| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Casirio
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Exhale.
27
   |
Posted - 2012.10.04 21:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alice Saki wrote:
Don't Ruin it xD Shhhhhhhhh
oh nvm must have been thinking of Star Fox 64 |
Irya Boone
Escadron leader
55
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 22:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
I would like to see roaming sleepers and Incursions in C3+ Whs
Improve C2 class WH More anos more signs ...RENAME null sec system With the name Of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It xill be awesome-á |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Swift Angels Alliance
450
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 00:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
Null static C4's. Transient wormholes into C4's from null/low. Its the ONLY class of wormhole without a direct k-space connection, ever, and it is the ghetto of w-space because of it.
Taking submissions for "Trinkets friendly Advice Column" via evemail or private convo in-game. Anonymity sorta guaranteed.
|
ugh zug
80
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 01:15:00 -
[34] - Quote
didn't you post this on the suggestion forum as well? +1
Want me to shut up?-á
Send me ISK and i'll stop giving suggestions to CCP that make sense.
Remove content from my post, 15 bil.
Remove my content from a thread I have started 30bil. |
Nnezu
Imperial Guardians
Tribal Band
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 04:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
I heard wormhole industrialists would be superhappy about the new poses not needing you to drag materials from one array to another to produce stuff. Also we have jump to k-space to harvest our own ice for fuel blocks :( |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
Dead On Arrival Alliance
1302
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 05:49:00 -
[36] - Quote
Since all the main things have already been mentioned, I'll throw in my pet peeve:
Class 3 wormhole background colors need to be changed.
The cool grey is kind of beautiful, but when it gets mixed with warm light from either the sun or the wormhole itself, result is rotten puke on pooptiles -brown, an extremely dull and bland environment.
(You can draw the conclusion that overall I'm rather happy with wormholes :D )
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 11:36:00 -
[37] - Quote
r Cubed wrote:-ice in Wh Grav sites (gives us the abiltiy to go 100% off the grid)
That probably won't happen.
But if it will, such gravs should be rare enough to check WHs nearby for opportunities of mining there (aka: not enough of it in just your system). Probably such sites should spawn already mentioned sleepers with tweaked (aka severely reduced) loot tables based on quantities of ice in the site decreasing (so that Skiffs will actually see some use and escort not being bored).
Or something like that.
Really though, such implementation have a lot of flaws I see (armour doctrines will have issues with keeping barges alive; entire mining op won't probably worth the hassle when you can run sites instead snd then send somene to sell loot and fetch some ice from the market, one of the reasons I don't think sleeper loot should be removed completely from site guardians, even though it must be reduced, is concern about entire endevaour being worthwile), and autonomy for everyone will still not happen, but it provides some additional opportunities for PvP (I believe) and we'll finally have some militarized indy operations (I was genunely surprized that this thing almost never happens in EVE). |
AdZc
Legio Prima Victrix
Imperius Legio Victrix
7
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 14:54:00 -
[38] - Quote
How about true random Whs? Instead of a DB of all the Whs they spawn randomly with all sorts of properties? Diff statics, miltiple statics etc etc. Istead of it being, Look up locus sig and see details on some DB somewhere, make each one uniqure.
Also yes i would like to see the GFX of the surronding space, they updated all of K-space but WH space was untouched. When you goto K-space its like you have been wandering around in doors with sun glasses and just took them off! lol |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
381
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 15:57:00 -
[39] - Quote
i know i'm gonna get hate for this. i would make wspace much bigger than it currently is so that there will be more daytrippers and nomad corps. PvP heroes, attack!
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
jonnykefka
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
140
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 16:19:00 -
[40] - Quote
Aside from POSes...
New nebulae. Really, with that, better sense of the spatial layout (however irrelevant it may be) of w-space. I kind of like being able to estimate where a K-space hole leads to by the nebulae peeking through it. You can already determine wormhole class by the color of the hole, but it would be kind of cool if you could also estimate roughly where within that class it was. Almost completely pointless, but cool. |
Backfyre
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 17:37:00 -
[41] - Quote
First, fix POSes. At the very least, let us open cans in the POS CHA. That would be an easy way to fix member storage - have people use secure cans and set the hangar permissions so people cannot "take" cans.
Getting back to derelict POS, how about having sleepers take over the tower and create a new sleeper site that basically involves having to lay siege to a fully functional hostile POS that has waves of reinforcements spawn. By "hostile POS", I'm talking how a competent player would fit a POS and not the cheesy NPC towers and batteries in PvE sites. |
Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
164
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 00:18:00 -
[42] - Quote
Random sleeper attacks against starbases.
|
Azemar
Order of the Silver Dragons
Silver Dragonz
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 02:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
I can't think of anything specific, but I shouldn't be sighing when I find a WH, i should be excited. |
Windorian
Leeole's Legion
41
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 04:35:00 -
[44] - Quote
Backfyre wrote:First, fix POSes. At the very least, let us open cans in the POS CHA. That would be an easy way to fix member storage - have people use secure cans and set the hangar permissions so people cannot "take" cans.
Getting back to derelict POS, how about having sleepers take over the tower and create a new sleeper site that basically involves having to lay siege to a fully functional hostile POS that has waves of reinforcements spawn. By "hostile POS", I'm talking how a competent player would fit a POS and not the cheesy NPC towers and batteries in PvE sites.
This. I K-space drones make hives, sleepers should too. Maybe when a pos is offline more then 30 days, the sleepers take it over. It takes 2 weeks to fully convert and online, but when it's up, it's a major challenge. Base it off tower size too, and have them influence the sleeper POS setup based on the tower type (so a sleeper caldari tower would have ECM, ammar would have lasers, etc...) |
Wolvun
Crimson Cell
44
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 06:25:00 -
[45] - Quote
Windorian wrote:Backfyre wrote:First, fix POSes. At the very least, let us open cans in the POS CHA. That would be an easy way to fix member storage - have people use secure cans and set the hangar permissions so people cannot "take" cans.
Getting back to derelict POS, how about having sleepers take over the tower and create a new sleeper site that basically involves having to lay siege to a fully functional hostile POS that has waves of reinforcements spawn. By "hostile POS", I'm talking how a competent player would fit a POS and not the cheesy NPC towers and batteries in PvE sites. This. I K-space drones make hives, sleepers should too. Maybe when a pos is offline more then 30 days, the sleepers take it over. It takes 2 weeks to fully convert and online, but when it's up, it's a major challenge. Base it off tower size too, and have them influence the sleeper POS setup based on the tower type (so a sleeper caldari tower would have ECM, ammar would have lasers, etc...)
With cookies inside? |
Utsen Dari
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
34
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 20:24:00 -
[46] - Quote
I'd change the way sieges work.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1908401#post1908401 |
LordSpock
Vherokior Death Squad
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 11:58:00 -
[47] - Quote
Capability of Caps exiting into a C5 or C6 if an entrance appears.
So C1-C4 ==> C5 no problem, but no turning back.
or as mentioned by others:
Repackaging/reprocessing in POS
Why? Because that would make it possible to get that capital out of your wormhole might you think about leaving it. Or to make some money from the build by reprocessing and making smaller objects from it (i.e. make the components into an Orca to safely take at least some ISK out.) |
ElCheeco mofo
Boosters Anonymous
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 12:19:00 -
[48] - Quote
As other have already mentioned the ability to change subsytems in the wormhole.
Also i would like the ability to be able to change clones within the WH, i dont mean being able to clone jump from K-Space or vice versa or to act as a medical bay so if you were podded then you would stay in the WH, but some new anchourable structure where clones could be stored which would allow you to change clones for implant purposes. And if the structure would be destroyed then so would your clones.
Other than that I like it  |
Dex DelaVenuto
Sky Templars
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 06:46:00 -
[49] - Quote
I would like to have a WH that no static exit for a week.  |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Swift Angels Alliance
465
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 13:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
LordSpock wrote:Capability of Caps exiting into a C5 or C6 if an entrance appears.
So C1-C4 ==> C5 no problem, but no turning back.
or as mentioned by others:
Repackaging/reprocessing in POS
Why? Because that would make it possible to get that capital out of your wormhole might you think about leaving it. Or to make some money from the build by reprocessing and making smaller objects from it (i.e. make the components into an Orca to safely take at least some ISK out.)
Won't happen.
I will inhabit a C3 with D845 (5 Gt mass allowable). I will then anchor a large tower at every moon. Some of these I will online and run massive, utterly massive dread and carrier manufacturing programmmes.
My mates in a C5/C3s will then roll their static a few times a day, and when they hit my wormhole, I will repatriate a cap or two into the C5, where they can be smugggled out to lowsec and sold.
I will make billions from cheap, accessible orca loads of minerals hoofed straight in to a virtually impregnable hisec static C3.
Taking submissions for "Trinkets friendly Advice Column" via evemail or private convo in-game. Anonymity sorta guaranteed.
|
LordSpock
Vherokior Death Squad
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 14:08:00 -
[51] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:
Won't happen.
I will inhabit a C3 with D845 (5 Gt mass allowable). I will then anchor a large tower at every moon. Some of these I will online and run massive, utterly massive dread and carrier manufacturing programmmes.
My mates in a C5/C3s will then roll their static a few times a day, and when they hit my wormhole, I will repatriate a cap or two into the C5, where they can be smugggled out to lowsec and sold.
I will make billions from cheap, accessible orca loads of minerals hoofed straight in to a virtually impregnable hisec static C3.
True, I never keep gamebreaking mechanics in mind.
So reprocessing items in the arrays they were build in seems good idea then. At a reduced percentage return of materials ofcourse. |
Dibblerette
The Phantom Regiment
THE ROYAL NAVY
96
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 13:55:00 -
[52] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:LordSpock wrote:Capability of Caps exiting into a C5 or C6 if an entrance appears.
So C1-C4 ==> C5 no problem, but no turning back.
or as mentioned by others:
Repackaging/reprocessing in POS
Why? Because that would make it possible to get that capital out of your wormhole might you think about leaving it. Or to make some money from the build by reprocessing and making smaller objects from it (i.e. make the components into an Orca to safely take at least some ISK out.) Won't happen. I will inhabit a C3 with D845 (5 Gt mass allowable). I will then anchor a large tower at every moon. Some of these I will online and run massive, utterly massive dread and carrier manufacturing programmmes. My mates in a C5/C3s will then roll their static a few times a day, and when they hit my wormhole, I will repatriate a cap or two into the C5, where they can be smugggled out to lowsec and sold. I will make billions from cheap, accessible orca loads of minerals hoofed straight in to a virtually impregnable hisec static C3.
Tbh, that sounded reeeeeally cool until I realized what a pain it would be to attack. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |