posting in a stealth nerf lvl4 missions thread

CCP probably want people in high sec to earn enough isk to pay for plex. Some people feel high sec profits are too high, but those high sec profits are what keeps CCP in business.

Posting in a nerf everything Highsec related so i have more targets in lowsec thread

I know several nullsec people who rat there faces off to plex their accounts. I would say just as many people from nullsec PLEX tehir accounts than highsec. Especially when you can rat for just a few hours in nullsec and buy a PLEX and they do this for 2 or 3 accounts

CCP probably want people in high sec to earn enough isk to pay for plex. Some people feel high sec profits are too high, but those high sec profits are what keeps CCP in business.

It should be impossible to make enough isk for plex in hisec imo. Having the safest activities in game generate enough isk to plex your characters goes against the risk-vs-reward ethos of EVE Online.

Besides, it's a stupid goal anyway, because look what happened when incursionfaucets were introduced: Plex prices jumped.

Highsec income should be 3,000,000 ISK per day regardless of activity, and T2 hulls or anything larger than a cruiser should be banned.

It should be impossible to make enough isk for plex in hisec imo. Having the safest activities in game generate enough isk to plex your characters goes against the risk-vs-reward ethos of EVE Online.

Besides, it's a stupid goal anyway, because look what happened when incursionfaucets were introduced: Plex prices jumped.

Assuming 3 hours of game play in a day, what level of t2 fitted t1 hulls do you feel the following hi sec careers should earn isk wise? (basically wondering how much isk grinding do you think each career path should you have to do to cover in pvp expenses)

Average Level 4 mission runner (this means battleship, average skills)
Low skill retriever miner
High skill hulk/mac miner
Planet interaction specialist only (assume a full 24 hour planet cycle)
T1 manufacturer
T2 manufacturer
Incursion runner

In other word:
Average lvl 4 missioner: 2 t2 fitted cruisers in a day
Low skill miner: 1 t2 fitted frig
High skill miner: 1 t2 fitted cruiser
Pi: 1 t2 fitted frig
T1 manufacture: 1 t2 fitted frig every 2 days
T2 mod: 1 t2 fitted cruiser
Incursion runner: no clue.

Assuming 3 hours of game play in a day, what level of t2 fitted t1 hulls do you feel the following hi sec careers should earn isk wise? (basically wondering how much isk grinding do you think each career path should you have to do to cover in pvp expenses)

Average Level 4 mission runner (this means battleship, average skills)
Low skill retriever miner
High skill hulk/mac miner
Planet interaction specialist only (assume a full 24 hour planet cycle)
T1 manufacturer
T2 manufacturer
Incursion runner

In other word:
Average lvl 4 missioner: 2 t2 fitted cruisers in a day
Low skill miner: 1 t2 fitted frig
High skill miner: 1 t2 fitted cruiser
Pi: 1 t2 fitted frig
T1 manufacture: 1 t2 fitted frig every 2 days
T2 mod: 1 t2 fitted cruiser
Incursion runner: no clue.

It should be impossible to make enough isk for plex in hisec imo. Having the safest activities in game generate enough isk to plex your characters goes against the risk-vs-reward ethos of EVE Online.

Besides, it's a stupid goal anyway, because look what happened when incursionfaucets were introduced: Plex prices jumped.

It should be impossible to make enough isk for plex in hisec imo. Having the safest activities in game generate enough isk to plex your characters goes against the risk-vs-reward ethos of EVE Online.

Besides, it's a stupid goal anyway, because look what happened when incursionfaucets were introduced: Plex prices jumped.

That makes no sense. You should earn what you put in and essentially restricting the amount of isk one can earn per day would ruin the economy. I see this topic as a "nerf highsec income" thread but it seems to me like almost all "L33t" 0.0 PVPer have highsec alts for indy/trade stuff so nerfing highsec would indirectly hurt their income as awell.

If you want highsec to be brought in line with 0.0 income how about CCP fix the FW "exploit" or nerf 0.0 anoms to make them as profitable as L4. Yep that's right I said it. Easily making 60-90mil/hr running anoms in complete safety aka NAP fest 0.0 seems more carbearish to me than flying around highsec with all the "L33t 0.0 pvper" ganking industrials and mission boats.

How come ganking freighters in high sec isn't on the list? Isn't that a source of high sec income?

I can only speak for myself, but I make as much as the effort I put in. That is the way it should work, if someone can make 200 mil in that 3 hours, they deserve it. If someone makes 20 mil in that 3 hours, they deserve it.