| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
From what I can tell, EVE is the only one with a steadily growing playerbase. Or is at least the largest one. With sub based MMOs being a dying breed, this is rather surprising.
What might help this is the fact that EVE has built the game from the ground up to support subscriptions and, to my knowledge, no game functions with it better. This game simply wouldn't work as well being free to play or buy to play.
Will EVE outlast the competition going into a world where subs for MMOs just isn't palpable? What do you think? |

Ensign X
211
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Huh? |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Do you think EVE will be the last of the sub based MMOs still functioning? |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
736
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
We will always be the dead star that orbits the WoW planet. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
rodyas wrote:We will always be the dead star that orbits the WoW planet. My crystal ball says they're going to change their feelings on free to play when their subs drop low enough.
Then again, I got the thing at Wal-mart so I wouldn't trust it. *shrug* |

Ambo
I've Got Nothing
32
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Actually, eve is free to play. As long as you have/make enough isk to buy a plex a month.
I suspect that if it wasn't for this mechanism, subscriber nuMbers would be a fair bit lower. |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
199
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
Most 2006 and earlier MMO's are sub based. Dark Age of Camelot I think has title on oldest. I don't know that for certain though.
WoW, EQ, older MMO's with deep roots in the Veteran group. EVE will be around as long as any of them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg-_HeVNYOk
Save Derpy! |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:51:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ambo wrote:Actually, eve is free to play. As long as you have/make enough isk to buy a plex a month.
I suspect that if it wasn't for this mechanism, subscriber nuMbers would be a fair bit lower.
Someone still has to pay for the PLEx though. And it's still a time investment to continue playing. |

Paul Oliver
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2209
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rift is a subscription based game, and I believe it's population is still rising. Thing is their are only so many people willing to pay a subscription to play a video game, thus limiting the overall growth potential for such games, which is probably why most MMOs seem to go the F2P route. "Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must undergo the fatigues of supporting it." - Thomas Paine |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Paul Oliver wrote:Rift is a subscription based game, and I believe it's population is still rising. Thing is their are only so many people willing to pay a subscription to play a video game, thus limiting the overall growth potential for such games, which is probably why most MMOs seem to go the F2P route.
Sad to say, but RIFT's population spiked.
Shame too since it was quite interesting. |

Nyla Skin
Maximum fun chamber
82
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 05:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
The biggest problem with free2play is that the IQ of the playerbase seems to go down dramatically and the idiocy in general chat goes up. Eve has so many players that kind of already like that here, but there are games where the change has been quite dramatic.
Its kind of like if you need to go to a public toilet. As public WC's go, you would rather use one that charges 10 pence or something insignificant instead of going to one that is completely free. Because that 10p is enough to keep the drug addicts, hobos and such from making a mess of the inside. The ones that you need to pay for are much cleaner inside. |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Nyla Skin wrote:The biggest problem with free2play is that the IQ of the playerbase seems to go down dramatically and the idiocy in general chat goes up. Eve has so many players that kind of already like that here, but there are games where the change has been quite dramatic.
Its kind of like if you need to go to a public toilet. As public WC's go, you would rather use one that charges 10 pence or something insignificant instead of going to one that is completely free. Because that 10p is enough to keep the drug addicts, hobos and such from making a mess of the inside. The ones that you need to pay for are much cleaner inside.
To be fair, if there's any game that can drive off an idiot, it's EVE.
"Only 9 days to get into a battleship? WOOHOO!"
*9 days later*
"OMG I lost my battleship! Why didn't anyone tell me losses are permanent!? This game sucks. *leaves*"
Actually, to be honest I can't imagine this game functioning as well under free to play or even buy to play because of how well subscriptions are integrated. It allows people with more money than time to catch up with their friends easily with the PLEx system. And the skill system is clearly built around subscriptions. |

Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
150
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided. |

pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
590
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
nothing is free to play not even F2P if youplay a F2p game eventually you wiill pay just to pass a certain level cap or you will pay to use a certain powerfull item etc etc eventually you pay more than what you pay for a sub Second F2p works fine on a MMO with 100 s of different serrvers EvE is not, introducing F2P will create a unnbalance between people willi ng to pay for their toys and people who can't afford it or are not willing to pay for it I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
112
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:17:00 -
[15] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:nothing is free to play not even F2P if youplay a F2p game eventually you wiill pay just to pass a certain level cap or you will pay to use a certain powerfull item etc etc eventually you pay more than what you pay for a sub Second F2p works fine on a MMO with 100 s of different serrvers EvE is not, introducing F2P will create a unnbalance between people willi ng to pay for their toys and people who can't afford it or are not willing to pay for it
What you describe is bad free to play MMOs.
Good free to play games allow playing for free to be palpable while still giving plenty of reasons to pay some money. League of Legends, while not a true MMO, has this aspect down pat and that's one of the reasons why it is so popular today. |

Astroniomix
Thorn Project
180
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lilianna Star wrote:
EDIT: To elaborate on that further, the mentality that WoW built up is that you're worthless until cap level. With the current skill system, it might encourage players not to play until they have all their skills up to par. Since time is free. But if players are paying for their time, it encourages them to make better use of it and get the experience they need to flourish.
You also have to keep in mind the fact that in order to PVP in WoW you have to resign yourself to getting curbstomped by total mouthbreathers for a while, and for no other reason than their gear is better than yours.
EvE PVP, no amount of officer equipment can help an idiot do well. |

Nyla Skin
Maximum fun chamber
82
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided.
This I agree with.. |

Astroniomix
Thorn Project
181
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:30:00 -
[18] - Quote
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided. This statement is so untrue as to not even be funny. As I already said in my earlier post, a skilled player will beat a well geared player ALL-DAY-LONG. |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ioci wrote:Dark Age of Camelot I think has title on oldest. UO's older. There is still a sub based MUD or two as well. WWII Online is still sub Ryzom is sub
f2p is just not good for sandbox mmo's, and sadly this stupid f2p rage makes seeing more sandbox games even more doubtful than it already is. |

Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
151
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 06:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
Astroniomix wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided. This statement is so untrue as to not even be funny. As I already said in my earlier post, a skilled player will beat a well geared player ALL-DAY-LONG.
I know huge swathes of people that purchase plex to replace lost ships instead of farming or mining like players use to in the past... The options to invest real life cash to purchase a plex which is then used to obtain large amounts of in game currency is exactly pay to win, regardless of which way you want to spin it.
|

William Walker
House Aratus Fatal Ascension
73
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Webvan wrote:WWII Online is still sub
WWII online went free to play  |

Astroniomix
Thorn Project
186
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:14:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Astroniomix wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided. This statement is so untrue as to not even be funny. As I already said in my earlier post, a skilled player will beat a well geared player ALL-DAY-LONG. I know huge swathes of people that purchase plex to replace lost ships instead of farming or mining like players use to in the past... The options to invest real life cash to purchase a plex which is then used to obtain large amounts of in game currency is exactly pay to win, regardless of which way you want to spin it. I guess if you define having stuff as "winning".
They can't gain any tactical advantage by paying more RL iskies that I myself cannot gain from just spending in game iskies. |

Paul Oliver
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2227
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one. "Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must undergo the fatigues of supporting it." - Thomas Paine |

Alphaphi
Lost Society Get Off My Lawn
16
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:18:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Astroniomix wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided. This statement is so untrue as to not even be funny. As I already said in my earlier post, a skilled player will beat a well geared player ALL-DAY-LONG. I know huge swathes of people that purchase plex to replace lost ships instead of farming or mining like players use to in the past... The options to invest real life cash to purchase a plex which is then used to obtain large amounts of in game currency is exactly pay to win, regardless of which way you want to spin it.
That's not pay to win.
no matter how much plex they buy, and how many ships they replace, it still won't change the fact that said player might not have proper skills trained to support the ships potential, thus leaving him to more fail and lost ships. you are not getting anything superior that non-plexing players can't get, the only thing that you are getting is your items (which all other players can obtain and use just as good with the same skills as you trained) therefore, it's not pay to win.
Paul Oliver wrote:But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one.
they can afford to lose it, and replace it. which brings us back to one of the most basic rules of eve: if you can't afford to lose it, don't fly it. players who fly those ships, buying Plex or not, can usually afford to replace it. unless they are carebearing high-sec missioners that likes to pimp their vindicator out with officer fittings. |

Astroniomix
Thorn Project
186
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:21:00 -
[25] - Quote
Paul Oliver wrote:But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one. But they can't get anything that I cant by simply playing the game.
My point is that it's not "pay to win" It's more like "pay extra to be slightly less inconvenienced" |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:29:00 -
[26] - Quote
William Walker wrote:Webvan wrote:WWII Online is still sub WWII online went free to play  Hmm? I just reactivated a month three months ago. *checks* oh... it's a tier trial. Ryzom did the same, you get access up to a point, then you need to sub to go further, not really the free to pay model. |

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries Alliance not Found
61
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 07:44:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ambo wrote:Actually, eve is free to play. As long as you have/make enough isk to buy a plex a month. PLEX isn't really a F2P system. If I had to give it a name I'd probably call it a Deferred Subscription system because in buying PLEX to keep your account active you're actually getting someone else to pay your sub.
|

Alayna Le'line
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 08:14:00 -
[28] - Quote
Lilianna Star wrote:pussnheels wrote:nothing is free to play not even F2P if youplay a F2p game eventually you wiill pay just to pass a certain level cap or you will pay to use a certain powerfull item etc etc eventually you pay more than what you pay for a sub Second F2p works fine on a MMO with 100 s of different serrvers EvE is not, introducing F2P will create a unnbalance between people willi ng to pay for their toys and people who can't afford it or are not willing to pay for it What you describe is bad free to play MMOs. Good free to play games allow playing for free to be palpable while still giving plenty of reasons to pay some money. League of Legends, while not a true MMO, has this aspect down pat and that's one of the reasons why it is so popular today.
Unfortunately good free to play games are the exception, not the rule. Most F2P games are glorified shareware where you can only get so far before you have to start paying (because you run out of stuff to do and have to buy new expansions/missions/whatever), can only play a limited set of races/classes (hey, EVE is free, but you can only fly Amarr up to frigates and cruisers, but for only Gé¼5 you can also fly BC and for anothter Gé¼5 you can fly battleships and for $15 you can fly Caldari too!... You get the idea)
Doing F2P or even microtransactions "right" is very hard and the vast majority of games fails at it because greed takes the upper hand and the regular content suffers. One example: EverQuest 2 has a carpentry class that crafts furniture to put in people's houses (read, CQ) since Sony figured out they could make money selling furniture through the ingame shop the amount of interesting additions to the profession has been reduced to almost 0. While arguably this is just fluff it's still part of the "normal" gameplay and as such does affect players negatively.
So while most people don't much care about the CQ clothing (as it's totally outside "regular" EVE gameplay) an argument could be made that selling ship skins is affecting regular EVE gameplay and as such should be off limits for RMT selling, I'm sure a long argument could be formulated either way (and I'm sure there will be once we get to that stage)
Back on topic, EVE has the advantage that there is really not much content beyond what players provide, it's a lot easier to keep paying a sub when you still get the feeling that you are getting something for your money, unlike most other MMOs where you'll have run out of content to do 6 months before the next major update, making it sort of hard to justify paying the sub, quitting otoh means you most likely lose your guild, so starting again gets harder again especially if there's a monetary cost attached to starting again (need to find new guild + need to pay sub + need to buy expansion).
Being F2P removes or at least lowers this monetary barrier and makes it easier for people that have quit to get back into the game once an update has been released. Ultimately though I think it's just the game model for those kinds of games that is failing as people eventually will stop coming back for the next update, so the decline of those MMOs that are/went F2P might have slowed down but imho they're still declining, just slower. |

Lilianna Star
SAZI Enterprises The Aslyum
114
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 08:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
Astroniomix wrote:Paul Oliver wrote:But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one. But they can't get anything that I cant by simply playing the game. My point is that it's not "pay to win" It's more like "pay extra to be slightly less inconvenienced" Pay to save time. And when you do it, you are putting real money on the line.
Spoiled kids with rich parents are the exception, not the rule. Other rich people don't have a lot of time on their hands (Typically) so this is a good way to help them catch up. |

Astroniomix
Thorn Project
188
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 08:40:00 -
[30] - Quote
Lilianna Star wrote:Astroniomix wrote:Paul Oliver wrote:But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one. But they can't get anything that I cant by simply playing the game. My point is that it's not "pay to win" It's more like "pay extra to be slightly less inconvenienced" Pay to save time. And when you do it, you are putting real money on the line. Spoiled kids with rich parents are the exception, not the rule. Other rich people don't have a lot of time on their hands (Typically) so this is a good way to help them catch up. It also gives everyone else pretty loot pinatas to shoot. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |