Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:04:00 -
[1]
I would pay that for the "opt out of Incarna" feature that gives me back the old hangar view. What other items/features would you buy for 100k AUR ?
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
REDNECKMINING
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:05:00 -
[2]
An ISK printer.
|
Volyte
Immortalis Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:05:00 -
[3]
A Blue response.
|
Lucy Light
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:06:00 -
[4]
win button
I like to eat one nutella sandwich for breakfast |
Duran Sarn
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:06:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Duran Sarn on 23/06/2011 19:06:54 Crosspost from my thread:
Originally by: Duran Sarn Please add more super expensive Vanity items to the NeX. I want to throw all of my money away for internet pixels so people see what kind of a special snowflake I am.
Also bonused modules and ships would be great too, I hate other players who are better than me. I finally want to get some kills, too. How about a special NeX frigate for 20,000 AUR that can mount a BFG9001 turret for 80,000 AUR?
To all the haters: Money rules the world. Deal with being poor and not spending all your money for a MMO.
PS: The new CQ looks great and it adds so much more gameplay value to the game. Keep it up!
|
Lynx Amurie
Caldari Rage For Order Nihil-Obstat
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:06:00 -
[6]
Walking in Stations, not Walking In A Minmatar Storage Closet With An Inexplicable Amount Of Stuff
|
Herping yourDerp
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:07:00 -
[7]
I'd purchase CCP for that much and stop the game from sucking, probably make back too because its obvious so many ways for ccp to make both crowds happy. make incarna optional= magically everyone who hates CQ is appeased make cheaper things in NEX store = magically the monocle is a joke
|
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:07:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Razin on 23/06/2011 19:07:07
Originally by: Akita T I would pay that for the "opt out of Incarna" feature that gives me back the old hangar view.
... If you like choice please support this topic in the Assembly Hall. Thanks.
|
Tammarr
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:09:00 -
[9]
How much isk you got tied into the PLEX market thats not going up up up in value as you you want Akitie since they introduced high aur pricing to not explode the PLEX demand and hence cost?
|
Raid'En
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:09:00 -
[10]
dual monocle of course
|
|
Lappa
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:10:00 -
[11]
The Empyrean Age.
|
Slatiska Wolfovna
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:11:00 -
[12]
100k aurums being 571 euros at 20 euros per PLEX I would buy one hell of a graphic card to play CQ with medium settings! --- Better I spend my subscription fee on hookers rather than monocles; at least they pretend to care about me.
|
Brego Tralowski
Galactic Extensive Technologies SUB ROSA ALLIANCE
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:11:00 -
[13]
I would like 1 mill SP per 1000 Aur to do with as I please.
----------------------------- Fail expansion is still fail. |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:12:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Tammarr How much isk you got tied into the PLEX market
I have about 6 PLEX in the RR system and none in any of my hangars. _
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Discrodia
Gallente Symbiosis International Moose Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:12:00 -
[15]
Replacing everyone who joined CCP in the last 2 years with everyone who left during those 2 years.
Originally by: anonymous WE JUST DID SCIENCE!
|
Tugrath Akers
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:12:00 -
[16]
A Karate Kid headband.
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:21:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Discrodia Replacing everyone who joined CCP in the last 2 years with everyone who left during those 2 years.
Now, now, that must surely cost a few billion AUR...
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Terianna Eri
Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:22:00 -
[18]
I would like the ability to redirect CCP's effort to gameplay improvments rather than "how can we best sugar the fact that we want to milk more money from you" improvements. ________________
|
Erai
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:23:00 -
[19]
Kind of depends on whether those 100k AUR would represent 571 of my dollars or 11.5 billion of my ISK
In the latter case, I'd be happy to buy something totally whimsical for it -a Leisure Suit Larry style jacuzzi for example. In the former case... hell, I probably spent more then 571 dollars on Eve already as it is, like hell I'd do that again for something that merely looks pretty.
(By the way, I don't really see the difference, gamewise between the old and the new view: the icons are the same, you can still watch your ship in the hangar...) |
Prince Kobol
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:24:00 -
[20]
How about some vaseline for the butt****ing we just got of CCP
|
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:26:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Erai By the way, I don't really see the difference, gamewise between the old and the new view: the icons are the same, you can still watch your ship in the hangar...
The difference is in the nearly triple GPU usage and the extra wear and tear on the machine that goes with it when you load it (and the extra power use, extra heat, etc). Looking at a static door is not that nice in comparison to the old hangar. And we might not even get to keep that option (to display the static image) for long, according to the corresponding devblog. _
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Herping yourDerp
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:32:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Erai By the way, I don't really see the difference, gamewise between the old and the new view: the icons are the same, you can still watch your ship in the hangar...
The difference is in the nearly triple GPU usage and the extra wear and tear on the machine that goes with it when you load it (and the extra power use, extra heat, etc). Looking at a static door is not that nice in comparison to the old hangar. And we might not even get to keep that option (to display the static image) for long, according to the corresponding devblog.
dont forget it takes 5 times longer to do something simple as put more ammo in my ship.
|
General Xenophon
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:33:00 -
[23]
Edited by: General Xenophon on 23/06/2011 19:33:48 Spawn a decent Developer who cares about players and has the power and authority to do it, generator. Easily priceless.
|
Darveses
Fantastulousification Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:34:00 -
[24]
A pair of socks.
|
Mey Alman
Jonferson Space Dynamics Division
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:37:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Herping yourDerp dont forget it takes 5 times longer to do something simple as put more ammo in my ship.
No it doesn't. In fact the new CQ takes half the time to load than the old hangar view did for me.
|
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:38:00 -
[26]
A Disguise Kit just like in Ultima Online ---
Originally by: CCP Greyscale Is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?
|
jadal colmag
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:40:00 -
[27]
some shoelaces
|
Dalmont Delantee
Gallente Shiloh Technologies
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:42:00 -
[28]
A couple of DEV's resignations Take comfort in knowing that its probably some pimply faced twit, or 40 year old virgin, who gleens everytime mommy offfers to take them to needle point lessons |
Herping yourDerp
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:48:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Erai By the way, I don't really see the difference, gamewise between the old and the new view: the icons are the same, you can still watch your ship in the hangar...
The difference is in the nearly triple GPU usage and the extra wear and tear on the machine that goes with it when you load it (and the extra power use, extra heat, etc). Looking at a static door is not that nice in comparison to the old hangar. And we might not even get to keep that option (to display the static image) for long, according to the corresponding devblog.
dont forget it takes 5 times longer to do something simple as put more ammo in my ship.
|
Rhuu
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:51:00 -
[30]
XL Ion Crotchblasters, because men deserve to have as wide a range of endowment options as women.
Bonus points if I can blast steaming ten foot wide *******holes in the walls of my CQ upon plugging in my testicular magnetic stabilizer implants.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |