| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Serpents smile
   |
Posted - 2011.06.23 12:34:00 -
[31]
Well the most urgent things I want are:
- The Station interior back with all its drag and drop functions.
- A convenient placed button where I can choose to use either CQ or Station interior and can switch from one to the other while I am in one of the two states.
- No frigging MT items at all *ever* that are not vanity items. No ammo or ships or skills or faction standings for AU ever. This is non-negatioable.
On the other hand I would not disagree if you would need AU to play games after CQ got developed more then the box it is now. If people want to trow away their money on that, not my problem.
- A group of selected players where CCP could test out some of their up coming stuff at, like say 4-6 people. Maybe chosen by the player base. This way if CCP comes up with a new "brilliant" idea they can present it to those selected players, and once they are done dodging darts, coffee/ thee mugs, dart-bords, laptops, shoes and high-heels they can ask those selected players what was wrong with their idea and see if they can come to terms with eachother, by that avoiding things like the current (MT) monocle debacle.
(Oh wait)
|
Republica Winder
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 12:43:00 -
[32]
1. End all RMT plans for EVE. RMT and sandbox CANNOT coexist.
2. A promise that ALL new items introduced to the game from now on will be either market seeded or seeded as blueprints.
3. Refund of all Aurum purchases.
If CCP doesn't do all three they'll never get a dime from me again. Hell, I already quit when the Incarna RMT shoe dropped a month ago. This one remaining account was one I forgot to cancel that auto renewed (it's now canceled).
|
Tobiaz
Spacerats
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 12:58:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Tobiaz on 23/06/2011 13:00:40
I want CCP puts their focus back on creating new gameplay content and fixes/balances. I want no more joke-expansions like Incarna that offer only eyecandy. MT-is fine, but I want it at acceptable prices and I want it to NEVER become CCP's core design philosophy, and only vanity items.
I want CCP Soundwave to be demoted to a simple coding monkey. I want CCP Zinfandel gone.
I want the CSM and the community to be 100% in the loop with every change and rebalance that CCP is planning. I want that the community gets to vote about big changes (because it's CCP that REALLY don't know what their customers want).
I also want my old Scorpion back, but I'm willing to settle on that
|
Olvel
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 13:05:00 -
[34]
 Originally by: Acac Sunflyier
I've been reading all night and I actually can't figure out what it is the community wants. Personally, I want MT's to cease and desist. I think some people are just upset about the price tag. And some just don't want it to grow. but am I wrong? What is it we want?
I really don't have a problem with microtransactions.
I played WoW for years - microtransactions existed, and didn't affect me as a gamer. I played LotR:O for a while, again, microtransactions didn't bother me. I've dabbled in far too many stupid FaceBook games to count, and never spent a cent on microtransactions.
What I want is to be able to continue playing my game without having to resort to microtransactions to survive.
Fine, if you want to pay real cash for a fancy monocle or a re-skinned ship or a slightly better gun or whatever, you go right ahead.
But I do not want to wind up in a situation where the only way to refuel a POS is with real cash.
I really think that microtransactions can be done in a way that makes everyone happy. In a way that earn CCP additional income, and makes players feel like they're getting something of value for their money, without completely alienating folks who choose not to participate. But we aren't there yet.
|
Grimpak
Gallente
The Whitehound Corporation
Frontline Assembly Point
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 13:08:00 -
[35]
I can kinda compromise.
I don't mind MT if it's for vanity only.
and I don't mind CQ if you have the old hangar view + "enter CQ" button.
---
Quote:
The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.
ain't that right. |
Freya Kesanlaulu
Minmatar
Arthashastra
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 13:17:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Mikal Morataya
Edited by: Mikal Morataya on 23/06/2011 10:53:12
I have no problem with MT/Aurum for vanity, customization, or such items.
Once you need Aurum (or someone does) to buy 'super' Scorch M, 'super' Hurricane etc etc I will seriously consider giving you all my stuff. I pay a monthly fee which is resonable and spend my isk ingame.
That is all.
Agree.
But if MT must exist, then I would like to see lower prices.
And the thing I would like the most - to enjoy Incarna, after I was waiting so much time for this expansion. I cannot turn on CQ even on low settings cause I have 2 fps, it's not playable. My computer in not that bad and old and can run many other games.... so I think the problem is not in my computer but in their optimization.
I'd really like that CCP fixes that problems, so I can finally walk in the station!
_______________________________
|
Bischopt
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 13:23:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Acac Sunflyier
I've been reading all night and I actually can't figure out what it is the community wants. Personally, I want MT's to cease and desist. I think some people are just upset about the price tag. And some just don't want it to grow. but am I wrong? What is it we want?
Exactly that for me. I want MT's gone as fast as possible. Also CQ should be optional.
|
Benedict Starkiller
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 13:39:00 -
[38]
a)Reinstate the old station hangar view and make it a configurable option between the CQ (They already have the code so should be as simple as adding an option to the config screen)
b)Sack the new GUI team for giving us gun icons that you canĘt tell the difference between. A lump of coal for a strip miner icon is really weak and just poorą an others a just grey blobsą !
c)Adjust the config screen to change Solid squares to hollow boxes (Idiotic to leave solid, looking at 5 options all solid are they active or not .. amazing stupidity ą !!)
d)Leave MT but ENSURE they stay VANITY only and not offer items that effect or assists the main gameplay.
e)Fix MT item values to make them realistic
f)Correct the numerous bugs that now exist and the many others that have existed for years
g)Add in the missing CQ for the other races ASAP
h)Bring proper character interactions and communal areas ASAP as CQ currently offers absolutely nothing other than increased CPU and GPU overheads
i)Permanently disband the CSM if they are endorsing the recent changes as they are clearly not representing the players interests
j)Concentrate on the BFF team and their mini fixes to improve the overall game experience
k)Look at the APB character editor as a benchmark and move to make Incarna what they did in 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WhOTrc5554
|
John McCreedy
Caldari
Eve Defence Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 13:41:00 -
[39]
The problem is that they've introduced a whole new currency based upon the purchase of PLEX. Now most people don't buy PLEX for real life currency, they purchase them for ISK to keep their accounts running because they can't afford to pay Eve's subscription with real life money. By introducing AURUM they've indirectly driven the cost of PLEX up which has a direct consequenceon certain players by making it more expensive to keep their accounts online. Why has the cost gone up? Clearly there is an anticipation for a market within Eve for MT on vanity items because people are trying to cash in on that anticipated market by selling PLEX for exorbitant prices. Whether there is a market, only time and CCP will tell but clearly in its present state, it's broken.
There's also a clear and understandable worry after seeing that "leaked" document (no comment has been made on its authenticity yet) that MT will go beyond vanity items and in to game changing (and therefore game breaking) items. This goes against the grain of a "sandbox" concept. This coming on the back of the draft price of $99 being pitched as a "nominal fee" for third party developers who, by and large, have made Eve what it is today, has simply lead to a large section of the community believing CCP are more intersted in profiteering than listening to their customers.
I personally have nothing against vanity items for your ship or your avatar so long as they don't give a competitive edge to a player. What I would like to see is it being used as an ISK sink, the scrapping of AURUM and purchase being made with good old ISK. I think we'd all like to see a public statement of assurance that Eve will not incorporate Micro Transactions that give a player a competitive edge or reward a player for certain actions (as suggested in the newsletter) and an improvement to community consultation on matters such as this in the future. As things stand right now, this is just the latest in a series of PR blunders by CCP.
Is greed good, CCP? Not when it bites the hand that feeds you.
Across the galaxy there is only war.
[center]
Website
Forums
[ur |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |