EVE Search - Jan 25-31 predctions

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Jan 25-31 predctions

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Obsidian Hawk RONA Legion RONA Directorate	Posted - 2011.01.23 23:22:00 - [1] I the Great ALL seeing Obsidian Predict the the following. 2 pages of mission runner whines about incursions nerfing mission running and ccp forcing them to do stuff. A dozen too much lag threads about incursions a new pcu of 65,000.
masternerdguy Gallente Meerkat Maner	Posted - 2011.01.23 23:25:00 - [2] I will be personally sending "sympathy messages" to anyone who complains about their mission hub being invaded.
Cathy Drall Amarr Royal Amarr Institute	Posted - 2011.01.23 23:25:00 - [3] Jan 25-31: ANet will reveal their next class for GW2!! "Im not nearly as paranoid as people think I am"
Jovan Geldon Gallente Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire	Posted - 2011.01.23 23:27:00 - [4] February 1st:- People will realise the difference between Live Events and Incursions.
Ocih Amarr The Program Controlled Chaos	Posted - 2011.01.23 23:51:00 - [5] You forgot the 40000000 petitions to have ships replaced.
Mana Trim	Posted - 2011.01.24 01:26:00 - [6] I just hope Jita isn't immune to Incursions. Sansha gate camp yes?
Quemist	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:01:00 - [7] Forced PVE, lots of bro's who can't jew it up ratting. Realizing high sec PVEers are the cause of it. Blood and tears.
Revii Lagoon The Foreign Legion Wildly Inappropriate.	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:06:00 - [8] IT Falls apart...
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:12:00 - [9] Originally by: Mana Trim I just hope Jita isn't immune to Incursions. Sansha gate camp yes? CCP could oh so get aay with this if they simply have a popup box just like you get when you first go to low sec. So if you are autopiloting you ship will stop at the jump before the incursion and not get wtfbbqd as it crawls to the next gate with no tank or hell even tanked if the testing on sisi is any indication. Plus you would get the same popup message if you are docked in a station in an incursion system. With those two simple additions they could seed the same level of nastyness in high sec as they do in low sec and nullsec and not a single person could legitimately ***** about losing their ship due to the rats. As far as the mission runners are concerned welp either get involved in kicking them out or move to a place that isn't effected. Lets just hope ccp have the balls to put incursions in the places they hurt the most.
Dorkfan	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:18:00 - [10] Originally by: Ocih You forgot the 40000000 petitions to have ships replaced. Already have mine in Que. lol j/k
Major Snitch	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:29:00 - [11] Well there only so much you can do with one sever......i mean you can borrow here,recycle there,divide here and .......in the end only so much code can be processed at a time with each blade the more you add the more numbers are active(player) the slower game play will be which we know as lag. the truth is more number = more lag......if it was me i would make every race its own sever with 0.0 area, and between them contested area were it's 50vs 50 man fights ....simalar to Wot battle system .....something on those lines but that require to much change and money..i guess..... it would handle so many issue and make eve online member numbers rise but it wouldn't be a single sever anymore .......in closing we are going to have lag and noid /cluster shutdowns with large number in a single cluster and there nothing that can truly be done ....with the system the way it is .....just roll with the punches
Letrange Minmatar Chaosstorm Corporation	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:33:00 - [12] Originally by: Obsidian Hawk I the Great ALL seeing Obsidian Predict the the following. 2 pages of mission runner whines about incursions nerfing mission running and ccp forcing them to do stuff. A dozen too much lag threads about incursions a new pcu of 65,000. You forgot an additional 3 pages of PvP player whining about being forced into PvE
RKColdFire Gallente	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:47:00 - [13] Better be good the sansha's crapy incursion or i ll go back to play COD and BF
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2011.01.24 02:56:00 - [14] Originally by: Letrange Originally by: Obsidian Hawk I the Great ALL seeing Obsidian Predict the the following. 2 pages of mission runner whines about incursions nerfing mission running and ccp forcing them to do stuff. A dozen too much lag threads about incursions a new pcu of 65,000. You forgot an additional 3 pages of PvP player whining about being forced into PvE The funny thing is that these new rats are better at coordinating the finding of weak spots to primary with dps and effective targeting of counter ewar to disrupt player rr or ewar than some supposedly 'elite' pvp corps.
RKColdFire Gallente	Posted - 2011.01.24 03:12:00 - [15] Edited by: RKColdFire on 24/01/2011 03:15:46 Edited by: RKColdFire on 24/01/2011 03:13:22 Lagg and forced pve is not enough? so we gonna deal with cheating sansha's too! that's BS.
Obsidian Hawk RONA Legion RONA Directorate	Posted - 2011.01.24 06:53:00 - [16] I look forward to our new sansha pvp overlords :D
Alpheias	Posted - 2011.01.24 06:55:00 - [17] I don't predict, I know I will be playing Dead Space 2.
Venkul Mul Gallente	Posted - 2011.01.24 07:30:00 - [18] Edited by: Venkul Mul on 24/01/2011 07:31:54 Originally by: Obsidian Hawk I the Great ALL seeing Obsidian Predict the the following. 2 pages of mission runner whines about incursions nerfing mission running and ccp forcing them to do stuff. A dozen too much lag threads about incursions a new pcu of 65,000. You forget the 4 pages of 0.0 denizens complaining that the Incursion rats are killing their ratting/mining ships and stopping them from cynoing. BTW: Sansha incursion rats don't enter missions or anomalies/exploration sites, so mission runners will protest about the reduced resists (if they ever notice them, most mission running ships are overtanked), reduced damage (that will be more of a nuisance) and reduced bounties . Originally by: Zhim'Fufu Originally by: Mana Trim I just hope Jita isn't immune to Incursions. Sansha gate camp yes? CCP could oh so get aay with this if they simply have a popup box just like you get when you first go to low sec. So if you are autopiloting you ship will stop at the jump before the incursion and not get wtfbbqd as it crawls to the next gate with no tank or hell even tanked if the testing on sisi is any indication. Plus you would get the same popup message if you are docked in a station in an incursion system. With those two simple additions they could seed the same level of nastyness in high sec as they do in low sec and nullsec and not a single person could legitimately ***** about losing their ship due to the rats. As far as the mission runners are concerned welp either get involved in kicking them out or move to a place that isn't effected. Lets just hope ccp have the balls to put incursions in the places they hurt the most. The low sec pop-up don't stop a autopiloting ship. It don't even appear if you are autopiloting.
Pookie McPook	Posted - 2011.01.24 07:35:00 - [19] Personally I'm expecting most of the whiners to be playing alts in different constellations for the week their main is effectively camped in station. CCP aren't stupid....they will be expecting a large increase in alt account creations. ----- Marmite. Rocket fuel of champions.
Xercodo Amarr INESTO Task Force	Posted - 2011.01.24 07:36:00 - [20] im preping a clean up ship to collect the loot and tears of all the newbs that still think that the current live events are actually incursions and explode when they face a REAL one -------------------------------------------------- The drake is a lie
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2011.01.24 07:37:00 - [21] Originally by: Venkul Mul The low sec pop-up don't stop a autopiloting ship. It don't even appear if you are autopiloting. I said like(should have said similar I suppose ;p) the low sec popup. Only it would not let you jump till you pressed the jump button on the popup or the cancel button to abort the jump. It would of course come with a handy check box to keep it from popping back up so that darwin can get his share.
Hows This Fun	Posted - 2011.01.24 07:38:00 - [22] Edited by: Hows This Fun on 24/01/2011 07:38:09 wtf. npc's camping us? f**** yyyou CCP
Abdiel Kavash Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans	Posted - 2011.01.24 08:26:00 - [23] Originally by: Venkul Mul You forget the 4 pages of 0.0 denizens complaining that the Incursion rats are killing their ratting/mining ships and stopping them from cynoing. Because an entity that can regularly field a hundred of people at the drop of the hat will really be stopped by a bunch of NPCs. If incursions are a problem for you, you don't belong to 0.0. I'm looking forward to the tears of people who join an "incursion fleet" only to get ganked at the site in their officer fit faction ships. --- Originally by: Sporked EVE IS DYING RUN TO THE HILLS! WE MIGHT HAVE TO ENGAGE WITH OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS MMO! THEY MIGHT SHOOT AT US WHILE WE ARE BUSY HOLDING HANDS AND FROLICKING! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Marlona Sky Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.01.24 08:43:00 - [24] Apparently mission and trade hubs will he excluded from possible incursions.
Masatoshi Hamada	Posted - 2011.01.24 08:45:00 - [25] Originally by: Marlona Sky Apparently mission and trade hubs will he excluded from possible incursions. Do you have a quotable source for this?
Marlona Sky Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.01.24 08:52:00 - [26] Originally by: Masatoshi Hamada Originally by: Marlona Sky Apparently mission and trade hubs will he excluded from possible incursions. Do you have a quotable source for this? Yup. Originally by: CCP Inconceivable Due to the massive difference between normal mission A.I. and Incursion A.I., we have decided to keep them away from mission and trade hubs. EVE is about fun and losing your pimp mission ship you worked hard for because of some event that happens is hardly fun. So much for that. I was looking forward to trolling noobs about this on the forums too.
Antihrist Pripravnik 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.01.24 09:12:00 - [27] Edited by: Antihrist Pripravnik on 24/01/2011 09:12:43 Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: CCP Inconceivable Due to the massive difference between normal mission A.I. and Incursion A.I., we have decided to keep them away from mission and trade hubs. EVE is about fun and losing your pimp mission ship you worked hard for because of some event that happens is hardly fun. So much for that. I was looking forward to trolling noobs about this on the forums too. And how about ratting systems in 0.0? I'm pretty sure CCP didn't exclude those from incursions, so you'll get plenty of tears for your trolls.
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2011.01.24 09:30:00 - [28] Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: CCP Inconceivable Due to the massive difference between normal mission A.I. and Incursion A.I., we have decided to keep them away from mission and trade hubs. EVE is about fun and losing your pimp mission ship you worked hard for because of some event that happens is hardly fun. So much for that. I was looking forward to trolling noobs about this on the forums too. Well they didn't say anything about not having an incursion in a high sec constellation between the major hubs. Hope still lives! Originally by: Antihrist Pripravnik And how about ratting systems in 0.0? I'm pretty sure CCP didn't exclude those from incursions, so you'll get plenty of tears for your trolls. Yeah I want to see the major fw areas with constant incursions along with the drone regions and nullsec home constellations etc etc. Also ccp move all remainging high sec ice belts to the areas that can be effected by an incursion plx.
James Moroci	Posted - 2011.01.24 09:43:00 - [29] ive tried the incursions on the the test server, they are really easy when u learned how to do em.. one trick thou is not to be more than the incursion site tells you to be.. if you are it will only meens more death!
Marlona Sky Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.01.24 13:01:00 - [30] Originally by: CCP Inconceivable There will be no Incursions at any high sec belts, stations or gates. EVE is a cold and harsh game but it needs to be payable. Perhaps war decing the poor miners in the ice belts might be a better course of action if they bother you so much. Deal with it. This expansion is getting more lame by the minute.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.