Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Charlie Jacobson
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 15:24:00 -
[181]
Yes, please. If the test server is any indication, the current implementation of captain's quarters is just useless fluff.
|
Rui Morin
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 20:05:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Wendi Watson Agreed, just as there is a button to exit the hangar, there should be a button that for exiting your pod. To exit your pod every time you dock is stupid.
This tbh.
You should dock normally, as you do now into the hangar view you see now and then have a second button to exit pod and go into your CQ.
Doesn't sound unreasonable and gets round two issues:
1. The foolishness of getting out of your ship every single time you dock. Oh I need to get out of my ship now cos I left hangar without my repair paste and had to go back for it. Sorry, that is daft. 2. People who do not want to or can't run the CQ or are running multiple clients are free not to unpod.
|
Smoking Blunts
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 23:24:00 -
[183]
Originally by: Rui Morin
Originally by: Wendi Watson Agreed, just as there is a button to exit the hangar, there should be a button that for exiting your pod. To exit your pod every time you dock is stupid.
This tbh.
You should dock normally, as you do now into the hangar view you see now and then have a second button to exit pod and go into your CQ.
Doesn't sound unreasonable and gets round two issues:
1. The foolishness of getting out of your ship every single time you dock. Oh I need to get out of my ship now cos I left hangar without my repair paste and had to go back for it. Sorry, that is daft. 2. People who do not want to or can't run the CQ or are running multiple clients are free not to unpod.
this. why teh hell do i need to get out of my ship to unload it. what a stupid idea.
|
Kala Randar
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 03:00:00 -
[184]
I am already dreading the long waiting times I will have undocking and redocking everytime I just want to do something as simple as repair.... |
Nikki Sanderson
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 06:59:00 -
[185]
Strongly supported.
Just give us the hangar and add a new button next to "Undock" - make it "Unpod" and upon clicking it loads CQ.
I really don't get why my pilot would see the need to leave his pod and get dressed everytime he docks just to reship or load/unload cargo All RP aside, the hangar view is the most practical for your typical everyday spaceship action needs, and there is no good reason to remove it.
|
Della Monk
Broski Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 14:11:00 -
[186]
Right-click > Leave pod Right next to the leave ship item. It's not that hard, for ****'s sake.
|
Milo Caman
Anshar Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 14:36:00 -
[187]
+1 to the option. I don't want to have to **** around with 30 second load times when I want to switch a ship out quickly.
Why this is being forced, I don't know, because it's certainly a downgrade on what we have currently. ---
|
Azuse
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 23:38:00 -
[188]
Sadly you've made 2 errors.
1. The disable option is not disable, it's have a nice brown wall paper. It should have been disable, bring back old hanger (for which the models still exist)
2. Resource hog. Making my pc use more juice while afk in station than the most intense fleet fight is bad. My alt sped much of it's time afk in station, increasing my power bill by a factor of 4/5 is just not viable for me - for laptops it's simply not possible. This complete oversight will cost you subs (before plex increase is factored in).
3. Who likes brown wall paper? I mean of all the colours a designer could choose, brown? -------------------------
|
Zleon Leigh
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 23:55:00 -
[189]
Edited by: Zleon Leigh on 21/06/2011 23:55:52 Supported. Keep WiS optional and bring back spinning in hanger.
|
Ceq Lysander
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:04:00 -
[190]
I like it, I'll probably leave it turned on with one or two of the machines I play on, but want to keep it disabled on my laptop for performance reasons. I want the option to go ship spinning back too!
|
|
Juziri
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:19:00 -
[191]
Make it really optional, don't force everyone to use unfinished crap which burns out graphic cards or sit in front of an ugly wallpaper.
|
Ejit
STD contractors
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:22:00 -
[192]
CQ is fail. I want to spin my ship and turn all that stuff off.
|
mobius nm
Imperativa
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:23:00 -
[193]
Plus ****ing 1
There needs to be a commitment from CCP for a permanent solution to this nonsense. In its current form, a non-gameplay element in influencing gameplay (docking loading times, number of clients running). This is not acceptable.
|
usrevenge
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:30:00 -
[194]
|
TheDoctorUK
BSC LEGION Split Infinity.
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:32:00 -
[195]
Thanks CCP! Now instead of paying CCP for eve I have to buy plex and save up to buy new gfx card to play eve. Well done, and for that 4th account I was going to open, all ready thinking of liquidating the 3rd account and going back to 2. To cut my electric bill, WHEN DOCKED!
|
FunzzeR
The Wyld Hunt Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:37:00 -
[196]
Yes, please make this rubbish optional PRAISE THE SCOTTISH FOLD!!
THEIR WILL SHALL BE DONE!! |
Laoire Maguidhir
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:49:00 -
[197]
Edited by: Laoire Maguidhir on 22/06/2011 00:50:21 I would love to be able to opt out of CQ for the old interface. It brings nothing to the game that I can see and if I uncheck load station enviro I have to open fittings to see what ship I'm in. Disappointing at best.
|
heyItradestuff
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:49:00 -
[198]
bad cq is bad
|
Messy Beaver
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:51:00 -
[199]
-1 account because my barely 1 year old computer struggles to run 2 eve clients at the same time. I think CCP will be saving lots of players RL cash when there is no sense to most people running more than one. With one expansion CCP have turned EVE into a high end game. Some are complaining about how high the vanity items cost, imo they aren't high enough with the amount of secondary accounts you are about to lose. |
MartyMorgy
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:51:00 -
[200]
Edited by: MartyMorgy on 22/06/2011 00:51:36 Terrible, make optional.
|
|
Wasted Skillpoints
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:55:00 -
[201]
Please keep your crap expansions away from the actual eve gameplay.
|
Lordofpanda
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:02:00 -
[202]
I want to ship spin again
|
Hemo Toxine
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:03:00 -
[203]
Hey CCP, I'm not living in North Alaska, I don't need something to warm my flat !!!
My McBookpro will melt because of your crappy CQ !!!
Useless, power-consuming, laptop killer.
Want my old hangar view too !!!
|
DosCocacolasPorFavor
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:08:00 -
[204]
I'd rather have the old hangar back even if i can run it smoothly or not :/
<3 Old Hangar
|
William I Wolfen
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:12:00 -
[205]
Captains Quarters need to be optional. My computer may run it fine, but the controls are clunky as hell, and my whole computer runs so hot its ridiculous. Give me my old hangar view back, this stupid fixed image is annoying.
|
panterus29
Blame The Bunny The Dark Nation
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:18:00 -
[206]
should be an option after docking imo
|
Baron Holbach
Ammo and Tag Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:19:00 -
[207]
please make CQ/Incarna optional
i want back my old spin ship view and this is spaceship game mostly (walking in station is nice add, but that all)
|
Ava Stonlai
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:27:00 -
[208]
I don't know why I even have to ask for this.
|
Lakut
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:29:00 -
[209]
Originally by: panterus29 should be an option after docking imo
This.
Give back ship spinning. Most importantly, the issue is that this is already my signature. ---------- You get a wonderful view from the point of no return. |
zergl
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:30:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Ava Stonlai I don't know why I even have to ask for this.
Because of TEAM :AWESOME:...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |