| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Enola Naari
Caldari Navy Industrial Division
Eternal Evocations
3
   |
Posted - 2012.08.09 05:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have found that when moving ore from the Idem's hanger to the ore hold of my Retriever it will not fill the ore hold up all the way. Also, in order to get it to hold as much as it would allow, I had to devide stacks.
My ore hold shows it will hold up to 25,300.0 m3, however it only allows me to use 23,100.0 m3. |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
1793
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 05:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's telling you not to be greedy |
Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
375
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 05:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Working as intended. |
Enola Naari
Caldari Navy Industrial Division
Eternal Evocations
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 05:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
It has nothing to do with greed. I'm just wondering if this is a known bug since the last patch. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
617
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 05:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Did you finish a barge lvl, and haven't logged off yet?
I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |
Enola Naari
Caldari Navy Industrial Division
Eternal Evocations
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 05:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Did you finish a barge lvl, and haven't logged off yet?
No, I have not finished a barge skill today. |
Niaht
Universal Conflict
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
I can confirm this.
While loading ore from station item hanger into my retrievers ore hold, I would receive the normal message telling me that it could only hold so much, and give an appropriate maximum transfer number. However, it would not transfer that amount. I had to transfer in increasingly smaller portions to eventually fill the ore hold (I was not so determined to fill it completely, so I gave up at near full capacity).
|
Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation
Deadly Unknown
415
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
Look guys, you can't expect CCP to launch a patch that works properly. That's a totally unreasonable expectation.
Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |
Pipa Porto
653
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Look guys, you can't expect CCP to launch a patch that works properly. That's a totally unreasonable expectation.
Have you been on SISI testing and filing bug reports?
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Dave stark
Black Nova Corp.
412
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
i've been mining in a retriever all day on my alt yesterday and didn't encounter this bug.
Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1209
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sounds like a good time to try killing the cache manually just in case.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T
T2 BPO poll : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 |
Niaht
Universal Conflict
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Sounds like a good time to try killing the cache manually just in case.
This is a fresh install for me, so first time the cache has been warmed, but I'll give it a shot for S&G. |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1209
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 07:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
An uninstall/reinstall of EVE does not wipe the cache, AFAIK.
Changing the path the game is installed to, that would do it (because it would create a new cache subfolder).
Win7 location of main EVE cache data for a particular install:
(C?):\Users\ [YourWindowsUserName\AppData] \Local\CCP\EVE\ [SerializedNameOfFolderEveIsInstalledIn] \cache
Inside, you might want to wipe the MachoNet subfolder first, and if that's not enough, also bulkdata, or even all of it if you like.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T
T2 BPO poll : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 |
Niaht
Universal Conflict
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 07:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Akita T wrote:An uninstall/reinstall of EVE does not wipe the cache, AFAIK.
Changing the path the game is installed to, that would do it (because it would create a new cache subfolder).
Win7 location of main EVE cache data for a particular install:
(C?):\Users\ [YourWindowsUserName\AppData] \Local\CCP\EVE\ [SerializedNameOfFolderEveIsInstalledIn] \cache
Inside, you might want to wipe the MachoNet subfolder first, and if that's not enough, also bulkdata, or even all of it if you like.
In this case, I literally never had Eve installed on this computer prior to today, so there was no prior cache. I'll still give it a shot in the morning.
Edit: Also haven't logged off yet, so first cache. |
Sueara Koshun
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 08:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
i can confirm this
and cleaning the cache changed nothing, as i expected |
Lysanne Reqetta
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 08:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Confirming this is a continued conspiracy to nerf mining Oh wait, this isn't one of those threads.
Let me see...ah here we go
~CCP~
The bep train's a'comin' for you boy! |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
270
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 08:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
lol I think every1 wih sense is semi-AFK mining with retrievers due to their not being worth it to gank or the payout's over T2 exhumors like I figured they would 2 weeks ago, huh?
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
653
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 08:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
For years now trying to stack say Veldspar in a hold results in weird errors.
Say max I can have 3000M3 in a hold I have 1500M3 in it and try to stack 1500M3 onto of the existing 1500 I get told that there is no room for this because there is only room for 1500M3 left over. 
Not sure if this is the case here but confirming maximum filling up cans or holds can lead to 1+1/=2 errors. 
Hi, I'm CCP Arrow, I screwed up the.. ummm... |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1209
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 08:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
Niaht wrote: literally never had Eve installed on this computer prior to today, so there was no prior cache. I'll still give it a shot in the morning.
Eh, no chance of a cache issue then, sadly 
I guess it's just a bug.
Did you post it in the official feedback thread and/or bugreport it ?
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T
T2 BPO poll : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1666
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 09:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:lol I think every1 wih sense is semi-AFK mining with retrievers due to their not being worth it to gank or the payout's over T2 exhumors like I figured they would 2 weeks ago, huh?
7k ehp retrievers aren't worth ganking?
weird
EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |
Niaht
Universal Conflict
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 16:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Niaht wrote: literally never had Eve installed on this computer prior to today, so there was no prior cache. I'll still give it a shot in the morning. Eh, no chance of a cache issue then, sadly I guess it's just a bug. Did you post it in the official feedback thread and/or bugreport it ?
No, not yet. Rookie reporting in here.. Please post links, and I'll do.
|
Niaht
Universal Conflict
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 16:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:lol I think every1 wih sense is semi-AFK mining with retrievers due to their not being worth it to gank or the payout's over T2 exhumors like I figured they would 2 weeks ago, huh?
Not quite right.. due to hulkageddon there are plenty of pilots out there who just want to watch the world burn, and get kills for their rep.. They could care less about your cargo or worth (though they will still gladly scrape your sad remains when they are done with you). If you are a miner, you are a target. Edit: they could care less about their own losses either.
So, fly safe ;) |
|
CCP Paradox
422
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 17:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
A fix will be rolled out tomorrow. Thank you to the guys who bug reported this.
CCP Paradox | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Super Friends
@CCP_Paradox |
|
Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy
Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 17:13:00 -
[24] - Quote
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Look guys, you can't expect CCP to launch a patch that works properly. That's a totally unreasonable expectation.
This wins the thread. |
Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
108
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 17:41:00 -
[25] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:lol I think every1 wih sense is semi-AFK mining with retrievers due to their not being worth it to gank or the payout's over T2 exhumors like I figured they would 2 weeks ago, huh? 7k ehp retrievers aren't worth ganking? weird
7k? Good god, at least stick a DCU2 on that thing... |
Palovana
Inner Fire Inc.
282
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 17:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
How much ore could an ore hold hold if an ore hold could hold ore?
Please support: export of settings in editable format
Your stuff goes here. |
Makari Aeron
The Shadow's Of Eve
TSOE Consortium
40
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 18:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Not sure if this is the case here but confirming maximum filling up cans or holds can lead to 1+1/=2 errors.
Here's my theory on that based on my knowledge of array copying:
This happens because of how CCP handles the drag and drop onto a stack. From what I can gather, if you have 1500m3 in a 3000m3 can and then add another 1500m3 by trying to stack it on top, it won't fit because the system adds all the items to the inventory first thus making the cargohold full. At the same time, it clones the first item puts the cloned item in to the old stack and deletes the original. Rinse and repeat.
Where as if you don't try to stack them and instead after moving the new stack into the can and then select "stack all", it simply merges them by add then total numbers.
Can a dev confirm/deny this please?
CCP RedDawn: Ugly people are just playing life on HARD mode. Personally, I'm playing on an INFERNO difficulty...
|
Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation
Deadly Unknown
421
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 19:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Look guys, you can't expect CCP to launch a patch that works properly. That's a totally unreasonable expectation. Have you been on SISI testing and filing bug reports?
Don't start this crap with me. I pay money to play the game. I am not paid to, nor am I obligated to perform testing.
This crap about "if you don't test, you can't complain" is similar to the retardation, "if you don't vote, you can't complain".
It's crap meant to make people who engage in futility and endorse failure, feel good about themselves, and I won't have it Ruby, least of all from you.
Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |
Pipa Porto
655
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 19:55:00 -
[29] - Quote
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Look guys, you can't expect CCP to launch a patch that works properly. That's a totally unreasonable expectation. Have you been on SISI testing and filing bug reports? Don't start this crap with me. I pay money to play the game. I am not paid to, nor am I obligated to perform testing. This crap about "if you don't test, you can't complain" is similar to the retardation, "if you don't vote, you can't complain". On the contrary, because players supposedly test (and are subsequently ignored anyway) for CCP, there is this false sense that some sort of Q&A is happening, when nothing could be further from the truth. It's not unlike the delusion that individual votes matter in a modern liberal democracy with millions of constituents. This sort of crap reasoning is meant to make people who engage in futility and endorse failure, feel good about themselves, and I won't have it Ruby, as you're someone who we all expect much more from.
You're getting free expansions, unlike most other MMOs where you have to pay for expansions on top of your subscription. Oh, and they still get nasty bugs all the time (one of which the CDC has had some fun studying).
Improving EVE is a collaborative process between a small company and its customers. More people stress testing new code = better chance of catching bugs.
If you wan't to talk about "endorsing failure," saying that voting or testing doesn't matter fits the bill, since not trying is an absolute assurance of failure.
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
2617
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 19:57:00 -
[30] - Quote
Wardeccing all miners in this thread.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |