| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Veinnail
FinFleet
   |
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:42:00 -
[1]
If CCP wants to increase income by Adding a vanity exchange, good!
Us older players understand how proud CCP is of thier player driven economy.
The things that we can absolutely expect from the Noble shop, Clothing, Decor, and other in station Accessories. Otherwise things that would not otherwise shift the player driven economy like, remaps, Standings, or paint jobs are also to be expected.
I support these possibilities, and honestly hope that a substantial portion of the extra revenue gets redistributed into EVEs staff. Many of the Angry players dont want to contribute to the development of "other games".
Good luck in your other projects CCP. keep it coming.
-vein
|
Valei Khurelem
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:44:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Valei Khurelem on 26/06/2011 05:44:24
 Quote:
more content = more revenue.
fixt
By introducing Micro-transactions CCP are simply taking the short term and lazy option since they can't be bothered making fully working expansions and game content anymore.
You don't need money to make game content, you need effort.
|
VeloxMors
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:44:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Valei Khurelem
Quote:
more bugs = more revenue.
fixt
ftfy
|
Da Gooch
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:45:00 -
[4]
my last troll for tonight
Another useless thread, in b4 it hits page 20+
night
|
Usuotas
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:45:00 -
[5]
Just woke up?
They are making two more games out of EVE revenue. Eve is done for...
----------------
Women - can't live with them........the end. - Al Bundy |
Ingvar Angst
Amarr
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:45:00 -
[6]
More revenue from Eve = more content for Dust and WoD
FREE Helicity and Niang! |
Alara IonStorm
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:45:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Veinnail
Otherwise things that would not otherwise shift the player driven economy like, remaps, Standings, or paint jobs are also to be expected.
I just want them to say this outloud.
|
Demon Azrakel
Gallente
Defiant..
Narwhals Ate My Duck
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:45:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Valei Khurelem on 26/06/2011 05:44:24
Quote:
more content = more revenue.
For DUST 514 and WoD, sure...
What about EVE?
|
nota spyalt
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:46:00 -
[9]
yeah, ccp could then promise more content, 5 years later we could get a small piece of it, while they start promising even better stuff that we know will never see the light of tranq.....
|
Adunh Slavy
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:46:00 -
[10]
Satndings are not vanity. Remaps are not vanity.
My faith in CCP will return SoonÖ |
|
|
Mavrelyn
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:46:00 -
[11]
I support the vanity shop in all it's just they said they'd add in performance enhancing items into the shop, And that in totality is what people are mad at.
|
AnzacPaul
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:47:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Veinnail
If CCP wants to increase income by Adding a vanity exchange, good!
Us older Dev Alts dont understand how out of touch CCP is of thier player driven economy.
-vein
FFY
|
Veinnail
FinFleet
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:47:00 -
[13]
quit speculating about the game industry when you have no perspective.
|
Zeg Quul
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:48:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Zeg Quul on 26/06/2011 05:48:21
Looking forward new monocle types
|
Fractal Muse
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:52:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Veinnail
Us older players understand how proud CCP is of thier player driven economy.
The things that we can absolutely expect from the Noble shop, Clothing, Decor, and other in station Accessories. Otherwise things that would not otherwise shift the player driven economy like, remaps, Standings, or paint jobs are also to be expected.
-vein
How is this assisting the player driven economy?
Let's ignore the fact that this stuff is not created by players and the rest of that supply chain. But, by introducing desireable goods into the market place that get bought with ISK that reduces the supply of ISK in the economy. That, in turn will impact the economy. In other words, all of these things, regardless of what they are, will "shift the player driven economy" to use your wording.
If you truly care about the player driven economy (personally, I find it neat but it isn't that important to me) then you would be against RMT items being available for ISK (via the route of buying PLEX).
But, since you are an older player, do you believe that CCP's envisioned business model of creating content based upon direct demand of player's purchasing it will somehow improve the bugs that have been around for years? What a system like this does is shift development resources to purchasable items while ignoring the rest of the game.
The extra revenue will then be directed towards their two other shiny projects and EVE will become a pony store. Since I like ponies, I could be okay with this. I wonder if I can get a shiny silver pony on the side of my ships? I'd pay for that!
|
Veinnail
FinFleet
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:52:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Veinnail on 26/06/2011 05:56:38
lol im a dev alt now!
cry cry cry.
my eve is live and kicking. great high-end gameplay from my strong community that isnt effected by anything but our own strong bonds.
edit: Plex is too old for discussion. aurum will not replace it. The other discussions of MT in that newsletter was directed at games without subscription rates like dust. MT in dust will help pay for its further development, to help it become independant from Eve's income.
Ofcourse money from EVE will be invested into DUST and WOD. It is how business works. CCP is growing the brand. Be happy that you're on board the flagship.
|
Grimpak
Gallente
The Whitehound Corporation
Frontline Assembly Point
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:53:00 -
[17]
no no no, you people are all doing it wrong
Originally by: Veinnail
more revenue = more pants for hilmar and content for WoD.
---
Quote:
The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.
ain't that right. |
Indy Rider
Amarr
Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:55:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Grimpak
no no no, you people are all doing it wrong
Originally by: Veinnail
more revenue = more pants for hilmar and content for WoD and dust
Fixt.
|
Sasuke Rukh
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:56:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Veinnail
If CCP wants to increase income by Adding a vanity exchange, good!
Us older players understand how proud CCP is of thier player driven economy.
The things that we can absolutely expect from the Noble shop, Clothing, Decor, and other in station Accessories. Otherwise things that would not otherwise shift the player driven economy like, remaps, Standings, or paint jobs are also to be expected.
I support these possibilities, and honestly hope that a substantial portion of the extra revenue gets redistributed into EVEs staff. Many of the Angry players dont want to contribute to the development of "other games".
Good luck in your other projects CCP. keep it coming.
-vein
So after these billions of bonuses for banking CEOs, a guy still says a thing like this. God humans deserve what they get.
|
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar
The Python Cartel.
The Defenders of Pen Island
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:57:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Grimpak
no no no, you people are all doing it wrong
Originally by: Veinnail
more revenue = more pants for hilmar and content for WoD.
I thought Zulu wore the pants 
|
|
|
Tobiaz
Spacerats
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:58:00 -
[21]
Yes more revenue will mean more content. The question is for what game, because I read that the dev teams for both WoD and Dust are both bigger then that of EVE. And another point: how sure are you that the extra content in EVE will actually be free? CCP obviously got the taste of Aurum now.
+ 1500 votes on MT in EVE | NO 79.03% | YES 5.02% | COSMETIC ONLY 11.23% | OTHER 4.73% |
Veinnail
FinFleet
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 06:02:00 -
[22]
frankly if everyone wanted to protest, they should have logged out, instead of in. a record low weekend peak would have proved a point.
|
Markarian Aurelius
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 06:04:00 -
[23]
I could care less about vanity items. If players want to blow their hard earned cash on hyperoverpriced monocle that will just end up getting you primaried out of pure spite, then fine.
What I'm angry about is the internal hints and leanings towards making "other" things available on the NeX other than vanity wares. Although I understand the Greedgate newsletter is just a brainstorming forum, it's still very concerning that there are those in the decision making process who actually think that making "items of power" and "faction standings" or "gold ammo" is a good idea. The protests are pre-emptive and I think aimed at sending the message that the playerbase won't tolerate such modifications to the game.
|
Valei Khurelem
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 06:04:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Demon Azrakel
Edited by: Valei Khurelem on 26/06/2011 05:44:24
Quote:
more content = more revenue.
For DUST 514 and WoD, sure...
What about EVE?
Well they're all ****ed if they're planning business models like this for all their games aren't they?
|
Adunh Slavy
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 06:05:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Veinnail
frankly if everyone wanted to protest, they should have logged out, instead of in. a record low weekend peak would have proved a point.
Doesn't prove anything one way or the other. A few days have only passed since. Lots of people spreading the word with their in-game protests. Quite unreasonable to expect anyone that has time left, and passion for Eve, to not log on.
My faith in CCP will return SoonÖ |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |