| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
   |
Posted - 2010.11.22 02:13:00 -
[31]
My guess on christmas surprise.
The removal of training skills, long been asked for.
The refund of SP for those who did train them, which is now technically possible if done right with a script to issue the bonus SP back.
Then everyone new or hasnt finsihed getting thier trainig skills maxed gets +12x5 more stats to mess around with in character creator/neural remapping.
Only other feasible other option Ive seen players demanding is removal of local becuase its sansha nation's fault for destroying the in system networks and scanners.
I dont think it will be BPO and BPC seperation ccp was commenting some long time about making those rolled into a new ui interface database basically which lets you carry the chips the Bps are for resell or hand over and once you have it you can plug it into the database where its nice and safe and easy to access and glance and sort out. Even if they didnt go that route, the metaphysical state of the blueprints child parent inheritence with current software would almost require redoing every single item in eve all over again just to make the BPC and BPO seperate icons since all items currently have a 'blueprint' due to the simple fact of its child inheritance of being part of the item family.
Becuase ships take way too many QA follow ups if its anything combat related. The above however already been tested in some sense and manner before.
Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 1SEPT10
|
Alty McExpendable
Standards and Practices
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 02:31:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Nova Fox
My guess on christmas surprise.
Stuff that would make a terrible surprise.
Or it could be some new ships...not like they held an art contest for that recently. 
|
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 02:35:00 -
[33]
I doubt its the tornado, ships like that go though extensive balance and checks it would have popped up on sisi at least. If it is a new ship its a new shuttle, its always safe to give those away. Takes about a half year to impliment a new ship anyways from ground up. Specially the one the size of a battleship.
Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 1SEPT10
|
Liogan
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 05:00:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Nova Fox
I doubt its the tornado, ships like that go though extensive balance and checks it would have popped up on sisi at least. If it is a new ship its a new shuttle, its always safe to give those away. Takes about a half year to impliment a new ship anyways from ground up. Specially the one the size of a battleship.
Well, actually, CCP has had a long time to balance a new ship. The comp was purely to design how the ship looks, not the attributes, so this could have been in the pipeline for a while.
Also, it wouldn't be in SiSi as they are currently testing the Nov.30th release, not the christmas one!
|
Qujulome
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 05:20:00 -
[35]
new forums?
|
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 05:20:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Liogan
Originally by: Nova Fox
I doubt its the tornado, ships like that go though extensive balance and checks it would have popped up on sisi at least. If it is a new ship its a new shuttle, its always safe to give those away. Takes about a half year to impliment a new ship anyways from ground up. Specially the one the size of a battleship.
Well, actually, CCP has had a long time to balance a new ship. The comp was purely to design how the ship looks, not the attributes, so this could have been in the pipeline for a while.
Also, it wouldn't be in SiSi as they are currently testing the Nov.30th release, not the christmas one!
Meritable truths there, its also not the nal***ar which they stated would take a year to remodel to have a third gun slot. The only hints though where something players where requesting for a long time though they also said it was a surprise. Not sure how well they are going to keep it a surprise though.
Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 1SEPT10
|
Krathos Morpheus
Legion Infernal
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 05:37:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Qujulome
new forums?
New forums are scheduled for January.
|
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 09:17:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Nova Fox
Originally by: Liogan
Originally by: Nova Fox
I doubt its the tornado, ships like that go though extensive balance and checks it would have popped up on sisi at least. If it is a new ship its a new shuttle, its always safe to give those away. Takes about a half year to impliment a new ship anyways from ground up. Specially the one the size of a battleship.
Well, actually, CCP has had a long time to balance a new ship. The comp was purely to design how the ship looks, not the attributes, so this could have been in the pipeline for a while.
Also, it wouldn't be in SiSi as they are currently testing the Nov.30th release, not the christmas one!
Meritable truths there, its also not the nal***ar which they stated would take a year to remodel to have a third gun slot. The only hints though where something players where requesting for a long time though they also said it was a surprise. Not sure how well they are going to keep it a surprise though.
It doesn't take a year to model a 3rd gun slot into anything..
If they say so it's something very different as:
- the Dev in question has no time for that ship within the next year
- CCP considers the ship fine and waits it out
- there is an overhaul for the whole ship class planned in a not to distant future (so doing this one now would be wasted Dev time)
Btw.. I didn't follow your evolution lately.. did you finally start to use some 3D package to make your work look more professional? Would give you some insight into the times which are needed to model something.
New Eden needs a Public Feature/Idea/Bug-Tracker |
Zagdul
Gallente
Shadowed Command
Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 09:47:00 -
[39]
Edited by: Zagdul on 22/11/2010 09:47:59
@CCP Explorer
You are by far the best troll on these forums. While Overur can be more witty at responding to the trolls, you do a better job at baiting.
Thanks for the suspense, do us all a favor and be careful that the bait you put into the water doesn't anger the hungry sharks by leaving them hungry.
|
Carniflex
StarHunt
R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 10:59:00 -
[40]
Let me say "POS - flogging the dead horse" - it has been requested over and over and over again for past 4 years and then some.
It would be time ... to do something with them. Before the walking in stations appears. Screw the ship, I have plenty of those. Give me PROPER POS!
|
Zagdul
Gallente
Shadowed Command
Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 11:05:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Carniflex
Let me say "POS - flogging the dead horse" - it has been requested over and over and over again for past 4 years and then some.
It would be time ... to do something with them. Before the walking in stations appears. Screw the ship, I have plenty of those. Give me PROPER POS!
Let you say? pfft...
|
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 11:07:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Tres Farmer
It doesn't take a year to model a 3rd gun slot into anything..
If they say so it's something very different as:
- the Dev in question has no time for that ship within the next year
- CCP considers the ship fine and waits it out
- there is an overhaul for the whole ship class planned in a not to distant future (so doing this one now would be wasted Dev time)
Btw.. I didn't follow your evolution lately.. did you finally start to use some 3D package to make your work look more professional? Would give you some insight into the times which are needed to model something.
No still the same software just getting better matching my creativity which is still rather far apart between the two.
Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 1SEPT10
|
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 11:10:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Carniflex
Let me say "POS - flogging the dead horse" - it has been requested over and over and over again for past 4 years and then some.
It would be time ... to do something with them. Before the walking in stations appears. Screw the ship, I have plenty of those. Give me PROPER POS!
I would have to agree with Carniflex here, a total reworking fo POSs would be an amazing part of an expansion. Granted it would require a lot of design work, but it would be very welcomed by the whole eve community.
------------------------
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum
"I've got a couple of Strippers on my ship... and they just love to dance!"
------------------------ |
Eyeama Spy
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 12:06:00 -
[44]
i want to be able to fit my pod into a fighterbomber and/or fighter drone...ship dont need modules, or new model, just let me and mine fly them without needing cap ship support, bring back swarm tactics |
Zeuth Proxy
Caldari
Nomadic Asylum
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 12:15:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Carniflex
Let me say "POS - flogging the dead horse" - it has been requested over and over and over again for past 4 years and then some.
It would be time ... to do something with them. Before the walking in stations appears. Screw the ship, I have plenty of those. Give me PROPER POS!
^ That.. Also bring back the old cyno effect.
|
|
CCP Explorer
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 12:21:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Shandir
Originally by: CCP Explorer
The 1st release contains a collection of player requests we have been working on alongside the main expansion features and that we could easily extract from the expansion code base. This includes: Rocket balancing, tech 2 ammo balancing, faction ships on the market, fighter bomber lag reduction, window resizing, camera offset, meta-item indicator icons, the Noctis, and more.
The 2nd release is a Christmas surprise; new development we decided to dive into but something players have requested. The Christmas surprise will probably be delivered in two parts...
Which package is the Ghost Research fix in?
The Ghost Research fix, a long requested change by players, is already on TQ. Here's the dev blog and the change was deployed to TQ in Tyrannis 1.1.
Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson
Software Director
EVE Online, CCP Games |
|
Carniflex
StarHunt
R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 12:36:00 -
[47]
Granted getting new POS stuff without anyone sniffing out all the bugs in SiSi would be propably somewhat disaster. But perhaps next expansion .. pretty please.
That reminds me .. there was ad a while ago in login screen .. something about CSM and their priority list. I'll think I'll go see their section what was this fuss about.
|
|
CCP Explorer
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 12:42:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Zagdul
@CCP Explorer
You are by far the best troll on these forums. While Overur can be more witty at responding to the trolls, you do a better job at baiting.
Thanks for the suspense, do us all a favor and be careful that the bait you put into the water doesn't anger the hungry sharks by leaving them hungry. We'd be willing and happy to gnaw on some dead horses who have been flogged.
I'm going to take this as a compliment and say "thank you!" 
Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson
Software Director
EVE Online, CCP Games |
|
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 12:48:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Nova Fox
My guess on christmas surprise.
The removal of training skills, long been asked for.
The refund of SP for those who did train them, which is now technically possible if done right with a script to issue the bonus SP back.
Then everyone new or hasnt finsihed getting thier trainig skills maxed gets +12x5 more stats to mess around with in character creator/neural remapping.
Only other feasible other option Ive seen players demanding is removal of local becuase its sansha nation's fault for destroying the in system networks and scanners.
I dont think it will be BPO and BPC seperation ccp was commenting some long time about making those rolled into a new ui interface database basically which lets you carry the chips the Bps are for resell or hand over and once you have it you can plug it into the database where its nice and safe and easy to access and glance and sort out. Even if they didnt go that route, the metaphysical state of the blueprints child parent inheritence with current software would almost require redoing every single item in eve all over again just to make the BPC and BPO seperate icons since all items currently have a 'blueprint' due to the simple fact of its child inheritance of being part of the item family.
Becuase ships take way too many QA follow ups if its anything combat related. The above however already been tested in some sense and manner before.
dear god MERRY XMAS!
|
Shandir
Minmatar
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 13:15:00 -
[50]
Originally by: CCP Explorer
The Ghost Research fix, a long requested change by players, is already on TQ. Here's the dev blog and the change was deployed to TQ in Tyrannis 1.1.
Either that was kept pretty quiet on release (I saw the devblog but never heard of it getting to TQ) or I was dumb and missed the announcement.
Obviously bets are on the latter.
|
Zaboth Garadath
Amarr
Ore Extraction Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 13:19:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Liogan
Originally by: Nova Fox
I doubt its the tornado, ships like that go though extensive balance and checks it would have popped up on sisi at least. If it is a new ship its a new shuttle, its always safe to give those away. Takes about a half year to impliment a new ship anyways from ground up. Specially the one the size of a battleship.
Well, actually, CCP has had a long time to balance a new ship. The comp was purely to design how the ship looks, not the attributes, so this could have been in the pipeline for a while.
Also, it wouldn't be in SiSi as they are currently testing the Nov.30th release, not the christmas one!
It is certainly not the Tornado.
The Christmas surprise is going to be something bigger- some dev said somewhere that the suprise was coming in two parts...
_____________________________________________
'If you really want to make someone hate you, explain to them, logically and politely, why they are wrong' - J. Baylock |
Nova Fox
Gallente
Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 13:41:00 -
[52]
hmm two parts, that means it will most likely be a new system first followed by the tools to make it enjoyable.
Or either that a new system with a layover period before old system get yanked out.
I say its horse flogging time.
Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 1SEPT10
|
Ultim8Evil
Oblivion Chaos Fleet
Oblivion United
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 13:49:00 -
[53]
Originally by: CCP Explorer
The 2nd release is a Christmas surprise; new development we decided to dive into but something players have requested. The Christmas surprise will probably be delivered in two parts.
Less lag then no lag?
Amirite?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Ultim8Evil
Oblivion Chaos Fleet
Oblivion United
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 13:53:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Zeuth Proxy
Originally by: Carniflex
Let me say "POS - flogging the dead horse" - it has been requested over and over and over again for past 4 years and then some.
It would be time ... to do something with them. Before the walking in stations appears. Screw the ship, I have plenty of those. Give me PROPER POS!
^ That.. Also bring back the old cyno effect.
And engine trails, and jump-gate sound fx, and and and
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
CCP Explorer
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 15:59:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Shandir
Originally by: CCP Explorer
The Ghost Research fix, a long requested change by players, is already on TQ. Here's the dev blog and the change was deployed to TQ in Tyrannis 1.1.
Either that was kept pretty quiet on release (I saw the devblog but never heard of it getting to TQ) or I was dumb and missed the announcement.
Obviously bets are on the latter.
It got postponed a couple of times following the dev blog and was eventually rolled into Tyrannis 1.1.
Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson
Software Director
EVE Online, CCP Games |
|
Denuo Secus
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 17:30:00 -
[56]
Something announced in this dev blog please?? I mean apart from the new contest ship. CCP Salvo wrote all other already existing ships will get an overhaul - one by one, done over multiple expansions. I'm sure it's a lot of work but please don't let the Scorp be the only one.
-
Save the missiles from the glowing blob :S
R ----------> *
A --------> *
V --------> *
E -------> *
N ---------> *
|
Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles
|
Posted - 2010.11.22 18:16:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Tres Farmer
It doesn't take a year to model a 3rd gun slot into anything.
Considering how much easier it is just to grant a damage bonus (with very similar effects), I doubt CCP is ever going to re-work a ship model to add additional turret hardpoints.
---
34.4:1 mineral compression |
|
CCP Explorer
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 12:01:00 -
[58]
Here's the Christmas Surprise revealed: Dev blog by CCP Greyscale on learning skill removal.
Is this all for Christmas? Who knows...
Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson
Software Director
EVE Online, CCP Games |
|
Dr Fighter
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 12:04:00 -
[59]
Originally by: CCP Explorer
Here's the Christmas Surprise revealed: Dev blog by CCP Greyscale on learning skill removal.
Is this all for Christmas? Who knows...
and it totally rocks and is very funny.
Nice work guys, 7 years late, but hey its here cant complain now!!! 
|
Kira X
Rage Orbital Construction Associates
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 12:07:00 -
[60]
Originally by: CCP Explorer
Here's the Christmas Surprise revealed: Dev blog by CCP Greyscale on learning skill removal.
Is this all for Christmas? Who knows...
Indeed that was one heck of a fun read. Probably the best blog post I've ever read, ever, in my life.
Also, at the end, he said that was 50% of the Christmas gift...which leaves 50% more. Something else awesome and cool to come our way.
I'm such in a state of shock as it is with just the learning skill thingy. just wow.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |