| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Kati Kirjasto
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:16:00 -
[1]
Finally figured out that Cricket sucks, huh?  Amazon sales - LINK Are they hanging on the edge of their seat, wondering who is going to win the pennant race this year? Cheering for those loveable losers, the Pittsburgh Pirates?
|

Cherry Nobyl
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:19:00 -
[2]
Isn't this how the Zom-pocalypse always starts.....

|

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:22:00 -
[3]
LOL
I feel sorry for you Brits with no guns to protect yourselves.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|

Alu Utukku
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:25:00 -
[4]
so, how do they expect to get it shipped? i've never seen a mailman/delivery person brave a riot before.
this smells like remarkably short sighted buying behaviour. 
|

Stitcher
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:29:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Kati Kirjasto Finally figured out that Cricket sucks, huh? 
I think it's more that nobody cares what happens to a baseball bat, but polluting the noble Cricket bat by allowing it to come into even the most momentary contact with a chav is just not acceptable.
Besides, cricket bats are more expensive. -
- Verin "Stitcher" Hakatain.
|

Solhild
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:30:00 -
[6]
52211% increase in sales - must be good!
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:30:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Ghoest
I feel sorry for you Brits with no guns to protect yourselves.
Yes, because rioting idiots with baseball bats are clearly worse than rioting idiots with guns... 
|

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:35:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Omara Otawan
Originally by: Ghoest
I feel sorry for you Brits with no guns to protect yourselves.
Yes, because rioting idiots with baseball bats are clearly worse than rioting idiots with guns... 
Its rather rare to see violent rioters with guns. ussually the guys with guns are the ones protecting their property at a riot scene.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|

Smoking Blunts
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:39:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ghoest
Originally by: Omara Otawan
Originally by: Ghoest
I feel sorry for you Brits with no guns to protect yourselves.
Yes, because rioting idiots with baseball bats are clearly worse than rioting idiots with guns... 
Its rather rare to see violent rioters with guns. ussually the guys with guns are the ones protecting their property at a riot scene.
i live in the uk and i have a gun. some guns are allowed, you just have to ask nicely
|

Cynosural Siiri
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:40:00 -
[10]
Business owner + pump shotgun + rioters = dead chav 
Rioters + guns = military response & lots of dead chavs.   
Either way, we win.
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:44:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 09/08/2011 23:47:40
Originally by: Ghoest
Its rather rare to see violent rioters with guns. ussually the guys with guns are the ones protecting their property at a riot scene.
You have any solid evidence for this wild claim?
People over in my country can own guns, and judging from those I know that do I'm sad to say 8 out of 10 fit into the 'nutjob' category in one way or another.
More guns available to the population means more guns on the streets in case of riots, thats pretty easy math. And that includes previous owner lying on the street with his skull bashed in and the new owner trading his bat for the gun.
Outgunned police forces is not what you need in these situations.
|

Kijo Rikki
Caldari Point of No Return Waterboard
|
Posted - 2011.08.09 23:46:00 -
[12]
Check Out # 18. For the more passive rioters.
|

Kati Kirjasto
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 00:33:00 -
[13]
LOL. Its like all these people were buying Louisville Sluggers, and then they were like, "Huh. Mise well buy some baseballs, too." You know, just in case they get the urge for some 'Home Run Derby' in Croydon.
|

Ejit
Amarr STD contractors
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 00:41:00 -
[14]
Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
|

Damnskippy
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 00:56:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 09/08/2011 23:47:40
Originally by: Ghoest
Its rather rare to see violent rioters with guns. ussually the guys with guns are the ones protecting their property at a riot scene.
You have any solid evidence for this wild claim?
Here is some.
http://www.tpromo2.com/gko/apr02/042602.htm
|

Mouthy Misses
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 01:01:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
this seriously had me psml, best post ive read on this forum..uh ever
im english btw so i agree with it too
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 01:05:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 01:06:35
Originally by: Damnskippy
Originally by: Omara Otawan
You have any solid evidence for this wild claim?
Here is some.
http://www.tpromo2.com/gko/apr02/042602.htm
Quote:
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Erich Pratt is the Director of Communications for Gun Owners of America, a national gun lobby with over 300,000 members
Oh, I'm sorry I should have been a bit more clear about the 'solid' part, and the 'evidence' part. I didnt want to make it sound like I was interested in lobbyist propaganda that lacks the above mentioned.
My bad, I apologize.
|

Kijo Rikki
Caldari Point of No Return Waterboard
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 01:05:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
Just a thought, but judging by the scrawny appearance of rugby players, I did some quick research on a hunch. Seems Rugby Forwards are heavier than Backs at an average of 99kg (218 lbs). The average NFL player weighs 248 lbs, with the heaviest position (offensive tackle) averaging 318 lbs.
Along the way I also found this interesting link
|

Mouthy Misses
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 01:09:00 -
[19]
fat yanks....still need protecting
|

Damnskippy
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 01:40:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 01:06:35
Originally by: Damnskippy
Originally by: Omara Otawan
You have any solid evidence for this wild claim?
Here is some.
http://www.tpromo2.com/gko/apr02/042602.htm
Quote:
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Erich Pratt is the Director of Communications for Gun Owners of America, a national gun lobby with over 300,000 members
Oh, I'm sorry I should have been a bit more clear about the 'solid' part, and the 'evidence' part. I didnt want to make it sound like I was interested in lobbyist propaganda that lacks the above mentioned.
My bad, I apologize.
This source more to your liking? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_armed_resistance_in_the_Los_Angeles_riots#Riots_and_the_Korean-American_community
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 01:59:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 02:03:15
Originally by: Damnskippy
This source more to your liking?
I think you somehow dont understand the question.
As far as the source goes, I'll give you credit for not linking another openly lobbyist propaganda piece, but it kinda escapes me why you'd link to that specific article.
A 15 year old girl, unarmed, by mistake (aka trigger happyness) being assaulted and subsequently shot in the back by a shop owner while trying to buy groceries being one of the prime causes for mass riots is a pretty good argument for strict gun-control regulations I would say.
|

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 02:05:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Omara Otawan
People over in my country can own guns, and judging from those I know that do I'm sad to say 8 out of 10 fit into the 'nutjob' category in one way or another.
More guns available to the population means more guns on the streets in case of riots, thats pretty easy math. And that includes previous owner lying on the street with his skull bashed in and the new owner trading his bat for the gun.
Outgunned police forces is not what you need in these situations.
I live in the US Congressional district with the highest rate of gun ownership in the US
We all feel pretty safe. We havent had any riots pop up. The only time I remember one nearby was one night in a college town some drunk guys burned a car and mad a scene in a street - they didnt bring any guns.
Probably the biggest reason is that its pretty much sucide to to go to a riot with a gun.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|

Babyfarts Mcdougan
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 02:14:00 -
[23]
OK...get it..you don't like guns. But you asked for a source and you received it. The previous poster is correct. You are more likely to come face to face with a armed proprietor than an armed rioter. It doesn't really matter though, because you'll reject any evidence out of hand based on the media and political agendas.
|

Babyfarts Mcdougan
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 02:17:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 02:03:15
Originally by: Damnskippy
This source more to your liking?
I think you somehow dont understand the question.
As far as the source goes, I'll give you credit for not linking another openly lobbyist propaganda piece, but it kinda escapes me why you'd link to that specific article.
A 15 year old girl, unarmed, by mistake (aka trigger happyness) being assaulted and subsequently shot in the back by a shop owner while trying to buy groceries being one of the prime causes for mass riots is a pretty good argument for strict gun-control regulations I would say.
Throw the baby out with the bathwater huh?
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 02:39:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 02:40:54
Originally by: Babyfarts Mcdougan OK...get it..you don't like guns. But you asked for a source and you received it.
Not at all, I'm not gun crazy by any means but didnt have a problem with them during my military service. I actually enjoyed shooting the G3 tbh.
What I do have a problem with is guns in the hands of civilians.
Also, I asked for a reliable source proving mass quantities of firearms in in civilians hands do not mean more guns being used by rioters. Solid facts mind you, not anecdotes.
I havent seen anything substantial in that regard yet, all we've seen so far strongly suggests civilian gun ownership is a bad idea in case of riots as it means more guns on the streets in a highly volatile situation.
|

Deryk Kyeld
Veteran Defense Initiative
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 02:43:00 -
[26]
Why is this even in EVE general? Does OP lack reading comprehension?
|

Peri Simone
Steel Dawn Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 02:50:00 -
[27]
Edited by: Peri Simone on 10/08/2011 02:51:32
|

Svandis Illuvatar
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 03:00:00 -
[28]
don't you pay attention to the news? Its because of the race-riots in Britain, where blacks are rioting, looting, and robbing people (including forcing people to take off their clothes)
|

Kati Kirjasto
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 03:13:00 -
[29]
Some of the comments on those baseball bats are freakin hilarious.
"Pretty good for using on looters, firm grip"
"Also doubles as a bat for playing rounders"
Lots of self-defense/2nd Amendment/lol at the pathetic disarmed Brits comments as well.
|

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 05:23:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 02:40:54
Originally by: Babyfarts Mcdougan OK...get it..you don't like guns. But you asked for a source and you received it.
Not at all, I'm not gun crazy by any means but didnt have a problem with them during my military service. I actually enjoyed shooting the G3 tbh.
What I do have a problem with is guns in the hands of civilians.
Also, I asked for a reliable source proving mass quantities of firearms in in civilians hands do not mean more guns being used by rioters. Solid facts mind you, not anecdotes.
I havent seen anything substantial in that regard yet, all we've seen so far strongly suggests civilian gun ownership is a bad idea in case of riots as it means more guns on the streets in a highly volatile situation.
I think the onus of proof would be on you. We live in a country where guns are literally everywhere its our observation that guns arent used much at all in riots. If your so sure that our experiences are wrong - how about presenting some examples of rioters using using guns in a western nation?
The only a few western nations have massive gun ownership. None of them frequently have serious riots. The last major riot in the US was the Rodney King riots in LA, I do remember that the there were almost no stories of rioters using guns and many stories of people guarding property with guns. Any rioter who trys to even flash gun is always the first target of police and property owners tend to shoot them.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|

Tobias Sjodin
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 05:31:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Ghoest
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 02:40:54
Originally by: Babyfarts Mcdougan OK...get it..you don't like guns. But you asked for a source and you received it.
Not at all, I'm not gun crazy by any means but didnt have a problem with them during my military service. I actually enjoyed shooting the G3 tbh.
What I do have a problem with is guns in the hands of civilians.
Also, I asked for a reliable source proving mass quantities of firearms in in civilians hands do not mean more guns being used by rioters. Solid facts mind you, not anecdotes.
I havent seen anything substantial in that regard yet, all we've seen so far strongly suggests civilian gun ownership is a bad idea in case of riots as it means more guns on the streets in a highly volatile situation.
I think the onus of proof would be on you. We live in a country where guns are literally everywhere its our observation that guns arent used much at all in riots. If your so sure that our experiences are wrong - how about presenting some examples of rioters using using guns in a western nation?
The only a few western nations have massive gun ownership. None of them frequently have serious riots. The last major riot in the US was the Rodney King riots in LA, I do remember that the there were almost no stories of rioters using guns and many stories of people guarding property with guns. Any rioter who trys to even flash gun is always the first target of police and property owners tend to shoot them.
Then why would the brits need "guns to protect themselves"?
HABIT
|

Skinae
Hello Kitty Hug Patrol
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 05:37:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Skinae on 10/08/2011 05:39:27
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
|

Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 05:44:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 10/08/2011 05:44:32
Originally by: Ghoest
I think the onus of proof would be on you.
Wrong, it is common courtesy that you back up the claims you make if you want to be taken serious. Since you claimed that firearms are rarely used in riots, I'd hope you can prove it with facts.
Originally by: Ghoest
The last major riot in the US was the Rodney King riots in LA, I do remember that the there were almost no stories of rioters using guns and many stories of people guarding property with guns.
Since you mention these riots, why dont you research a bit?
Someone posted a nyt news article citing a tally of coroners reports in this thread, I wont repost it as the poster removed it probably since it is kinda inappropriate for these forums but its easy enough to find on google.
You'll find plenty of examples about rioters in a western nations using firearms in there.
In fact, the whole story is a shining example why they dont belong in civilian hands, including looters as well as defenders.
|

Telvani
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 07:16:00 -
[34]
It's funny how guns are so embedded in american culture they can't be removed, which is probably the one thing most people would want to 'wish away' yet some people still think they should be introduced to the civilized world?!
Newsflash: No modern, sane society would honestly implement this now, there are just a few who have been lumbered with it due to their ancestors mistakes.
|

ChromeStriker
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 07:42:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Skinae Edited by: Skinae on 10/08/2011 05:39:27
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
We dont, we have 6'6 viking's, aus'ies, scotsmen ect all of which dont get a sweat on at the thought of food or running for more than 2min without a break  - Nulla Curas |

Florestan Bronstein
24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 07:53:00 -
[36]
Edited by: Florestan Bronstein on 10/08/2011 07:58:14
When I was serving in the military it was made very clear that it is only acceptable to use a firearm (with live ammo) on humans when the hostile is carrying a firearm (or equally bad stuff) himself - and even then there is going to be a criminal investigation of the case afterwards (no matter whether this happens in your home country or Afghanistan) to determine whether you really had no other choice but to shoot.
In any other case the only way you are going to use your firearm is as a club or to give off warning shots into the air (which is btw the highest stage of escalation you are allowed to use when facing rioters).
Of course exceptions are made when a life is in immediate danger - but using a firearm against opponents that are unarmed/armed with clubs to protect your property is just plain wrong. The idea of some shop owner firing away at people to protect his windows from being smashed lacks any notion of commensurability.
How likely is a civilian to have the training and self-restraint to give proper warning, aim for inflicting only non-serious injuries, ... ?
I recall a semi-recent case of some old man being assaulted by a small gang of youths in his home - when they left he took the opportunity and gave off one shot with his rifle - boom, headshot. (and he even had a gun permission, had shooting training, ... and still failed completely in the situation at hand) That's the sort of situation that I would use to explain why you generally can't give firearms into the hands of civilians.
|

Hestia Mar
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 08:27:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
As a Brit I would contradict these statements, and would point out that it confirms the poasters name. I smell a pasty faced kid who never got involved with sport of any sort...
I played baseball for many years here in the UK, and am a diehard Mets fan, as well being a diehard member of the toon army. I also follow the New England Patriots during the NFL season.
As for the patently stupid statements about gun ownership, well, they were just so ridiculous that I'm dumbfounded...
|

Vice Admiral Spreadsheet
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 08:44:00 -
[38]
Fun crowd-control alternatives:
- High-pressure fire-hose of citric acid. Non-lethal and possibly tasty!
- Position 2 trucks on both ends of a road, facing each other with rioters in the middle. Attach a wall to each truck, which spans the entire road. Drive the trucks together, forcing the rioters into an extremely tight and compact pile. Pour a chemical solution over them which deteriorates clothing. Pour a solution which gives people severe vomiting and diarrhoea.
- 800RPM automatic flashbang grenade launcher! Aim into crowd, watch them disperse!
- 500,000RPM rubber bullet minigun. best to keep this weapon for medium-ranged shooting.
- Nut-cracker mine. Set it on the ground. Upon detecting a target standing above, it propels itself into the target's sensitive parts.
- A gun which shoots millions mosquitoes genetically modified for a 10 minute lifespan. Mosquitoes are damn annoying. Dispersed rioters can be arrested later due to obvious itchy bumps.
- High-pressure fire-hose of extremely sticky, smelly ooze. Like a stasis webifier, but medium range and disgusting!
- Seizure gun. Apparently this weapon is under development. Aim at enemy face, pull trigger, they seizure.
- Gas bombs which, upon inhalation, permanently reduce breast/wang size by 50%
- Bombs which explode in cow manure.
- A sniper rifle loaded with tasers which attach to the target, shocking them for up to 5 minute. Buries into skin. Degrades after 2 days.
|

Jackson Millenius
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 08:48:00 -
[39]
Obviously the bat sales are up because of the need for protection from rioters.
Duh.
'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.' |

Selene Eine
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 08:56:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Rounders is not baseball nor the basis for baseball, as popular British myth would lead one to believe. Baseball has much closer ties to cricket and an obscure game known as townball more than anything else.
|

Cylide Askald
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 09:11:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Vice Admiral Spreadsheet Fun crowd-control alternatives:
- Gas bombs which, upon inhalation, permanently reduce breast/wang size by 50%
Judging from the few girls I've seen rioting on TV, these are already in action.
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 09:31:00 -
[42]
We need to send in Borris, in riot gear, armed with an iron bar and riding a hire bike.
|

RAW23
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 09:45:00 -
[43]
Edited by: RAW23 on 10/08/2011 09:46:14
Originally by: Florestan Bronstein Edited by: Florestan Bronstein on 10/08/2011 08:04:59
When I was serving in the military it was made very clear that it is only acceptable to use a firearm (with live ammo) on humans when the hostile is carrying a firearm (or equally bad stuff) himself - and even then there is going to be a criminal investigation of the case afterwards (no matter whether this happens in your home country or Afghanistan) to determine whether you did really act within reason.
In any other case the only way you are going to use your firearm is as a club or to give off warning shots into the air (which is btw the highest stage of escalation you are allowed to use when facing rioters).
Of course exceptions are made when a life is in immediate danger - but using a firearm against opponents that are unarmed/armed with clubs to protect your property is just plain wrong. The idea of some shop owner firing away at people to protect his windows from being smashed lacks any notion of commensurability.
How likely is a civilian to have the training and self-restraint to give proper warning, aim for inflicting only non-serious injuries, ... ?
I recall a semi-recent case of some old man being assaulted by a small gang of youths in his home - when they left (after taking jewelry and money) he took the opportunity and gave off one or two shots with his rifle - boom, headshot. (and he even had a gun permission, had shooting training, ... and still failed completely in the situation at hand) That's the sort of situation that I would use to explain why you generally can't give firearms into the hands of civilians.
You cannot give people means to inflict damage far beyond anything a court is allowed to impose just based on the whim of a (probably very emotional) moment.
Whilst I find the fetishisation of firearms in some segments of the US population highly alarming, I am entirely supportive of the notion that personal safety (of life, liberty and property) are primarily the responsibility of the individual and that abdicating this responsibility to the state is one of the causes of the general feelings of impotence that many Brits (and other Europeans) labour under. Everyone should be armed for personal protection at all times. The idea that the police and/or state are even competent to protect you, your property and your freedom is purely mythological. Crime clear-up rates are incredibly low and the chances of actually getting police help in the course of being attacked are vanishingly small. By refusing to take responsibility for our own safety you contribute to a reliance culture that will inevitably turn to disillusionment when it is realised that you can't rely on the state at all. As to the example of shooting someone whilst they flee from the scene of their crime, I really have very little sympathy for anyone who CHOOSES to put themselves in that position and have no problems with the risks they run being increased. Once you start playing the proportionality game you concede control of the situation to the agressor.
Obviously, as a liberal/lefty brit, I am used to almost no-one ever agreeing with me on these points except people who's politics I find nauseating 
|

Captain Megadeath
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 09:47:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Captain Megadeath on 10/08/2011 09:48:59
Originally by: baltec1 We need to send in Borris, in riot gear, armed with an iron bar and riding a hire bike.
No, what needs to be done is to send in water cannon, police armed with baton rounds with the Army as backup... oh but I forgot, that inhuman treatment is only reservered for one part of the United Kingdom and would never be used on people who have a direct link to what ever party will be elected into government. 
Naw that sort of treatment is left to them thar paddys trying to stop the UKs version of the Klu from walking through their area. 
|

Wyke Mossari
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 10:32:00 -
[45]
Originally by: RAW23
Whilst I find the fetishisation of firearms in some segments of the US population highly alarming, I am entirely supportive of the notion that personal safety (of life, liberty and property) are primarily the responsibility of the individual and that abdicating this responsibility to the state is one of the causes of the general feelings of impotence that many Brits (and other Europeans) labour under. Everyone should be armed for personal protection at all times. The idea that the police and/or state are even competent to protect you, your property and your freedom is purely mythological. Crime clear-up rates are incredibly low and the chances of actually getting police help in the course of being attacked are vanishingly small. By refusing to take responsibility for our own safety you contribute to a reliance culture that will inevitably turn to disillusionment when it is realised that you can't rely on the state at all. As to the example of shooting someone whilst they flee from the scene of their crime, I really have very little sympathy for anyone who CHOOSES to put themselves in that position and have no problems with the risks they run being increased. Once you start playing the proportionality game you concede control of the situation to the agressor.
Obviously, as a liberal/lefty brit, I am used to almost no-one ever agreeing with me on these points except people who's politics I find nauseating 
The "fetishisation of firearms", I really like that expression.
I'm British, left leaning, self made and still consider myself working class. I don't really find your position unusual or problematic. I entirely agree with your implication that what is necessary is 'equality of opportunity' which is something completely different from the nanny-statism of the 'academic' left which is dis-empowering.
|

Peri Simone
Steel Dawn Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 10:56:00 -
[46]
Edited by: Peri Simone on 10/08/2011 10:57:03
Originally by: Omara Otawan
Originally by: Ghoest
The last major riot in the US was the Rodney King riots in LA, I do remember that the there were almost no stories of rioters using guns and many stories of people guarding property with guns.
Since you mention these riots, why dont you research a bit?
Someone already posted a nyt news article regarding death toll citing a tally of coroners reports in this thread, I wont repost it as the poster removed it probably since it is kinda inappropriate for these forums but its easy enough to find on google.
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/04/us/riots-in-los-angeles-the-toll-some-of-50-killed-in-los-angeles-violence.html
There's the link, which I removed due to a sudden moment of "somebody's wrong on the internet" self-awareness. This topic is already being discussed in OOPE.
|

Ejit
Amarr STD contractors
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 12:37:00 -
[47]
Edited by: Ejit on 10/08/2011 12:43:48
Originally by: Hestia Mar As a Brit I would contradict these statements, and would point out that it confirms the poasters name. I smell a pasty faced kid who never got involved with sport of any sort...
Not that I have to but I would like to clarify that's I'm actually 37, I've been married for 13 years and the wife and I have 5 kids between the ages of 2 and 16.
I also spent most of the 90's in the army. I severed with a certain Welsh infantry regiment before moving on to specialise with the Engineers.
During that time I toured Northern Ireland and the Balkans twice, first one during the height of the troubles and ethnic cleansing (that was grim and enough to turn a man to drink...ohh wait!)
I've been using my experience to draw a comparison with the current troubles regarding UK policing. Mainly comparing their reluctance to engage in a pro active manner.
For instance. When I was peacekeeping with the UN, they'd issue pamphlets and guidelines detailing the current rules of engagement.
They were utterly ridicules and here's a real example.
UN manned checkpoint.
PVT: Sir, there is a person running down the hill towards the checkpoint. 2LT: Is the individual posing a threat? PVT: No sir. 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the guy is getting closer and appears to be holding a grenade, permission to engage? 2LT: Is he posing a threat to you at this particular moment? PVT: No sir. 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the guy is now in berserker mode and appears to have a finger in the ring pull and is extracting the safety pin. 2LT: Is he posing a threat to yours, mine or anyone's life and limb at this time? PVT: Errr...well, I guess not at this exact second! 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the grenade has now left the persons hand and it is now inbound in our general direction, permission to engage? 2LT: Negative, person is now unarmed and not posing a threat. PVT: Sir, grenade has now landed at our feet and is....BooM.
And that kind of reluctance to engage due to fear of offending and upsetting minority's will and does inevitably cause more trouble than it solves and is the same issue facing UK policing.
I remember watching the miner strikes in the early 80's. Police would wade into a peaceful picket line with riot shields and batons and batter the hell out of them.
How times have changed...
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 12:42:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Ejit I remember watching the miner strikes in the early 80's. Police would wade into a peaceful picket line with riot shields and batons and batter the hell out of them.
How times have changes...
Weeellà that was just because they had to do something to keep themselves warm, since the picketers weren't digging up coal to keep the heating on.  ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|

Gorki Andropov
Kerensky Initiatives
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 12:54:00 -
[49]
Originally by: ChromeStriker
Originally by: Skinae Edited by: Skinae on 10/08/2011 05:39:27
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
We dont, we have 6'6 viking's, aus'ies, scotsmen ect all of which dont get a sweat on at the thought of food or running for more than 2min without a break 
Hello Mr. Racist. -----------------------------------------------
"I have not problem with prostitute, but the kiddy dools is to much for me" - Orcan |

Naran Eto
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:01:00 -
[50]
Edited by: Naran Eto on 10/08/2011 13:02:51
Originally by: Mouthy Misses
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
this seriously had me psml, best post ive read on this forum..uh ever
im english btw so i agree with it too
Rounders is only similar to baseball in the fact that you use a bat and a ball and play it on a field, it is a very different game, with different equipment, different rules and a different field.
Softball is actually the english version (although it was invented in the US too, we just kind of adopted it) of baseball and is a direct descendant of baseball, the only differences being larger and harder ball (ironic considering the games name lol) which is thrown underhand instead of overhand and a smaller diamond, apart from that it uses almost the same ruleset and scoring system.
Rounders has a different shape and smaller field, smaller balls, smaller bats, wickets like in cricket, does not have strikes (they use outs like cricket) and follows a very different ruleset and scoring system, it's more like a cross between baseball and cricket than it is a version of baseball.
|

Naran Eto
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:07:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Captain Megadeath [No, what needs to be done is to send in water cannon, filled with sulphuric acid 
/fixed
|

Information Agent
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:08:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Gorki Andropov
Originally by: ChromeStriker
Originally by: Skinae Edited by: Skinae on 10/08/2011 05:39:27
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
We dont, we have 6'6 viking's, aus'ies, scotsmen ect all of which dont get a sweat on at the thought of food or running for more than 2min without a break 
Hello Mr. Racist.
What did he say that was racist? Seriously, don't be so fast to play that card.
At 6'6 and 410lb's, I'd imagine that person would find it hard to get around and would most likely be very unhealthy.
|

Hestia Mar
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:08:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Ejit Edited by: Ejit on 10/08/2011 12:43:48
Originally by: Hestia Mar As a Brit I would contradict these statements, and would point out that it confirms the poasters name. I smell a pasty faced kid who never got involved with sport of any sort...
Not that I have to but I would like to clarify that's I'm actually 37, I've been married for 13 years and the wife and I have 5 kids between the ages of 2 and 16.
I also spent most of the 90's in the army. I severed with a certain Welsh infantry regiment before moving on to specialise with the Engineers.
During that time I toured Northern Ireland and the Balkans twice, first one during the height of the troubles and ethnic cleansing (that was grim and enough to turn a man to drink...ohh wait!)
I've been using my experience to draw a comparison with the current troubles regarding UK policing. Mainly comparing their reluctance to engage in a pro active manner.
For instance. When I was peacekeeping with the UN, they'd issue pamphlets and guidelines detailing the current rules of engagement.
They were utterly ridicules and here's a real example.
UN manned checkpoint.
PVT: Sir, there is a person running down the hill towards the checkpoint. 2LT: Is the individual posing a threat? PVT: No sir. 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the guy is getting closer and appears to be holding a grenade, permission to engage? 2LT: Is he posing a threat to you at this particular moment? PVT: No sir. 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the guy is now in berserker mode and appears to have a finger in the ring pull and is extracting the safety pin. 2LT: Is he posing a threat to yours, mine or anyone's life and limb at this time? PVT: Errr...well, I guess not at this exact second! 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the grenade has now left the persons hand and it is now inbound in our general direction, permission to engage? 2LT: Negative, person is now unarmed and not posing a threat. PVT: Sir, grenade has now landed at our feet and is....BooM.
And that kind of reluctance to engage due to fear of offending and upsetting minority's will and does inevitably cause more trouble than it solves and is the same issue facing UK policing.
I remember watching the miner strikes in the early 80's. Police would wade into a peaceful picket line with riot shields and batons and batter the hell out of them.
How times have changed...
LOL our lives are a bit similar then - although I'm a bit (i.e. a lot) older than you, I'm also ex-Army, did NI and Cyprus for my active service, but thankfully never had the misfortune to serve with any Welsh Infantry regiments...but your life history doesn't excuse your comments about the great sport that is baseball!!! 
|

Fractal Muse
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:16:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Peri Simone
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/04/us/riots-in-los-angeles-the-toll-some-of-50-killed-in-los-angeles-violence.html
There's the link, which I removed due to a sudden moment of "somebody's wrong on the internet" self-awareness. This topic is already being discussed in OOPE.
Say or write something long enough and loud enough then some people will start believing it. Once they believe then it is right.
For example, guns aren't used by rioters, they are only used by law-abiding shop owners to shoot looters. That link is 'leftist' propaganda. 
|
|

CCP Fallout

|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:17:00 -
[55]
Moved from GD to OOPE.
Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|

Gorki Andropov
Kerensky Initiatives
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:18:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Information Agent What did he say that was racist? Seriously, don't be so fast to play that card.
At 6'6 and 410lb's, I'd imagine that person would find it hard to get around and would most likely be very unhealthy.
He suggested that while a 6'6" 410lb black man would tire quicker than a white equivalent. -----------------------------------------------
"I have not problem with prostitute, but the kiddy dools is to much for me" - Orcan |

RAW23
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:19:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Hestia Mar I'm also ex-Army, did NI and Cyprus for my active service, but thankfully never had the misfortune to serve with any Welsh Infantry regiments...
7614 Jones? Here sir. 6351 Jones? Here sir. 1635 Jones? Here sir. 9534 Jones? Here sir. 1579 Jones? Here sir. 1953 Jones? Here sir. 1950 Jones? Here sir. 2543 Evans? Here sir. 7591 Jones? Here sir. 3614 Jones? Here sir. 5351 Jones? Here sir. 1535 Jones? Here sir. 9934 Jones? Here sir. 1279 Jones? Here sir. 1753 Jones? Here sir. 9950 Jones? Here sir. 3543 Davies? Here sir. 1191 Jones? Here sir.
|

Kijo Rikki
Caldari Point of No Return Waterboard
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:20:00 -
[58]
Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 10/08/2011 13:20:05
Originally by: Gorki Andropov
Originally by: Information Agent What did he say that was racist? Seriously, don't be so fast to play that card.
At 6'6 and 410lb's, I'd imagine that person would find it hard to get around and would most likely be very unhealthy.
He suggested that while a 6'6" 410lb black man would tire quicker than a white equivalent.
Good thing they have forward momentum. 
|

Tian Garsk
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:22:00 -
[59]
Edited by: Tian Garsk on 10/08/2011 13:23:48
Originally by: Hestia Mar
Originally by: Ejit Edited by: Ejit on 10/08/2011 12:43:48
Originally by: Hestia Mar As a Brit I would contradict these statements, and would point out that it confirms the poasters name. I smell a pasty faced kid who never got involved with sport of any sort...
Not that I have to but I would like to clarify that's I'm actually 37, I've been married for 13 years and the wife and I have 5 kids between the ages of 2 and 16.
I also spent most of the 90's in the army. I severed with a certain Welsh infantry regiment before moving on to specialise with the Engineers.
During that time I toured Northern Ireland and the Balkans twice, first one during the height of the troubles and ethnic cleansing (that was grim and enough to turn a man to drink...ohh wait!)
I've been using my experience to draw a comparison with the current troubles regarding UK policing. Mainly comparing their reluctance to engage in a pro active manner.
For instance. When I was peacekeeping with the UN, they'd issue pamphlets and guidelines detailing the current rules of engagement.
They were utterly ridicules and here's a real example.
UN manned checkpoint.
PVT: Sir, there is a person running down the hill towards the checkpoint. 2LT: Is the individual posing a threat? PVT: No sir. 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the guy is getting closer and appears to be holding a grenade, permission to engage? 2LT: Is he posing a threat to you at this particular moment? PVT: No sir. 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the guy is now in berserker mode and appears to have a finger in the ring pull and is extracting the safety pin. 2LT: Is he posing a threat to yours, mine or anyone's life and limb at this time? PVT: Errr...well, I guess not at this exact second! 2LT: Nothing we can do then. PVT: Sir, the grenade has now left the persons hand and it is now inbound in our general direction, permission to engage? 2LT: Negative, person is now unarmed and not posing a threat. PVT: Sir, grenade has now landed at our feet and is....BooM.
And that kind of reluctance to engage due to fear of offending and upsetting minority's will and does inevitably cause more trouble than it solves and is the same issue facing UK policing.
I remember watching the miner strikes in the early 80's. Police would wade into a peaceful picket line with riot shields and batons and batter the hell out of them.
How times have changed...
LOL our lives are a bit similar then - although I'm a bit (i.e. a lot) older than you, I'm also ex-Army, did NI and Cyprus for my active service, but thankfully never had the misfortune to serve with any Welsh Infantry regiments...but your life history doesn't excuse your comments about the great sport that is baseball!!! 
I'm actually welsh and in all my years in the army not once served in a welsh regiment :D started in the Royal Anglian (TA) did a couple of tours in Cyprus, joined full time with 2 Royal Green Jackets (getting used to their drill was a nightmare when i joined them!) alternating between homebase (winchester) and germany, then moved on to become a cherry beret attached to the ADU and spent most of my time at home chasing down AWOL's. Fortunately because i moved so much i narrowly missed NI tours in all three regiments, which i am very glad of, i know many squaddies who did NI tours and one of them came back the same.
|

Ay Liz
Sacred Templars RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:24:00 -
[60]
"Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.", Noah Webster.
|

Kijo Rikki
Caldari Point of No Return Waterboard
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:30:00 -
[61]
Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 10/08/2011 13:30:29
Quote:
"Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.", Noah Webster.
I wonder if Noah is seeing the same America I'm seeing. 1984 has come and gone, if the military even remotely backs the government its people are screwed. Even without the military surveillance , intelligence and counter intelligence will go a long way to squashing any uprising.
|

RAW23
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:33:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Kijo Rikki Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 10/08/2011 13:30:29
Quote:
"Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.", Noah Webster.
I wonder if Noah is seeing the same America I'm seeing. 1984 has come and gone, if the military even remotely backs the government its people are screwed. Even without the military surveillance , intelligence and counter intelligence will go a long way to squashing any uprising.
I mean, they did so well in Iraq and Afghanistan that I'm sure they would have no problem carrying out counter-insurgency ops against a population 10x bigger in a country that is half of a continent.
|

I'm 5particus
Minmatar REV0LTING
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:37:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Skinae
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
You think a bunch of fatties with body armour are more intimidating than Samoan/Maori doing Haka. LOL.
|

Tian Garsk
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:40:00 -
[64]
Originally by: I'm 5particus
Originally by: Skinae
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
You think a bunch of fatties with body armour are more intimidating than Samoan/Maori doing Haka. LOL.
|

Kijo Rikki
Caldari Point of No Return Waterboard
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:40:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 10/08/2011 13:40:51
Originally by: RAW23
Originally by: Kijo Rikki Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 10/08/2011 13:30:29
Quote:
"Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.", Noah Webster.
I wonder if Noah is seeing the same America I'm seeing. 1984 has come and gone, if the military even remotely backs the government its people are screwed. Even without the military surveillance , intelligence and counter intelligence will go a long way to squashing any uprising.
I mean, they did so well in Iraq and Afghanistan that I'm sure they would have no problem carrying out counter-insurgency ops against a population 10x bigger in a country that is half of a continent.
Yeah, we sortof don't have that whole surveillance infrastructure set up over there. You realize every atm machine, every traffic cam, surveillance camera, every cell phone, every land line etc are all tools that can be used to track you. They don't have that advantage over there.
|

Myfanwy Heimdal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:47:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Kati Kirjasto Finally figured out that Cricket sucks, huh?  Amazon sales - LINK Are they hanging on the edge of their seat, wondering who is going to win the pennant race this year? Cheering for those loveable losers, the Pittsburgh Pirates?
No, I don't think so. I don't think that we, as a rule, find ourselves getting beat at a game and then decide to take the ball, go home, change the rules and call it something else.
Now, baseball. That's an odd sport the rules of which are lost in time though it does look like it's had its roots in both cricket (from the sub-continent) and, strangely enough, Wales.
One doesn't see much of Welsh Baseball these days. Thankfully. Just give me an oval ball and the Six Nations...
|

Myfanwy Heimdal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:51:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Hestia Mar ...as well being a diehard member of the toon army.
There is clearly no hope for you.
How do I know? I am clearly just as deluded as you...
|

Ejit
Amarr STD contractors
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:53:00 -
[68]
Originally by: RAW23
Originally by: Hestia Mar I'm also ex-Army, did NI and Cyprus for my active service, but thankfully never had the misfortune to serve with any Welsh Infantry regiments...
7614 Jones? Here sir. 6351 Jones? Here sir. 1635 Jones? Here sir. 9534 Jones? Here sir. 1579 Jones? Here sir. 1953 Jones? Here sir. 1950 Jones? Here sir. 2543 Evans? Here sir. 7591 Jones? Here sir. 3614 Jones? Here sir. 5351 Jones? Here sir. 1535 Jones? Here sir. 9934 Jones? Here sir. 1279 Jones? Here sir. 1753 Jones? Here sir. 9950 Jones? Here sir. 3543 Davies? Here sir. 1191 Jones? Here sir.
hahaha that really does take me back. There were so many Jones's and Davies that we usually ended up just using their last 2 service number digits. 
|

I'm 5particus
Minmatar REV0LTING
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 13:53:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Hestia Mar
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
As a Brit I would contradict these statements, and would point out that it confirms the poasters name. I smell a pasty faced kid who never got involved with sport of any sort...
I played baseball for many years here in the UK, and am a diehard Mets fan, as well being a diehard member of the toon army. I also follow the New England Patriots during the NFL season.
As for the patently stupid statements about gun ownership, well, they were just so ridiculous that I'm dumbfounded...
Thank you for confirming the Yank Stereotype that Brits don't have a sense of humour. 
|

Peri Simone
Steel Dawn Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 14:00:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Fractal Muse Say or write something long enough and loud enough then some people will start believing it. Once they believe then it is right.
For example, guns aren't used by rioters, they are only used by law-abiding shop owners to shoot looters. That link is 'leftist' propaganda. 
Simone to Polly Toynbee, the jig's up, I've been made. Get me back to the Gore Ecodome.
In Ghoest's defence (god help me), we can see the problem right here:
Originally by: Ghoest I do remember that the there were almost no stories of rioters using guns and many stories of people guarding property with guns.
|

Myfanwy Heimdal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 14:03:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Ejit
Originally by: RAW23
Originally by: Hestia Mar I'm also ex-Army, did NI and Cyprus for my active service, but thankfully never had the misfortune to serve with any Welsh Infantry regiments...
7614 Jones? Here sir. 6351 Jones? Here sir. 1635 Jones? Here sir. 9534 Jones? Here sir. 1579 Jones? Here sir. 1953 Jones? Here sir. 1950 Jones? Here sir. 2543 Evans? Here sir. 7591 Jones? Here sir. 3614 Jones? Here sir. 5351 Jones? Here sir. 1535 Jones? Here sir. 9934 Jones? Here sir. 1279 Jones? Here sir. 1753 Jones? Here sir. 9950 Jones? Here sir. 3543 Davies? Here sir. 1191 Jones? Here sir.
hahaha that really does take me back. There were so many Jones's and Davies that we usually ended up just using their last 2 service number digits. 
The Royal Welch, as I recall, were stuffed full of Hughes and Roberts during my time.
|

Esu Nahalas
Yote Patrol
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 14:05:00 -
[72]
I'm too lazy to see if someone already posted a link to this image:
here.
|

ChromeStriker
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 14:26:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Kijo Rikki Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 10/08/2011 13:20:05
Originally by: Gorki Andropov
Originally by: Information Agent What did he say that was racist? Seriously, don't be so fast to play that card.
At 6'6 and 410lb's, I'd imagine that person would find it hard to get around and would most likely be very unhealthy.
He suggested that while a 6'6" 410lb black man would tire quicker than a white equivalent.
Good thing they have forward momentum. 
ugh being black has nothing to do with it lol just sayin rugby has big guys too... admitadly bulk isnt so much of a factor comapred to being able to flaten someone but there you go... quite sure some of them are black too thinkin about it - Nulla Curas |

Gavriel Black
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 15:19:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Ghoest LOL
I feel sorry for you Brits with no guns to protect yourselves.
Ignorant quote of the day.
Thus far a handful of people have been killed. If we had guns I can assure you that it would be a whole lot more.
I'm currently in Birmingham surrounded by the madness and while it's sad seeing the destruction it does get a heap load of idiots off our streets.
I for one have seen this coming for the last 10 years so it really isn't a shock, but this means that our government will hopefully realise that you can't just let young people have babies and not teach them how to bring them up, take extra curricular activities away from schools and cut funding from youth clubs.
|

Wilhelm Riley
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 15:32:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Ghoest LOLI feel sorry for you Brits with no guns to protect yourselves.
I feel sorry for you Americans. Having an endless parade of ******ed presidents, the latest of which doesn't even know what year it is.
/obligatory America bashing
I hate being mean :(
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Gallente Sigma Special Tactics Group
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 15:57:00 -
[76]
Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer on 10/08/2011 15:58:20 I love it how the Brits really cling to their sorry state of tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson was right about you people. 
Quote: If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, and give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; And the sixteen being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they do now, on oatmeal and potatoes, have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; But be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains around the necks of our fellow sufferers; And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second, that second for a third, and so on 'til the bulk of society is reduced to mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering...and the forehorse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.
Unfortunately, what he said about England then applies to the US today - and how many royals own the banking system that is busting out the world? Hmmm?
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 16:11:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Gorki Andropov
Originally by: Information Agent What did he say that was racist? Seriously, don't be so fast to play that card.
At 6'6 and 410lb's, I'd imagine that person would find it hard to get around and would most likely be very unhealthy.
He suggested that while a 6'6" 410lb black man would tire quicker than a white equivalent.
You assumed he meant they were of the same weight, nothing about the weight was mentioned, your mistake.
Delenda est achura. |

Astenion
Gallente Spiritus Draconis
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 23:54:00 -
[78]
Edited by: Astenion on 10/08/2011 23:56:31
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
Baseball is closer to cricket. Rounders is more like stickball.
Your football is mainly played by girls in the US.
Rugby is very big in the US as well.
You've obviously never played American football if you think pads make it hurt LESS. If anything, it hurts MORE. And no one wears cups, genius. The styles of tackling are completely different between rugby and football because you simply cannot launch yourself headfirst like a missile into someone's face in rugby.
Get outside and play a sport that doesn't include bouncing a ball off of your head while running around like a fairy, crying that you broke an eyelash.
|

Brisco County
The Shadow Plague Gentlemen's Agreement
|
Posted - 2011.08.11 12:04:00 -
[79]
wtf, #18: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Freedom-Purple-Whiz/dp/B001ANQDVG/ref=zg_bsms_sports_29
Is squatting really that hard, ladies?
|

Brisco County
The Shadow Plague Gentlemen's Agreement
|
Posted - 2011.08.11 12:07:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Tian Garsk
Originally by: I'm 5particus
Originally by: Skinae
How many 6'6 410lb black men do your rugby teams have?
You think a bunch of fatties with body armour are more intimidating than Samoan/Maori doing Haka. LOL.
tbh Al Davis is scarier:
|

Heroltior Ghedonia
|
Posted - 2011.08.12 12:00:00 -
[81]
I like the associations
Sales Associations
Look at the "Tags Customers Associate purchase with" at the bottom.
Now, look at the sales uptake in the Zippo Lighters:
1923%
|

Dray
Caldari Euphoria Released HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2011.08.12 15:37:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Hestia Mar
Originally by: Ejit Here in the UK Baseball is called Rounders and is almost entirely played by girls.
Same for American Football. Here it's called Rugby only without all the gay body armour and nut cups....
But yeah Baseball bats here are only used for cracking skulls.
As a Brit I would contradict these statements, and would point out that it confirms the poasters name. I smell a pasty faced kid who never got involved with sport of any sort...
I played baseball for many years here in the UK, and am a diehard Mets fan, as well being a diehard member of the toon army. I also follow the New England Patriots during the NFL season.
As for the patently stupid statements about gun ownership, well, they were just so ridiculous that I'm dumbfounded...
You're quite obviously the exception not the rule, I'm sure there will be some Americans that like cricket but very very few. American football is a lot more popular but still way behind other sports.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |