Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:46:00 -
[1]
Hello everyone,
i wanted to ask if i am the only one having problems with deactivated modules after a ship change in station? It seems like the mods are deactivated becouse the unpiloted ship has not enough powergrid for all of them .
Also agression Timers, i got troubles with Gallente Navy, but i had an Standing of -3,16 with gallente, isn't the navy supposed to attack only under -5 ??
Br, and thanks all
|
Mr Kidd
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:53:00 -
[2]
The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
|
Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:54:00 -
[3]
ok, i just wanted to make sure that i had not too much beer... so they've messed up again.
thanks
|
Othran
Brutor Tribe
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 14:56:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
On this instance it doesn't, hard as it is to believe (and I'm not being sarcastic).
Tuxford actually engaged with the forum users and now he knows what is wrong.
Thread is HERE
|
Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:04:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Othran
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
On this instance it doesn't, hard as it is to believe (and I'm not being sarcastic).
Tuxford actually engaged with the forum users and now he knows what is wrong.
Thread is HERE
Thanks for the info,
and whats about the aggression timers? Isn't the navy supposed to engage players with a standing lower then -5 ?
|
Othran
Brutor Tribe
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:13:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Kristina Vanszar
and whats about the aggression timers? Isn't the navy supposed to engage players with a standing lower then -5 ?
Did you go GCC at all? If so then remember you have multiple timers running and landing on-grid with a faction npc (sentry gun) will reset the faction timer so it can last a lot longer than 15 mins.
I assume you already knew that but I haven't heard anyone else complaining so I dunno really :)
|
Denidil
Gallente Rape Pillage and Burn
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 15:28:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.
CCP - What are you going to do to make a Commitment To Quality in your patches going forward? |
Othran
Brutor Tribe
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 16:24:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.
You got a lot to learn about CCP matey. He's really NOT trolling
|
Rediculous Grammer
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 16:28:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.
Module offline problems have been on SiSi for MONTHS and still went live. The only ones trolling are you and CCP.
|
Denidil
Gallente Rape Pillage and Burn
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 16:48:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.
Module offline problems have been on SiSi for MONTHS and still went live. The only ones trolling are you and CCP.
and he explained how that happened. they had fixed the cause of the original reports, then it got broken again near the last minute and they thought the reports they saw were stale (from the previously fixed break).
why don't you go read Tuxford's comments.
CCP - WiS is sorta cool, but FiS is more important. Put Resources back on Space, NOW. |
|
Rediculous Grammer
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:05:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Mr Kidd The official word from CCP is "We are aware of the issue", which given CCP's track record translates to either "So, what?" or "Deal with it!". Your choice.
they're already fixed one of the common causes of the module offlining issue, and isolated another. stop you're trolling jackass.
Module offline problems have been on SiSi for MONTHS and still went live. The only ones trolling are you and CCP.
and he explained how that happened. they had fixed the cause of the original reports, then it got broken again near the last minute and they thought the reports they saw were stale (from the previously fixed break).
why don't you go read Tuxford's comments.
You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.
|
Xercodo
Amarr Xovoni Directorate
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:42:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Xercodo on 03/09/2011 17:43:11
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.
considering what has happened to me with code before, yes, this could very much happen, especially cause of the complexity of EVE
If anything I sympathize with them over how frustrating it must be to have fixed something only for it to break again with ppl like you breathing down their backs
-------------------------------------------------- The drake is a lie |
Denidil
Gallente Rape Pillage and Burn
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:44:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.
i'm a software engineer, and i saw a reasonable explanation. just because you that thinks everyone is always dishonest doesn't mean ****.
CCP - WiS is sorta cool, but FiS is more important. Put Resources back on Space, NOW. |
Kristina Vanszar
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 17:53:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Denidil
Originally by: Rediculous Grammer
You believe anything CCP says, don't you. I highly doubt after months of reports they "fixed it but then it broke right before release!" again...when this happens constantly with huge bugs reported on SiSi that still go live.
i'm a software engineer, and i saw a reasonable explanation. just because you that thinks everyone is always dishonest doesn't mean ****.
it's funny how everyone is a software engeneer when it comes to questions like that.
you'll learn it mate.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |