Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
EdFromHumanResources
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 09:54:00 -
[31]
Anything without a role bonus or cov ops cloak shouldnt be able to regen cap. The AFK Cloakers that are ****ting up the thread dont really have any argument beyond "Waaa this isnt fair let us abuse cloaks"
|
Korg Leaf
Time Bandits.
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 11:35:00 -
[32]
Wow, im shocked a cloak change that I can agree on that doesnt ruin cov ops cloakers
|
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 12:34:00 -
[33]
Supportin this.
Also, how about a similar penalty to shield recharge?
-----------------
|
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 12:42:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Garst Tyrell yes please lets punish 'stupidly brave' pilots? Confirming that bravery has no place in EVE, so lets all jump in a blob
You're only 'stupidly brave' if you're carrying out an action with a high risk involved, not just dropping your supercap on unsuspecting jump freighters.
-----------------
|
Marlona Sky
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 12:45:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Marlona Sky on 19/01/2011 12:46:12
Originally by: Scatim Helicon Also, how about a similar penalty to shield recharge?
I was thinking about that but was worried it might not go over so well and the cap penalty not get the support. If there is enough people that think it would be a good addition as well, then I will add it to the OP. After all, you can't armor repair while cloaked so it makes sense. Again people, remember this is for all NON-Covert Ops Cloaks.
|
Aineko Macx
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 13:01:00 -
[36]
Oh think of the tears potential Nice idea to nerf drive by DDing. ________________________ CCP: Where fixing bugs is a luxury, not an obligation. |
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 13:59:00 -
[37]
I support this with one caveat - that Black Ops and ships that fit covert cloaks are unaffected.
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sig.php |
james1122
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 14:01:00 -
[38]
Epic idea is epic
(so long as black ops arnt affected by said change)
|
Marlona Sky
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 14:07:00 -
[39]
Originally by: james1122 Epic idea is epic
(so long as black ops arnt affected by said change)
I agree, OP updated.
|
Jaik7
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 14:23:00 -
[40]
|
|
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 17:45:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Marlona Sky Edited by: Marlona Sky on 19/01/2011 12:46:12
Originally by: Scatim Helicon Also, how about a similar penalty to shield recharge?
I was thinking about that but was worried it might not go over so well and the cap penalty not get the support. If there is enough people that think it would be a good addition as well, then I will add it to the OP. After all, you can't armor repair while cloaked so it makes sense. Again people, remember this is for all NON-Covert Ops Cloaks.
I'd be for that.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ |
Daedalus II
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 18:10:00 -
[42]
Agreed!
|
Ephemeron
Lubricous Rebel Alliance of New Eden
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 18:49:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Paskis Robinson If this was about stopping people cloaking up for hours and hours in any ship at all (other than covops/recon) then I'd actually be all for it. However cloaking to regen cap is not something I'd look to change. I'd probably go with something like "Cloak duration = 15 minutes, can be stopped at any time, but has a 5 min re-cloak timer" to start with - to force 'visible' time onto any cloaked ship.
I believe the entire cloaking mechanic should be re-evaluated after CCP removes local as intelligence tool.
Until that happens, AFK cloaks are necessary to negate some of the power of local chat.
|
HolyNerfBatman
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 02:31:00 -
[44]
|
Solomon XI
Independent-Miners-Association Lazy is our middle name
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 06:32:00 -
[45]
Not a bad idea, to be honest. Helps with the whole AFK cloaking thing and is a pretty fair nerf to non-covert cloaking.
|
Ephemeron
Lubricous Rebel Alliance of New Eden
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 06:37:00 -
[46]
Those that think this idea is for AFK cloaking - reread the OP
it does nothing to stop AFK cloaking. It just stops recharge so caps can't cyno out easily after waiting cloaked.
|
EdFromHumanResources
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 07:32:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Ephemeron
Originally by: Paskis Robinson If this was about stopping people cloaking up for hours and hours in any ship at all (other than covops/recon) then I'd actually be all for it. However cloaking to regen cap is not something I'd look to change. I'd probably go with something like "Cloak duration = 15 minutes, can be stopped at any time, but has a 5 min re-cloak timer" to start with - to force 'visible' time onto any cloaked ship.
I believe the entire cloaking mechanic should be re-evaluated after CCP removes local as intelligence tool.
Until that happens, AFK cloaks are necessary to negate some of the power of local chat.
Fly away little troll
|
Double Dee
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 12:28:00 -
[48]
O hey look, a great idea!
|
Mamba Lev
Masturbating Hand Social Club
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 14:48:00 -
[49]
Supported.
|
TimMc
Brutal Deliverance Extreme Prejudice.
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 15:41:00 -
[50]
Edited by: TimMc on 20/01/2011 15:41:28 A good idea tbh.
My only concern would be about covert ops ships running out of cap as they move around. A few warps and they are out of cap, forcing them to decloak and recharge.
Not that its a bad thing.
|
|
Marlona Sky
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 16:31:00 -
[51]
Originally by: TimMc My only concern would be about covert ops ships running out of cap as they move around.
:facepalm:
I guess I need to update my OP and use the largest font available to say this has...
NOTHING TO DO WITH COVERT OPS CLOAKS!
|
Corina Jarr
|
Posted - 2011.01.20 20:19:00 -
[52]
Not a bad idea at all.
|
Zorn Aldridge
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 03:34:00 -
[53]
YARR!!!
|
CarnegieSteel
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 04:23:00 -
[54]
While on the topic, why not give black ops a bonus to cap and shield regen while cloaked?
|
OmgNoFreeNames
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 04:46:00 -
[55]
Don't fix what's not broken not supported, sorry
|
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 07:39:00 -
[56]
Originally by: OmgNoFreeNames Don't fix what's not broken not supported, sorry
But it is broken.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ |
Leviathan9
Royal Hiigaran Navy
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 08:27:00 -
[57]
Sounds like a great idea, adds more risks for dropping caps on people. ---------------------------
|
Brian Khan
StarHunt R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 11:36:00 -
[58]
This is good idea.
|
OmgNoFreeNames
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 12:10:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Val'Dore
Originally by: OmgNoFreeNames Don't fix what's not broken not supported, sorry
But it is broken.
No it's not. Trying to fix capital issues by braking cloaking devices is something like a rectal surgery on the eye.
fyi capital ships can refit near each other, and they can cap transfer to each other, no cap pilots will be affected by this, xpt a lonely Jackie Chan on a route from Chribba meeting point to his home system. Did you noticed a lot of cloaking devices in a capital kill mails?
|
Marc Younbrog
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 12:12:00 -
[60]
I do not support your proposal. You have neglected to explain why NON-Capital ships should also be affected by this change.
If you simply edit your proposal to be exclusive to capital ships, I shall approve. Or, please add an explanation as to why subcap ships should also be affected by this change.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |