough lol.
But those frames it pumped out........... gasmic.
/me *hugs* /me
Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
Aint that right? |
dr doooo
|
Posted - 2010.10.18 16:58:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Ascendic
I have news for you mate.
HIGHER RESOLUTION = HIGHER QUALITY.
So guess what? resolution corrosponds to better quality. Get your head out of the sand you tit. You are trying to tell me that by stretching an image that I see on a single 24" screen over 50" it looks better? Same resolution over larger area = less ppi = worse quality not better.
Get a grip.
Have you actually played Eve on a decent big plasma TV?
Your reasoning about screen size doesn't make any sense. If bigger is worse, why aren't you using a 14" monitor?
You are not 'stretching' an image any more or less on a 50" TV compared to a 24" monitor. It's just a bigger image designed to be viewed from further away!
It seems you have been suckered by marketing, and their obsession with pixels and resolutions with electronics. The OP is talking about real image quality, not marketing department bragging figures. Of course resolution is important, but it's only one part of the image quality equation. My very old digital camera (that sold for ú1500 back in it's day) still takes better photo's than my few hundred quid modern camera which has almost three times the number of pixels.
|
MaxxOmega
Caldari Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
|
Posted - 2010.10.18 18:29:00 -
[34]
Edited by: MaxxOmega on 18/10/2010 18:33:02 Well... I have a Panasonic 50 Inch Plasma that runs at 1920 x 1080. But I still thinks EVE looks better on my 30 Inch Monitor running at 2560 x 1600. 1080 vs 1600 is a big difference. At 1600 you can see all kinds of cool little things happening in space you cant see at other resolutions. But really they both are extremely cool..
But hey it's all subjective anyway based on things like room lighting, how old you are and how good your eyes are, etc...
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |