| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Coasterbrian
   |
Posted - 2005.01.20 20:43:00 -
[61]
Signed!!!
|
Cacciatore
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 20:47:00 -
[62]
I'll add my name to the list.
Something is only impossible when you refuse to try
Kills |
The Burninator
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 20:51:00 -
[63]
Signed
----------------
BDCI Website - We solve problems. |
Cayote XIII
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 20:56:00 -
[64]
Signed...
|
Neurotic Cat
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 20:57:00 -
[65]
Signed.
While we are at it how about adding the chump in the covert ops ship that acted as a warp in point and put the fleet within 10km of the bad guys?
|
Erzengal
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 21:11:00 -
[66]
Agree, while EW still needs to remain an agressive act, please make it so EW ships who have activated offensive EW modules against a ship that is destroyed get added to the kill mail.
|
Joshua Calvert
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 22:12:00 -
[67]
 Originally by: Wrangler
Those were made hostile acts because people would have a mate not in corp jam/dampen/web etc while others in corp and at war with you attacked. Meaning you couldn't kill off the one doing EW without getting CONCORD after you, but they could take part in an attack against you.
With the new flagging rules, that shouldn't be as much of a problem anymore?
LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! |
R'adeh
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 23:11:00 -
[68]
Signed
|
Polaras
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 23:20:00 -
[69]
Agreed and Signed |
Squagel
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 23:25:00 -
[70]
signed
|
Specops
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 23:35:00 -
[71]
/signed
~Specops~ |
Draximus Cane
|
Posted - 2005.01.20 23:37:00 -
[72]
Signed......
-------------------------------------------------
|
Krapz
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 00:29:00 -
[73]
as a member of the "never get on the kill mail club" i whole heartedly agree with my PvP counterparts ;)
-- Insert cool graphics sig here -- |
Slayto
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 01:50:00 -
[74]
Signed
|
Hinik
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 02:31:00 -
[75]
Agreed, but I'd also like to add:
 Please also make shooting a missile at someone Hostile (even if it doesn't hit), Now before you all go shouting n00b!!!! at me, let me explain. A Raven shoots a missile at a frig, the frig warps out, and the fleet warp in to OMGWTF the raven up BAD... only trouble is... there be a station next to the raven... now it has most deffinately NOT been the 2 minutes agression timer... it hasn't even been 45 seconds... as we're uber we're there even faster...  but only to pummel the raven down to 3% shields before the damn thing dock, this is frustrating as it seems to be irregular how fast the station will let you get into it's protective Ship Hangers. Now Much as i like mooning my enemies from outside the portholes, I'd prefer to kill em... what say you?
"Last time I eas in this situation it wasn't a paintball gun..." |
Xivox
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 03:25:00 -
[76]
Very annoying when you're in an EW ship but don't end up on a killmail. EW is as essential to almost any battle as the guns being fired. Please put EW on the killmail.
Signed :D
|
Stetu
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 03:51:00 -
[77]
Signed, and add scrambling and webbing to this as well.
----------------------
|
orpus Instor
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 04:42:00 -
[78]
wondered why the CLS war bountys wasnt working for me ...
ok please CCP dont keep me poor
|
Kane Jacobs
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 05:52:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Latex Mistress
Apologies to all who've mentioned it before, but why this has not been done already is beyond logic.
Problem:
You jam someone in secure space, you get Concordoken'd and lose SS (hostile act)
You dampen someone in secure space, you get Concordoken'd and lose SS (hostile act)
You do either to a ship during sanctioned war and it dies before you hit it (usually missiles) = you get nothing (no hostile act)
I believe the above is the same for webbing, scrambling, and NOS'ing, but in those cases you are almost always in range for missiles to hit (and added to the kill). Regardless, I think the above is something that is easily fixable.
Solution:
Add EW ships that actively target and engage an enemy with EW, or...
Eliminate EW from being classified as a act of aggression
Obviously, the former makes much more sense. Please discuss and/or sign.
Agreed. *signed*
_______________________________________________
|
Omeega
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 06:35:00 -
[80]
signed
Don't speak english. F1,f2,f3... |
Beringe
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 06:40:00 -
[81]
Like, totally signed. Totally.
*does the whole teenage scoff thing*
Totally.
-------------------------------------------
"My main griveance with the Caldari state was that once I had finished my work for them, they wanted me dead."
"No, it's none of your business." |
NAFnist
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 07:20:00 -
[82]
*signed*
_____________
|
Joshua Calvert
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 09:46:00 -
[83]
Signed but why don't you just fit a gun to your EW ships anyway?
LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! |
Feyd Mantis
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 10:49:00 -
[84]
*Signed*
|
Trooper B99
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 12:45:00 -
[85]
*signed*
Thinking about it, the tagging would have to have a timer on it (say 15 mins and link it in to the agression timer) otherwise you could have ships with people on killmails from multiple fights over several days.
Personally i think that the Ewar tagging should be on:
Scramblers
Webifiers
Jammers (multis, racials, ECM burst)
NOT
dampners
Reason: I find that dampning, despit being an agressive action in the eyes of CONCORD is not, to me, as "agressive" a form of Ewar like direct sensor jamming.
Wirykomi Team Racer - COLOSSUS Championships Year 106
|
Levin Cavil
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 12:56:00 -
[86]
Edited by: Levin Cavil on 21/01/2005 13:04:27
As a Scorpion pilot I have to say SIGNED.
The number of kills I have not been on because I was firing missiles and jamming is depressing. Just today I was flying with a few other frigs and only got on about 1/2 of the kills because I was in a Crow and the hostiles died to the other gun toting frigs before my missiles could hit, even though I webbed and scrambled.
If concord would own me for it then I want on the mail.
Originally by: Cinnander
Also get rid of the silly camera-reset-on-kill thing, kthx
^^ I'd sign that too 
------------------------------
<Hammerhead> we can't do anything that requires programming
|
Agent Ronin
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 12:57:00 -
[87]
Signed
Its just quite silly to think that those who tackle and jam do not get to take a mentionable role in the killmail. 
|
Ijaz
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 17:47:00 -
[88]
Yes EW should remain a hostile act.
Yes EW pilots should be on the kill mail.
|
Stealthrun
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 19:43:00 -
[89]
//Signed//
|
Cowboy
|
Posted - 2005.01.21 19:48:00 -
[90]
signed
"Come on God. Answer me. For years I am asking you why. Why are
the innocent dead and the guilty alive? Where is justice? Where is
punishment? Or have you already answered? Have you already said to the
world, here is justice, here is punishment, here..............in me"
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |