Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
3129
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
I wanted to get some input on a specific aspect of the Inferno change, the ability to earn LP from the "diagonal" militia.
Given the massive problem we have right now with dwindling PvP and increased farming, I think its time to re-evaluate the value of this particular element of Faction Warfare.
The community has been very loud and clear that we need to get back to FW being a PvP-centric feature, where players enlist for the pew, and stay because they can afford to fight, as supposed to enlisting for the isk, and fighting if they have to (which is never.)
With that goal of increased pew pew in mind - in your experience, has "diagonal plexing" contributed to increased PvP? Is allowing dominant groups like the Minmatar to spread out deeply into Caldari space helping to create a "target rich environment" for the Amarr militia? Has diagonal plexing played a significant role in allowing an underdog militia to recover, or does it merely band-aid the issue by pacifiying them with isk?
Lets discuss the value of this mechanic, or alternatives if we decide it isn't helping a broken militia to recover, or isn't helping to generate more pew pew. Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
939
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
well its hard to say. I sometimes roam through the allied space if there is not much going on in local space. Most minmatar farmers (the typical gunless, stabbed incursus/merlin/slasher) moved to caldari space since there are more farmable systems *right now*. More systems = less interruption. However this can change in any moment if the sov map changes.
If the FW changes go through as planned much of this will be solved since farming won't be possible the same was as its now. (no farming of vulnerable systems, lp for defensive plexing, new AI, npcs block contesting, ...)
So once again.. hard to day right now. However what i would really like to see is a way to mark allies in your overview, local etc. Many i spoke to would never engage allies, esp not when there are wts to shoot at. Checking FoF via show info -> decorations is very annoying right now. a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105
You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Morgan North
The Wild Bunch Electus Matari
86
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
It is kind of annoying, but it has upsides and downsides.
Most of the time, you get a handfull of "diagonal" militia coming around and farming. sometimes, they put up a fight. Sometimes they bring a neutral to help them, kind of betraying the point in enlisting in the militia, and lowering overall defender sec status.
Its my experience that directly opposed militias usually put up better, longer, harder combats than diagonal militias, who seem mostly interested in multi-boxing and harvesting.
Add to that the fact they do it 23/7, don't flip systems at all, and just contribute to lowering the overall tier thanks to a non-stop farming, makes for a rather dull game in terms of initial ideas for factional warfare.
But hey, when you catch one of the stabbed, boosting, cloaky unarmed merlins... its a blast. |

Zarnak Wulf
Imperial Outlaws
625
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
My take on it has always been that if you plex sites for your ally then you earn your ally's LP for their store. |

Crispin McTarmac
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
The key at the heart of driving conflict is limited resources. So from a pew pew perspective, the fewer systems a given individual may choose to farm LP from, the better. |

Luc Chastot
Moira. Villore Accords
26
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote:My take on it has always been that if you plex sites for your ally then you earn your ally's LP for their store.
A 10% difference between what you earn plexing your direct enemy's sites, and those of your ally, would be nice. |

Alticus C Bear
University of Caille Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
The Gallente Caldari warzone certainly has had an influx of Minmatar militia; some just farm some PVP as well. I first started noticing many new neutrals and had to start setting certain corps blue (this really needs fixing we should be able to easily identify allied militia).
The problem with receiving your own LP for Plexing the allied warzone is that it does not actually promote true militia cooperation. It is much better for the Minmatar if the Gallente do poorly; they have systems to plex and can spend the LP with great discounts. The LP that is earned is also not spent in the allied factions I Hubs and effectively swapped to support the other warzone.
The proposed mechanics also will not really help this. With the Minmatar almost certain to maintain high warzone control they will actually get better plex rewards for completing plexes in the Gallente Caldari Warzone than either the Gallente or Caldari factions.
A radical solution may be to abolish dual warzones, if there was just one warzone then there may be a better balance across the factions. (probably not going to happen)
LP earned should be for the allied faction, this ensures it is spent in that factions LP stores or that factions I Hubs. LP in the future should be earned at the rate of the allied faction in that warzone.
|

Sheynan
Lighting the blight
71
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
I think Zarnaks solution is the best for this, it's sounds rather tricky though because you'd have to leave your own militia everytime you want spend your ally lp.
If Zarnaks solution is not possible then abolish it. The only situation where the other militia should be able to aid is during massive system-flip-fights. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
441
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 22:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
I like the idea of just 1 warzone. It's never made much sense to me that the 2 warzones are different sizes. It's another reason minmatar is so popular, they need fewer systems to hit tier 5.
If that's not possible, then I'd say ally LP should be abolished. With the new system, you want your militia taking and holding your own space. Defensive LP should help that, and would make going to the other warzone to LP farm illogical.
|

CaptainFalcon07
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
27
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yes, If you plex a caldari you get Gallente. If you plex Minmatar, you get Amarr.
This will prevent minmatar from coming into caldari systems just to farm and instead more for pew. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
307
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 08:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
It depends.
- Assuming NPC changes are set in stone at this point (they had better damn well be!)
If CCP goes ahead and introduces the 99% static fronts by way of LP for defensive plexes and absurd bleed rates, then it won't matter as farming will reach hitherto unknown heights, combat operations become limited to home-base systems + adjacents (almost there now due to lockout) and FW will effectively be dead.
All other instances, cross faction (who the hell cooked up the diagonal thing .. sheesh! ) LP should be reduced to a bare minimum. Assistance ought to be just that, assistance .. focus should be on the pew (as opposed to orbit assist) but other forms should be available as well. Examples: - If ally helps dispatching an enemy the LP-for-kill is increased by XX% (thinking 20-25%) - When links are made on-grid, an ally booster could get a wee additional boost. - RR effectiveness of ally's modules could get a wee boost. - If ally assists with defensive work, NPCs from ally's faction could spawn instead of the native faction (depends on NPC diversity). - Trading in ally's space cuts taxes/fees (beyond what is achieved through upgrading systems).
In short: If one crosses the border to help ones neighbor fight the evil that torment him, it should be with a gun and supplies rather than running shoes and an open wallet. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
513
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 12:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
afk plexing alts from any faction plexing any space is the problem - not diagonal plexing. Diagonal plexing is just one way for them to maximize their rewards. From what we know now, defensive afk plexing alts will be scrubbing all the un-occupied regions in FW clean from now on. And their mains will be offensive plexing the same systems as well.
|

Noa Fuyu
Forced Penetration
8
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 13:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Its the farmers that are 1day olds that are the problem, just stop speed tanking plexes, make it so you have to kill the NPCs. Sure there will be a way around this but its a start and makes me wonder why it wasnt in there off the bat. Level out LP rewards for doing it a group though and maybe very small LP rewards when you kill the NPCs. 5 for a frig, 10 for a dessy, 15 cruiser, 20 bc, 30 BS. Something like that. It all will add up. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
445
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 22:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
Noa Fuyu wrote:Its the farmers that are 1day olds that are the problem, just stop speed tanking plexes, make it so you have to kill the NPCs. Sure there will be a way around this but its a start and makes me wonder why it wasnt in there off the bat. Level out LP rewards for doing it a group though and maybe very small LP rewards when you kill the NPCs. 5 for a frig, 10 for a dessy, 15 cruiser, 20 bc, 30 BS. Something like that. It all will add up.
Have to assume you totally skipped the other FW stickies ...
|

Ch3244
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
157
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 04:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
no, i for one have no problem with the farming |

Commander Ted
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
16
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 05:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
Give the plex rats webs. Problem solved |

Mara Rinn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1888
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 06:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
I was parked in Raa last night with a friend waiting to move some high value assets. For the longest time (about two hours) the only occupants in Raa were the two of us and one or two plexers. These folk were week old alts flying T1 interceptors. They made a point of spamming Dscan and disappearing when anyone turned up on scan. Their ships were fitted with afterburners, reppers, capacitor rigs and a cloaking device.
Is this what Faction Warfare is supposed to be about?
At some time in the night, someone flew through with a Sin. Within minutes, Raa and the systems around it became very busy: the Sin running around pursued by perhaps a dozen yellow and red targets. The few that I got info on were not involved in Faction Warfare: they were pirates. The Sin disappeared, and over the next half an hour the yellow and red folks wandered around in the hope of scoring a black ops kill. Their numbers gradually died out, then the plexers returned.
Nobody seems to be hunting the plexers: mostly because the plexers log off or warp out to cloak the moment they see anything untoward occurring.
To me, the issue of diagonal plexing is avoiding the elephant in the room: what is (solo-able) PvE doing in an environment intended to encourage PvP. Give the plexes warp scramming interceptors that can actually intercept, stasis webifier towers, neuts, or other means of ensuring that the sites can not be trivially completed. Having the sites means there are places other than gates or stations for players to encounter each other, so the sites are perhaps a good thing at some level.
Perhaps the Level One AI will help make FW more PvP and less PvE, I will wait and see. Diagonal plexing will help once the plexes are not so easily cheesable, and there are mechanisms that make it meaningful to attempt interfering with someone else's capture attempt. When the prey doesn't have to commit to the fight, and can run away on a whim, there will be no PvP.
Even the possibility of getting on a billion ISK kill mail brought pirates out of the woodwork. No one was interested in a week-old alt flying a T1 frigate that would warp off and cloak at the slightest provocation.
That being said, I have heard of people infiltrating plexes with recons to scram and web the plexer. They do this for the jollies, which is what PvP is supposed to be about IMHO. PvP shouldn't be about kill mails, ISK efficiency, or other game mechanic reward. PvP should be about taking someone's stuff despite their best attempts to avoid that loss. The prestige is in getting the hard or lucky kills because you were smart or brave enough to catch that prey.
Once there is some reasonable level of probability that people in low-skill combat ships can catch and kill other people in low-skill combat ships, I would expect plexing's milkshake to bring all the boys to the yard. People will go plexing looking for fights and being handsomely rewarded if none are forthcoming. Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

King Rothgar
Black Watch Guard Gl0rious Bastards
311
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 07:51:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote: That being said, I have heard of people infiltrating plexes with recons to scram and web the plexer. They do this for the jollies, which is what PvP is supposed to be about IMHO. PvP shouldn't be about kill mails, ISK efficiency, or other game mechanic reward. PvP should be about taking someone's stuff despite their best attempts to avoid that loss. The prestige is in getting the hard or lucky kills because you were smart or brave enough to catch that prey.
Once there is some reasonable level of probability that people in low-skill combat ships can catch and kill other people in low-skill combat ships, I would expect plexing's milkshake to bring all the boys to the yard. People will go plexing looking for fights and being handsomely rewarded if none are forthcoming.
Confirming I fly a t2 rigged pilgrim with a 120M isk faction scram and loki boosts to catch unarmed slashers. It's the only practical way to get them, if you consider doing that practical. Don't know of anyone else doing it but I doubt I'm the only one. The Troll is trolling. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
449
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 20:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
Perhaps I'm wrong, but i think Hans means if the changes already proposed go in, should diagonal plexing stay. He's not talking about the current mechanics, but the new ones. There won't be 1 week old alts offensively plexing majors in the new system. They might defensively plex minors/rookies, but that'll hardly be a cash cow.
I'd still go with one warzone if possible. If not, you get the other militia LP for plexing their sites, or simply gain some miniscule amount of Empire standings.
|
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
223

|
Posted - 2012.10.05 21:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
Modicum of glue applied. ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Mara Rinn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1888
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 00:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
Rengerel en Distel wrote:Perhaps I'm wrong, but i think Hans means if the changes already proposed go in, should diagonal plexing stay.
Diagonal plexing means the risk-averse have more options for spreading out to farm their ISK while avoiding PvP.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

2ofSpades
Medic.
9
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 04:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
Faction warfare I would call the frig farming grounds. You should have to destroy all the ships in each plex before its completed so that way noobships cant earn millions of LP. All the LP flooding from faction warfare pretty much killed all mission LP stores, remove the tier booster system and reset LP prices back to normal. I also think more LP for ship kills would help to increase PvP. But please make it so a cruiser has to complete a cruiser size plex, a battle cruiser for the majors, and a battleship for the unrestricted majors. |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 06:23:00 -
[23] - Quote
There's nothing wrong with 'Diagonal Plexing' and if anything, friendly militia should be displayed as blue by default.
The BIG problem is that the laughably, retardedly broken plexing system means that FW plexes are farmed by an endless procession of unarmed Incursus alts, many of whose mains AREN'T EVEN IN MILITIA.
Looking at the post-DT killboard, I can almost see a pattern developing:
IncursusPlague
|

Mara Rinn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1889
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 07:11:00 -
[24] - Quote
Squatdog wrote:The BIG problem is that the laughably, retardedly broken plexing system means that FW plexes are farmed by an endless procession of unarmed Incursus alts, many of whose mains AREN'T EVEN IN MILITIA.
Obviously the Incursus needs a nerf, right?  Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 07:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Squatdog wrote:The BIG problem is that the laughably, retardedly broken plexing system means that FW plexes are farmed by an endless procession of unarmed Incursus alts, many of whose mains AREN'T EVEN IN MILITIA. Obviously the Incursus needs a nerf, right? 
They use Merlins too. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
310
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 08:02:00 -
[26] - Quote
They are in militia just not one of the locals .. CCP still haven't managed to make the ally militias show as such in local channel.
Another argument against cross-faction plexing: It removes a major balancing tool as there is no consequence to steamrolling at home as one can merely send excess farm hands abroad to rake in the cash. Success ought to be a double edged sword, once combat operations are completed, principal income should come from the newly acquired territories thus emphasizing defense.
That is unless the bi-annual flip of entire regions rather than a continual tug-o-war is the desired goal. |

Squatdog
State Protectorate Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 08:49:00 -
[27] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:They are in militia just not one of the locals .. CCP still haven't managed to make the ally militias show as such in local channel. Another argument against cross-faction plexing: It removes a major balancing tool as there is no consequence to steamrolling at home as one can merely send excess farm hands abroad to rake in the cash. Success ought to be a double edged sword, once combat operations are completed, principal income should come from the newly acquired territories thus emphasizing defense. That is unless the bi-annual flip of entire regions rather than a continual tug-o-war is the desired goal.
The most voracious Incursus farmers are usually the alts of local pirate corps, Nullbears fags or just players who have heard they can farm astronomical amounts of Isk from doing nothing. |

fingie
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 09:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The community has been very loud and clear that we need to get back to FW being a PvP-centric feature, where players enlist for the pew, and stay because they can afford to fight, as supposed to enlisting for the isk, and fighting if they have to (which is never.)
The whine is strong with this one. |

Morgan North
The Wild Bunch Electus Matari
87
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 10:10:00 -
[29] - Quote
I am ofthe oppinion that simply making the ships inside the complex destroyed is sufficient to pretty much wipe out the farming community. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
310
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 10:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
Morgan North wrote:I am ofthe oppinion that simply making the ships inside the complex destroyed is sufficient to pretty much wipe out the farming community. Isn't that essentially what is planned? Timer stopping when NPCs are present?
Will cut down on the solo-alt farming but if payouts remain at the same levels I doubt we'll see much of a decrease as it is a simple matter of adding one DPS alt per plex, especially considering the plans for allowing all cruiser in mediums and what not .. farming will be easier (T2 ships vs. rats balanced against T1) but more expensive to start up and may (or may not) require a second account.
Worst case: We'll see a surge in bots. Currently no point in using them as an ab frig can be left largely unattended, but when it becomes the equivalent of clearing a mission room/complex we'll probably see bots taking over .. hope Screegs is ready for it  Best case: Payouts are reduced to a point where dual-boxing is not profitable enough, forcing farm hands to seek employment elsewhere.
PS: Above dependent on defensive plexing NOT getting much of anything and bleed rates changes axed .. were that to happen then all that is accomplished is the relocation of orbit alts making both front lines effectively dead as no system will change hands ever again barring a staggering undertaking by one side or another .. just the thought of chasing stab-alts around for a week per system makes me cringe. |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |