EVE Search - New Dev Blog: Candidacy Period for CSM6 to Open Soon

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: Candidacy Period for CSM6 to Open Soon

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)

CCP Fallout	Posted - 2011.01.21 15:30:00 - [1] CCP Diagoras' newest dev blog gives us the dates for the upcoming candidacy period for the Sixth Council of Stellar Management. Head here for all the details. Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us

adriaans Amarr Ankaa. Nair Al-Zaurak	Posted - 2011.01.21 15:52:00 - [2] first. Prometheus Exenthal has my vote --signature-- F.CS boost: Here Vid: Link

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2011.01.21 16:06:00 - [3] nice Secure 3rd party service \| my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Steve Thomas Minmatar	Posted - 2011.01.21 16:20:00 - [4] meh its the 6th anual conest to see who gets to be part of CCPs overhyped focus group.
Nika Dekaia	Posted - 2011.01.21 17:01:00 - [5] Originally by: Steve Thomas meh its the 6th anual conest to see who gets to be part of CCPs overhyped focus group. Don't vote if you feel it's not worth it. Simple, really. I for my part think that all CSMs did do a great job in getting what the playerbase thinks to the ears of CCP. Sure, there were bumps and some drama on the way, but still, the comunication gets better with every new CSM. The CSMs got CCP to do things which would not have happened - even if some stuff was "low hanging fruits". Even getting CCP to simply state why some stuff is done (or not) is rather satisfying and way more than players of other mmmos could ever hope to know.
fukier The Unpodable Supermen	Posted - 2011.01.21 17:07:00 - [6] to anyone thinking of running for CSM... if you want my vote you have to have as your policy. 1. Hybrid fix 2. af 4th bonus 3. BO Boost 4. low sec boost 5. some sort of mechanic that allows small or solo pvp... dont care if its arena combat or some sort of Concord sanctioned fight (like a war dec but only lasts half an hour) that is all... oh and i guess fix the darn sov system...
Illectroculus Defined Chooch Inc. Twilight Federation	Posted - 2011.01.21 18:00:00 - [7] After the great work of the previous CSM and their vocal expressions of frustration I'm in two minds about running again. However CCP did implement a number of changes I campaigned for, and there are still more where that came from, so I believe I shall throw my hat in once more. Vote Illectro for CSM5! Supporting the New Generation of Eve Players
Leovarian Lavitz Minmatar Ghost Tribal Credit Union Sspectre	Posted - 2011.01.21 18:18:00 - [8] Edited by: Leovarian Lavitz on 21/01/2011 18:19:05 Originally by: fukier to anyone thinking of running for CSM... (like a war dec but only lasts half an hour) Declare war, wait an hour, withdraw war. Next day you have a war that will last for one hour, which can be a rather expensive war (considering that the price usually gets you a full week)
Virtuozzo Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2011.01.21 18:39:00 - [9] So, so .. tempting .. ≡v≡ once was about internet spaceships. Then those became serious business. Now all that's left, serious business, and spaceships are docked for two years till after the Dust of Incarna.
TeaDaze	Posted - 2011.01.21 18:49:00 - [10] Originally by: fukier to anyone thinking of running for CSM... if you want my vote you have to have as your policy. 1. Hybrid fix 2. af 4th bonus 3. BO Boost 4. low sec boost Already on the table and waiting for CCP to respond. Originally by: fukier oh and i guess fix the darn sov system... Also on the table and waiting for CCP to respond. I suggest people don't get the idea that they can run on a narrow platform of fix X and actually expect to be able to get X fixed. CCP are only now putting time into issues raised nearly 3 years ago. TeaDaze.net Blog \| CSM Database
Larkonis Trassler NibbleTek Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2011.01.21 19:19:00 - [11] See you on the campaigning field!
Mynxee	Posted - 2011.01.21 19:31:00 - [12] Just my .02, but CSM is no longer just about changing this thing or that thing in the game. It is a stakeholder and as such can be most effective when its members are able to maintain a bigger picture view on the game, the community, and CCP. Those CSM6 candidates who combine game knowledge and experience with the ability to communicate well, ask hard questions of CCP and insist on answers, and effectively interact with the community and media are going to be best position to leverage the progress of CSM5. CSM5 did not get the wins that we did by focusing on narrow elements of the game, but by making every effort to keep CCP accountable, communicative, and collaborative. No easy task--and not going to get any easier for CSM6, but absolutely necessary in the current environment. For those considering running, and those reviewing prospective candidates...I urge you to consider all the factors that make for a successful CSM and don't draw your boundaries too tightly around hoped-for changes in specific game mechanics. Life In Low Sec
Seleene Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2011.01.21 19:40:00 - [13] Originally by: Larkonis Trassler See you on the campaigning field! You stay outta trouble this time, young man! ---- CEO - BDCI
Dierdra Vaal	Posted - 2011.01.21 19:46:00 - [14] Originally by: Mynxee Just my .02, but CSM is no longer just about changing this thing or that thing in the game. It is a stakeholder and as such can be most effective when its members are able to maintain a bigger picture view on the game, the community, and CCP. Those CSM6 candidates who combine game knowledge and experience with the ability to communicate well, ask hard questions of CCP and insist on answers, and effectively interact with the community and media are going to be best position to leverage the progress of CSM5. CSM5 did not get the wins that we did by focusing on narrow elements of the game, but by making every effort to keep CCP accountable, communicative, and collaborative. No easy task--and not going to get any easier for CSM6, but absolutely necessary in the current environment. For those considering running, and those reviewing prospective candidates...I urge you to consider all the factors that make for a successful CSM and don't draw your boundaries too tightly around hoped-for changes in specific game mechanics. This is exactly right. I think we've set the CSM on a very productive, useful course with CSM5. However, it is a course that requires constant attention and quite a lot of effort. This is not just a :freetrip:. And as mynxee said: while its tempting to run a "I will fix [feature]" platform, the CSM is about much more than that and you probably won't be able to keep your specific promise anyway. * * * Director of Education :: EVE University * * * CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman
iP0D	Posted - 2011.01.21 19:49:00 - [15] Looking forward to seeing departing CSM members do live roundtable sessions, or even podcasts, telling the stories of how the CSM functions, what topic where went how, what methods in dealing with CCP for planning and scheduling worked, so that new CSM candidates do not have to reinvent the wheel and can figure out how CCP works.
Dierdra Vaal	Posted - 2011.01.21 20:01:00 - [16] Originally by: iP0D Looking forward to seeing departing CSM members do live roundtable sessions, or even podcasts, telling the stories of how the CSM functions, what topic where went how, what methods in dealing with CCP for planning and scheduling worked, so that new CSM candidates do not have to reinvent the wheel and can figure out how CCP works. We actually did a CSM roundtable in December but only a small number of people showed up :( * * * Director of Education :: EVE University * * * CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman
Helen Highwater Gallente GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.01.21 20:16:00 - [17] Originally by: iP0D Looking forward to seeing departing CSM members do live roundtable sessions, or even podcasts, telling the stories of how the CSM functions, what topic where went how, what methods in dealing with CCP for planning and scheduling worked, so that new CSM candidates do not have to reinvent the wheel and can figure out how CCP works. There is a continuity document being written, also each CSM gets to read all the previous discussions and so forth in the CSM forum which helps. Additionally every CSM so far has had at least a couple of members from the previous session for continuity, and those former members who aren't delegates any more can still be contacted if there are specific questions to be answered. No CSM after the first one has had to reinvent the wheel, what more often happens is that the candidates find when taking their places, the CSM is nothing like they expected it to be while campaigning and they need to make some sharp adjustments. -------------------------------------------------------------- Let's not and say we did.
Mr LaForge	Posted - 2011.01.21 20:28:00 - [18] The one person who can shout the loudest about a mining and industry revamp (and there have been several food threads about such a thing in the Assembly Hall) and in general want to help miners will get my vote.
fukier The Unpodable Supermen	Posted - 2011.01.21 21:15:00 - [19] Originally by: Leovarian Lavitz Edited by: Leovarian Lavitz on 21/01/2011 18:19:05 Originally by: fukier to anyone thinking of running for CSM... (like a war dec but only lasts half an hour) Declare war, wait an hour, withdraw war. Next day you have a war that will last for one hour, which can be a rather expensive war (considering that the price usually gets you a full week) perhaps you are confused as to what 'like' means... it would be like a war dec... but be much cheaper... have to be agreed on by both parties... its pretty much a mechanic that will allow pvp for people that usually dont have any access to it... i.e. people who are in noob corps and people who just want a good fight without having to worry about getting ganked by 20 other guys... can flipping is not an option becuase that just leads to getting ganked by multiple people and going to low sec and negotiating a fight leads to getting boinked by 20 peeps in t3 ships... we need a mechanic that will allow small time pvp...
fukier The Unpodable Supermen	Posted - 2011.01.21 21:26:00 - [20] Originally by: TeaDaze Originally by: fukier to anyone thinking of running for CSM... if you want my vote you have to have as your policy. 1. Hybrid fix 2. af 4th bonus 3. BO Boost 4. low sec boost Already on the table and waiting for CCP to respond. Originally by: fukier oh and i guess fix the darn sov system... Also on the table and waiting for CCP to respond. I suggest people don't get the idea that they can run on a narrow platform of fix X and actually expect to be able to get X fixed. CCP are only now putting time into issues raised nearly 3 years ago. cool beans... care to share what the CSM ideas were on hybrids? or was it more hybrids blow fix ehm? also i am pretty narrow minded... so hopefully if we just keep at it... they will eventually listen...
Marlona Sky Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.01.21 21:51:00 - [21] Whoever pushes for reduction in nap train ultra power blocks gets my vote. Also don't ruin the work CSM 5 has done.
jade ranger	Posted - 2011.01.21 22:25:00 - [22] can players with a forum ban take part? :P just curious.

CCP Diagoras C C P Alliance	Posted - 2011.01.21 23:06:00 - [23] Originally by: jade ranger can players with a forum ban take part? :P just curious. Hi Jade, This depends on severity. Generally relatively minor infractions of the rules (either ingame or on the forums) will not cause a candidacy application to be rejected. The longer duration since the infraction the more leniency is given. _______________ CCP Diagoras Research and Statistics

jade ranger	Posted - 2011.01.21 23:51:00 - [24] Originally by: CCP Diagoras Originally by: jade ranger can players with a forum ban take part? :P just curious. Hi Jade, This depends on severity. Generally relatively minor infractions of the rules (either ingame or on the forums) will not cause a candidacy application to be rejected. The longer duration since the infraction the more leniency is given. Thanks, who should I email to follow up on this? I would like to run for CSM but currently do have a forum ban on my main. I would like to email someone my mains name privately to discuss the situation.
Trebor Daehdoow	Posted - 2011.01.22 00:07:00 - [25] As matters stand now, I intend to run for re-election. I am, btw, collecting endorsements, so if you think I've done a decent job, please let me know. PS: Is a post from a dev who still hasn't created his new avatar really an official dev post? Confessions of a Noob Starship Politician The most expensive free trip to Iceland you'll ever win!

CCP Diagoras C C P Alliance	Posted - 2011.01.22 00:12:00 - [26] Originally by: jade ranger Thanks, who should I email to follow up on this? I would like to run for CSM but currently do have a forum ban on my main. I would like to email someone my mains name privately to discuss the situation. Any questions regarding the CSM can be sent to [email protected] _______________ CCP Diagoras Research and Statistics

Seleene Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2011.01.22 00:31:00 - [27] Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow PS: Is a post from a dev who still hasn't created his new avatar really an official dev post? Nope. :) I'm running for CSM 6. As a CCP employee at the time, I watched from the inside as the CSM grew from an experiment into something that's now become, what I believe, to be one of the most important forces for change in the direction of the game. At the end of the day, I believe that even the most bitter folks on this forum and in every EVE community all want the same thing - a fun and balanced game to play. One of the key elements in moving the next CSM forward will be continuing to improve on the communication and accountability processes between the players and the developers. As someone that has been passionately involved from both sides of the fence, I feel I can do this very effectively. ---- CEO - BDCI Truth, Iteration and the Pursuit of 'Excellence'!
Mike Azariah	Posted - 2011.01.22 01:15:00 - [28] It is going to be an interesting campaign this time around and I am wondering how many of the current CSM will be coming back for another kick at the can. Make no mistake, folks, you read between the lines and you can see that some of the CSM did a TON of work this time round and didn't always get the . . . responses or timelines they wanted (NDA's and such) The last CSM set the bar quite high . . . But I am willing to try as well. m
Dragonia Redtail	Posted - 2011.01.22 06:11:00 - [29] Ill probebly ask this knowing that the details should be available elsewhere, but... - what is expecter of the person that joins the csm expanse wise? Something like pay your own ticket to whateverplaceonearth? In all the years ive played this game, this is aquestion that has been bugging me all along... - Since a lot of CSM members have replied to the tread, how long on average in hours a week do you spend for the csm? This so that us, unknown to csm members, also get an idea of the amazing work and input u people give to the game; afterall we would not be here today if it wasnt for ccp and their csm...
Aineko Macx	Posted - 2011.01.22 07:36:00 - [30] Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow As matters stand now, I intend to run for re-election. I am, btw, collecting endorsements, so if you think I've done a decent job, please let me know. Subjectively and purely based on what is visible from the outside, it seems among the CSM members you have put the most effort into it. That might ofc not reflect the actual effort and I can only suggest to (future) CSMs to get more visibility by engaging in dialog with other players, especially in AH. ________________________ CCP: Where fixing bugs is a luxury, not an obligation.
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2011.01.22 08:34:00 - [31] I've been well behaved on the forums lately and now have a passport, time to run for once!
Korerin Mayul Amarr	Posted - 2011.01.22 09:58:00 - [32] I really want to run for this, but i have just changed jobs and countries so ill probably wait until the next one to give myself a chance to settle down.
Helen Highwater Gallente GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.01.22 12:08:00 - [33] Originally by: Dragonia Redtail Ill probebly ask this knowing that the details should be available elsewhere, but... - what is expecter of the person that joins the csm expanse wise? Something like pay your own ticket to whateverplaceonearth? In all the years ive played this game, this is aquestion that has been bugging me all along... - Since a lot of CSM members have replied to the tread, how long on average in hours a week do you spend for the csm? This so that us, unknown to csm members, also get an idea of the amazing work and input u people give to the game; afterall we would not be here today if it wasnt for ccp and their csm... For the summits in Iceland and for Fanfest you get a flight and accommodation paid for by CCP. Anything outside of that is on your own dime but there's nothing I can think of off-hand that's absolutely required for the role that you need to pony up for in most circumstances. Amount of work done per week varies tremendously with the individual and the time of year - just before a summit the work increases a lot, outside of that I probably spend 10-15 hours a week reading and working on CSM stuff. -------------------------------------------------------------- Let's not and say we did.
Mynxee	Posted - 2011.01.22 13:28:00 - [34] Originally by: Helen Highwater Originally by: Dragonia Redtail Ill probebly ask this knowing that the details should be available elsewhere, but... - what is expecter of the person that joins the csm expanse wise? Something like pay your own ticket to whateverplaceonearth? In all the years ive played this game, this is aquestion that has been bugging me all along... - Since a lot of CSM members have replied to the tread, how long on average in hours a week do you spend for the csm? This so that us, unknown to csm members, also get an idea of the amazing work and input u people give to the game; afterall we would not be here today if it wasnt for ccp and their csm... For the summits in Iceland and for Fanfest you get a flight and accommodation paid for by CCP. Anything outside of that is on your own dime but there's nothing I can think of off-hand that's absolutely required for the role that you need to pony up for in most circumstances. Amount of work done per week varies tremendously with the individual and the time of year - just before a summit the work increases a lot, outside of that I probably spend 10-15 hours a week reading and working on CSM stuff. What Helen said, and to add to it, CCP usually springs for dinner two nights; usually lunch is courtesy of the office cafeteria which seems to be pretty decent when CSM is in the house. So you are left to pay for your own drinks and food outside those times and of course while enroute to Iceland. Interestingly, I've never used cash while in Iceland--just my VISA debit card for everything (bank charges a tiny, tiny fee for each transaction but it's so small it is inconsequential--pennies, really). Time per week varies per member as does the nature of activities; everyone has their own style, approach, and focus in carrying out their CSM duties but Helen's estimate is about right. Unless you're Trebor, and then its double that. Life In Low Sec
El'Niaga Minmatar Republic Military School	Posted - 2011.01.22 15:53:00 - [35] Why bother? Based on the ideas that came out of the December meeting I'd just stop the charade. Just drop the CSM and instead of flying them out to Iceland, etc, just use that money to hire someone to actually work on code and see if you can fix this disaster of a expansion/patch.
Meissa Anunthiel	Posted - 2011.01.22 17:50:00 - [36] CSM is more work than it looks, and can be very frustrating at times (both with the devs and with the players), but it's also very rewarding. For while we can never dictate what CCP does (never believe a candidate who says "vote for me and I'll get you this"), they do take our feedback and suggestions into account. If you feel like running, do so. I will... Meissa, CSM 2, 3, 4, 5 and, maybe, 6 ;-) ----- Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Feel free to contact me with queries. Convo, evemail or join the "meissaCSM" in-game channel.
Trebor Daehdoow	Posted - 2011.01.22 22:55:00 - [37] Edited by: Trebor Daehdoow on 22/01/2011 22:55:33 Originally by: Mynxee Originally by: Helen Highwater Amount of work done per week varies tremendously with the individual and the time of year - just before a summit the work increases a lot, outside of that I probably spend 10-15 hours a week reading and working on CSM stuff. Time per week varies per member as does the nature of activities; everyone has their own style, approach, and focus in carrying out their CSM duties but Helen's estimate is about right. Unless you're Trebor, and then its double that. If you want to do CSM right (or at least, what I define as right), it's a significant commitment. Helen's numbers are in the ballpark, but the peak workload for me is after the summits when all the minutes drafting and editing happens. For me, the writing of the minutes is the most important thing I do on CSM, and my approach to doing so is entirely in accordance with the guiding principles of the great British Civil Servant, Sir Humphrey Appleby. Bottom line: if you are thinking about running, don't do it if you're not prepared to put in the hours. Confessions of a Noob Starship Politician The most expensive free trip to Iceland you'll ever win!
El'Niaga Minmatar Republic Military School	Posted - 2011.01.23 04:41:00 - [38] Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel CSM is more work than it looks, and can be very frustrating at times (both with the devs and with the players), but it's also very rewarding. For while we can never dictate what CCP does (never believe a candidate who says "vote for me and I'll get you this"), they do take our feedback and suggestions into account. If you feel like running, do so. I will... Meissa, CSM 2, 3, 4, 5 and, maybe, 6 ;-) This could be the problem with the CSM....same folks....same results.....
Carniflex StarHunt R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.01.23 08:09:00 - [39] Promise me to campaign for removal of T2 BPO's and I'll throw in 5 votes for ya. Assuming you are not saying something outright stupid with the rest of your message.
Deadly Hobbitses Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2011.01.23 13:17:00 - [40] Elise Randolph for CSM! Also please get CCP to do something about this new lag in Incursion... it reminds me too much of Dominion.
Beltze Sorgin Minmatar L V B Industries	Posted - 2011.01.23 15:27:00 - [41] Anyone who can get CCP to communicate effectively & in a timely manner with petitioners rather than just leave them in the dark for days at a time will get my vote.
Artisan Botanist Minmatar Hysteria Nexus	Posted - 2011.01.23 17:19:00 - [42] In the past CSM votes have been based mainly on "who from my alliance is running?", can CCP make it so that CSM that gets voted will actually be voted for based on their ideas and not because they own all of the north. Show their ideas but conceal their identity
Leovarian Lavitz Minmatar Ghost Tribal Credit Union Sspectre	Posted - 2011.01.24 08:49:00 - [43] Edited by: Leovarian Lavitz on 24/01/2011 08:51:37 Originally by: Artisan Botanist In the past CSM votes have been based mainly on "who from my alliance is running?", can CCP make it so that CSM that gets voted will actually be voted for based on their ideas and not because they own all of the north. Show their ideas but conceal their identity I disagree with this because identity is a powerful thing within the online world, and critically so within EVE online. In my opinion platforms and planks are generally just as important; knowing a CSM which puts in excellent hours, is an effective communicator, and also has a reasonable platform is better than nameless-faces for whom you cannot demand accountability nor predict their successes or weaknesses.
Leovarian Lavitz Minmatar Ghost Tribal Credit Union Sspectre	Posted - 2011.01.24 08:56:00 - [44] Originally by: fukier Originally by: Leovarian Lavitz Edited by: Leovarian Lavitz on 21/01/2011 18:19:05 Originally by: fukier to anyone thinking of running for CSM... (like a war dec but only lasts half an hour) Declare war, wait an hour, withdraw war. Next day you have a war that will last for one hour, which can be a rather expensive war (considering that the price usually gets you a full week) perhaps you are confused as to what 'like' means... it would be like a war dec... but be much cheaper... have to be agreed on by both parties... its pretty much a mechanic that will allow pvp for people that usually dont have any access to it... i.e. people who are in noob corps and people who just want a good fight without having to worry about getting ganked by 20 other guys... can flipping is not an option becuase that just leads to getting ganked by multiple people and going to low sec and negotiating a fight leads to getting boinked by 20 peeps in t3 ships... we need a mechanic that will allow small time pvp... I still do not support this feature; Faction warfare exists within game as one way to do have PVP. Another way is to found two seperate corporations who can war with each other (EG Red Vrs Blue). Can dueling is also an option. This is off-topic, though. We can discuss this further if you create a new thread for it in features and ideas.
Malcanis Caldari Vanishing Point. The Initiative.	Posted - 2011.01.24 11:11:00 - [45] Originally by: Artisan Botanist In the past CSM votes have been based mainly on "who from my alliance is running?", can CCP make it so that CSM that gets voted will actually be voted for based on their ideas and not because they own all of the north. Show their ideas but conceal their identity Even if this were a good idea, which it isn't, it would be trivial to work around. Also, alliance members aren't the hive-mind drones you seem to suppose. Your suggestion is based on a false premise. Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players.
Galadium	Posted - 2011.01.24 14:24:00 - [46] I really don't understand why CCP don't adopt the Blizzard style approach of authentication keys, be it a seperate device or on the mobile phone, they work a treat for Starcraft II and W@rld @f W@rcraft. (changed the letters to avoid profinity filter mentioning wow! )
Berikath	Posted - 2011.01.25 15:57:00 - [47] Originally by: Artisan Botanist In the past CSM votes have been based mainly on "who from my alliance is running?", can CCP make it so that CSM that gets voted will actually be voted for based on their ideas and not because they own all of the north. Show their ideas but conceal their identity Identity is important; personally I would say that it is at LEAST as important as ideas/goals, and probably more so. No matter how good your ideas are, if you can't communicate them effectively you don't make a good representative. Also, there is a difference between communicating ideas in prose and in a conversation (written or verbal). Someone who can write a stellar "statement of purpose" when given time to formulate and refine their ideas can be useless when they have to convince people on the fly. Personally, given a choice between someone with a good head on their shoulders who can communicate effectively with only a general similarity to my own viewpoint or someone who I agree with exactly but who has trouble communicating, I think I'd pick the former every time. * [ SIG] * Wish list for PI: One-click input routing Copy product, inputs & outputs in factories *Launchpad upgrades: twice the space, twice the cost, half the hassle! [ /sig ]
Aelius Caldari Mnemonic Enterprises Dark Matter Coalition	Posted - 2011.01.28 11:04:00 - [48] For the 1st time in my 8 EVE years i will be running. See my sig for more info. _________________________ CSM Candidate for 2011 (soon a pretty photoshop sig) Aelius 2011 Candidacy Guide Lines
Vaneshi SnowCrash	Posted - 2011.01.29 05:28:00 - [49] Edited by: Vaneshi SnowCrash on 29/01/2011 05:31:30 Alright fine, I might well put myself up for election. Depends on how drunk I am. So should I open a paypal donation thing for "Get Vaneshi steaming"? Why? Why not. What'll be different between you and X? I'll buy my own ticket to Iceland (I'm unemployed so I'll do my best/video conference/whatever but if I can I will be there under my own steam... I am a good swimmer). You want someone who's not "paid for by CCP"? Fine, you got it. What'll I bring to the table? Rampant alcohol and nicotine abuse the likes of which Iceland can only dream of and I'll show Johnny Foreigner how an Englishman drinks! But seriously, transparency. I sollomly swear I'll walk right up to the NDA and give it a damn good kicking. Fine, I'll respect CCP's "business and commercially sensitive information" stuff, which is fair, but other than that... whatever. PvP? Done it. Lag monster? Seen it. PvE? Stupid Damsel. Incursions? Not so much yet. So yeah, you want someone honest... cool. Get me drunk enough and we'll talk. We'll you'll talk I'll just dribble in the corner mashing buttons.

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.