Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ryea Eripmav
Caldari Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:27:00 -
[91]
X.
To quote an EVE-Online Facebook comment on the Dev Blog "Fearless, virtual goods and rage":
Quote: "I would be more than happy to combine my EVE subscription with a DUST514 subscription, say for $3-5 more a month or something"
Ideally, yeah -I'd like to do away with MT but there's a weakness in the armor against it with PLEX in play. Probably can't undo that. But if MT are to take place, please limit it to ONLY "fluff." -----------------------------------------------
(\_/) (O.o) (> <) The Bunny strikes again, on his way to world domination.
"...The bunny, the bunny Oh! I love the bunny..." |
Tarix Loken
Amarr Pandorum Research Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:32:00 -
[92]
same thought crossed my mind today, 20 might be a bit steep but i would pay more than the standard fee if its MT free!
X
|
Velios
M. Corp -Mostly Harmless-
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:33:00 -
[93]
NO.
CCP would want their $20 AND MT at the same time. |
Morgan Polaris
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:35:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Morgan Polaris on 25/06/2011 16:35:19 No. $15 (although I pay EUR 15, do the math) is plenty to develop and run an MMO without MT.
edit: paid.
Donations accepted: 1BpQEYT7aSUNM863BV67FPxyv1cpxr74uu |
Holly Cleland
Special Operations Foxhound
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:36:00 -
[95]
Get out.
It's expensive enough as it is, other MMOs give you more for your money and better quality of service than EVE ever could for the same price, and even now, EVE resources are being taken away to fund their other projects, so your money would be wasted on these other projects that CCP want to work on instead of what you want them to work on, get a clue man, this isn't how business works, MT isn't a last resort, they're just over extending themselves with 2 different projects that aren't generating any revenue, meanwhile EVE goes to hell.
|
El'Niaga
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:37:00 -
[96]
Honestly what's really come out the last 2 years, not worth 20 dollars a month. The problem is your asking for an increase not to improve or maintain EVE but so that they can funnel more money like the last 2 years into DUST and WOD. Honestly they need to delay WOD until after DUST is completed and released so they have the additional revenue stream they need to complete WOD. Then once WOD is out you take the revenue from the three to make a new project and so on.
I don't think they have a good plan for their aurum though.
|
Dragan Moonraker
Rheinbraun Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:51:00 -
[97]
Originally by: SciWolf This idea might save EvE as it is now. And i truly want it so.
I'd do this if they take Aurum out of the game.
|
Swren1
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:52:00 -
[98]
X
|
Sgt Maru
Shadowed Command Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:55:00 -
[99]
X
If CCP wants more money, that's fine, but don't destroy something that so many love just to increase your profits.
|
Vin Hellsing
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:56:00 -
[100]
Don't give them ideas.
Also, they already charge $20 effectively through PLEX. Look how that's working out...
|
|
Kali Omega
Pitch Black.
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:57:00 -
[101]
X
Im all for it
|
Anna Maziarczyk
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:58:00 -
[102]
Edited by: Anna Maziarczyk on 25/06/2011 17:58:35 X
I wouldpay 19.99 a month
If and ONLY IF
They removed ALL MT form the game.
did spaceflight<--->docked<---->CQ
And started actually developing content for EVE.
And, send all employees to Ethics classes. STARTING WITH THE CHIEF ICELAND MANS.
|
Spookyjay
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 18:02:00 -
[103]
No and no to MT. CCP use to make profit off eve till they over-expanded projects. You do not make your existing customer base suffer for your mistakes. They need to scale back. If they developed EVE properly they would make more cash any way. Hey they could of even MT for vanity items if we could of trusted them that is as far as it would of gone. But no they got greedy and wanted more faster. I see no reason we should pay more either way.
NO to MT for ingame advantage. No to EVE sub for WOD development.
CCP can get funding for other games same way they got it for eve. From banks and investors. Screw our sub's boosting other game development.
|
Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 20:51:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Maltrus As it has been stated before there is already MT in the game you short sighted fools and don't give me the whole " But CCP will do ships and ammo" So? I mean if I want to i can buy plex after plex and get isk to BUY an already established char. I don't see people up in arms around this. I am sorry but you don't have a leg to stand on here.
Okay, I'd be fine with removing PLEX, if that's what it takes. There's a huge difference, in that one supports the economy and one destroys it, but if people can't manage to grasp that, scrap the whole thing.
|
Super Mommabear
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 20:53:00 -
[105]
I read the title of this thread and wanted to go to subway
|
Elizers
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 20:59:00 -
[106]
I already pay 20$ pr month. But ye 20USD and 15 Eur is fair.
|
Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:00:00 -
[107]
Originally by: Comy 1 I would quit EVE instantly the day I can't buy game time with ISK. If you want to remove all MT from the game you will have to remove the PLEX. Which is my que to leave.
Okay, so it's now your job to explain why to keep PLEX in the game, and how it's different. I paid my subscription every month, never bought or sold a PLEX, and I'm tired of explaining over and over and over how PLEX->isk works with the economy. Players don't get that, so PLEX may need to go as well. If you want PLEX and benefit from them, defend them.
I'm now happy to scrap the whole PLEX/AUR plan and hunt the botters and macroers that pop up. They did less damage to the game than CCP is doing now.
|
Illwill Bill
For a fistful of Veldspar
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:01:00 -
[108]
Sure thing.
FREE HELICITY |
Portmanteau
Gallente CTRL-Q
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:03:00 -
[109]
No, if they cannot keep this game going on one of the most expensive subs on the market it means they are using too much of our cash for developing WOD etc... I am not made of money Turbefield for CEO
|
Ianus
Caldari Geminus Gateway
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:05:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Portmanteau No, if they cannot keep this game going on one of the most expensive subs on the market it means they are using too much of our cash for developing WOD etc... I am not made of money
This ^
|
|
Zverofaust
Gallente Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:07:00 -
[111]
Originally by: Ghoest You realize youre offering to pay more money solely so they can develop other games instead of EVE.
Unavoidable at this point. CCP are looking for ways to increase profitability of Eve Online, for whatever reason. Their plan is ******ed. Even an increase in subscription fees of $1 a month would gain them a lot more money in both the short and long term than their stupid MT ideas.
X!
|
Shorty Loot
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:08:00 -
[112]
****heads. this will end in 20 bugs + macrotransactions for balancechanging items.
|
Gordon Hellbender
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:12:00 -
[113]
Hell no, i'm not paying 20$ a month to fund YOUR AUR needs. More people will quit the game than we've already seen from this whole drama if they raised the monthly payment.
If you don't like the AUR option, then don't use it, simple as that.
|
Dirritat'z Demblin
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 01:53:00 -
[114]
X
|
Vikarion
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 01:58:00 -
[115]
X.
I'd do it. If they really need more money, I understand. Just don't ruin the game! - - -
Originally by: CCP Pann If you have something to say, IĘd like very much to hear it.
Originally by: Hilmar this is one of the moments where we look at what our players do and less of what they say. |
Callisto Ares
Companion Cube Industries
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 01:59:00 -
[116]
Edited by: Callisto Ares on 26/06/2011 02:01:16 No. Make that a **** no.
CCP has already shown how irresponsible they are with the current subscription price of $15/mo per account in overextending themselves support 3 studios and 3 different games solely on the back of Eve-Online revenue which they've steadily been squeezing to bring in more money over the last year or two.
A responsible company would have kept their team sizes and costs down, or only worked on one project with their revenue, but they decided to finance everything without any regard to impact and repercussions it would have on the vision and game design for Eve-Online and it's player driven sandbox.
As long as they have PLEX, and their game design continues to force players into using multiple subscriptions where people are actually paying $30, $45, $60/mo for a single MMO.. NO I wouldn't support a $5/mo increase across the board. I don't even support the current design which is so exploitive of their customers even before the Microtransaction push was made.
As customers we've been very tolerant, grudgingly accepting changes like PLEX in the promise it would combat RMT even though we knew it was primarily a income source for CCP, we've looked past the Ghost training nerf that made paying for multiple accounts at least somewhat affordable, we've supported many projects like the Eve Magazine, Maps, CCP Store, events, etc.. all to 'support' what we thought was a company committed to a quality product while sharing the same vision as its playerbase for a open single shard world driven and owned by the players with a full player driven economy.
Then we find out the only thing they care about is the $$$?
You give them $20/mo per account they'll just keep spending it on other projects and blow it like they have been for the last couple of years without developing or improving Eve-Online one single bit in any measurable way. How long have Eve players stuck with this game hoping for that eventually promise of lag free fleet engagements and 0.0 system that actually works? You can only pay so long and so much for a dream.
They already had my $45/mo in 3 accounts, and failed. I'm not going to pay them $60, let alone $20 for one. Nobody else should fall for that BS either until CCP gets their house in order first. |
Nikki West
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:00:00 -
[117]
No. ---
Free LIANG, Free HELICITY, Free ANGEL HUN |
Bischopt
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:02:00 -
[118]
Paying CCP an extra 5 bucks a month so they wont milk money out of me? Doesnt really sound right.
|
Harcosi
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:05:00 -
[119]
No, that would be an increase of $35 a month for me.
If they can't keep their company afloat, cancel Dust, it's going to fail anyway.
|
Brian Ingram
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 02:08:00 -
[120]
X
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |