| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
2257
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 00:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:
Does ganking a miner even need a reason? Does it even need to be justified?
If it's fun, then just say it is fun and have done with it.
Well it used to be rather good money but now that the isk is gone there no point in going after the badly tanked miners which is why we now have fleets of untanked bot barges in lonetrek. And as everyone knows, mass botting only leads to bad prices on the markets. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2257
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 00:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote: And if the prices go low enough miners will either have to accept it or get off their fatasses and do something about it. (reporting, ganking whatever)
Most of what occurs in Eve is self-levelling.
Minerals get cheaper, ganking (or any PvP for that matter) gets cheaper, more of it happens and prices go back up. A beautiful thing imho.
I really think we worry to much about trying to inject regulation or whines about game play styles to get things changed when in reality, they'll change themselves given enough time.
Problem here is miners whined and CCP changed the game for them. They didn't adapt or change tactics themselves. Thanks to this short sightedness miners are going to suffer a loss of income, just when things were looking good. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2259
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 03:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
PI Maker wrote:why don't the 6k of you could create destroyer alts and just kill every thing in high sec. little schools of piranhas devouring the miners. aren't you guys the super villains in this particular universe? i'm terribly disappointed that you're down to forum posts. entertain me mr. player content!
We moved onto more profitable ventures such as the great freighter gank. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2260
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 12:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vanria Vexed wrote:You can still gank mining vessels, it just requires the ganker to invest more money into a successful gank.
The problem is that you cannot make a profit anymore. They might still be gankable but if there is no money in it then nobody is going to do it. The only threat to high sec miners have more or less been removed. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2260
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 12:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ana Vyr wrote:I like mining. I'd go as far as saying its my main playstyle at the moment.
The thought of logging in to play sickly deer for some coward pvp wannabes is terrible. You gankers are just incapable of seeing this from the other side. You would destroy the game just so you can shoot ships that can't fight back. Pathetic.
Whats pathetic is the fact that for 8 months people such as yourself failed to do anything to protect yourselves dispite "evil gankers" such as myself posting fits and tactics that would make you unviable targets. You made yourselves targets for pirates.
Even now you people fit zero tank but thanks to CCP most are not profitable to kill. Miners whine how boring their job is then nerf the only excitement they have |

baltec1
Bat Country
2264
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 06:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tesal wrote:There were too many gankers is all. It was unbalanced. So it got nerfed like ALWAYS happens when things get unbalanced. Effective gankers have already moved on to freighters. If that gets out of control, it will get nerfed too. You are living in the past, move on already.
Funny thing about this is that outside of hulkageddon and the Galente ice interdiction there were no more than 30 to 40 people ganking miners and that it was only widespread on the forums. Ships such as ruptures were dieing in much greater numbers. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2265
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 15:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:So many miners in this thread gloating that the gankers can no longer kill them
I hope they come back to gloat in a few months when they have pushed trit prices through the floor
They have already undone all of the benefits my corp provided them at the start of the year. Caldari Ice is 1/3 the price it was when this barge change hit. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2265
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 15:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
PI Maker wrote: why don't you and your buddies stop whining and bring out a destroyer fleet? can you seriously not get 5 or 6 goons in destroyers together to do some ganking of miners? can a 6k man alliance not put together 250 destroyer alts? have the goons been neutered by a simple EHP buff? is that all it took to turn you guys into whiny babies? where the **** is your emergent gameplay?
We only ganked miners because it was profitable. The EHP buff means that macks are no longer profitable to gank so we no longer gank them. This is something miners have never been able to grasp for some reason.
The EHP of the mack also means that the skiff, a ship built for greater protection from ganks, is pointless. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2276
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 05:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
PI Maker wrote: so basically, you're whining that the resource you were farming isn't as profitable as it once was. has it really come to this? i thought you guys were the best and brightest villains in eve. has the idea well been tapped out? with 6k of you, it shouldn't be hard for you to get together a massive noob ship blob. you could do it with trial accounts. even buying fittings for it would be a rounding error in your null sec pilots' wallets.
put your numbers to work. your high sec pve got nerfed. get over it. i'm pretty sure that's what goons tell the rest of us.
Acctually my main complaint is that the skiff is redundent because of the macks tank. You also under estimate the logistics and cost of such operations. Even our wallets are not endless. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2276
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 06:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tarinara wrote:They are? Hey Baltec: did I miss the memo that you guys were the villains while I was un-subbed or something? 
Bat Country have become the bane of many in highsec with our attacks on the stupid. Goons as a whole are deemed the worst thing ever and our dear leader is the anti-christ himself.
Which is ironic because we have done more good for miners in the past 8 months than anyone else in the past 8 years. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2277
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 13:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Garonor wrote:
So with that out of the way: I still don't get why gankers are still complaining about the mining buff, the same way I don't get why miners complain about suicide ganking. There are tons of threads in which gankers tell miners to quit whining and tank their barges, in order to adapt to the conditions that are set by the game. And rightly so. In return the gankers must also accept that they have to adapt to the new conditions, by either using bigger and better fit ships, roaming in larger gangs, looking for other targets, or just starting a new pasttime. Eve offers so many fun things to do, but sometimes when you look at the GD-forums it seems like mining and ganking miners are the only activities people care about.
The problem is that the skiff is a pointless ship because the mack is doing its job. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2280
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 14:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tarinara wrote:I think I see what this is all about. You really liked your Skiff, didn't you. This ENTIRE Ice Interdiction, Freighter Ganking and even HULKAGEDDON is all because of Skiff! ... You... you... VILLAIN!! 
I know right?
Fighting to get the barges balanced right, blowig up countless bots and bad miners, getting great prices for the stuff miners mine, giving out fitting advice and tactics...
Its almost as if I am a force for good for miners and care about their wellbeing |

baltec1
Bat Country
2282
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 17:33:00 -
[13] - Quote
PI Maker wrote: I don't underestimate the logistics of it. Step 1: Create trial account Step2: Log in and create character Step 3: Undock. Step 4: Get into fleet Step 5: Gank en masse. See? That isn't even remotely hard. It's also free.
WTF has happened to you guys? Do you need help? Are you seriously telling me you don't have the wherewithal to put together a stack of 10 destroyers and fittings each in Jita or another hub? Is all that sov space pve income not enough to cover 50 to 75 million isk in expenses per pilot? You are sad sad men. Your entire alliance should feel bad.
I have a stack of 100 catalysts and 100 thrashers with basic gank fits taken from the hulkageddon ganker instructions. If you can get 100 pilots to form up, I'll arm you, since the Goons are so freaking uncoordinated (srsly. I. Cannot. Believe. How. Wimpy. You. Have. Become.). A simple contract exchange for a reasonable price. Then you run a barracuda fleet into an ice system, 10 ships per mack and kill as many as you can before you burn through the stack of ships.
get your balls out of your wife's purse already.
Last time we used over 1000 ships which needed 8000 named blasters, 3000 points and 3000 t1 damage mods.
It cost us billions and we simply are not going to invest that kind of capital into something that gives us no profit. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2289
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 00:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:..stuff.. Mate. For all the faffing about on this. In RL we do not go around blowing up oil-tankers or oil-rigs to increase prices. Period.
This isn't RL.
Its no coincidence that ice mining sucked for years untill the two ice interdictions hit. We effectivly wiped out the vast bulk of miners who were either bots or very bad at it. Coupled with market panic we brought about a three fold increase in profits for miners. Then the barge buff happened and the ganking stopped. The result?
A collapse of the ice prices and the spawning of large bot fleets and porly tanked scrubs flooding the market again. Turns out, ganking is a good thing for miners. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2290
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 00:40:00 -
[15] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote: Funny how it's "not RL" when you justify the ganks but you use RL economic theory to do so.
And my point is made exaclty. The change in prices was temporary. Period.
BUT, and this is my point, the anger/anghst/whine whatever you want to call it over the interdiction bought about an EXTERNAL force to circumvent it.
Why? Because the impact to the game and the players (in this, a VR world) was seriously causing a problem. CCP saw it for what it was and "fixed it".
We cannot call "God" in RL when things go bad and to be perfectly honest CCP played "God" to fix the problem. Whether I or you or anyone else agrees is irrelevant.
>> CCP's RL economic reality required a fix. And so it came to be.
Bring back manic ganking again and it'll simply happen again.
I stand by all this talk about gank, not gank to manipulate prices is purely faffing.
You have to come up with another way.
Ice prices stablised at around 900 isk/unit for seven months, this was not a temporary blip. Its also wrong to say gankers were cause mass unsubbing given that subs have been growing the entire time this was happening.
The only problem was that a lot of people were too dumb/greedy to fit a tank. We are seeing exactly the same thing with our freighter gank. There is a single person who has lost 3 freighters in the last few days in exactly the same system doing the same thing. The only difference between miners and freighter is the scale of the botting which is massive in mining.
People such as yourself are destroying your own profession with your blind hatred of ganking. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2291
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 02:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
Piugattuk wrote:Not blind hatred, sure ganking a freighter full of doodoo is one thing but to blanket target miners because as we all know every single mining barge is a bot is stupidity, there's this obsession with hating miners its the reason CCP had to intervene and buff the ships why is it we should all fly around a$$ grabbing each other all the time around every corner is beyond me, i mean if blowing up everything in sight is all that you want there's 0.0 and dull sec, low sec, WH, FW, all the a$$ grabbing you want empire is only a small part of eve...WTF more do you want.
You do realise that if you fit a tank you are more or less safe right?
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2291
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 02:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote: You do realise that if you fit a tank you are more or less safe right?
Not this old argument again. sigh... I don't recall CCP sending out an email to remind the miners of this point. I don't recall the email where CCP told all the miners to HTFU. I do recall it causing a LOT of anger and it DID cause unsubs (that's why CCP reacted - it's the ONLY reason they would. I do recall your whingy/whiney/moan that you're doing the miners a favour. Oh wait. You're STILL doing it..... And you reckon the MINERS haven't learned anything. Sheesh Baltec. Just sheesh!
You are exactly the kind of village idiot who we love. CCP changed the barges to give them all a role to play, the skiff got the tank job but because the mack has a tank that makes it unprofitable to kill the skiff is simply not needed. This is a problem CCP wanted to fix.
I would also like to see these mass unsubs given that over the past year EVE has returned to steady growth. I also find it rather funny that you require CCP to hold your hand and tell you that a ship should be fitted with a tank for protection. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2293
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 09:40:00 -
[18] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:
Deal with it.
Well well well.
Firstly, tanking your barge to the point where you are not profitable to gank is a very viable tactic. If it wasnt then why are all of these untanked macks in 0.7 belts going untouched?
Secondly our "evil ganking" wiped out the bot armies in high sec and resulted in ice prices shooting up to three time more profitable than before our campain and stayed there. Its a fact that this happened and it was good for miners who took the very simple steps to protect themselves.
Thirdly, the skiff is designed to be the barge to protect yourself from ganks but because the mack can do this untanked the skiff is pointless to fly. CCP changed the barges to stop a single ship (the hulk) from being king of mining so its only right they alter the mack to stop it from doing the skiffs job.
And lastly, your genious idea of buying all minerals and killing all miners would cost more than the net worth of ALL 0.0 powerblocks. If you stopped to think about it for even a split seconds you would realise the impossibility of buying trillions of isk worth of trit alone.
Miners such as yourself are shooting yourselves in the foot while stabbing yourselves repeatedy in the back and destroying all the good things that have happened to you over the last 9 months. Ice is only the first to tank in price, the other minerals are going to follow at a slow but gradual pace and once again miner income will pathetic. I will end up gaining from that with cheaper POS fuel, ships and mods as well as ganking other things such as poorly tanked haulers and bling mission runners. You however will once again be relegated to bottom feeder status as miners once again become the $1 a week worker. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2293
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 09:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:
I'm completely confused why non-miners and presumably non-industrialists are bothered about ore prices being too low.
Doesn't that actually make their gameplay easier?
Why would anyone ASK for ways to make stuff more expensive? It defies logic.
So let me get this right. As a miner, you think it is better for say, trit prices to go from 6-7isk/unit to 3isk/unit? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2294
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 18:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Tarinara wrote:baltec1 wrote:So let me get this right. As a miner, you think it is better for say, trit prices to go from 6-7isk/unit to 3isk/unit? Or how about the 1.70 or so wasn't it that it cratered to back around '08-'09 time frame?
This is good for miners how? |
| |
|