EVE Search - Unity Expansion Patch Notes (Best troll ever?)

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Unity Expansion Patch Notes (Best troll ever?)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 07:46:00 - [1] Best. Ideas. Ever. I leave you now with the photo, which, because of CCP's 1990s mentality towards forum rules, I have to link to instead of directly show. Thanks. I appreciate that. Now, on to the good stuff. Now, everyone who looked at it and the other accompanying picture that came with it but I won't post here agreed it had to be one of the best trolls ever, but damn. Just...damn. Look at all those good ideas right there. Holy cow. If this is in fact true, though, I'm still going to complain about the supercapital hitpoints. Those need to go. Damn. That's a lot of good ideas.
yumike	Posted - 2011.03.25 07:58:00 - [2] You and me, we can't be friends. I was way too "omg omg omg that'd be awesome!". you tease :(
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 07:59:00 - [3] On second thought here's the other one. Since Abathur stopped working for CCP after his abysmal Dominion expansion, and the blog ID is already taken, it's definitely fake. Also some text issues and a few other minor things, but w/e. Still would be an amazing expansion.
Patient 2428190 DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:00:00 - [4] Edited by: Patient 2428190 on 25/03/2011 08:01:11 POS rigs, really? ed: That list reads like "Everything we should have been doing besides Incarna" ...Then when you stopped to think about it. All you really said was Lalala.
ModeratedToSilence	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:02:00 - [5] Unity will be the best patch since beta. Even the dev blog is a step up from the usual ccp drivel. How to write a blog
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:04:00 - [6] ITT: What Incarna should have ****ing looked like.
Diana Araquez Caldari	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:07:00 - [7] The game doesn't need more T3 ships. Having one ship fulfilling all ship roles better than anything else with a subsystem switch instead of the elegant specialization of T2 is absolutely ******ed.
Florestan Bronstein Amarr Taishi Combine	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:09:00 - [8] Free Abathur!!! oh wait...
Patient 2428190 DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:10:00 - [9] Originally by: Diana Araquez The game doesn't need more T3 ships. Having one ship fulfilling all ship roles better than anything else with a subsystem switch instead of the elegant specialization of T2 is absolutely ******ed. The game doesn't need avatars pacing in their quarters, but guess what!?!?! ...Then when you stopped to think about it. All you really said was Lalala.
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:11:00 - [10] Originally by: Florestan Bronstein Free Abathur!!! oh wait... Wuh-wuhhh
El'Niaga Minmatar Republic Military School	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:12:00 - [11] Some good things here. Not sure about DDing structures though (although really it makes no sense they can't for game balance I think its better they don't). To many good things that it probably is a troll though :(
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:13:00 - [12] Say, can I report my own thread for awesome?
yumike	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:14:00 - [13] Edited by: yumike on 25/03/2011 08:14:36 Where did you get this stuff? And why is it so much better then what we're really getting? edit:: Originally by: Alty McExpendable Say, can I report my own thread for awesome? Yes, you may.
Cyaxares II	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:15:00 - [14] Originally by: Alty McExpendable Say, can I report my own thread for awesome? If you do that CCP reads the suggestions in these patch notes and screws them up in the most horrible way possible.
SmashTech	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:28:00 - [15] That's impossible, they can't do that any more than they already did with Incarna... Unless... FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU--
ModeratedToSilence	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:29:00 - [16] Originally by: Alty McExpendable Say, can I report my own thread for awesome? It is a 10/10 lets hope it drops a x-type em shield hardener and rattlesnake bpc and an x type xl shield boost. I suspect we will just get the overseers effects though.
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:32:00 - [17] Someone go rehost these, just in case mine somehow get changed or deleted. I don't control the source for them and I can't seem to download them properly sized to my computer.
Memorya	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:40:00 - [18] This woud be to good to be true ! ------------------------ English is my 5th. Language.
yumike	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:44:00 - [19] Originally by: Alty McExpendable Someone go rehost these, just in case mine somehow get changed or deleted. I don't control the source for them and I can't seem to download them properly sized to my computer. http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1103/Dw9pa.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1103/kfypF.jpg
Patient 2428190 DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:46:00 - [20] Some nice clickable links http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1103/Dw9pa.jpg http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1103/kfypF.jpg ...Then when you stopped to think about it. All you really said was Lalala.
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:50:00 - [21] Thanks.
Scorpyn Caldari Warp Ghosts Omega Spectres of the Deep	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:54:00 - [22] I like most of the ideas, but not all of them, and some I have no opinion on. Look out the window of stations? Not so sure about that one... Doomsday in lowsec? No. No insurance during self-destruct or piracy? I can somewhat understand self-destruct, but I disagree with piracy. Either way, I say no to both parts. Black market on the market? Makes no sense. I disagree with the sovereignity changes. Instead, remove the concept of sovereignity completely. Self destruction timer should not be reduced. It's already possible to change the resolution of all active scan probes at the same time. Hold shift (or at least I think it was shift). Also, why would you want to free a slave?
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 08:56:00 - [23] Edited by: Alty McExpendable on 25/03/2011 08:56:54 If you weren't trying to troll with some of those comments, that's sad. If you were trying to troll with some of those comments, it's also sad. I mean really, getting rid of sov. Like that's not all that this game has banking for it. edit: FFFFFFFUUU TYPOS
A Research Alt	Posted - 2011.03.25 09:23:00 - [24] How nice of this to get posted right at the beginning of the day. At least, for those of us having to get up super early for shenanigans. looks at photos DAAAAAAYUMMMMM guuurl them is some fine content right thurr
Alty McExpendable	Posted - 2011.03.25 09:25:00 - [25] Oh god it's so late here I hate research papers-- --and I hate you for bringing up the mention of sleep. Now I'm starting to get tired...
Kabaal S'sylistha Caldari Technomage Trilogy Valor Empire	Posted - 2011.03.25 09:37:00 - [26] Even if it's not a perfect "everything's fixed!" troll, this should be shown to someone in the head office at CCP before slapping them. -More Pewpew, Less QQ-
Furb Killer Gallente	Posted - 2011.03.25 09:39:00 - [27] I really dont get the ammount of people acting like these would possibly be serious or good changes. Sure some would be good, but there are enough horrible changes in it, doubling titan EHP and making them doomsday structures? Really?). Removing skillpoint loss from t3 because they expect everyone and their mother to fly them? That doesnt even make sense. Being able to use all fonts when they got someone working on a new font? T3 frigates that require same subsystems as t3 cruisers? (So very expensive).
Scorpyn Caldari Warp Ghosts Omega Spectres of the Deep	Posted - 2011.03.25 09:55:00 - [28] Originally by: Alty McExpendable Edited by: Alty McExpendable on 25/03/2011 08:56:54 If you weren't trying to troll with some of those comments, that's sad. If you were trying to troll with some of those comments, it's also sad. I mean really, getting rid of sov. Like that's not all that this game has banking for it. edit: FFFFFFFUUU TYPOS The only thing I wasn't serious about was the question about why you'd want to be able to free slaves. I consider SOV to be a design flaw.
A Research Alt	Posted - 2011.03.25 09:55:00 - [29] Edited by: A Research Alt on 25/03/2011 09:55:54 Originally by: Kabaal S'sylistha this should be shown to someone in the head office at CCP before slapping them. Good thing fanfest is happening; I'll inform my minions at once of the plan of action.
Marija Vanszar Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2011.03.25 10:37:00 - [30] **** incarnia, Who do i need to eject from the airlock to get this?! Nice Troll btw. BR

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.