EVE Search - lock please

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

lock please

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:10:00 - [1] Well you FOE people are getting too predictable. I knew you were going to show up with excuses no matter what would have really happened. Let me get a few things straight. Fact is, DDC held out to 2 assaults of your fleet in Hakonen. We just stayed there and fought until you guys started warping off. The DDC fleet did not outnumber you and CLS was to keep the Hakonen gate in Nalvula closed should you try to escape. Call us blobers as much as you like, while in fact we took you on with even numbers and had the second fleet cut your escape route. You can call us blobbers if you were that reinforcement fleet stuck in the Vellaine safespot. We did blob that fleet to keep both FOE fleets seperated. You can not critize this decision from a strategical point of view. However, the DDC fleet then decided to move back to OBE as the CLS and newly formed MAZA. fleets were able to handle this situation. Back in OBE the DDC fleet engaged an even sized fleet camping the Hakonen gate. We sat on the gate and fought them while the FOE fleet warped off to the DED station. At that time CLS was called back to Hakonen in order to hold the OBE gate. Losses on both sides were minimal considering the size of the engagements. To know exactly what DDC lost consult the FOE killtracker and to know what FOE lost consult our killtracker at http://www.ddcorp.org/killtracker If you didn't yet catch on it and wonder who I am, I was leading the DDC fleet yesterday and the only purpose of this post is to set facts.
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:14:00 - [2] Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 15:15:48 Originally by: ChaosOne Originally by: Balistic Void ChaosOne after your last "batle report" you are thoroughly discredited. Get someone else to post reports. whatever. so i take it your disputing this post as well then?? get a life or think of something constructive to add. id like to hear peoples perspective on what they saw etc not just stupid childish remarks. i thought i was rather refrained in this one and accurate to what i saw. I agree with ChaosOne, if you want to get a point accross at least support your arguments or just don't post. edit, fixed to a more polite comment
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:18:00 - [3] Originally by: MAXSuicide Originally by: Zardock Well you FOE people are getting too predictable. I knew you were going to show up with excuses no matter what would have really happened. Let me get a few things straight. coming from a corp that were blaming their losses on the game in the last fleet battle that happened. Did you stop reading there?
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:23:00 - [4] Originally by: Robotek Hybrid Originally by: Zardock Well you FOE people are getting too predictable. I knew you were going to show up with excuses no matter what would have really happened. Let me get a few things straight. Fact is, DDC held out to 2 assaults of your fleet in Hakonen. We just stayed there and fought until you guys started warping off. The DDC fleet did not outnumber you and CLS was to keep the Hakonen gate in Nalvula closed should you try to escape. Call us blobers as much as you like, while in fact we took you on with even numbers and had the second fleet cut your escape route. You can call us blobbers if you were that reinforcement fleet stuck in the Vellaine safespot. We did blob that fleet to keep both FOE fleets seperated. You can not critize this decision from a strategical point of view. However, the DDC fleet then decided to move back to OBE as the CLS and newly formed MAZA. fleets were able to handle this situation. Back in OBE the DDC fleet engaged an even sized fleet camping the Hakonen gate. We sat on the gate and fought them while the FOE fleet warped off to the DED station. At that time CLS was called back to Hakonen in order to hold the OBE gate. Losses on both sides were minimal considering the size of the engagements. To know exactly what DDC lost consult the FOE killtracker and to know what FOE lost consult our killtracker at http://www.ddcorp.org/killtracker If you didn't yet catch on it and wonder who I am, I was leading the DDC fleet yesterday and the only purpose of this post is to set facts. Thats not true. 1st hakonen fleet engagement when you seperated your fleets we warped in and you lot warped away. 2nd hakonen fleet engagement we were camping the obe gate and the xetic fleet in obe jumped in then we safespotted. 3rd hakonen fleet engagement we warped at you faught for a minute then we had to warp back out. Then the xetic fleet left obe and hakonen entirely so the hakonen fleet went to obe to pick up a few guys that just logged on. 1 of your fleets came back and we duked it out in obe for a bit. I had to warp our early in the battle but when I came back xetic had about 9 ships at the gate as did we then the 2nd fleet came in and we dissengaged. FOE fleet- 7 BS 4 cruisers 4 frigates( that engaged in hakonen ) null 1st hakonen fleet engagement when you seperated your fleets we warped in and you lot warped away. That's the CLS fleet, not DDC. Sorry, get your facts straight. 2nd hakonen fleet engagement we were camping the obe gate and the xetic fleet in obe jumped in then we safespotted. That's the DDC fleet, and it is correct. 3rd hakonen fleet engagement we warped at you faught for a minute then we had to warp back out. Also correct. Did you miss the fight in OBE at the Hakonen gate?
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:29:00 - [5] Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 15:31:56 Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 15:29:22 Originally by: Robotek Hybrid no its the last little paragraph there and ddc or not its a red enemy fleet it matters not to me if it was ddc or xetic. but yes what happened there is true. I discussed what happened with the DDC fleet, you quoted on it and said it was false to come back and talk about CLS? DDC is not CLS, so before you say that what I said is wrong or false you better get your own facts straight. edit: typos
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:48:00 - [6] Originally by: Robotek Hybrid Originally by: Zardock Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 15:31:56 Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 15:29:22 Originally by: Robotek Hybrid no its the last little paragraph there and ddc or not its a red enemy fleet it matters not to me if it was ddc or xetic. but yes what happened there is true. I discussed what happened with the DDC fleet, you quoted on it and said it was false to come back and talk about CLS? DDC is not CLS, so before you say that what I said is wrong or false you better get your own facts straight. edit: typos No I said that the movements you described were false let me put it this way XETIC ( thats CLS and you ) warped away twice FOE warped away 3 times. Or wait let me put it this way. My fleet being the european alcoholic contingent in hakonen warped away twice and ended the night with low kills and losses while the CELTS who are in NO WAY associated with this FOE fleet did their own thing during the night. Then the DED station lovers AAA group came online. They used a different TS but share our killboard. We gorpued with them on different TS. Then TS went down and it was evryman for them self. So that in the final battle it was 27 different FOE fleets ( 1 ship per ) against the 2 xetic fleets. If you didn't notice DDC and CLS fleets were flying seperatly. DDC did not warp away from a fight a single time yesterday. My orders were to hold our ground and that's what we did. You can stop arguying about my earlier post as it was about DDC and NOT the CLS crew. If you're unable to make the contrast or recognize your mistake then stop arguying about what the DDC fleet reported.
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 15:54:00 - [7] Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 15:56:11 In a recap Robotek Hybrid you saw the CLS fleet heading to the Supremacy fleet around the highways. You caught them on the obe gate in Hakonen and they warped out. Then DDC jumped in hakonen from obe and engaged your fleet, we got you on the run and you acknowledged it yourself. Second encounter between DDC and your fleet, you warped out and you said if yourself. It's your experience, not necesarily the whole. See how it fits in the events you experienced before calling anything you did not experience false.
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 16:05:00 - [8] Originally by: Foyle Yes, we did get out numbered. We fight against all odds on any given day, we had too much working against us yesterday. C4W3 ws sober, we were outnumbered, and their was a shortage on Ibis. For the first time since these 5 wars started our guys had to retreat. FOE looks forwards to weeks more of good fighting. smack free of course. looks for max Regardless of numbers or any other factor. It was a good fight and we had fun. I hope your guys did too :) We're looking forward to meeting you on the battlefield again!
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 21:33:00 - [9] This thread is getting completely off topic with random people posting random comments based on distorted or misinterpreted information on the battle report. Some people will even stop reading here to quote it and throw something else. I don't have all day to argue, sincerely I couldn't careless about the opinion of the people who take an insulting tone while replying to any post in this thread. Thanks to all of those who stayed polite and respectful both in local and in this thread. Time to let it die. See you on the battlefield :)
Zardock	Posted - 2005.03.06 21:54:00 - [10] Edited by: Zardock on 06/03/2005 21:54:07 Originally by: Foyle FOE needs to retreat from the Forums now...... Seleene thank you for clearing up some questions we had. Xetic and FOE will meet again. Lets try not to post every battle- no one really needs update everytime a ship goes down, we have pretty kill boards for that information. Yes, time to let it die and I'm wondering why it was posted in the first place myself. I'll give a cookie for a lock! edit: added lock part

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.