EVE Search - An overdue apology and request for parley

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

An overdue apology and request for parley

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 19 post(s)
FantomChaser	Posted - 2011.06.24 15:53:00 - [1] ive read a few of the good posts. i must admit yes ccp is growing the inflation is here and we still only pay around the 15$ a month ... considering the amount of players dont grow in that huge amount they have to go for the MT deal... but heres is the problem im fine with MT aslong its for EYE CANDY and not power.. for example that idea selling a scorpion with a differnt skin its fine ASLONG you also have to give them a scorpion ... so you dont just get a ship created out of thin air because.. all ready now its clearly to see eve as it is atm will come to a flatation at some point because if we get 1b new isk every month we only pay 200m to npcs... its fine that the whole marked is now created and supported by the players but by doing so we lost a big outgoing amount of isk every month... and then by further doing ppl can buy a ship that is spawned of thin air it will make the inflation worse.. and as ccp is working atm it for me sounds like it will be the people with alot of irl money that has the biggest part to say so we will start as some F2P games and browser games... sure you can play but if you want some power you must pay so in the end we will have alliances saying you can only join if you r willing to use xxx amount of money per month.. and so forth.. id rather have they fixed alot of the 0.0 issues and used more resourses changin the code to a new and better one but i guess ccp wont lisen to all these players who are so kind to give you hints and constructive critism and not just ***** without giving a hint what should and shouldnt be done
FantomChaser	Posted - 2011.06.24 16:21:00 - [2] Originally by: Antihrist Pripravnik Edited by: Antihrist Pripravnik on 24/06/2011 15:57:53 Originally by: Jonny Foreigner Am loving the Hypocrisy of: "I'm protesting in game advantage for money by cancelling my multiple account" You do realise that multiple accounts is an in game advantage that you pay for? Hypocrisy? Are you really that blind? Here, let me explain it for you: - Blueprints are seeded on the market for ISK. You need a POS and fuel to research it. You need to mine materials to build it. Then you have a product ready for invention or ready to be used in LP store's blueprints as a base item for production of the faction mods. Parties involved: - Blueprint researchers - Manufacturers - Planetary Interaction (POS modules and fuel) - Ice miners (POS fuels) - Highsec ore miners (low-end T1 materials) - 0.0/Wormhole miners (high-end T1 materials + Morphite) - Mission runners (LP store for faction mods) - Inventors Now fast forward to MT system: - Blueprints for things that have alternatives in the existing production lines are seeded on NEX for cash. * Blueprint researchers get screwed (not profitable to research) >>> Planetary Interaction get screwed (BP researchers don't consume POS modules and fuel)... hell even DUST get screwed even before it goes live (no initiative to set up or fight for a useless PI colony) >>> Ice miners get screwed (ice fuel lost a POS market) >>> Inventors get screwed and datacore market collapses >>> exploration get screwed (data interfaces are made from COSMOS/exploration materials) Depending on the quality and performance of the MT item: Mission runners get screwed (LP store item prices failscade) If you seed a whole module/ship in the store you'll kill ore miners and manufacturers and collapse the whole economy too. It's not about what you can get for cash or with multiple accounts... it's about destroying every single industrial profession in EVE with one MT swing. You need effort to maintain multiple accounts, you need planning, spreadsheets, calculations, observation of the market, hauling/logistics, business agreements with miners, your own POS,... (the list goes on and on) to be able to use those accounts in their full capacity and it actually boosts the economy and helps out those who are playing a different type of the game. With MT in place, one can be just another rich bastard with no life that will conveniently cash out his "production line" with no effort at all while selfishly monopolizing production to the point where other players find it unprofitable or not fun to engage in any of the industrial activities. Please tell me that those two things are the same. Signed
FantomChaser	Posted - 2011.06.24 20:36:00 - [3] haha i just watched this episode and agreed with my Friend that Cartman is defently Hillmar :P watch ya self :P http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6VSKJzWBU0
FantomChaser	Posted - 2011.06.26 19:05:00 - [4] well seems we got a little answer now http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=934 lets see what they will pull out hopefully a full written line signed by the ceo they will never sell ships ammo or other stuff that will have impact in the game economic or power wise ... but only selling eye candy

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.