Yes it's called EVE online

SiSi

Thanks for the free bump.

The whole point of pyfa/eft is to make sure it's cap stable before i waste 750+ mil on a module that i can't afford to waste.

I'd pay a billion for a module to make my ship CAP STABLE

it's better than sex

this fit:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=151704&find=unread

shows stable at: 22.5% in eve, 57% in eft and 48% in Eve HQ.

I'd pay a billion for a module to make my ship CAP STABLE

it's better than sex

Cap stability is overrated!

You can be pretty certain that none of them are correct. Pyfa and EFT use simplified models and the in-game fitting screen uses incorrect assumptions.The largest differentiator is that the fitting assumes that you are running the salvager and tractor beam constantly and that you fire the rails with whatever cap-eating ammo you've put into them at full tilt without ever reloading.

GǪnone of that happens, and as such, your cap draw is much lower than the game thinks.

Ok so i'm using Pyfa, EFT etc etc to setup ship fits, I do this mostly for Capacitor simulation but I have found that I get alot of conflicting results.

For example a fit I have for a loki in EveHQ's EFT is 62% stable, Pyfa says 71% stable and the ingame fitting screen says 43% stable.

My quiestion is, is there a fitting tool that gives accurate results regarding capacitor usage/stability?.

Thanks in advance.

is this even real or its this again /facepalm threat

In this thread:
- op posting about flying a ship what he can't afford
- likely on his main
- on general discussions forum

Perhaps not the wisest idea? Given the existence of in-game locater npc agents?

(Might as well point out both the ships and fittings forum and the forum devoted to eve related application development...)

You forgot:
- complaining about free tools not being 100% accurate

iirc eft calculates in terms of cap per second whereas pyfa accounts for cycle times and the recharge rate curve and all that stuff. So the pyfa figure is probably the accurate one

PYFA shows the wrong one actually. in PYFA the cap calculator shows much more stable cap than the other tools. I've heard EVE HQ is the most accurate from a friend who uses it, and I know EFT shows capacitors as just slightly more stable than in EVE.
and using the ingame fitting window to figure out cap stability is wrong as you it won't let you simulate situations in which modules are not in use etc., like MWDs being deactivated or Nos mods in use.
also PYFA has a horrible UI. so I'd rather use EFT(because i'm too lazy to use EVE HQ).

PYFA shows the wrong one actually. in PYFA the cap calculator shows much more stable cap than the other tools. I've heard EVE HQ is the most accurate from a friend who uses it, and I know EFT shows capacitors as just slightly more stable than in EVE.
and using the ingame fitting window to figure out cap stability is wrong as you it won't let you simulate situations in which modules are not in use etc., like MWDs being deactivated or Nos mods in use.
also PYFA has a horrible UI. so I'd rather use EFT(because i'm too lazy to use EVE HQ).

Have you tried to go on Sisi and test it there?
Usually thats the best tool to test any setup.

Was'nt complaining about the free tools which i've donated towards and supported for a few years, great bits of software and really helpfull, the original post was a question about wether or not there is a more accurate tool or other method of calculating cap better.

You forgot:
- complaining about free tools not being 100% accurate