| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mace X5
   |
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:07:00 -
[1]
I am of course talking of this
I liked this feature a lot on Sisi and it seems to me there are many like-minded people similarly disappointed with the lack of it in the 3rd part of the Incursion deployment.
I for one would immediately switch to using it and playtest the **** out of it.
It was on Sisi a few weeks ago, so the code should be ready for deployment as it was.
Even if it wouldn't get many updates for some time being, I am convinced that CCP really wants to overhaul the UI completely (why refactor the UI background else), so I would love to be able to playtest, give feedback and supply you guys with bugreports to that end.
Anything to get a nice looking, usable, customizable UI! |
Mace X5
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:10:00 -
[2]
Supporting myself. |
Mamba Lev
Masturbating Hand Social Club
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:14:00 -
[3]
They have to fix the obvious mistake they made first, predicting it's arrival in the summer patch. |
Mace X5
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:19:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Mamba Lev
They have to fix the obvious mistake they made first, predicting it's arrival in the summer patch.
I'm not so sure cause all we have right now is an statement in General Discussion that it was pulled for some reason.
At least they could have updated the topic about it in the information portal. |
Vorqoth
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:20:00 -
[5]
signed.
|
Jaarin Kuor
The Kuor Collective
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:38:00 -
[6]
Confirming I would be much more likely to give money to CCP if they updated the ancient UI. |
Mamba Lev
Masturbating Hand Social Club
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 16:52:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Mace X5
Originally by: Mamba Lev
They have to fix the obvious mistake they made first, predicting it's arrival in the summer patch.
I'm not so sure cause all we have right now is an statement in General Discussion that it was pulled for some reason.
At least they could have updated the topic about it in the information portal.
It was removed as it had an exploit in it that would give an unfair advantage to people using it over people who didn't, and yeah some information would be nice but just like their "known Issues" page it's devoid of useful information. |
krickettt
Golden Orb Technology inc
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 17:01:00 -
[8]
I wanted to use that neocom so bad :( |
Mace X5
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 18:09:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Mamba Lev
It was removed as it had an exploit in it that would give an unfair advantage to people using it over people who didn't, and yeah some information would be nice but just like their "known Issues" page it's devoid of useful information.
Didn't know that but if that's true it kinda is understandable why it wasnt deployed.
Still, some dev communication would be very much appreciated, I'd hate to see this go the way of engine trails and cyno effects. |
Alex Cortex
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 19:31:00 -
[10]
Throwing my support in here. If it was indeed removed because of it being exploitable (or a similar valid reason beyond simple complaints), what should be done is find a way to fix it, put it back on again as an optional feature, and allow us to test it farther. Obviously if the 'exploit' is simply because the new Neocom is superior, then it would have to be put back on Sisi or applied to all players (mandatory) on Tranq. Neither option is very good for proper testing, but the EVE UI /needs/ a revamp, it's clunky and outdated.
|
|
|
Alex Cortex
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 19:35:00 -
[11]
Whoops, forgot to check the support box.
|
AtheistOfFail
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 19:55:00 -
[12]
Guys, what are you guys whining about? I just saw a CCP post yesterday saying that both the Incursion code and the new UI is in this patch. It's just DISABLED because it's still very experimental and they wanted to delay it till the 25th. I don't think this thread has any point.
|
Dexter Talon
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 20:19:00 -
[13]
Supported.
|
Alex Cortex
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 20:23:00 -
[14]
Originally by: AtheistOfFail
Guys, what are you guys whining about? I just saw a CCP post yesterday saying that both the Incursion code and the new UI is in this patch. It's just DISABLED because it's still very experimental and they wanted to delay it till the 25th. I don't think this thread has any point.
Oh? Never saw that, it'd be nice if it was an official announcement. Maybe a link, please?
|
Mace X5
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 21:08:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Alex Cortex
Originally by: AtheistOfFail
Guys, what are you guys whining about? I just saw a CCP post yesterday saying that both the Incursion code and the new UI is in this patch. It's just DISABLED because it's still very experimental and they wanted to delay it till the 25th. I don't think this thread has any point.
Oh? Never saw that, it'd be nice if it was an official announcement. Maybe a link, please?
Yeah link please.
I only saw this
Originally by: CCP Explorer
The new NeoCom will not be activated. Based on player feedback and internal review then we decided that this Experimental Feature would be pulled.
So, is it there and not activated or was it pulled? It's a very ambiguous statement at best.
I understand it as pulled which makes me afraid we won't hear of it again for a very long time if ever.
--
release the neo neocom beta! |
krickettt
Golden Orb Technology inc
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 21:14:00 -
[16]
Originally by: AtheistOfFail
Guys, what are you guys whining about? I just saw a CCP post yesterday saying that both the Incursion code and the new UI is in this patch. It's just DISABLED because it's still very experimental and they wanted to delay it till the 25th. I don't think this thread has any point.
Definitely need proof on that. CCP has already said the feature was pulled.
|
klyeme
The Mind's Eye
Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.01.24 00:14:00 -
[17]
Yes, I want it now, don't make such a huge deal out of something your just going to get rid of before the release, at least get some player feedback from it first!
|
PTang
|
Posted - 2011.01.24 03:48:00 -
[18]
yes please, bring it back.
Also great to see only two people not support so far. As long it was optional, it was awesome.
And if there was an exploit, someone needs to sill the beans.
|
Rannz
Minmatar
Scordite Excavating Xenaphobe
|
Posted - 2011.01.24 22:52:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Rannz on 24/01/2011 22:55:39
Not sure why a minority opinion was excepted as the de facto opinion when it came to the new Neocom. Why are more choices a bad thing?
The current UI is clunky and old. Time for a change.
|
Avaaloniaa
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 12:30:00 -
[20]
I would support this if it gave an option to change the ingame font size 
|
|
|
Velocifero
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 13:44:00 -
[21]
/support support support
|
Mallikanth
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 14:01:00 -
[22]
Excel in space needs a UI overhaul - I imagine many people would agree with that but is the Windows7 rip-off UI the way to go?
I'm not sure having only played with it a little on Sisi myself and now having CCP pulled it (indefinitely?) it's seems either it was bugged or wasn't doing what they wanted.
We need *something* done, that's true.
|
Dark Assassin15
Failed Diplomacy
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 15:57:00 -
[23]
i support this message.
---
|
Eli Simon
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 21:16:00 -
[24]
I was looking forward to the beta Neocom. I definitely would like to see it activated with a quickness! The whole UI does indeed need a revamp/cleanup.
|
Shelantara
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 00:59:00 -
[25]
Let me get rid of crap I never use 
|
Thaylon Sen
The Boondock Saints
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 03:39:00 -
[26]
I was looking forward to this... let the people decide, after all it was optional.
|
Wolodymyr
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 05:34:00 -
[27]
OK but make it optional like the new contracts system.
I really don't want another buggy CCP release screwing up my interface and getting my ship blown up while my API crashes.
|
Siiee
Recycled Heroes
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 06:00:00 -
[28]
Supported
Didn't take the time to test it any on Sisi but I was looking forward to giving it a chance on my secondary characters when it hit TQ.
|
Shandir
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 10:49:00 -
[29]
Edited by: Shandir on 04/02/2011 10:49:35
I want it and I'm frustrated by the fact that it's arrival was announced with trumpets, a marching band and a devblog - it's removal was that it simply wasn't there, and later a vague post about 'player feedback'.
I didn't see any player feedback that said it was a bad idea - players just wanted it *and more*.
At the very least, we deserve a proper explanation - they clearly spent time and effort on it, and hyped it up lots. |
Norian Lonark
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 11:48:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Norian Lonark on 04/02/2011 11:48:01
Supported. I'm using the optional beta contracts I would be using the neocom if it was there.
|
|
|
James Giovanni
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 09:09:00 -
[31]
signed
|
jade ranger
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 09:50:00 -
[32]
Despite people forgetting to check the box, and some confused people, I don't see ANY negative views on the neo neocom in this thread O.o
|
ErrorS
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 10:27:00 -
[33]
Edited by: ErrorS on 05/02/2011 10:27:13
Oh God, definitely.. when I first saw this I got pretty excited, but they shelved it? C'mon CCP, please?
________
I'm strict Caldari
"The grass is always greener on the other side" - Maybe they're not as uber as you think?
-ErrorS |
Ben Derindar
Dirty Deeds Corp.
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 10:54:00 -
[34]
CCP don't do themselves any favours by promoting features like this too far ahead of time, it only leads to situations like this when people push for things before they're ready.
And yet, we've seen so many unfinished features added to the game already and somebody's asking for more? 
Not supported.
|
Joxxy
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 16:02:00 -
[35]
Yes please - gief new UI
|
Selinate
Amarr
Red Water Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 18:05:00 -
[36]
not supported.
neocom is fine as it is.
If they ever fix the real reasons for why the UI is a cluster****, then I will support this. New neocom will not do this.
|
Sethose Olderon
|
Posted - 2011.02.10 18:52:00 -
[37]
Please fix any exploits or problems and get this in a future release SOON¡Ö.
Alliance Owned Stargates
|
Darteis Elosia
PHOENIX 2ND C.A.G.
DEM0N HUNTERS
|
Posted - 2011.02.15 18:20:00 -
[38]
YES!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |