|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 57 post(s) |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 03:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:It's great to see that there are ppl working at CCP that do not think that "EVE is only about spaceships and eleet peeveepee" and are working on avatar gameplay. What a shame that people who could be working on it too and helping it being released earlier got laid off. Its not like CCP is facing economical problems and needs to cut on personnel expense.
After what happened when Incarna was released if there are people at CCP who think EvE should be about anything other than spaceships and the industry that supports them those people should be fired.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 05:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Rhes wrote: After what happened when Incarna was released if there are people at CCP who think EvE should be about anything other than spaceships and the industry that supports them those people should be fired.
And like magic, an idiot appears.
And what is your fursona?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 05:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:The two previous responses illustrate why CCP will implement more content for avatars.
The best they can come up with is some gibbering nonsense about furries and emoting. Neither of which have anything do do with the suggested prototype.
Dribble on brave retards, dribble on.
Actually CCP cares more about the massive drop in subscriptions that occurred right after Incarna than they do about people who want to turn Eve into a second-rate Second Life clone.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 06:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:the whole drop in subscriptions came after a number of years of underwhelming expansions and broken promises, for which Incarna with it's macrotransaction store was the final straw..
You are literally arguing my point. CCP wasted two years on roleplaying nonsense and neglected Eve's core gameplay which resulted in them losing a ton of subscriptions. They aren't going to make that mistake again no matter how many furries whine at them.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 21:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:But hey ,WIS is not coming ,So that Mittens guy and his Goons can go to sleep ,with no worries and dream about the next big ship.
Well that is a relief
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:CCP should care about people unsubbing when they actually buy PLEX and support the game, not when moon farming crybaby herds throw tantrums. Btw send my regards to Lord Mittler and tell him maybe he should get some puppies not infected with rabies, that stuff's dangerous and contagious brah.
What is your fursona?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 15:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Rhes wrote: What is your fursona?
brah, you should consider to stop whining like spoiled brats, HTFU and disengage in such ridiculous and vomit-inducing activities like shooting statues, burn Jitas and other attention seeking activities. Taiwanistan wrote: hey can you stop that battered spouse syndrome crap? and just hit the door already? why are you still paying for a sub or grinding plexes, get a clue, eve's been dying for 10 years,
being mean to the lady bic boi? come at me brah, im right here! want some of this bic boi? somehow ur the one who strikes me as a wife batterer, if you had any in the first place, which is highly unlikely given the obvious sperg and fear you've been showing towards women. what's this fear that players from other games such as WoW and Second Life would come play EVE about? Are you that afraid that they beat you at it and banalized your sad existance? or just hate women in general?
I still want to hear about your first fursuit.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 17:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Rhes wrote: I still want to hear about your first fursuit.
now ur going OCD in forum thread replies. get that checked brah
Just based on your username I bet it has feathers.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 17:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Based on your lip, I bet you like walruses. 
Sure I like walruses. That doesn't mean I put on a walrus suit and hump somebody wearing a squirrel suit.
People who like animals are great. Furries are disgusting and CCP shouldn't be encouraging them to play Eve.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 19:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Rhes wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:Based on your lip, I bet you like walruses.  Sure I like walruses. That doesn't mean I put on a walrus suit and hump somebody wearing a squirrel suit. People who like animals are great. Furries are disgusting and CCP shouldn't be encouraging them to play Eve. Really?  When CCP was encouraging them to play EVE? Oh, i see, you see furries everywhere. Too much time spend with goons,and their something awful forums I suppose. 
Walking in Stations and other roleplayer nonsense = catering to furries. Don't let it happen to your game.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 20:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
Cpt Tirel wrote:Rhes wrote:Sure I like walruses. That doesn't mean I put on a walrus suit and hump somebody wearing a squirrel suit.
People who like animals are great. Furries are disgusting and CCP shouldn't be encouraging them to play Eve.
Youre delusions of what WIS is about are amusing. CCP has said they planned on adding exploration type avatar-gameplay in this very thread. You expect to find animals in space exploration and extra-vehicular activity?
I expect company that makes an internet spaceship game to focus on internet spaceships and not avatar based Barbie crap that only appeals to roleplayers. CCP wasted two years on that crap and the game almost died because of it. Anybody asking for CCP to intentionally kill their game should be banned. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 00:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:Rhes wrote:I expect company that makes an internet spaceship game to focus on internet spaceships and not avatar based Barbie crap that only appeals to roleplayers. CCP wasted two years on that crap and the game almost died because of it. Anybody asking for CCP to intentionally kill their game should be banned. Yeah yeah, we get it. You suffer from a bad case of Pediophobia. After you get some professional help please feel free to come back to this thread if you have something inteligent to add, otherwise stop derailing a good discussion.
Your Quafe shirt is spiffy.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 03:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:The spacebarbie and emoting stuff was getting old,was it not ?
It's all the same side of the roleplayer coin. These degenerates want to turn our wonderful spaceship game into a disgusting Second Life clone where they can indulge in their sick impulses. They almost killed the game two years ago...let's not let them do it again.
Eve is spaceships. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 03:36:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:The only reason Incarna "almost killed" the game is that shitstorm caused by their "greed is good" leak, and overall Incarna content delivery.
That was just the match that lit the flame. The fuel for the fire was the two years of wasted development time spent on WiS nonsense.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 03:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:Keep crying how it's waste of development time, because it will make sure it is a waste, since CCP is scared to even mention WiS anymore.
You're welcome.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 05:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:I blocked it a while ago
Blocking: the last bastion of the person who lost the argument. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 06:15:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:When Star Citizen proves that the concept of a blend of Avatar and Spaceship game play can work well if approached properly, I hope that many people that currently deride the concept as hopeless will give the matter a rethink.
I hope it's wildly successful so the furries and pedophiles will flock to that game and leave Eve alone.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 06:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Ahhh, nevermind. I thought you were actually trying to be taken seriously in your stance towards Incarna. Obviously I was mistaken. 
Nope. I'm 100% serious about not wanting CCP to make the same mistake that almost killed the game two years ago.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 16:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:the problem with wis is that some people think that second life freakshow, a bunch of dudes emoting each other in a player-run "bar" is acceptable as sound game play.
I remember right before Incarna was released and people were talking about having dance parties in stations. It was such a relief when CCP came to their senses and went back to focusing on real Eve content.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 17:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
Stegas Tyrano wrote:Rhes wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:the problem with wis is that some people think that second life freakshow, a bunch of dudes emoting each other in a player-run "bar" is acceptable as sound game play. I remember right before Incarna was released and people were talking about having dance parties in stations. It was such a relief when CCP came to their senses and went back to focusing on real Eve content. I'm pretty sure they were being sarcastic.
I'm pretty sure they weren't. I guess you don't realize how damaging roleplayers can be.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 22:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Oow , i forgot the WIS toke 2 years stuff except it was a complete new game engine that toke 2 years.
Yes, two years where real Eve gameplay was ignored.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
95
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 18:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Sarah Targaryen wrote:Ok... This whole eva thing and actually getting to play with your avatars is a cool idea. But honestly, I would just be satisfied if there was a social aspect to it. Let me walk around inside of hubs and stations, see other peoples avatars, go to chat bars or actually have to walk to different shops or places for different things instead of just a GUI. That really wouldn't be THAT hard would it? I'm honestly completely stunned to NOT see that in this game.
Let me tell you about a little game called Second Life...
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
95
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 18:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Rhes wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Oow , i forgot the WIS toke 2 years stuff except it was a complete new game engine that toke 2 years. Yes, two years where real Eve gameplay was ignored. So you tell me now that this whole carbon stuff is a waist?
Well waists, chests, arms and legs, heads, etc.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 17:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
J3ssica Alba wrote:Let me tell you about a game that has all these things and is space related called Star Citizen. Hope goons like you will enjoy yourselves when your targets will be enjoying themselves there.
I'm not worried. Everything I read about Star Citizen points to it just being microtransaction hell. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
96
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 17:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
David Kir wrote:The Incarna uproar:
1) was not caused by WiS, but by the implementation of vanity items and pay-to-win content (golden ammo, eh?)
Just repeating this lie over and over again doesn't make it true. The uproar was over the fact that after ignoring real Eve content for two years all we got was a room with a couch and a hilariously bad attempt at a microtransaction store.
If you want proof just look at the steadily increasing subscription numbers from when CCP announced they were going back to focusing on spaceships. If there was some huge crowd of Eve players who couldn't live without Space Barbies they would have left by now and subs would be decreasing.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
100
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 19:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
David Kir wrote:Tell me again how do you think the playerbase would have it regarding WiS, despite the fact that the feedback CCP gets from this is (quoting Unifex) "overwhelmingly positive".
A handful of furries and their alts isn't going to stand up to the massive number of sub cancellations the game suffered after Incarna was released. Subscription numbers are ultimately the only feedback that really matters.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 20:03:00 -
[27] - Quote
David Kir wrote:How can you consider subscriptions as "the only feedback that matters" when talking about features in proposal?
Because in a subscription game the number of subscribers is the most important indicator of how well the game is doing. It's not a difficult concept.
If features are added that the subscribers don't like (like WiS) then people cancel their subscriptions.
If features are added that the subscribers do like (like spaceships and the industry that support them) then people keep paying their subscriptions and new people join so the game grows.
I feel kind of bad for you that you can't just see the truth of how this works.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 01:44:00 -
[28] - Quote
David Kir wrote:Proposal.
Features that are yet to be implemented.
Features that have not been added.
You act like they didn't already try WiS. It was called the Incarna expansion and obviously you didn't play when it was released. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 02:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Rhes wrote:You act like they didn't already try WiS. It was called the Incarna expansion and obviously you didn't play when it was released. I know, reading only what you want to read is a big thing on forums, but please try anyways... Incarna was not WiS, it was demo CQs and a cash shop, and that's what turned people off.
I'm not the one with the comprehension problem. Incarna (which included a form of WiS) was a failure and people are asking that CCP once again ignore real Eve gameplay and waste more resources on further iterations of WiS. It's madness. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 02:09:00 -
[30] - Quote
If you furries and space barbie enthusiasts really want to know the future of WiS you should ask your local CSM rep the status of Team Avatar... |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 02:46:00 -
[31] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Rhes wrote:If you furries and space barbie enthusiasts really want to know the future of WiS you should ask your local CSM rep the status of Team Avatar... Yea, that's the reason why there is DUST... and Valkyrie... CCP is very well aware that the EVE universe has more potential then just spaceships, and they will do something to expand on the current gameplay/connect it with all the other games at some point.
You should really find out the official status of Team Avatar. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 15:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
David Kir wrote:PS: Read the patch notes.
I have a counter challenge: go through those patch notes and find something that was released un-broken or even something that was released broken but fixed before Incarna.
Go ahead....I'll wait.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 15:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:In fact most rage was about the nex store and supposed "monocle madness".
Guys this isn't Fox News. You can't just keep repeating the same lie and hope it magically becomes true.
The rage was because Eve got ignored for two years while Space Barbie was being worked on. The monocole was just the match that lit the fuse.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
105
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 16:16:00 -
[34] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Funny, repeating derogatory terms again and again is another halmark of FOX news...
Except in this case the derogatory term rings true. WiS is never going to add meaningful content to the actual game. Having poker night in a station bar or going to a dance party isn't going to change the course of New Eden. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
105
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 17:02:00 -
[35] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:That maybe, but boarding enemy ships/space stations would... and should there by one there could be the other aswell. Besides, the ability to own your own bar or shop on a station (POS or NPC) would open up a whole new venue for players to engage in a) business and b) social interaction... CCP has stated time and time again that they would like EVE to become a fully fledged scifie simulation, not "just" a spaceship game..
Well let's see...based on DUST it doesn't look like CCP has the ability to create a viable shooter/fps game where your avatar could "board stations" and the bar and shop is just more RP nonsense. CCP can state whatever they want but when it comes down to the one thing they care about (subscription numbers) they saw what happened when they tried to cater to people like you.
Eve is spaceships and the industry that supports them. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
105
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 17:04:00 -
[36] - Quote
David Kir wrote:PS: keep posting, gotta keep this thread up.
Considering that Team Avatar doesn't even exist anymore that's fine with me.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
105
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 17:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
David Kir wrote:A myriad of small fixes and changes to the Neocom, Hangars, general UI/usability, ship models, turret models/effects, new ships, learning skills removal, incursions, PI, POCOs, the ingame calendar, etc.
Thanks for proving my point. Two years of nothing but cosmetic changes and all we had to show for it was a room with a couch and a monocle. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
108
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 15:37:00 -
[38] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Who decides what is "meaningful"?
The people paying for subscriptions. Here is how you can tell if the majority of players want Space Barbies: cancel your subs and if there are enough of you CCP will take action like they did after the mass cancellations when Incarna was released. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
112
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 18:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Wind Commander series ring a bell?
I play that every time I eat Mexican food.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
112
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 18:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
Teinyhr wrote:There is nothing coming because WiS team doesn't exist anymore. They are terrified of players throwing a hissyfit again
You're welcome.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 00:48:00 -
[41] - Quote
Sadly it looks like Star Citizen is just going to be completely microtransaction driven. After monocles and designer space pants I'm not sure that's the best argument to make in favor of CCP wasting more time on WiS. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 15:12:00 -
[42] - Quote
Teinyhr wrote:Maximilian Akora wrote:...ONCE YOU GOT SOV AND POS WORKED OUT ... This will never be "done" or "worked out", because some people will never be satisfied. Therefore it should not be held as a brake for WiS development, instead they could be worked on at the same time. You know, that should be possible, because WiS is largely needing graphic assets (and optimization and a handful of fixes) that Sov and Pos should not require as much if at all, as far as I've understood it POS/Sov people want redesigned mechanics. But I'm not sure because I don't own either.
So you have no idea what you're talking about but that's not going to stop you from advocating that CCP ignore broken game mechanics to add more emotes and space pants. Thanks for the useless input I guess. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 20:23:00 -
[43] - Quote
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:The current status of WiS is also "holy **** this sucks", so it should see the same level of development effort.
Not really since WiS has nothing to do with real Eve gameplay which is spaceships and the industry that supports them.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 20:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:You forgot about the furries and the roleplayers ,maybe it wil help us to take you serious
You seem very interested in furries.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 22:26:00 -
[45] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:I'm not saying that CCP should ignore everything that is broken in the game right now... and if they'd build a dedicated team for the whole "avatar gameplay" (not calling it WiS anymore) they wouldn't have to ignore them.
Any resources they waste on a separate team dedicated to roleplaying nonsense are resources that could have been used to improve and enhance Eve's core gameplay. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
116
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 15:36:00 -
[46] - Quote
J3ssica Alba wrote:Don't worry dear, they are goons after all. They go on and on trashing the RP and the space barbies and yet they make their avatar look like "angry black men" and act as they would. It's hilarious really.
Reported for racism.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
116
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Rhes wrote:Reported for racism. That's a racial stereotype even used by the media, not racism... just saying.
Only on Fox News.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
116
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Lateris wrote:Personally, Dust 514 is not the solution for avatars in New Eden.
At least you got this part right. Dust was always going to be a failure and people thinking that it can be used as a way to cram non-spaceship content into Eve are delusional. Again, resources that are currently being wasted on Dust should be refocused on Eve. WoD is just vaporware at this point so I'm not worried about it at all.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
124
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 18:38:00 -
[49] - Quote
Lateris wrote:After 2011 I doubt we will see any WiS for quite some time
You're welcome.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
127
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 18:58:00 -
[50] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Rhes wrote:Shalua Rui wrote:I'm not saying that CCP should ignore everything that is broken in the game right now... and if they'd build a dedicated team for the whole "avatar gameplay" (not calling it WiS anymore) they wouldn't have to ignore them. Any resources they waste on a separate team dedicated to roleplaying nonsense are resources that could have been used to improve and enhance Eve's core gameplay. Just put them on Valkerie and we will be fine right??
Well at least Valkyrie is spaceship content.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
132
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:18:00 -
[51] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Rhes wrote:Well at least Valkyrie is spaceship content. Yea... arcade, CoD style spaceship combat that will, most likely, never have anything to do with EVE... ...uh, right, no "space barbies", I forgot ...it gotta be alright then, right? 
I'm not wildly enthusiastic about Valkyrie but I figure it will be vaporware like WoD so I'm not getting worked up about it. My point was that even though Valkyrie sounds kind of dumb it at least makes more sense than dance parties and clothing boutiques. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
149
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 21:22:00 -
[52] - Quote
Silent Rambo wrote:Rhes wrote:at least makes more sense than dance parties and clothing boutiques. This guy is just a super forum troll. Logic is impervious to the thickness of his skull. Any argument, no matter how well crafted will have him spouting 'Herp derp, barbies and furries" nonsense because he has no real argument. This works great in convincing absolutely no one of any actual cons to walking in stations. All it does is show how much of a **** this guy is, or anyone who genuinely believes that the implementation of WiS would be equivalent to barbies and furries. EvE is a great game, and it will grow to be even better when everyone starts ignoring people with no imagination or vision. The word "never" should be changes to, 'if we can figure out how to correctly implement".
Here is some logic for you: When CCP added WiS to the game they lost a ton of subscribers. When they apologized and promised to focus on spaceships again they stopped losing subscribers. When they actually did what they promised to do subscriptions have risen every quarter since Incarna. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
157
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 21:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:"i am dumb and dummer"
Thanks for participating.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
157
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 22:35:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:OK, blocked.
Blocking: The end move of the person who lost the argument.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
158
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 23:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:People cancelled because of the gold ammo and pay to win crap as per the leaked memo, not the avatar stuff. I think CCP are going to regret lack of avatar game play when their competitor's start eating to their market share and subs drop.
No, people canceled because Eve was ignored for two years and all we had to show for it was a room with a couch and a laughably bad microtransaction store. Why do you want CCP to ignore Eve again?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
158
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 00:00:00 -
[56] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Rhes wrote:Little Dragon Khamez wrote:People cancelled because of the gold ammo and pay to win crap as per the leaked memo, not the avatar stuff. I think CCP are going to regret lack of avatar game play when their competitor's start eating to their market share and subs drop. No, people canceled because Eve was ignored for two years and all we had to show for it was a room with a couch and a laughably bad microtransaction store. Why do you want CCP to ignore Eve again? It's been ignored ever since, ui changes and balancing ships are not expansions. Dust got all of the love, not eve.
Actually Eve is in a great place now compared to where it was right before Incarna was released. Long-abandoned ship classes are being used regularly, Tidi has made awesome fleet fights possible, the UI is finally becoming useable, etc. It's a testament to what CCP can accomplish when they aren't catering to furries. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
174
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 13:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Funny how out of all the tens of thousands of EVE players, Rhes is the only one that is vocally against the implementation of meaningful avatar content.
Looks like new stuff for avatars is a virtual certainty.
I speak for the thousands of people who canceled their accounts after Incarna went live. Also, if there was really a great demand for WiS beyond the handful of furries who keep propping up this thread CCP wouldn't have disbanded Team Avatar.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
181
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 20:37:00 -
[58] - Quote
Silent Rambo wrote:Can we just ignore the troll and get back to the discussion? I reported him, hope he at least gets banned from this thread so it can stay on topic, and without the petty name calling.
I like how you guys can't even conceive that not everybody wants Eve to turn into Second Life in space and it messes with your head so much that you take steps like reporting other posters for disagreeing with you.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
182
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 03:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:The same would also apply to most of the "giev WIS naow!!!" posts in this and other threads. Most of the data and etc used to further that position are presented matter-of-factly, but in reality turn out to be only emotionally fueled and pulled directly from a rectum.
CCP is never going to release the number of people who still have CQ turned on because the entire WiS fiasco was a huge black stain on the game and on CCP's reputation. I still don't understand why this thread is open considering Team Avatar has been disbanded and the roleplayers and furries have their own ghetto forum where they can go and talk about dance parties. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
182
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 03:37:00 -
[60] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:The WiS will boost eve online
I guess you didn't play when Incarna was released.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
182
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 03:40:00 -
[61] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:It's nice I don't have to worry about EVE WiS anymore
You're welcome
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
182
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 03:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:The thing is all that negative posting and unnecessary name-calling by Rhes brings anything related to WiS on front forum page, where CCP can see how many ppl actually care about it. Actually, I think he is the biggest WiS fan. In other words, thanks for all the bumps from us, "furries," Rhes 
Considering that Team Avatar doesn't even exist anymore I'm not too worried about. I also enjoy posting and believe in never stop posting.
Also, there is no need to put the word furries in quotes. They are real.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
182
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 04:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:rediculous troll
No need for so much anger, friend.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
184
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 04:45:00 -
[64] - Quote
Lors Dornick wrote:(Note that they banned any capture or rebroadcast from the WoD demo at fanfest).
I hadn't heard that. Hi-lar-ious.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
184
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 04:59:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lors Dornick wrote:They did show in-game footage from WoD at fanfest but asked/begged that it shouldn't be recorded and published.
As a project lead can understand why, since I don't like wasting my time explaining to wannabe reporters why stuff doesn't look the way they think it should in the middle of a dev cycle.
Stuff _is_ happening in Georgia, WoD and the avatar based engine is far from dead.
(Nor far from Undead, given their IP).
But it's not what we have in CQ, and it's not ready to replace what we have, yet.
I think we all knew that after all the video cards getting set on fire that the engine they used for Eve's WiS was never going to work in an avatar based MMO.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
194
|
Posted - 2013.09.14 04:57:00 -
[66] - Quote
Maximus Andendare wrote:Ok, so spare me the 78 pages of reading: where is Eve at with more ambulation/WiS? I don't think many players would object to more WiS environments and feature iteration, as long as they weren't forced into it like the original CQ disaster. Think of it more like Eve's Industry or Exploration careers. Not required, but certainly something alive, well and iterated upon.
The short version is that CCP ignored Eve for two years to work on WiS. When it launched it was a massive failure and the playerbase rioted and the game lost more subs than at any other time in its history. CCP apologized for the wasted development time and promised to refocus on real Eve gameplay: spaceships and the industry that supports them. Ever since that time the game has grown steadily every quarter.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
194
|
Posted - 2013.09.14 05:25:00 -
[67] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:A must-read article by Alizabeth, presenting the case for microtransactions in general and vanity items specifically, including avatar-related ones. "must-read" indeed, thanks Ish... summarizes very good all the arguments we brought up here.  "The future is coming and CCP needs to adapt to the changing business model." ...times have changed a lot since 2011 and they should adapt.
Not every game works under a F2P model. Eve certainly wouldn't work if people could have unlimited alts for zero cost.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
199
|
Posted - 2013.09.14 17:11:00 -
[68] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Rhes wrote: After what happened when Incarna was released if there are people at CCP who think EvE should be about anything other than spaceships and the industry that supports them those people should be fired.
Your impaired speech seems to have improved in the last couple of weeks, you seem to be finally and slowly starting to acknowledge that balances and reworking of old mechanics are needed Rhes wrote: The short version is that CCP ignored Eve for two years to work on WiS. When it launched it was a massive failure and the playerbase rioted and the game lost more subs than at any other time in its history. CCP apologized for the wasted development time and promised to refocus on real Eve gameplay: spaceships and the industry that supports them. Ever since that time the game has grown steadily every quarter.
but so are "expansions" with graphic improvements, content and gameplay features. The word "furries" also seems to not be present in your lines so often. I think the medication I prescribed you is finally kicking in and showing some good results.
It's amazing how you WiS "enthusiasts" are unable to make your points without baseless personal attacks. It's almost like you think the ToS doesn't apply to you.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
199
|
Posted - 2013.09.14 17:12:00 -
[69] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:People who keep screaming WiS as concept should die are practically demanding that CCP scrap all the work done in those "2 years that they ignored real Eve." I think this player base could be more supportive.
They have already scrapped it and the game is healthier for it.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
200
|
Posted - 2013.09.14 20:56:00 -
[70] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Don,t get me wrong ,i am one of those WIS lovers ,but 2014 ?
2014 seems wildly optimistic.
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:WIS is used as an excuse not to expand on EvE a bit to long to compare it with some animation stuff But the funny thing is new graphics and animations are results of the so called 2 year neglecting of EvE and as a byproduct there was that 1 disappointing room
What are you talking about? Eve is constantly expanding. |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
201
|
Posted - 2013.09.15 00:35:00 -
[71] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Rhes wrote:Eve is constantly expanding. Yeah, we are getting whole 0 new star systems every year for 3 (5?) years in a row!
The second to last thing Eve needs is more systems (the last thing it needs is WiS). But the game has been expanding with new players and new content quite nicely now ever since Incarna exploded.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
202
|
Posted - 2013.09.15 03:10:00 -
[72] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:There's no shortage of ideas from the player-base for things they'd like to see added to WiS, starting with opening that blasted door.
That's part of the problem considering most of the ideas are horrible. Roleplayers are just awful people and once they get entrenched in a game it's very difficult to get them out and while they are there they just ruin the community. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
207
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:39:00 -
[73] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Also Dust 514 is based on the Carbon engine
LOL
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
210
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 02:08:00 -
[74] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Meanwhile the 12 month anniversary of this thread is coming up.
Seriously CCP. What else do we need to do to demonstrate that there is huge interest in meaningful avatar gameplay?
This one is easy. If you can't live without more space pants or dance parties then cancel your subscription and state why. If there really is "huge interest" CCP will take note of all the people canceling and do something.
This is what real Eve players did after Incarna was released and it was fantastically effective. We got WiS put on the backburner and they have concentrated on spaceships ever since.
CCP is a business that relies on subscribers and it's the only metric that matters. Posting in a thread addressed to a team that doesn't even exist anymore isn't going to sway them.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
211
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 08:04:00 -
[75] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:
I know that the code was forked, but it's not just about the code. They are developing tools, making design decisions around social gameplay, figuring out what works and doesn't work when you design a MMO with realistic avatars and environments.
The lessons they learn should feed back into EVE.
That would be dumb. WoD is an avatar based game and Eve is spaceships.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
211
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 08:09:00 -
[76] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Rhes wrote:This one is easy. If you can't live without more space pants or dance parties then cancel your subscription and state why. If there really is "huge interest" CCP will take note of all the people canceling and do something.
This is what real Eve players did after Incarna was released and it was fantastically effective. We got WiS put on the backburner and they have concentrated on spaceships ever since.
CCP is a business that relies on subscribers and it's the only metric that matters. Posting in a thread addressed to a team that doesn't even exist anymore isn't going to sway them.
Actually, yes, yes it will. There are plenty of ways to get the attention of the dev-team without canceling your subscription. Posting on the forums is one of those ways. If they know there's interest in something they're more likely to invest time and money into it
Posting on forums doesn't pay the bills. This thread is a year old...CCP is well aware of what handful of role players and furries want and when they compare that to the number of people who stopped paying them last time they tried WiS it is not hard to see why they haven't tried again. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
216
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 16:44:00 -
[77] - Quote
Sir Jack Falstaff wrote:The fact that CCP created this thread (in October 2012, i.e. after Incarna) to talk about avatar gameplay specifically rebuts the claim that CCP was scared off by the Incarna backlash (again June 2011).
They also disbanded Team Avatar. That should tell you everything you need to know.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
217
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:08:00 -
[78] - Quote
Sir Jack Falstaff wrote:The 2013 Winter Expansion: Rebalancius just doesn't get the blood flowing.
Maybe not but CCP's focus on fixing spaceships has been very successful considering that subscriptions go up every quarter. As we've already discussed in this thread, the only times subs dropped substantially was when WiS went live.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
219
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 21:38:00 -
[79] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:http://users.telenet.be/mmodata/Charts/Subs-2.png
make of it what you will, but theres the data
That graph illustrates perfectly why CCP should stay out of the WiS business. There's some additional analysis here: http://mmodata.blogspot.com/2013/08/version-40-thoughts-and-comments.html
Here's the important part:
Quote:Talking about EVE Online, that is still the example of how to do things in the post - WoW era. While CCP thought they were becoming the dinosaur of the industry, and therefore had to implement a cash shop with micro transactions. They realized their mistakes in time ( after their customers reminded them where their loyalty must lie Riots-in-eve-against-microtransactions ). And turned around and got back on track making EVE Online a better game.
CCP is being rewarded now, with a PCU ( peak concurrent users ) of over 65.000 and over 500.000 monthly playing subscribers and a continued growth every year since release, now more than 10 years ago.
At this moment EVE Online is the second biggest subscription based MMORPG in the west, and the only subscription based MMORPG that is still growing in the west and probably in the world. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 22:38:00 -
[80] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:I have read you`re input there is nothing that declarable about wis out of the picture you are just trolling.
Maybe you didn't play when Incarna was released. WiS and microtransactions are tied together and both are bad for the game.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 22:53:00 -
[81] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:Johan Civire wrote:I have read you`re input there is nothing that declarable about wis out of the picture you are just trolling. Maybe you didn't play when Incarna was released. WiS and microtransactions are tied together and both are bad for the game. They really aren't. There is no reason any future WiS content needs to have micro-transactions associated with it.
Here's the best thing, though. Considering how successful the game has been since CCP decided to refocus on real Eve content there's no need for them to worry about WiS or microtransactions. Everybody wins!
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 23:15:00 -
[82] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:The number of people subbed has nothing to do with it.
In a subscription game it's the only metric that matters. I don't know why people keep wanting to ignore it.
If they scrapped their current plan and went all in on WiS and it caused most of the subscribers to stop giving CCP money would you count that as a success? |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 23:40:00 -
[83] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:I am saying that as long as WiS would increase subs, it doesn't matter how good the game is doing at the moment. I agree, subs are the only thing that matters, but the current subs are irrelevant. It is only the potential subs gained over the current that matter
Your problem is asserting that WiS would increase subs when past history indicates, rather clearly, that it has the opposite effect.
The only time in the history of Eve that subscription count went down was when WiS was released.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 23:49:00 -
[84] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:The assertion that "WiS" cause Incarnageddon, is just rubbish. Not least of all because we never got "WiS".
Based on the complete failure of DUST and the fact that WoD is still vaporware do you honestly believe CCP is capable of adding meaningful WiS to Eve? And even if, by some miracle, they were would it worth having them neglect spaceship content again to appease a small group of people who can't live without it?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 23:57:00 -
[85] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The assertion that "WiS" cause Incarnageddon, is just rubbish. Not least of all because we never got "WiS". Based on the complete failure of DUST and the fact that WoD is still vaporware do you honestly believe CCP is capable of adding meaningful WiS to Eve? And even if, by some miracle, they were would it worth having them neglect spaceship content again to appease a small group of people who can't live without it? So what your saying is, CCP is **** and we should get used to it? Well excuse me for wanting to have some faith in CCP. As for would I want CCP to neglect spaceship content over WiS? They don't have to neglect it. Also, it's really not a small group of people. This is why you are the minority in this discussion.
Nope. I think CCP is a pretty good company and they have a great spaceship game that I would hate to see ruined.
And if you think I'm in the minority of players you might want to scroll up and look at the graph again. Or just read back through this thread...there are a few dozen people at most who just can't accept that Eve doesn't need emotes or dance parties to be a great game. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 00:01:00 -
[86] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The assertion that "WiS" cause Incarnageddon, is just rubbish. Not least of all because we never got "WiS". Based on the complete failure of DUST and the fact that WoD is still vaporware do you honestly believe CCP is capable of adding meaningful WiS to Eve? And even if, by some miracle, they were would it worth having them neglect spaceship content again to appease a small group of people who can't live without it? about Dust however its doomed to die or some miracle need to be happening to keep that game alive. http://crossingzebras.com/2013/06/21/the-tragedy-of-dust-514/But thats apart from WiS.
Not really. If CCP isn't able to create a compelling avatar based game why would you think they could add meaningful avatar based gameplay to Eve?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 00:08:00 -
[87] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Firstly, I have gone through this thread and I'm sad enough to have actually counted the different unique posters and whether they are pro or con
lol...sure you did
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:03:00 -
[88] - Quote
Sir Jack Falstaff wrote:The problem, Rhes, with your plan of staying the course and avoiding innovation is that it works great until suddenly, it doesn't. You are correct: subs are the best measure of the company's health, although active users is a very important measure of engagement. You're correct, right now, CCP doesn't need to do anything innovative: subs are strong, engagement is strong. They don't need to do anything. This is the Microsoft 2007 strategy. Windows and Office reign supreme. Who is going to use a phone without a keyboard except a bunch of carebear fools, right?
Unwillingness to change is the recipe for disruptive innovation. The only way a competitor steals the space MMORPG crown from Eve is if Eve lets them. No one, no one, is suggesting that Eve move from its core competency, which is community driven spaceship flying. But Eve needs to improve in areas where it is weak: PvE and customization. That's exactly the weaknesses that avatar play addresses, and creates excitement about the game in the process.
You're suggesting putting the game on autopilot. We know what happens when you do that, and the real world is far less forgiving than Eve. If a disruptive competitor points Eve as it slow boats to a gate, CCP doesn't get to wake up in a new clone.
I'm not asking for CCP to stop expanding Eve or put it on autopilot. What I hope they don't do is try to expand it in a way that they tried once before and it almost killed the game.
The problem with space Barbie enthusiasts is they can't see any other way for Eve to expand other than WiS and that's just narrowminded.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:06:00 -
[89] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Which says absolutely nothing about WiS further reinforcing my point.
It's not worded very well but as we've already established (several times) in this thread it was the fact that Eve was ignored for two years while WiS/microtransactions were being worked on that caused people to riot. If the captains quarters had just magically appeared one day nobody would have cared much but after going two years with broken or unfinished Eve content it was insulting to log in and see a room with a couch. If that was all they could come up with in two years then they should forget about WiS and just focus on what they are good at.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:14:00 -
[90] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:Thats not.. Like i say that before the put 1 team in the WiS "avatar" thats what 10 man? The rest still focus the main eve part new ships balance here and there put some tweaks and so on. Thats like 3/4 of there people. So you think the avatar game play will remove spaceships because of a avatar walking to a other player is a game breaking technology in eve or what? its a interaction not a game changing. You don`t want to use you`re barbie fine no one will care
Any resource (whether it's money or manpower) they put into WiS is a resource that's not spent on real Eve gameplay.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:30:00 -
[91] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:Rhes wrote:Johan Civire wrote:Thats not.. Like i say that before the put 1 team in the WiS "avatar" thats what 10 man? The rest still focus the main eve part new ships balance here and there put some tweaks and so on. Thats like 3/4 of there people. So you think the avatar game play will remove spaceships because of a avatar walking to a other player is a game breaking technology in eve or what? its a interaction not a game changing. You don`t want to use you`re barbie fine no one will care Any resource (whether it's money or manpower) they put into WiS is a resource that's not spent on real Eve gameplay. Also not true because thats a different team and not part of the regular eve crew. So the hired to do WiS without losing any real ccp member. So the have 5/4 crew. So there is no worry`s about losing resource. The gain resource. And the best part is its not the team on Iceland but in japan a other ccp partner 
So who is paying this "different team" that's going to do WiS? |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:30:00 -
[92] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Rhes wrote:Any resource (whether it's money or manpower) they put into WiS is a resource that's not spent on real Eve gameplay.
Except that WiS is part of "real Eve gameplay"  Just because you, personally, don't like it doesn't make it any less a valid part of the game.
Nope. Eve is spaceships and the industry that supports them.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:33:00 -
[93] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Yes, there were some long-standing issues with in-space features but those are being addressed.
Exactly my point. They are being fixed because CCP stopped with the WiS nonsense and promised to focus on spaceships.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:45:00 -
[94] - Quote
Sir Jack Falstaff wrote:Rhes wrote:Cade Windstalker wrote:Which says absolutely nothing about WiS further reinforcing my point. It's not worded very well but as we've already established (several times) in this thread it was the fact that Eve was ignored for two years while WiS/microtransactions were being worked on that caused people to riot. If the captains quarters had just magically appeared one day nobody would have cared much but after going two years with broken or unfinished Eve content it was insulting to log in and see a room with a couch. If that was all they could come up with in two years then they should forget about WiS and just focus on what they are good at. Finally, something cogent and intelligent and not insults about barbies. More like this please. I finally, after pages and pages of back and forth, understand where you're coming from. Is your argument then, that you feel CCP is not capable of implementing WiS in a professional and worthy manner? Then make that argument. It's a better argument than insults and deliberately conflating the microtransactions fiasco with the WiS implementation. You're right. The CQ is half assed. You'll get no argument from me on that one. If your argument is that CCP can't do avatar play right, then make that argument. It's your best one so far.
I've made the argument several times. Just look at the state of CCP's two avatar based games: DUST is a failure and WoD is vaporware.
The problem is that despite that evidence there is a small group of Eve players who insist that CCP ignore history and ignore their track record and waste more time and money on game mechanics that aren't going to improve Eve's core gameplay. Gameplay that has continued to bring new subscribers to the game steadily since they promised to refocus their efforts to improve it.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:48:00 -
[95] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Rhes wrote:Johan Civire wrote:Also not true because thats a different team and not part of the regular eve crew. So the hired to do WiS without losing any real ccp member. So the have 5/4 crew. So there is no worry`s about losing resource. The gain resource. And the best part is its not the team on Iceland but in japan a other ccp partner  So who is paying this "different team" that's going to do WiS? Also not how development works. If they feel that WiS will make the game more successful then they can afford to budget in an entirely new team for that since it will bring in more subs. Throwing more teams at a narrow feature set has diminishing returns since you can only have so many people working on a specific feature before they start stepping on each-other's toes.
What evidence do you have that more WiS content will make the game more successful? The last time they tried it the game's subscribers nosedived. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:57:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:But - the game stays sub-based, while micro-transactions provide additional ISK sink. People who are willing to spend on eyecandy - it can be a fancy suit , shoes, whatever piece of gear that provides a character distinctive memorable look - will buy more Plex. More bought Plex - more cash for CCP, more money for development.
The problem is that the space barbie crowd won't be satisfied with more clothes. Next they will want more emotes, then dance parties, then full on furry sex dungeons. The nonsense will never stop.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:58:00 -
[97] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Dipped, not nose-dived.
CCP paid for the entire CSM to fly to Iceland for an (unplanned) emergency summit during the summer of rage. They were very scared about the state of the game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 02:45:00 -
[98] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:Rhes wrote: The problem is that the space barbie crowd won't be satisfied with more clothes. Next they will want more emotes, then dance parties, then full on furry sex dungeons. The nonsense will never stop.
Does it mean that evil space barbies would make you participate? Or would it be too hard for you to resist the urge to join those dungeons? Also if they are charged good amt for those emotes and fluff - more money for ccp to work on spaceships, right?
No the problem is the development time and money spent on emotes and sex dungeons. It's time and money that's not spent on real Eve gameplay.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 02:46:00 -
[99] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Rhes wrote:Tanthalassa wrote:But - the game stays sub-based, while micro-transactions provide additional ISK sink. People who are willing to spend on eyecandy - it can be a fancy suit , shoes, whatever piece of gear that provides a character distinctive memorable look - will buy more Plex. More bought Plex - more cash for CCP, more money for development. The problem is that the space barbie crowd won't be satisfied with more clothes. Next they will want more emotes, then dance parties, then full on furry sex dungeons. The nonsense will never stop. Slippery Slope argument ahead!!!
It's like you haven't read this thread and seen what they are asking for. You should try it. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
224
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 03:32:00 -
[100] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Rhes wrote:It's almost like you guys have never met a furry irl. Blawrf on jabber is too much already
Those broadcasts about moon scanning are starting to haunt my dreams.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
226
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 04:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Rhes wrote:Cade Windstalker wrote:Also you're still not responding to people who actually refute your arguments. Should we take failure to respond as agreement?  As soon as somebody actually refutes one of my arguments I'll respond. Well, you certainly haven't been attempting to refute people's counter-arguments so... again, agreement?  People cite sources and provide counter examples and you pick one tiny little word you don't like and respond to that. That's not even good trolling, let alone constructive debate.
No, I read a post and as soon as I find something stupid I respond to it. I figure once I find a dumb argument in the first sentence of the post there's probably no reason for me to worry about the rest.
As for citations there was a graph and a link to a blog post that explained the graph a few pages back. Take another look at both of them. For the rest of it you'll have to remember back to the summer of rage if you were playing back then.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
226
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 04:11:00 -
[102] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:K, under that logic I'm going to start a thread demanding more "fun stuff".
******* WiS retards.
Making fun of people who play a spaceship game but whine about a lack of space pants is p fun. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
226
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 04:15:00 -
[103] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:The only time the forums have a hope of rising above the usual perennial insignificance is when the community articulates a generally consistent and coherent argument.
Or when those forum posts are accompanied by subscription cancellations. Kind of like what happened after Incarna was released.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
231
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:02:00 -
[104] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:The sheer volume of drivel that comes out of Rhes is frankly amazing.
All of your arguments have been covered time and time again throughout this thread. I remember now why I stopped posting before, because I got tired of repeating myself to people who will just throw the same discredited arguments up over and over again.
I haven't seen a single person discredit anything I've posted. Can you find some links for me?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
231
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 05:18:00 -
[105] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:You guys are so stuck to Incarnagate,it is almost embarrassing No one in this thread wants something forced onto anybody The only thing we want is the OPTION to open that door
You make it sound so simple but we both know that you're not just asking for the door to be opened. You're asking for a whole bunch of nonsense content that would take away from Eve's core gameplay. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
238
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 20:56:00 -
[106] - Quote
I just watched the Rubicon announcement and I'd like to thank CCP for continuing to follow through on their promise to focus on real Eve gameplay. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
243
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 21:20:00 -
[107] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:I bet we will not even be able to use our CQ screens to watch those, though...
Nobody would want to turn CQ on just for that.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
244
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 21:35:00 -
[108] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:on the other hand, it can be destroyed by anyone when left unattended, which is stupid.
It's almost like you don't *get* Eve.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
255
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:18:00 -
[109] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Meanwhile Star Citizen devs announced collectible fish for aquarium
Nothing says sci-fi like tropical fish.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
257
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:53:00 -
[110] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:...Rhes is kinda cute... I have no idea what he writes, since I got him blocked, but seeing how he always posts directly after me, I almost feel flattered. 
It's nice to know you still care.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
257
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:54:00 -
[111] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:J3ssica Alba wrote:Seems you don't *get* Sci Fi, Captain Picard had a fish tank, the Enterprise had several of them actually. Well, that's because EVE is no longer really about sci-fie... sure, it's about spaceships... but other then that, it's a playground for juvinile delinquents on a power trip, screwing each other over... no wonder, no excitement... just meaningless, tedious competition... Take a look at the SC forums... there you see real sci-fie enthusiasts.
What is sci-fie? I might be an enthusiast and not even know it.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
265
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 01:34:00 -
[112] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Trii Seo wrote:I mean, that's the main selling point of EVE - not a flashy hangar bay you can walk around in. Only because that bay sucks in EVE and nobody in healthy mind would pay money for 4 locked jail cells without any customization options. However hangar (housing) with racing circuit, shooting range, collectible ship models-fish-paintings, manufacturing equipment, ability to invite people and (probably) shoot them (fish have to eat something!) - all of this may add a lot to sandbox and may become a selling point. And it works in SC already: I gave them money right after hangar implementation when I've seen videos of toons walking around and inside their ships - and I didn't even expect to see aquariums, lounge, windows, racing tracks, posters, furniture, ship enhancement equipment and god knows what else they are going to implement there (and probably many items will be craft-able).
So if you already have a game that you enjoy why are you still trying to ruin Eve?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
276
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 04:50:00 -
[113] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:Sure, CCP didn't keep the promises about WiS
Completely untrue. CCP promised to put WiS on the backburner and focus on real Eve gameplay and they have kept that promise. That's why the game has continued to grow every quarter since Incarna.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
290
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 16:21:00 -
[114] - Quote
Job Valador wrote:And to Rhes, i dont like your methods of furries and barbies but im on your side now of spaceships over avatars
And that's why I keep posting despite the organized resistance from furry and RP cartels.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
290
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 16:22:00 -
[115] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:everybody in this thread are here because they like EvE .
People demanding that CCP waste time and resources on fish tanks and toilets don't like Eve. They want it to fail.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
291
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 16:30:00 -
[116] - Quote
kosswomen Mckay wrote:Stop listening to **** heads CCP. Be strong and keep to the original vision that included getting out of your ship.
Maybe you don't know this but you can already get out of your ship.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
298
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 21:56:00 -
[117] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:The fact that my post, stating that we should have seen WiS or DUST integration work in this expansion, is now the most liked post in the first page of the expansion discussion thread should speak to some evidence that this is not a minority belief.
Thankfully game development isn't done on the basis of forum likes. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
298
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 22:36:00 -
[118] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Rhes wrote:Job Valador wrote:And to Rhes, i dont like your methods of furries and barbies but im on your side now of spaceships over avatars And that's why I keep posting despite the organized resistance from furry and RP cartels. I thought you are posting to turn this thread into ad hominem garbage instead of actual conversation about WiS because CCP and Goonswarm collaborate to keep status quo, pacify public and persuade people it's normal for the last non-dying subscription-based game not to have meaningful gameplay expansions during 3 years (since Incursion) while shareholders feast on the money instead of investing them back into the game.
You're right. I get PLEX to post in this thread.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
301
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 00:00:00 -
[119] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:In then end it is all about resources. In theory if there was enough people developing the game all the major player groups could get what they want. However this obviously would cost more than any company could afford and probably turn the game into something no-one really recognizes as their own anymore.
So... company needs to prioritize what they want to do, with how much resources and what is worth doing.
It seems that CCP has taken the safe path and keeps redirecting some attention to sectors from where the money is currently coming. Those people seem to keep paying and game keeps going. This approach doesn't eat much resources, doesn't need much investments and has very small risks. Positive thing is that as long they keep doing this - Eve won't die :) Downside is that subscription amounts won't suddenly at least radically grow.
I can imagine reasons why CCP is doing what they are doing, but that doesn't really mean that I would accept it. In the end this isn't really black and white like "would you like us to fix the old stuff and be all about spaceships" OR "something else". This is something we players often seem to discuss about and IMO is totally wrong thing to argue about. I don't know if this is even something CCP want's us to bang our heads on to ignore the real issue behind the point.
In other words there is no "OR" between these current and new customers. In any successful company it is clear that you have to keep your old customers happy. You can not redirect all your resources just to attract new customers or the journey will end very fast. If you want new customers with some new concept you have to invest and assign more resources to the project while still keeping the old resources doing what they were doing.
As long CCP is not willing to invest greater part of the profits back to Eve and assign more developers to add new content which may or may not draw new subscribers from new target group - things really won't change.
I can only hope that someday some of the other CCP projects which have been eating from Eve start to make enough profits for them to give back to Eve and that CCP actually redirects those resources back to us as well. The flow has been other way around for too long already.
Obviously this is just customer feedback about "what I feel" without any statistical facts to back my beliefs up. Feel free to correct with real info if you know better. Would love to be wrong with this one.
Eve subs have gone up every quarter since WiS was put on the backburner and CCP promised to focus on real Eve content. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
303
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 02:46:00 -
[120] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:Heavy spam of the Power of 2 is by far most likely the reason, which fueled basic requirement to multibox (or at least have multiple accounts) to succeed in this game.
Eve actual subscriber number could easily be only 2/3 of that 500k, due everyone and their grandma having alt accounts
Alt accounts are regular accounts as far as CCP's accountants are concerned. Also, if people are purchasing additional accounts it means they are enjoying the game and the direction it's heading.
The point is that there is no proof that neglecting real Eve content again to add more roleplaying nonsense would increase subs in any meaningful number while there is a ton of proof (namely the Summer of Rage) that the opposite is true.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
304
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 04:53:00 -
[121] - Quote
Tanthalassa wrote:The only proof that was brought by "summer of rage" is that: Roime wrote:<...>Overreacting, hysteric herdmental basement dwellers with entitlement issues gone full ****** is what almost destroyed the game, luckily all they achieved was a broken pixel statue.
I guess you didn't play during the Summer of Rage. You know when CCP flew the entire CSM in for an emergency summit to find a way to stem the tide of people fleeing the game. What was achieved, beyond a "broken pixel statue" was a commitment from CCP to focus on actual Eve content...a commitment they have stuck with and the reason why the game is successful now. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
307
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 17:38:00 -
[122] - Quote
J3ssica Alba wrote:Stop talking to it (the Rhes thing) .. its just like a voicemail message, no matter how much you try to reason with it, it will keep auto repeating.
I'll keep repeating the truth until somebody proves it's not. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
313
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 17:24:00 -
[123] - Quote
Baby ChuChu wrote:I don't think Ish, J3ss, Shalua, or anyone else for that matter, would really take vanity features over meaningful gameplay.
Of course they would. That's exactly what they are asking for in this thread.
They are crying over robes ffs.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
313
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 18:30:00 -
[124] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:It's no big secret that WiS in combination with meaningful avatar gameplay (owning businesses on stations etc.) would have been aimed first and foremost at highsec and industrial/trading players... so CCPs new plan is basically not only a refusal to WiS, but to the whole "non ship to ship PvP" part of EVE, and it's players
The "non ship to ship PvP' part of Eve has never been stronger. There seem to be plenty of people out there mining, trading, building, inventing and shipping who don't need wizard robes or dance emotes to have fun in this game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
320
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 21:27:00 -
[125] - Quote
J3ssica Alba wrote:if you hate WiS so much why do you even have an avatar? Should have left the silhouette space holder .. yet you went to the trouble of making your face and moustache and put clothes on and finding the background you liked . Ah hypocrisy, such an ugly beast.
When Incarna was released I gave it a shot. I logged in, created my new avatar and then logged in to my captain's quarters. I walked (very, very slowly) around my couch and then logged out. I realized that Eve had been neglected for two years for a really in-depth character creator and a room with a couch and I canceled all my subs. Once CCP apologized for almost destroying the game and promised to refocus on spaceship content I resubbed.
Unlike some people in this thread I spoke with my wallet. The only hypocrisy I see are people who say they can't enjoy this game without bathrobes and dance emotes but continue to pay (for multiple subs even!). |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
320
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 21:32:00 -
[126] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:Avatar gameplay is not only about emotes and gudfait in Jita cantina, it's a whole new playstyle, a very dangerous one. Just imagine the havoc a group of marines could do by boarding an enemy ship during a huge fleet battle. Or infiltraring an enemy POS or station. But ofc this is vay too much for CCP, not even a whole decade would be enough to pull this out. Rebalancing dots in space over and over is much more convenient.
Based on what was released for Incarna, the complete failure of Dust and the lack of progress on WoD do you really believe CCP has the ability to add that type of gameplay to Eve without once again neglecting the core gameplay that the game was founded upon?
Listen, I like CCP a lot as a company and I really enjoy their spaceship mmo. That's why I don't want to see them get misled by a small handful of people who think Eve is something it's not.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
321
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 21:53:00 -
[127] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:No matter... pretty soon EVE will be the only (successful) spaceship game that is JUST about spaceships... hope all you intelligent players will be happy then. ...vision is scary. 
We are already happy and we're also excited about CCP's vision for the future of Eve. I feel bad for people who are too narrow-minded to see that vision even if it lacks dance emotes and bathrobes.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
321
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:02:00 -
[128] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:We use bathrobes and emotes only in Second Lyfe and LoL guyz! EVE is spaceshipz 
Now you're getting it.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
322
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 03:47:00 -
[129] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:Or we can go play a fresh new take on "internet spaceships" that combines all that in one login, on one platform.
I think this is a fantastic idea for anybody who can't play an internet spaceship game without dress-up Barbie attached. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
322
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 03:59:00 -
[130] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Its a fantastic idea for people that want a real space simulator sci-fi mmorpg and not tiny squares and spreadsheets.
If people feel this way about Eve I have to question why they are paying a subscription fee for it.
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
329
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 20:24:00 -
[131] - Quote
Gel Musana wrote:OK, this post is 1 year old now. Can you show this to us now? Or was this just smoke? 
Team Avatar doesn't even exist anymore. CCP has wisely decided to honor their promise to focus on real Eve content.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
329
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 20:34:00 -
[132] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:It is quite interesting how they claim to be thrilled about getting more of the same (go there, conquer it, lose it, conquer it again, rinse and repeat) and yet fail to understand or respect what other players ask from CCP.
The game has evolved and changed a lot since Incarna. You just don't care because the change didn't include more outfits for your space Barbie.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
333
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 22:23:00 -
[133] - Quote
Cypherdog wrote:Didn't you watch the Incarna development videos?
Compare what was in those videos to what was actually released.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 22:50:00 -
[134] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:Cypherdog wrote:Didn't you watch the Incarna development videos? Compare what was in those videos to what was actually released. Exactly, dumb ass. We never got any of that.
So we had two years of wasted development time and we got a room with a couch and a microtransaction store and you want them to waste even *more* time on it? I just want to be clear that that is really what you are advocating for.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 23:22:00 -
[135] - Quote
Eli Green wrote:It should also be noted that arguing that X group that believes X about WiS is correct as CCP has never released any data on the player interest in the subject for quite some time. This goes for those arguing both for and against WiS, devolving the discussion into personal attacks and jibes does nothing to help either side.
Subscribers have gone up every quarter since the summer of rage (since CCP put WiS nonsense on the back burner) and that is the only data that is needed.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 00:11:00 -
[136] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Non sense. I unsubbed after WiS development stop. So did many people.
Not enough to make a difference. During the summer of rage so many people canceled that CCP flew the entire CSM to Iceland for an emergency summit to try and stem the flow of people leaving the game. After CCP apologized and made a commitment to refocus on real Eve content subs started going up again.
The fact that you canceled your subscription and it didn't make CCP change course means not enough people agree with you. Apparently the number of people who can't live without space Barbie is less than the usual monthly subscription churn numbers. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 00:26:00 -
[137] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Rhes wrote: The fact that you canceled your subscription and it didn't make CCP change course means not enough people agree with you.
Nope. It just means that those people either don't unsub or do it quietly without throwing tantrums at CCP and shooting pixel statues 
Either way there still aren't enough to make CCP change the course of the game again. If subscriptions weren't going up every quarter you'd have an argument but they are so you don't.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 02:11:00 -
[138] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Rhes wrote: Either way there still aren't enough to make CCP change the course of the game again. If subscriptions weren't going up every quarter you'd have an argument but they are so you don't.
Make CCP change the couse of the game??? What are we now? Dellusional fanbois who think they own the game and force CCP to fire a whole dev team so they stop whining? Nope, we're all adults here
Yes, we changed the course of the game when thousands of people canceled their subscriptions after Incarna was released. You guys keep bleating about the "total sci-fi emulator" that CCP was preparing in the years leading up to WiS being released...what do you think made them change direction? |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 02:13:00 -
[139] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:It's interesting when I post pics of Incarna (and EVE in general) on facebook and compare them to the cartoonish crap from other MMOs. EVE looks amazing.
It's a real shame that they have the engine for avatar game play already in place, but are refusing to use it.
Maybe we should get CCP to release the art assets from the existing CQs and get players to design a new space using them. Could be a fun competition.
They don't have the engine for avatar gameplay already in place. The engine developed for Incarna can't even support more than one person in a room.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 02:16:00 -
[140] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Funny thing: Look where Second Life is on there. And that's with like... no "meaningful gameplay" whatsoever. And every game on the chart with over a million subs... has at least something avatar gameplay related.
You mean games that were designed from the ground up as avatar-based games?
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
342
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 17:50:00 -
[141] - Quote
Teinyhr wrote:Do humor me by telling how adding avatar gameplay would alter fundamentals of EVE gameplay in any way
Resources spent on more WiS nonsense are resources that aren't spent on real Eve content.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 18:09:00 -
[142] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:Teinyhr wrote:Do humor me by telling how adding avatar gameplay would alter fundamentals of EVE gameplay in any way Resources spent on more WiS nonsense are resources that aren't spent on real Eve content. Perhaps you should whine more about Dust, Valkyrie and World of Darkness in that case.
Dust is a failure that probably won't be around much longer, WoD is vaporware and while I won't play Valkyrie at least it is spaceship related.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 18:10:00 -
[143] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Indeed. Two ships and a few anchorable structures does not an "expansion" make. That's a content patch.
I like you conveniently leave out the amazing amount of effort put into rebalancing that has happened since Incarna. It's been nice seeing the focus put back into spaceships. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 19:09:00 -
[144] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:But balancing has nothing to do with WiS, WiS is a completely different type of effort, and would not harm subscriptions, as long as CCP continued to rebalance and iterate spaceship gameplay.
I don't know how I can make this concept any more simple. If they spend resources on WiS it means they are not spending those resources on real Eve content. Ship balancing is content when it means that hulls that nobody ever flies become viable options again. If you guys could stop obsessing over bathrobes and dance parties you'd see that Eve has been expanding and getting better since Incarna. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 21:36:00 -
[145] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:I support ship balancing. Ship balancing requires one guy. How many devs does CCP have?
This is a shockingly ignorant comment. Do you understand how difficult it is to balance things in complex competitive online games? Even then, ship balancing isn't the only thing being done in the expansion. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 21:45:00 -
[146] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Rhes wrote:Crasniya wrote:I support ship balancing. Ship balancing requires one guy. How many devs does CCP have? This is a shockingly ignorant comment. Do you understand how difficult it is to balance things in complex competitive online games? Even then, ship balancing isn't the only thing being done in the expansion. Yes, we got two ships, ... four deployable space objects, I believe, and an achievement system that isn't cool enough to offer any cool achievements.
You forgot about high sec POCOs. The content generation from that alone was enough to make me happy about the expansion. You also missed the first part of CCP Seagull's intro where she explained that Rubicon is the first step in the next phase of the game where the great empires will be assaulted by the capsuleers. You should go back and rewatch the entire announcement...good stuff there.
But I guess if all you care about is space outfits and emotes...
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 22:15:00 -
[147] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:The game is horribly static, because any time CCP wants to introduce something that truly adds gameplay, people like you cry about it.
I'm not the one in this thread crying. I staged my protest during the summer of rage and got what I wanted and I'm happy with the direction the game is taking.
Team Avatar doesn't exist anymore and WiS wasn't even mentioned in the expansion announcement. It's time for those of you who can't live without more WiS nonsense to actually do something about it. If there as many of you as you seem to think somebody at CCP will notice all of your subscription cancellations.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 23:20:00 -
[148] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Brah, we don't need to do sh*t.
Then what are you complaining about? |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 23:27:00 -
[149] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Rhes wrote: Then what are you complaining about?
Complaining? Thats what goonsheep do in such attention seeking events, not us WiS supporters brah.
You have posted multiple times in this thread about how unhappy you are with the game while I have posted the opposite.
I'm still confused about why you bother subscribing to a game you dislike so much.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 23:33:00 -
[150] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Check yourself before you engage in Summers of Tantrum and wreck yourself while Dust514 and Valkyrie are worked on instead of EVE. Hypocrite attention seeking tantrums are bad fo yo health brah.
So you're just trolling at this point?
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
348
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 02:48:00 -
[151] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:It's not an either/or argument. With appropriate planning we can see improvements to both space and stations. It's just a matter of what size steps to take.
I used to believe this as well. Then Incarna was released and I realized that Eve had been ignored for two years for a room with a couch and a monocle.
CCP has an amazing spaceship game and two failed avatar games...they should stick with what they do best.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
348
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 04:53:00 -
[152] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Then why, instead of campaigning against avatar content (in your incoherent way), are you not passionately against the THREE other games CCP are putting together.
I just answered this. Dust is a complete failure and won't be around much longer (and I did campaign against it before it was released), WoD is vaporware and Valkyrie I won't be playing but at least it's spaceship related. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
349
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 05:41:00 -
[153] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:DUST is, at this point, a more entertaining game than EVE is. It's not going anywhere. And with any luck, should be part of the next sov system when CCP gets around to finally fixing that.
It doesn't matter how entertaining it is if nobody is playing it (or more importantly paying for stuff). The integration with Eve is also laughable. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
351
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 07:55:00 -
[154] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:raven666wings wrote:Check yourself before you engage in Summers of Tantrum and wreck yourself while Dust514 and Valkyrie are worked on instead of EVE. Hypocrite attention seeking tantrums are bad fo yo health brah. So you're just trolling at this point? He's just doing what you were doing before. And now we have two of you in the thread. I hope your happy.
But I'm not trolling.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
351
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 07:56:00 -
[155] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:Even worst, the whole Hallelujah Plan and its 3 years course will end up rewarding only the players who already managed to make the transition to nullsec gameplay.
This is a good thing. Anything CCP can do to get people from mindlessly mining and running missions in highsec will be good for the game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:40:00 -
[156] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:True... I mean, even EVE is still an extremely flawed game. After 10 years of continuous development, it's very unbalanced, horribly un-accessable and all in all, very limited in scope.
I completely agree which is why I don't want CCP to waste resources on WiS nonsense when they should be fixing the flaws in the core game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:42:00 -
[157] - Quote
Mhax Arthie wrote:I know those are some kind of book illustrations but why so detailed and so much focus on ships interior?
Because Eve is a spaceship game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:49:00 -
[158] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Arduemont wrote:At the moment it looks like Dust can't support itself. It's being supported by Eve. I'd like to see your evidence of that. Quite a few serious DUST players are running double-boosters (active and passive) which cost in excess of $20-30 per month EACH. Which means there are plenty of players paying $40-60 a month to play DUST. Not counting paid weapons/suits/etc.
Depending on a few people to pay $60 a month to keep your game in business seems like a really sound business plan. 
If CCP isn't careful they will end up like Zynga. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:49:00 -
[159] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Core problems like EVE's terrible New Player Experience would be pretty much solved by WiS.
WiS isn't real Eve gameplay so using it for the NPE would just be confusing.
Would your version of the NPE be sitting on your couch in your CQ watching tutorial videos of how to operate your ship on the little video screen? |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 16:05:00 -
[160] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:But your fine with them wasting resources on WoD, Dust and Valkyrie right?
I have answered this at least three times on the last few pages of the thread. But I'll do it one more time for the slow people.
Dust has failed miserably and probably won't be around much longer (and I did protest the time and money spent on it when it was announced), WoD is vaporware with barely any staff assigned to it and Valkyrie, while I won't be playing it, is at least spaceship related.
All clear now?
|
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
457
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 00:25:00 -
[161] - Quote
Teinyhr wrote:From the Reddit IamA:CCP RIse wrote:Basically, Incarna taught us two things as far as I can tell. 1. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay, and 2. Working on Avatar gameplay is very costly in terms of resources and time.
As a result, for the time being we are extremely focused on the in-space gameplay. We have years worth of work we can do in space but who knows, maybe someday we will get a chance to go back to it. I guess that is the final nail in the coffin for me personally. It will never come, one CCP promise more never to be delivered. Well, at least it was fun to dream what it could've been. No you cant have my stuff, since I'm not quitting. Incarna never was a deal breaker for me, but I'm still sad to see it never mature.
I would just like to thank CCP Rise for continuing to honor CCP's promise to focus on real Eve content. It's good to know that after all the drama of Incarna that CCP learned their lessons and they actually care about not repeating past mistakes. Well done. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
461
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 01:57:00 -
[162] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Translation: you have to enjoy ships because they are cheap.
Better translation: you have to enjoy ships because Eve is a spaceship game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
463
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 03:08:00 -
[163] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Rhes wrote:Lipbite wrote:Translation: you have to enjoy ships because they are cheap. Better translation: you have to enjoy ships because Eve is a spaceship game. Even better translation: CCP talks big. Delivers little. Anyone else remember David Reid talking about how EVE was going to be the biggest gaming universe by the end of the year? Meanwhile, star citizen reaches 33 million.
CCP promised to focus on real Eve content and they have stuck to it. If you don't want to play a spaceship game why are you still here?
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
463
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 03:59:00 -
[164] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Because regardless of what comes out of your flappy word hole Rhes, players want avatar content.
No, a tiny fraction of the playerbase wants avatar content. The rest of us recognize that Eve is spaceships.
There are countless games where you can play dress-up with your avatar and use dance emotes. Go play one of them and stop trying to trick CCP into ruining their spaceship game.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
463
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 04:01:00 -
[165] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:To be honest, I'd take the word of the CCP executive over a developer. And they have said a number of times that they want to introduce meaningful avatar gameplay when resources permit. I admire your hopeful optimism and am glad that you are so wrong.
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
463
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 04:17:00 -
[166] - Quote
Thetabetalpha wrote:Rhes wrote:There are countless games where you can play dress-up with your avatar and use dance emotes. Go play one of them and stop trying to trick CCP into ruining their spaceship game.
Because that is only "meaningful avatar content," that you can imagine, right? How come you don't post that particular game name anymore, with that certain kind of RP contingent? You know, the ones that you included in every ship toast of yours in the thread that should only concern players wanting Avatar content, rather than those who have tunnel vision concerning the next decade of eve. I'm going to need a Pubbie to English translate on this one. I have no idea what it is saying. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
463
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 04:28:00 -
[167] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:I'm trying to understand your point of veiw Rhes.
Do you believe that if CCP spent time developing some avatar content that it will ruin your enjoyment of the spaceship side of the game?
But you enjoy the spaceship game right now, right?
That won't change, avatar content will simply be an added extra. Completely optional too no doubt.
So is it instead the concept alone that CCP might spend development time on something other than spaceships enough to ruin your game? Must CCP fully devote 100% of their development resources to spaceships, every single update, to keep your enjoyment in EVE satisfied?
I'm trying to find the angle where the introduction of avatar content will ruin your personal game, Rhes. I can't see how it would, unless you're already not having fun.
Real Eve content was basically ignored for two years while Incarna was being developed. I don't want that to happen again.
I love Eve and enjoy it a lot but with that said there is a *ton* of work that needs to be done on spaceship content before we go back to worrying about space barbies. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 04:39:00 -
[168] - Quote
Thetabetalpha wrote:highsec should be nerfed vs nullsec. Agreed. But it has nothing to do with WiS.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
466
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:30:00 -
[169] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Rhes wrote:Real Eve content was basically ignored for two years while Incarna was being developed. I don't want that to happen again. Ok. But was it really "ignored"? You've played longer than me Rhes, but I seem to remember updates throughout that period which brought changes and updates to the spaceship game. There's a difference to it being ignored completely and simply not being focussed on as much as you'd personally like it to be. Go back and look at the things introduced to the game while Incarna was being developed. They were all "big ideas" that fell flat and were left to rot. The best example was Faction Warfare (which has since been fixed after the promise to refocus on real Eve content) but things like the Dominion sov system and the problem of super capital proliferation *still* haven't been addressed and when a solution to those problems finally does arrive it will be two years later than it should have been because of WiS.
Quote:And that's a fair point. But it does bring rise to a question - So it's not the fact that avatar-content is being introduced that annoys you, but more-so the fact that you believe CCP can't introduce it in a balanced fashion that doesn't harm the development of the spaceship side?
i.e. Is you problem avatar gameplay - or the way in which it's developed and introduced? This is actually a good point (probably the first one I've seen from a pro-WiS person in this thread). I have admitted that I wasn't against the idea of avatar based content before Incarna was released but after suffering through the game being neglected and then getting a single room maybe it's the sad truth that CCP doesn't have the resources to realize their "vision" for an all-encompassing sci-fi simulator. After DUST failed and WoD continues to linger it's become clear that any more time spent not focusing on what made Eve great in the first place is just wasted development time and money.
Quote:It sounds like you'd be fine with it if CCP could somehow introduce it without effecting spaceship game development. If so then, as I mentioned earlier, shouldn't you be pushing for CCP to bring more balance to it's WiS's implementation rather than completely opposing it's introduction? If CCP was somehow able to develop more WiS nonsense without having the spaceship game suffer I wouldn't care. I no longer believe CCP is capable of doing this, however.
Quote:Personally I disliked many of the things introduced in Odyssey for example. But as a wormholer I could also see that these changes would bring more people, and more targets, to w-space. So I supported the update overall. Similarly I believe there's benefits that come with avatar gaming, more people, more subscriptions, more targets. And because I'm a roleplayer - more RP fun too. So I support it's introduction. I'm quite happy with the spaceship game as it is, anything extra is a bonus. This might have been true before Incarna was released but for the most part the people who just can't enjoy Eve without an avatar have left and quietly moved on to other games. The people who are left (the people mucking up this thread) are just trolls who are literally asking CCP to make the same mistake they made with Incarna. Why CCP allows them to continually troll in this thread is beyond me. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
466
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:33:00 -
[170] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Still trying to figure out why "meaningful" gameplay is so important for WiS. Yes, let's encourage CCP to waste more time and money on adding gameplay to Eve that has no meaning. 
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
534
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 02:34:00 -
[171] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:This is the reason we can't have nice things.
Whiners that are afraid to try any new or interesting ideas.
When the WiS fetishists have some new and interesting ideas we can talk.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
539
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 16:08:00 -
[172] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:I wonder if it was discussed at the CSM summit.
If it was its likely to be under NDA anyway.
Star citizen continues to look like an attractive alternative to EVE. I hope the competition it brings causes CCP to do something exciting again. Seriously none of the recent expansions, whilst having some nice things in the, have even been remotely exciting.
lol...if Star Citizen even gets released it's not a MMORPG. I also don't see wizard robes or Barbie gowns on the list of features. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
562
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 13:51:00 -
[173] - Quote
Samoth Egnoled wrote:It is truly sad that the Dev focus has gone off of Eve and onto Dust and VR, It appears that they have just gotten bored with Eve the same way the blizzard devs had with WoW and Trion with Rift. Now we are spoon fed broken patches and told to be grateful for what we get, let alone what they pass off as expansions these days.
After 9 years of playing this game it's disgraceful to see Eve pushed aside when so many great ideas are just ignored, and the current Devs churn out useless modules to cater for the WoW crowd rather than making any attempt to engage the players they already have. I'm not saying we shouldnt encourage new blood to the game, just that you shouldn't **** on your own doorstep and expect people to be happy about it.
I seriously hope that someone with half a brain in CCP gets wind of plea threads like these and takes notice for once, contrary to common opinion we do actually want to make this game better. So you're upset that CCP ignores Eve to focus on DUST but you hope that they, instead, will ignore Eve by focusing on WiS?
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
562
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 14:26:00 -
[174] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Or they could ignore Valkyrie/Dust, and put just as much work on ongoing Eve projects AND add Avatar content without negatively affecting the Eve development that 'you want'. They're not mutually exclusive Rhes. Of course they are. Any development time or money spent on WiS nonsense is development time or money not being spent on real Eve content. I'd love to see CCP stop wasting effort on Dust and Valkyrie but if they did they should redirect those resources to spaceships. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
564
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 15:11:00 -
[175] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:You know, if you love spaceships so much maybe you should play a spaceship sim. Eve is an MMO, a social monster, where a great many of the people who play successfully hardly ever need to undock. Spaceships are the medium of our gameplay, but they are not the gameplay itself. A great many of the things that are important in Eve don't require spaceships at all. A better way to say what you're trying to say is that Eve is a sandbox and spaceships are how we interact with that sandbox. CCP is really good at utilizing spaceships to make the sandbox fun but they have a pretty horrible track record when it comes to shoehorning avatar gameplay into their spaceship game. Why wouldn't you want them to continue to do what they are good at? EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
564
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 15:53:00 -
[176] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:A track record implies multiple events. One expansion is not a track record. If your not willing to give them a second chance then I understand your hesitancy, but a lot of people want to see that second chance. The track record consists of Incarna, DUST and the WoD vaporware game. That's three chances!
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
564
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 16:43:00 -
[177] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:A track record implies multiple events. One expansion is not a track record. If your not willing to give them a second chance then I understand your hesitancy, but a lot of people want to see that second chance. The track record consists of Incarna, DUST and the WoD vaporware game. That's three chances! Rhes wrote:they have a pretty horrible track record when it comes to shoehorning avatar gameplay into their spaceship game. I'm counting one from where I am sitting. Dust and WoD aren't ' shoehorning avatar gameplay' into a spaceship game. So your argument is that the horrible DUST avatar gameplay or the non-existant WoD avatar gameplay would translate perfectly to Eve? Or is it that CCP should spend another two years ignoring Eve to come up with a whole new framework?
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
564
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 16:48:00 -
[178] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Here, we go with the 'Two years of neglect' bullshit that you attribute to WiS, but actually have nothing to do with it. You got any sources? Or are you just happy to make stuff up? What content was added to the game in the two years WiS was being implemented that actually worked when it was released. This is another one of my questions you've never been able to answer. I'm starting to think you may not actually know what you're talking about.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
597
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:04:00 -
[179] - Quote
Anomaly Oneok great found it, the 4th dev post on this thread
CCP t0rfifrans wrote: [u wrote: Hey guys, thanks for the positive reaction. Like stated above, our vision is to make the EVE Universe the ultimate science fiction simulator.[/u] Saying that EVE is just about spaceships, is a bit like saying that phones should only be about making voice phone calls one on one with other people. Indeed they did start out like that, but as technology evolved, they become something much bigger. We hope you guys stay with us long enough for that dream to materialize.
Oh and to someone that asked if it can be safe. Sorry, nope. The EVA gameplay is not safe, it's as safe as going into a wormhole. That's also what makes it interesting. Quoting the old dev posts from this thread doesn't make any sense because Team Avatar was disbanded some time ago. Also, CCP devs can envision whatever they want but unless a single developer is actually working on WiS it doesn't mean a thing.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
608
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 19:54:00 -
[180] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote: Quoting the old dev posts from this thread doesn't make any sense because Team Avatar was disbanded some time ago. Also, CCP devs can envision whatever they want but unless a single developer is actually working on WiS it doesn't mean a thing.
Still posting? Not going to find some references/posts/proof for your bull earlier? If you can't back any of your posts, why are you posting? Unless there is some secret WiS expansion coming out soon (there's not) all the proof I need is the current state of the game. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
608
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 20:05:00 -
[181] - Quote
Elizabeth Brown wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote: Quoting the old dev posts from this thread doesn't make any sense because Team Avatar was disbanded some time ago. Also, CCP devs can envision whatever they want but unless a single developer is actually working on WiS it doesn't mean a thing.
Still posting? Not going to find some references/posts/proof for your bull earlier? If you can't back any of your posts, why are you posting? Unless there is some secret WiS expansion coming out soon (there's not) all the proof I need is the current state of the game. So, you don't need proof to believe what you believe, because your going to believe it anyway right? Also, CCP, are working on World of Darkness, they mentioned a timid 2015 release date. That's Avatar content being developed continuously, using the CARBON engine. Working with Avatars on the same engine that Eve uses, might not be 'working on Avatar content for Eve', but it's pretty close. Once WoD is out, using that knowledge to add to Eve shouldn't be difficult. You can argue that you don't want them working on stuff because it will hurt the game that you want Eve to be, but they are already doing that by dedicating an entire office worth of developers to developing a CARBON based Avatar game. Sorry but WoD is vaporware and won't be released in 2015. Bookmark this post and see if I'm wrong on 12/31/2015 (I won't be).
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
608
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 20:16:00 -
[182] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote: Sorry but WoD is vaporware and won't be released in 2015. Bookmark this post and see if I'm wrong on 12/31/2015 (I won't be).
You really are a dumb ass. Yea, CCP has an office full of people working on a game they never intend to release. Of course, that makes perfect sense. Like I said...bookmark my post and we'll see.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
609
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 21:03:00 -
[183] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:This is why CCP need to live up to their promise of making Eve into a living work of science fiction and the ultimate sci fi simulator. For real Eve players it already is.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
609
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 21:09:00 -
[184] - Quote
Why are roleplayers always so angry? EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
610
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 21:27:00 -
[185] - Quote
Seras Victoria Egivand wrote:Rhes wrote:Why are roleplayers always so angry? Prob for the same reason that everything that comes from your mouth sounds like something from the special Olympics. Again with the personal attacks...you should try making your point without them.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
621
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 03:06:00 -
[186] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Plus the only person in this thread who attacks people personally is you. lol It's too bad that ISD doesn't delete personal attacks from these threads since they are against the ToS. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
689
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 17:29:00 -
[187] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:WoD development is being re-animated. There is hope to see WiS before 2030 \o/ Maybe even before 2020 - but that would be too much to wish... LOL
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
741
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 03:08:00 -
[188] - Quote
Seras Victoria Egivand wrote:Doubt you will see any game or wis anytime soon... CCP no offence develops like a kid with ADD they only work on it tell something else shinny comes along.. That's how they used to be. Ever since they almost blew up the game with Incarna CCP has been really good about sticking to their promise to focus on spaceship content. I have to admit that after the Summer of Rage I didn't believe that they would keep their word but I'm glad they did and that they give every indication of continuing to do so.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
755
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 22:57:00 -
[189] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:People's responses regarding WiS on the CSM Vote Match will be taken into account when I select my ballot for the CSM9 election. I recommend everyone else who's participated in this thread to do the same. (Though not as sole criteria, of course.) Here's an interesting excercise. Go through the candidates for CSM8 and identify any who were pro-WiS. Note how many of them made it to the CSM and then note how much time CCP wasted on WiS content.
A little hint for the last one...it was zero (thankfully).
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
756
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 23:30:00 -
[190] - Quote
Tweek Etimua wrote:Well if your going to compete with SC I think you're going to have to do something. But what ever you do it has to be HUGE.
Unfortunately I doubt the player base will allow it. I refer to the summer of rage. SC isn't an MMORPG.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
757
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 00:12:00 -
[191] - Quote
Tweek Etimua wrote:Rhes wrote:Tweek Etimua wrote:Well if your going to compete with SC I think you're going to have to do something. But what ever you do it has to be HUGE.
Unfortunately I doubt the player base will allow it. I refer to the summer of rage. SC isn't an MMORPG. Perhaps, but I think that a lot of the general public sees them competing. Regardless of technical categorizations. Nope. The only people who are trying to compare the two are delusional roleplayers who can't let go of WiS.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
758
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 02:29:00 -
[192] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rhes wrote:Tweek Etimua wrote:Well if your going to compete with SC I think you're going to have to do something. But what ever you do it has to be HUGE.
Unfortunately I doubt the player base will allow it. I refer to the summer of rage. SC isn't an MMORPG. In SC people play space pilots and they have the option to play on one universe, be merchants, pirates who gank them and so on. The first part is RPG, the latter is MMO, together I'd say it's MMORPG enough. Unless you don't consider "MMO" pirates ganking merchants, in which case EvE is not a MMO either. It'll probably be a sort of SWTOR "single player friendly but you still play in a MMO" gameplay. You need to look up what MMO stands for. Especially the first letter.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
761
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 08:03:00 -
[193] - Quote
Tarpedo wrote:I've seen people commenting on unusually high amount of female candidates for this CSM. It seems CCP is going to test certain content on them. WiS maybe? I cannot imagine any other content within EVE which could be taken by male and female players differently. Well that's sexist.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
764
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 17:35:00 -
[194] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:It's inevitable that one day WIS will become part of the eve universe Rhes. It's already there. Dock up and enjoy walking around (very slowly) in the station!
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
766
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:46:00 -
[195] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Rhes wrote:Little Dragon Khamez wrote:It's inevitable that one day WIS will become part of the eve universe Rhes. It's already there. Dock up and enjoy walking around (very slowly) in the station! That's why I'd like to see it completed, it's no different to wanting to see sov revised as it's already in the game. The sov system is actually broken. Unless your characters' legs no longer propel you around your captain's quarters WiS is working.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
826
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 21:17:00 -
[196] - Quote
I've been seeing a lot of sad roleplayers and WiS fetishists opening threads in GD and they all end up getting locked so I'm bumping this thread to remind everybody that this is the only approved ghetto for all your WiS badposting. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
829
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 23:31:00 -
[197] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Why should anyone's fun be more valid than someone else's? that's what he doesn't get. When international news organizations start writing stories about what roleplayers and dress-up fetishists are doing in Eve you'll have an argument to make.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
829
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 00:00:00 -
[198] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Rhes wrote:Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Why should anyone's fun be more valid than someone else's? that's what he doesn't get. When international news organizations start writing stories about what roleplayers and dress-up fetishists are doing in Eve you'll have an argument to make. To be fair, it's not that uncommon for fetishists and roleplayers to make international news.  I doubt CCP wants that kind of publicity.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
829
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 03:49:00 -
[199] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:Nothing anywhere requires that one's play style be validated in the international press. No but it sure helps CCP focus on what's important.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
829
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 04:05:00 -
[200] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Rhes wrote:Dersen Lowery wrote:Nothing anywhere requires that one's play style be validated in the international press. No but it sure helps CCP focus on what's important. How's that sov revamp coming?  It will arrive long before any further WiS content. CCP learned their lesson.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
829
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 05:26:00 -
[201] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Rhes wrote:Dersen Lowery wrote:Nothing anywhere requires that one's play style be validated in the international press. No but it sure helps CCP focus on what's important. How's that sov revamp coming?  Haven't you seen the two year old threadnaught where players from all across EVE voice their interest in a SOV revamp. Oh that's right. There isn't one. Why would we waste our time on a thread like this one (lol) when we can stack the CSM with our people? EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
829
|
Posted - 2014.04.26 14:55:00 -
[202] - Quote
Pirmasis Sparagas wrote:I hope now Atlanta with WoD developers could focus and work on WiS and connection between EVE, DUST and Valkyrie. What would be the most logical thing that comes to my head They were all laid off.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
836
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 03:57:00 -
[203] - Quote
Webvan wrote:I can't see WiS ever being accepted by the majority of players until CCP finishes what they set out to do in regards to fixing this game. Adding lots more stuff just slows down that goal. People think it's somehow a popular idea now just because the majority of players don't bother to discuss it any longer, to object so much... to an old warn out topic really dead and buried for all intents and purposes. This guy gets it.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
837
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 00:33:00 -
[204] - Quote
Ubat Batuk wrote:You need ground shaking stuff at this point:
- WiS as walk in Station, Structure and Spaceship with aggression and ability to kill with a gun or knife - Ship paint workshop like the character one - Serious change to hangars: they need to be walkable, good looking and hold all my ships at the same time - Serious DUST integration to the point that all current EVE players can play DUST on PC without having to switch to another game - New type of missions that are either DUST related or WiS related
And then if CCP is really into Oculus, then adapt the whole of EVE to be used the with the FB device, preferably an alternative one.
Those are my 2 cents.. Check the quote in my sig. CCP isn't going to ignore real EVE content to cater to roleplayers again.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
837
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 03:20:00 -
[205] - Quote
Ubat Batuk wrote:Rhes wrote:Ubat Batuk wrote:You need ground shaking stuff at this point:
- WiS as walk in Station, Structure and Spaceship with aggression and ability to kill with a gun or knife - Ship paint workshop like the character one - Serious change to hangars: they need to be walkable, good looking and hold all my ships at the same time - Serious DUST integration to the point that all current EVE players can play DUST on PC without having to switch to another game - New type of missions that are either DUST related or WiS related
And then if CCP is really into Oculus, then adapt the whole of EVE to be used the with the FB device, preferably an alternative one.
Those are my 2 cents.. Check the quote in my sig. CCP isn't going to ignore real EVE content to cater to roleplayers again. That's not what I have learnt from the beginning, that in fact EVE wanted to be a science fiction game that goes beyond space ships. Here is an extract from an article released some time back: "Most interestingly, Olafsson touched on the potential for the avatar component of Eve Online. Players may one day be able to leave their spacecraft and explore valuable ruins that populate the universe. These will not be closed instances, and Eve's critical sense of danger at all times will prevail. A typically bombastic visionary trailer outlining the future of the game was used to close the ceremony" Link to article... http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-03-24-ccp-presents-its-vision-of-the-future-for-eve-online-and-dust-514 That quote is old. CCP has since regained sanity and promised to focus on real Eve content. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
837
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 03:23:00 -
[206] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Honestly anyone who thinks the layoffs were sorely due to Incarna needs to do better research and stop blindly following what some other whining players have said. The layoffs were due to CCP ignoring Eve for two years while they tried to cater to the dance emotes and wizard pants crowd which resulted in the summer of rage and a massive drop in subscription numbers.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 07:01:00 -
[207] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Does legion satisfy the WiS fans? No because it doesn't have dance emotes.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 07:56:00 -
[208] - Quote
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:But you can't deny that CCP has succesfully made a game that makes you irrationally passionate about things to the point that you'll make a fool of yourself repeatedly with the same repetitious garbage over and over and over again all because someone else is interested in something that you're not. Just to clarify, CCP has successfully made a spaceship game that we are passionate about. They have yet to successfully produce anything else.
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:But in all honesty, If the idea of WiS annoys you so much, You probably shouldn't spend so much time engrossing yourself in it's community. Just sayin it's kind of like intentionally torturing yourself. There isn't a WiS community. There are a small handful of roleplayer trolls who won't let it go. EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:00:00 -
[209] - Quote
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:Rhes wrote:Just to clarify, CCP has successfully made a spaceship game that we are passionate about. They have yet to successfully produce anything else. Thanks for clearing that up, I must have been crazy to think that all the outcry from the Dust community when legion was announced and would likely kill dust was born out of passion for something other than internet spaceships. I'd be lost without your infinite wisdom, insight, and guidance. Man that was hard to say with a straight face! xD Haha you think Dust is a successful game. Again, just like with the WiS fetishists, you're letting a small group of vocal players trick you into thinking there is a large group behind them.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:09:00 -
[210] - Quote
Solecist Project's Alt wrote:Rhes wrote:Beofryn Sedorak wrote:Rhes wrote:Just to clarify, CCP has successfully made a spaceship game that we are passionate about. They have yet to successfully produce anything else. Thanks for clearing that up, I must have been crazy to think that all the outcry from the Dust community when legion was announced and would likely kill dust was born out of passion for something other than internet spaceships. I'd be lost without your infinite wisdom, insight, and guidance. Man that was hard to say with a straight face! xD Haha you think Dust is a successful game. Again, just like with the WiS fetishists, you're letting a small group of vocal players trick you into thinking there is a large group behind them. According to those who understand the financial report from CCP, DUST is profitable, thus it's successfull. Your opinion on the matter is irrelevant. If it was successful they would be working overtime to port it to PS4.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |
|

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:18:00 -
[211] - Quote
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:CCP is much more interested in the long term rather than Unsustainable explosive growth in a short time frame that sputters out after a year or two. This is hilarious considering the only reason CCP is now like this is because of the summer of rage. Which was caused by WiS.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
907
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:39:00 -
[212] - Quote
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:neglected development on sapceships. This is the first thing you've gotten right.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
907
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:45:00 -
[213] - Quote
Solecist Project's Alt wrote:Argueing with weak minded people only drags you down to their level. It's too bad you people can't discuss this without resorting to personal insults which just causes ISD to butcher the threads.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
907
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 08:49:00 -
[214] - Quote
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:Rhes wrote:Beofryn Sedorak wrote:neglected development on sapceships. This is the first thing you've gotten right. Fortunately your opinion of what I get "right" isn't the deciding factor in whether something is true or not. :) Here is what's true. CCP has given up on WiS and the team mentioned in the thread's title has been disbanded. Nowhere in CCP Seagull's plan for the next several years of Eve development is further WiS development mentioned.
The fact that you can't let it go, while amusing, is a little sad to witness.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |
|
|
|