EVE Search - New Dev Blog: 0.0 Tweaks

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: 0.0 Tweaks

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 75 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 31 post(s)
David Carel Caldari Random Selection. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:13:00 - [31] Titan bridges hurray
ShadowandLight Amarr Cryptonym Sleepers Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:13:00 - [32] are you seriously brain damaged CCP? I never chime in on alot of these changes you keep coming up with throughout the years, but this is freaking ******ed. 0.0 space is the "end game" of EVE. The last thing needed is more work to live in 0.0 as it is. ------- "The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1 Eve Online
Aveng3X Caldari Roving Guns Inc. RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:13:00 - [33] Once again CCP is making another god awful change, to remove another reason to be proud of owning your own space. I thought Dominion was bad enough, turns out I was wrong. If you want to nerf anything, nerf Technetium and supercaps. That will balance the game. __________________________
Vuk Lau 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:14:00 - [34] This is **ing **ed but nothing else to be expected from 0.0 dev team who wants to limit force projection by raping industrialist and common John 0.0 Doe with this change. And the worst thing is giving only a week for a change to implement, while there is hundreds of things in backlog community is crying for years, but its more important for you guys to heal the frustrations and enjoy in drama on forums this change will cause. You are that really that horny to people up. Before usual trolls emerge, I need to point my alliance will be the least affected with this cause we have small territorial footprint and we live 10j from Jita and 3j from highsec. Also cynojammers are not any protection for long time, but I pitty all semiserious industrialist in 0.0 and people who are living bit more far from high/low sec. CCP just got your life 10 times harder cause they are **ing clueless how 0.0 operates.
Lucas Tigh GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:14:00 - [35] Originally by: Fuujin Originally by: Night Epoch One JB per system? I expect a threadnaught. Regardless, a nerf was needed. Overpowered force projection over vast JB networks is a real problem. Spoken like someone who's never had to plan, organize, and maintain a single jump bridge link. The logistical requirements are enormous. Additionally, you need to hold sov for nearly a month uninterrupted in order to deploy one; if you let a hostile force hold systems on your doorstep for that long you deserve to have a hostile highway speed along the demolition crews to take out your empire. bro where's my titan
Xeross155 Minmatar NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:15:00 - [36] The previous CSM wanted to remove them completely, luckily people have responded to this with discontent, but unfortunately a seed was planted, and this is the result. --------------------------------------------- Xeross' ventures into EVE
Murixo M. Corp M. PIRE	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:15:00 - [37] What a complete load of human fecal matter. Enjoy the CSM meeting CCP, you're going to get torn apart.
Furb Killer Gallente	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:15:00 - [38] Edited by: Furb Killer on 10/05/2011 18:16:20 Quote: Does the current sovereignty system meet our goals? Probably yes. But that has more to do with your goals than the sov system being anything besides absolutely horrible. It is a small miracle the servers didnt explode yet to protest against such horrible use of their resources. Quote: Are there enough incentives for conflict/pvp outside sov? Not that this post will be heard, but you are again looking completely wrong at it. Yes there are plenty of incentives for conflict/pvp, and anything you do to increase that will increase the size of the powerblocks (lets say you can easily raid some kind of passive income source, best way to defend against such easy raids would be napping everyone in the neighbourhood, since they also dont want you raiding their income). The issue is NOT incentives for conflict, the issue is the absolute requirement to have the biggest blob in this sov system. Also lol@nerfing force projection, do you ever realise you introduced those special ships that only ever would be 1 or 2 of in game? Yes titans I am talking about...
Pau Tia	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:15:00 - [39] Once AGAIN CCP FU*KS members of 0.0 while doing nothing about the RMT Traders in the Drone Regions!!!! Sounds like CCP is in the pocket of the RMT guys.
Croier	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:16:00 - [40] Quote: We will then start implementing changes that will hopefully end up making 0.0 a better place to live than it is today. This particular area of space should offer a lot more opportunities than it does today un-nerf ratting perhaps? Where do you guys get these ideas? Maybe it's time for you people to start playing your own game?

Gerard Gendri Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:16:00 - [41] Make it even harder for subcaps to catch and tie down supercarrier blobs? GREAT IDEA!
Fuujin GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:16:00 - [42] Limiting the jump bridges to 1 per system MIGHT be palatable if you also increase their range to 7.5-10 LY.
Prof Fail Minmatar	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:16:00 - [43] "adapt your jump bridge network" CCP...how can you build a jb network with just 1 jb per system? Thats really the dumbest idea I ever heard. It will be heaven for cloaking gatecampers and 0.0 Traffic will be impossible. If youre concerned about too save 0.0 trafffic you should probably remove the untouchable interdiction nullified T3s.
Liang Nuren	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:16:00 - [44] Originally by: ShadowandLight 0.0 space is the "end game" of EVE. No. It isn't. -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
Tyrael Primus Paxton Industries -Mostly Harmless-	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:16:00 - [45] Originally by: Vuk Lau This is **ing **ed but nothing else to be expected from 0.0 dev team who wants to limit force projection by raping industrialist and common John 0.0 Doe with this change. And the worst thing is giving only a week for a change to implement, while there is hundreds of things in backlog community is crying for years, but its more important for you guys to heal the frustrations and enjoy in drama on forums this change will cause. You are that really that horny to people up. Before usual trolls emerge, I need to point my alliance will be the least affected with this cause we have small territorial footprint and we live 10j from Jita and 3j from highsec. Also cynojammers are not any protection for long time, but I pitty all semiserious industrialist in 0.0 and people who are living bit more far from high/low sec. CCP just got your life 10 times harder cause they are **ing clueless how 0.0 operates.
DTson Gauur Caldari Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:17:00 - [46] Suddenly I'm very glad I quit the insanity lagfests known as nullsec. Very happy in empire :)
Sharon Tate Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:17:00 - [47] The only thing this ensures is mass rage quits from those alliance folks who do logistics. Good job CCP, once again, you are terrible and don't understand this game. Go f*** yourselves. -------------------------------------------- Minister of Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, Bacon and Spam
Julia Fistage Caldari Fistage Inc.	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:18:00 - [48] Mmmmmm... NC tears... please continue to share them with us
Phain Death GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:18:00 - [49] I, for one, welcome our new sovless titan-bridging overlords.
Tomcat Gallente Bad Kitty Inc. Wildly Inappropriate.	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:19:00 - [50] Originally by: Vuk Lau This is **ing **ed but nothing else to be expected from 0.0 dev team who wants to limit force projection by raping industrialist and common John 0.0 Doe with this change. And the worst thing is giving only a week for a change to implement, while there is hundreds of things in backlog community is crying for years, but its more important for you guys to heal the frustrations and enjoy in drama on forums this change will cause. You are that really that horny to people up. Before usual trolls emerge, I need to point my alliance will be the least affected with this cause we have small territorial footprint and we live 10j from Jita and 3j from highsec. Also cynojammers are not any protection for long time, but I pitty all semiserious industrialist in 0.0 and people who are living bit more far from high/low sec. CCP just got your life 10 times harder cause they are **ing clueless how 0.0 operates. The man speaks truth.

Lennie Clarke Minmatar Republic Military School	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:19:00 - [51] "The first change is the removal of ships with jumpdrives from the jumpbridge eligibility list. This isnÆt very dramatic and long overdue. Basically if your ship has a jumpdrive, it canÆt use the jumpbridge (Black Ops ships are exempt from this rule). This change will go in on the 17th of this month." ------------------------------------------- How is this not dramatic? It very dramatically affects positioning of strategic resources in sovereign nullsec, as well as further reducing the usefulness of cynojammers for protecting said resources.
Ceratin Amarr Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:19:00 - [52] Edited by: Ceratin on 10/05/2011 18:19:37 Are u **ing kidding? 1 bridge per system, this is ****ed on a grand scale you are doing it wrong
Hanro Gaishou Pator Tech School	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:20:00 - [53] Big fleets won't care about this. Engage on a gate or engage on a Jump Bridge POS, who cares? Solo/Small Gangs are the ones who get screwed by this change whether they are PvP or PvE. Once again it's the little guy who gets fisted. Just one more nerf to protecting your space/earning isk in 0.0 as a solo or small group.
PianoCat	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:20:00 - [54] Edited by: PianoCat on 10/05/2011 18:20:19 Originally by: Vuk Lau This is **ing **ed but nothing else to be expected from 0.0 dev team who wants to limit force projection by raping industrialist and common John 0.0 Doe with this change. And the worst thing is giving only a week for a change to implement, while there is hundreds of things in backlog community is crying for years, but its more important for you guys to heal the frustrations and enjoy in drama on forums this change will cause. You are that really that horny to people up. Before usual trolls emerge, I need to point my alliance will be the least affected with this cause we have small territorial footprint and we live 10j from Jita and 3j from highsec. Also cynojammers are not any protection for long time, but I pitty all semiserious industrialist in 0.0 and people who are living bit more far from high/low sec. CCP just got your life 10 times harder cause they are **ing clueless how 0.0 operates. Spot on Vuk
Korerin Mayul Amarr	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:20:00 - [55] Originally by: Chia Mulholland Finally a nerf to subcaps. God knows they were getting way too powerful compared to caps and supercaps. this. dear ccp I dont know what we 0.0 folks have done to annoy you so much, goodness knows we keep even in the press with our blobs and meta-gaming, but i can only assume by the fact your pushing ahead with flaying us out of our hand-made empires that a simple 'im sorry' wont suffice. never the less, for what we have done to offend you, i am sorry.
northwesten Amarr Trinity Corporate Services White Angels.	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:20:00 - [56] Edited by: northwesten on 10/05/2011 18:24:02 Ok before people start crying about the changes... I want to get this straight This is a good change on JB's.... It's better what we have now and it will force alliance to take action against hostile gate camps... If the alliance can't hold their systems then they don't have the right to have it period. Funny like the old days really. Logistic is still do able even they remove it... Jump freighters.. This will not hurt small alliances because if they have a poor logistic then they are hurting them self period. I lived in the region with no access to JB and I had a blast trying to stay alive moving crap around. So good call on this change CCP. This was very much needed and make people work as a team more. Originally by: Julia Fistage Mmmmmm... NC tears... please continue to share them with us ------------------------------------
Selma Body Amarr Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:21:00 - [57] Edited by: Selma Body on 10/05/2011 18:21:20 Ugh this is just terrible. Why don't you fix the pos mechanic while you're at it since we have to move all of them now(this is what makes logi people commit suicide)
Snou H'egemon	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:21:00 - [58] Originally by: Vuk Lau This is **ing **ed but nothing else to be expected from 0.0 dev team who wants to limit force projection by raping industrialist and common John 0.0 Doe with this change. And the worst thing is giving only a week for a change to implement, while there is hundreds of things in backlog community is crying for years, but its more important for you guys to heal the frustrations and enjoy in drama on forums this change will cause. You are that really that horny to people up. Before usual trolls emerge, I need to point my alliance will be the least affected with this cause we have small territorial footprint and we live 10j from Jita and 3j from highsec. Also cynojammers are not any protection for long time, but I pitty all semiserious industrialist in 0.0 and people who are living bit more far from high/low sec. CCP just got your life 10 times harder cause they are **ing clueless how 0.0 operates.
Donny Osmond Strategic Syndicate -Mostly Harmless-	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:21:00 - [59] Originally by: Vuk Lau This is **ing **ed but nothing else to be expected from 0.0 dev team who wants to limit force projection by raping industrialist and common John 0.0 Doe with this change. And the worst thing is giving only a week for a change to implement, while there is hundreds of things in backlog community is crying for years, but its more important for you guys to heal the frustrations and enjoy in drama on forums this change will cause. You are that really that horny to people up. Before usual trolls emerge, I need to point my alliance will be the least affected with this cause we have small territorial footprint and we live 10j from Jita and 3j from highsec. Also cynojammers are not any protection for long time, but I pitty all semiserious industrialist in 0.0 and people who are living bit more far from high/low sec. CCP just got your life 10 times harder cause they are **ing clueless how 0.0 operates.
kula kain	Posted - 2011.05.10 18:21:00 - [60] few words is all i have to say ccp your ruining the game you purchased second hand cause you dont know what the ** your doing.. stop ing up our game that we have worked the last 11 **ing years to accumulate.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 75 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.