| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
I know a lot of miners have spent large amounts of money puting cargo expanding rigs on there mining ships. We did that to increase the ore holding maximum on our ships. Not to hold mining crystals in the cargo hold.
Cargo expanding rigs are now 50% more useless because the only real thing to use them for now is to expand cargo space on haulers.
I know CCP is trying to make mining ships more role set... but.
Solo mining is still something people do... and having ships with a super large ore hold but mines slow.. is retareded.
Same thing for having a ship that mines the largest amout have a small ore hold.. its just stupid.. and forces jet can mining on solo miners.. or making us look like macro miners cause we have to warp to station all the time. (which is a huge waste of time).
So.. new rigs... Medium Orehold Optimization I and II etc. all the needed ones |

Paikis
Lycosa Syndicate Surely You're Joking
195
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
No. Fly a Mackinaw. |

Nestara Aldent
Citimatics
97
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
I think when the size of the ore hold was balanced, it was taken into account that there are no rigs/modules for ore hold increase.
|

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Paikis wrote:No. Fly a Mackinaw.
The mackinaw mining amout sucks. i didnt spend months getting all my skills to 5 to mine in a ship that cant mine.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9681
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:The mackinaw mining amout sucks. No, it really doesn't.
You just have to face the fact that you now have to pick your ship according to what you want to do and that none of them will do it all. If you want yield, use a Hulk (and a fleet). If you want cargo capacity and AFK:ness, use a Mack. If you want silly tank, use a Skiff.
Asking for a module that directly contravenes the balanced they've created for the three ships will need a bit stronger argument than GÇ£I don't wanna!GÇ¥
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.
|

Paikis
Lycosa Syndicate Surely You're Joking
195
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:Paikis wrote:No. Fly a Mackinaw. The mackinaw mining amout sucks. i didnt spend months getting all my skills to 5 to mine in a ship that cant mine.
The Mack mines something like 10% less than a Hulk. It also has the largest Ore hold of all the miners.
CCP deliberately set the Hulk to have a small ore hold to STOP you from doing what you're asking them to do. Why on earth would you think they'd introduce a module that would completely undo the work they put into balancing these ships?
If you want max yield (Hulk) then you need a hauler. If you want max AFK (Mackinaw) then you sacrifice yield.
Hulk for fleet mining, Mackinaw for solo mining and Procurer for bait mining.
Why are there so many miners who simply don't get this? The mind truly boggles. |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nestara Aldent wrote:I think when the size of the ore hold was balanced, it was taken into account that there are no rigs/modules for ore hold increase.
Ya i have 120 million in rigs on one ship alone that would argue with that...
Over all the changes and adding a orehold was a good idea.. but they should have left the general sizes of the holds be the same. when they transfered over to oreholds.
It really does not make sence that the largest most expensive ore mining ship is not the best.. all around ship to mine with.
I understand they wanted to make group mining more of a focus.. and i do group mine as well.. but dont nerf it for when people are solo mining becuase people are not online.. or you just feel like mining solo.
|

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 07:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Paikis wrote:Futchmacht wrote:Paikis wrote:No. Fly a Mackinaw. The mackinaw mining amout sucks. i didnt spend months getting all my skills to 5 to mine in a ship that cant mine. The Mack mines something like 10% less than a Hulk. It also has the largest Ore hold of all the miners. CCP deliberately set the Hulk to have a small ore hold to STOP you from doing what you're asking them to do. Why on earth would you think they'd introduce a module that would completely undo the work they put into balancing these ships? If you want max yield (Hulk) then you need a hauler. If you want max AFK (Mackinaw) then you sacrifice yield. Hulk for fleet mining, Mackinaw for solo mining and Procurer for bait mining. Why are there so many miners who simply don't get this? The mind truly boggles.
I'm not afk mining.. im just mining.. It's people like you that assume that 100% of miners just log on turn there miners on and go play another game or watch youtube.
And as for afk and macro miners.. if CCP did what they were supposed to it would not be a problem.. they were supposed to make mining require scanning down you ore.. instead of going to a belt... ibut they always just trry and bandaid things. instead fo fixing them. |

Nestara Aldent
Citimatics
97
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 08:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:Nestara Aldent wrote:I think when the size of the ore hold was balanced, it was taken into account that there are no rigs/modules for ore hold increase.
Ya i have 120 million in rigs on one ship alone that would argue with that... Over all the changes and adding a orehold was a good idea.. but they should have left the general sizes of the holds be the same. when they transfered over to oreholds. It really does not make sence that the largest most expensive ore mining ship is not the best.. all around ship to mine with. I understand they wanted to make group mining more of a focus.. and i do group mine as well.. but dont nerf it for when people are solo mining becuase people are not online.. or you just feel like mining solo.
Theres no "best all around" in EVE. All ships are ultra-specialized, and in that way, many ships are useful. Also more expensive isnt always the better. |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 09:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
OMG really no best over all ships?? all the ship classes are set up that exact way.
(the best ship for salvage) = Noctis
i could list every ship thats in a catagory like that.. becuase they all are..almost.
The Hulk used to be the best ship and the longest to skill up .. now all 3 exumers are the same to learn.
Basicly they took ships that people had to take longer to learn .. for the added benifit of it being the best and nerfed the whole lot of them into one group of ships that all suck at 2/3 of everything.
The old roles were better .. but thats a whole other topic.. and one even i think is closed now.
But it would be nice for the solo.. people who mine to be able to upgrade there ships to hold more ore with rigs if they want to.
as it stands now i have rigs in my ship that i payed a lot of isk for that are a waste of space and upgrade a stat (cargo hold space) that for a mining ship is usless. 120 million to get 1 or 2 more mining crystals in the bay is something no one in there right mind would do.
|

Nestara Aldent
Citimatics
97
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 10:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
No. Rly which battleship is the best, tell me?
And you cry Hulk isnt the best in all ways than the others? How can you not see that now other two exhumers are useful, rather than useless, like they were before? |

WilliamMays
Stuffs Inc.
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 10:27:00 -
[12] - Quote
from what you've said, it sounds like your old mining ship was fit for max cargo, which means you had terrible yield and even worse tank. Your new option is a mackinaw with better yield than before, about double the space for ore, and a solid tank.
It's like you're complaining about insurance costs on your new ferrari after winning the powerball and quitting your job at burger king. |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 10:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
WilliamMays wrote:from what you've said, it sounds like your old mining ship was fit for max cargo, which means you had terrible yield and even worse tank. Your new option is a mackinaw with better yield than before, about double the space for ore, and a solid tank.
It's like you're complaining about insurance costs on your new ferrari after winning the powerball and quitting your job at burger king.
No i had it set up for max mining with 2x mining laser upgrade II's and with 2x cargo hold opt. II's i could hold 2x pulls without any loss of ore. and i mined more then the current amount now for the hulk.
current setup i lose ore on the second pull every time.. and i pull less ore over time as well.
The only way i can get it to work is to stagger all the beams and dump ore into a can.
Before i didnt need to use a can even. unless i wanted to group mine .. then i used jet cans and haulers.
The new system is very inefficent and could be corrected with orehold rigs.
and just so you all know i dont support afk mining.. or bots... i cant wait till they put in ore scanning.. and get rid of the belts... i always wanted mining to be an active thing to do because i enjoy it. |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 10:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nestara Aldent wrote:No. Rly which battleship is the best, tell me?
And you cry Hulk isnt the best in all ways than the others? How can you not see that now other two exhumers are useful, rather than useless, like they were before?
The only ship that was usless before was the skiff.. because it was to weak to use in 0.0.. and in empire you could not even get the ore it was made for.
The old way was set up for hulk (max ore) (and cargo)
And mac was max ICE with enough cargo hold to take in 2.5 pulls if fitted right.
The current setup is most cargo for a ship that mines less.. and less cargo for a ship that mines the most?? sounds kinda backwards to me.
It like making a dump truck with a small bin to hold stuff .. and making a loader with a super mega sized scoop that dumps extra sand or what ever all over the place around the dump truck because its bin is to small. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
760
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 11:10:00 -
[15] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:Nestara Aldent wrote:No. Rly which battleship is the best, tell me?
And you cry Hulk isnt the best in all ways than the others? How can you not see that now other two exhumers are useful, rather than useless, like they were before? The only ship that was usless before was the skiff.. because it was to weak to use in 0.0.. and in empire you could not even get the ore it was made for. The old way was set up for hulk (max ore) (and cargo) And mac was max ICE with enough cargo hold to take in 2.5 pulls if fitted right. The current setup is most cargo for a ship that mines less.. and less cargo for a ship that mines the most?? sounds kinda backwards to me. It like making a dump truck with a small bin to hold stuff .. and making a loader with a super mega sized scoop that dumps extra sand or what ever all over the place around the dump truck because its bin is to small.
Tell me, are you familiar with the concept of BALANCE?
The hulk has an advantage, best yield, and a disadvantage, small hold. Seriously, just use a mackinaw. |

Iris Bravemount
The Golden Gaze
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 11:51:00 -
[16] - Quote
So you would like to get a refund for your now useless T2 cargo rigs, right?
You claim that a more expensive ship is always better: compare battleships and black ops. And while you're at it, compare the dps of a sieged dreadnought and the dps of a titan. Compare the dps of an interceptor and an attack frigate. Etc etc. A higher price does not equal overall better stats.
The ships are now specialized, which is good.
And finally, the hulk costs 5% more than a mack. Big deal. I accidentally... the bookmark. How much is it worth? |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 12:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
Iris Bravemount wrote:So you would like to get a refund for your now useless T2 cargo rigs, right?
You claim that a more expensive ship is always better: compare battleships and black ops. And while you're at it, compare the dps of a sieged dreadnought and the dps of a titan. Compare the dps of an interceptor and an attack frigate. Etc etc. A higher price does not equal overall better stats.
The ships are now specialized, which is good.
And finally, the hulk costs 5% more than a mack. Big deal.
Why are people bringing in all this usless stuff about other ships.. there was a time when black ops ships were better then standard battleships.
And titans lol.. there used to be a time when they could insta pop 300 ships if they didnt crash the whole cluster!!
When ever they change something in game some ships get left behind.. like black ops.. and as for titans there role as a almost system wide death star has been changed. and for the good.
Some of the changes they make are good ones and some are bad.. like what they did to the ORE ships.
And the easy way to offset this is to make proper rigs for all the ore ships.. ones that are actually usefull for ORE ships. not just the hulk. but all 3 of them.
|

Jin alPatar
Entertainment 7wenty
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 13:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:WilliamMays wrote:from what you've said, it sounds like your old mining ship was fit for max cargo, which means you had terrible yield and even worse tank. Your new option is a mackinaw with better yield than before, about double the space for ore, and a solid tank.
It's like you're complaining about insurance costs on your new ferrari after winning the powerball and quitting your job at burger king. No i had it set up for max mining with 2x mining laser upgrade II's and with 2x cargo hold opt. II's i could hold 2x pulls without any loss of ore. and i mined more then the current amount now for the hulk. current setup i lose ore on the second pull every time.. and i pull less ore over time as well. The only way i can get it to work is to stagger all the beams and dump ore into a can. Before i didnt need to use a can even. unless i wanted to group mine .. then i used jet cans and haulers. The new system is very inefficent and could be corrected with orehold rigs. and just so you all know i dont support afk mining.. or bots... i cant wait till they put in ore scanning.. and get rid of the belts... i always wanted mining to be an active thing to do because i enjoy it.
If you didn't use a can did you run back and forth between the station?
Because if that's the case, then the current mackinaw will give you better yields than the hulk did then due to fewer trips to station.
If you're using a hauler then this isn't really an issue as you should be 100% maximized for yield in your hulk now.
|

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 15:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
I was going back to the station to avoid the many can flippers in the area.. now a days im taking the risk of loss of ore to max out mining with the hulk.
its not the best option but it will have to do.. in the end i think im going to re-sub my hauling alt again.. cause thats the best option lol
Maybe thats was CCP's idea in the first place.. lol |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
27
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 15:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:Paikis wrote:No. Fly a Mackinaw. The mackinaw mining amout sucks. i didnt spend months getting all my skills to 5 to mine in a ship that cant mine.
the mack is only about 400 a cycle of the hulk |

Idris Helion
University of Caille Gallente Federation
128
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 15:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:I'm not afk mining.. im just mining.. It's people like you that assume that 100% of miners just log on turn there miners on and go play another game or watch youtube.
And as for afk and macro miners.. if CCP did what they were supposed to it would not be a problem.. they were supposed to make mining require scanning down you ore.. instead of going to a belt... ibut they always just trry and bandaid things. instead fo fixing them.
If you're solo mining, use a Mack. That's what it's for; that's what it's good at. You won't out-yield a Mack with a Hulk unless you have 3+ Hulks plus an Orca booster. Hulks are meant for fleet use. Just get used to it. Your rigs still work on your cargo hold, and if you have to carry a lot of crystals you'll still need them. It's not like they're wasted.
I can't believe people are still complaining about this. The Mack is the most pimp solo mining vessel in the game. If you can't be bothered to switch to a vessel that is clearly better-suited to your playstyle, then the problem is yours, not the game's.
|

Jin alPatar
Entertainment 7wenty
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 17:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote: its not the best option but it will have to do.. in the end i think im going to re-sub my hauling alt again.. cause thats the best option lol
Maybe thats was CCP's idea in the first place.. lol
Are you suggesting that CCP has an ulterior motive? Something about profit and making money? CRAZY!
Mining Barge rigs would make sense (less damage to crystals, increased yield, etc). we've got implants, why not rigs!?
Note: If you re-sub your hauler, your best mining yield is still to use two miners (mackinaw + whatever your hauler can fly. retriever is quick to get into).
I think a bigger issue is now with the orca. The Hulks are made to be used with a fleet vehicle (orca or rorq). But you need 3 or more hulks working with one to outweigh a 4th person in a lesser miner.
But the orca doesn't really have the ore capacity to sustain 3+ hulks at the boosted mining rate.
Give the orca a 125k m3 ore hold (half the rorq but no compression). Then it can realistically support a small fleet of hulks |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1701
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 04:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:I know a lot of miners have spent large amounts of money puting cargo expanding rigs on there mining ships. We did that to increase the ore holding maximum on our ships. Not to hold mining crystals in the cargo hold.
Cargo expanding rigs are now 50% more useless because the only real thing to use them for now is to expand cargo space on haulers.
I know CCP is trying to make mining ships more role set... but.
Solo mining is still something people do... and having ships with a super large ore hold but mines slow.. is retareded.
Same thing for having a ship that mines the largest amout have a small ore hold.. its just stupid.. and forces jet can mining on solo miners.. or making us look like macro miners cause we have to warp to station all the time. (which is a huge waste of time).
So.. new rigs... Medium Orehold Optimization I and II etc. all the needed ones
Why in the name of the Virgin Mary would you need MORE space in this ginormous ore hold we've been blessed with?
Before the patch, we barely had 2k-6k to work with. Now you have 5 times that. And still your moaning about ore hold size?????
WTF you smoking foo! |

Astroniomix
Thorn Project
255
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 04:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote: 120 million in rigs
WHY THE HELL WERE YOU T2 RIGGING THE DAMN THING!?!
Seriously, the game should not be balanced around a few players bad decisions. |

Ganthrithor
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
421
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 05:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
(I loled at this op)
((IRL))
[Because seriously...] |

TheSkeptic
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 08:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote: Ya i have 120 million in rigs on one ship alone that would argue with that...
Gold!, thanks for the laugh 
Jin alPatar wrote:Give the orca a 125k m3 ore hold (half the rorq but no compression). Then it can realistically support a small fleet of hulks
Not required... the orca is fine as is... please stop trying to turn everything into a massive afk activity. Just warp the orca to station or pos and empty it instead of being so lazy |

Jin alPatar
Entertainment 7wenty
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
TheSkeptic wrote: Not required... the orca is fine as is... please stop trying to turn everything into a massive afk activity. Just warp the orca to station or pos and empty it instead of being so lazy
That's not laziness. When the orca is in station it's not boosting. The more often it has to warp back and forth the less useful it's boost effects are. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
572
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 18:26:00 -
[28] - Quote
1.) The hulk / mack / skiff are well designed, imo. The hulk is meant to be used with a fleet, not solo... htfu!!!
2.) I also believe in choice.... I don't see any problems with ore-bay expander rigs... but they need to have an appropriate penalty. Something like -10% to shield resistances, or -15% to shields, or something potent enough to put you in jeopardy of suicide gankers. |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 11:42:00 -
[29] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: 1.) The hulk / mack / skiff are well designed, imo. The hulk is meant to be used with a fleet, not solo... htfu!!!
2.) I also believe in choice.... I don't see any problems with ore-bay expander rigs... but they need to have an appropriate penalty. Something like -10% to shield resistances, or -15% to shields, or something potent enough to put you in jeopardy of suicide gankers.
First smart thing anyone has had to say!
And i agree 100% to the loss of tank or any defences. If you like to mine.. and mine enough .. the chance of loss on a ship is what you pay for the extra mining bonuses.
Suicide ganks are bound to happen esp when alliances have "Campaigns" to wipe out mining ships.
And if they add rigs its not like you cant put them on what ever ORE ship you want.. or any ship for that matter. The rigs would be good even for all other mining ships .. maybe even the new ORE frig. that is coming out.
And as for having T2 rigs it was so that i could have 2x mining upgrades in lows an extra 18% ore and have the cargo space i needed from the rigs.
As for the old rigs being usless.. i would not care if i could replace them with something that is useful. Cargo rigs are not useful for any mining ships anymore.
If you think about it cargo rigsin the past were used for only two ship types really, mining ships and haulers. 50% of the ships they are designed for now have no use for them. Watch what happens to the price of those rigs over the next few months .. they are going to drop hard im sure.. because no where near as many people will use them or need them.
|

Ark Anhammar
EVE University Ivy League
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 13:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
Futchmacht wrote:I know a lot of miners have spent large amounts of money puting cargo expanding rigs on there mining ships. We did that to increase the ore holding maximum on our ships. Not to hold mining crystals in the cargo hold.
Cargo expanding rigs are now 50% more useless because the only real thing to use them for now is to expand cargo space on haulers.
I know CCP is trying to make mining ships more role set... but.
Solo mining is still something people do... and having ships with a super large ore hold but mines slow.. is retareded.
Same thing for having a ship that mines the largest amout have a small ore hold.. its just stupid.. and forces jet can mining on solo miners.. or making us look like macro miners cause we have to warp to station all the time. (which is a huge waste of time).
So.. new rigs... Medium Orehold Optimization I and II etc. all the needed ones No. Simply, no.
You need to stop crying about this, because you're coming across as very stupid.
Besides, you can drag ore into your cargo hold anyway if you really wanted to. Drag it back and forth. Be happy. Also, thanks for the info about your Hulk and its juicy Tech 2 cargo rigs. I'm sure there's a goon somewhere around here who'll introduce you to their "Hulkageddon" initiative.
You know, I'm generally against in-game griefing, but I'll admit there's an exception for everything. You're just a locator-agent's call away from a fat kill mail from a suicide gank. Let that thought resonate with you when you go out in your belt tonight, mate. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |