Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 13 post(s) |

ctx2007
Wychwood and Wells Beer needs you
160
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 13:06:00 -
[61] - Quote
You need to have thick skin for the insults (that are not necessary) that are thrown at you. |
|

CCP Gargant
C C P C C P Alliance
163

|
Posted - 2012.10.16 13:36:00 -
[62] - Quote
Becka Goldbeck wrote:It surprises me that you seem so eager to squelch free expression if that's the case. A sandbox functions better if it has a set of defined rules, that's true, but on the forums of all places people like you apply the most rigid definition of "trolling" OP, you need to have a certain amount of cognitive dissonance apparently and be willing to abandon principles for the sake of your ego. Amber Accelerando wrote:*snip*
Removed your unfriendly post! ISD Dosnix Are you kidding me?
This isn't a sandbox. It is a discussion forum. We don't take kindly to trolling as it derails threads, sometimes to the point that we can't really get it back on track, so we need to lock it. That in turn creates threads that accuse us of "squelching free expression" that get locked as they violate the rules. This is a vicious circle that is not easily broken.
We are trying, though. I am trying. I ask that you guys try as well and the first step in that trying is to stop berating the ISD's like they are some sort of pinata that you can vent frustrations on. The edit message from Amber you quote is one of them. If something regarding the ISD's appears on the forums, the posters that love to hound them descend into it like vultures to a carrion.
You have the right to post anything you want. If you do so within the rules there is no problem. Pissing and moaning about the volunteer moderators will not be tolerated anymore. There is now an official place to discuss moderation and all of us in the Community Team are watching it. Don't bash, constructively criticize. I believe these posters can so I don't understand why it doesn't happen. CCP Gargant | Community Representative |
|

Becka Goldbeck
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 14:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
CCP Gargant wrote:[quote=Becka Goldbeck] This isn't a sandbox. It is a discussion forum. We don't take kindly to trolling as it derails threads, sometimes to the point that we can't really get it back on track, so we need to lock it. That in turn creates threads that accuse us of "squelching free expression" that get locked as they violate the rules. This is a vicious circle that is not easily broken.
We are trying, though. I am trying. I ask that you guys try as well and the first step in that trying is to stop berating the ISD's like they are some sort of pinata that you can vent frustrations on. The edit message from Amber you quote is one of them. If something regarding the ISD's appears on the forums, the posters that love to hound them descend into it like vultures to a carrion.
You have the right to post anything you want. If you do so within the rules there is no problem. Pissing and moaning about the volunteer moderators will not be tolerated anymore. There is now an official place to discuss moderation and all of us in the Community Team are watching it. Don't bash, constructively criticize. I believe these posters can so I don't understand why it doesn't happen.
I never claimed the forums were a sandbox unto itself but as part of the EVE universe, the ISD was espousing that he or she is a passionate veteran of EVE and EVE is a sandbox. A forum is a medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged, where the community comes together outside of the game. This includes ideas which you don't agree with or rub you the wrong way. That is what a forum is supposed to be, you can have yours be about whatever you want (I never claimed you can't).
For instance I'm of the opinion that the laziness of CCP staff lead to this outsourcing and it's ill-advised.
Is this opinion wrong? Maybe. Are you offended by it? Maybe, if you're easily offended by random opinions (which is a distinct possibility considering).
What I'm concerned about it why you think I shouldn't be able to express it.
There are many ways to interpret "trolling" and it seems like CCP and the ISDs have determined it means anything that they don't agree with... or isn't "friendly" enough. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
696
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 14:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/isd.asp At least this first response wasn't a troll. We need more of these threads. /c
No we don't.
What we need is more Imperial Star Destroyers. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
853
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 14:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
I was under the impression that once your level of egotism and self importance passes a certain point CCP automatically contact you about it. |
|

CCP Gargant
C C P C C P Alliance
179

|
Posted - 2012.10.16 16:47:00 -
[66] - Quote
Becka Goldbeck wrote: I never claimed the forums were a sandbox unto itself but as part of the EVE universe, the ISD was espousing that he or she is a passionate veteran of EVE and EVE is a sandbox. A forum is a medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged, where the community comes together outside of the game. This includes ideas which you don't agree with or rub you the wrong way. That is what a forum is supposed to be, you can have yours be about whatever you want (I never claimed you can't).
For instance I'm of the opinion that the laziness of CCP staff lead to this outsourcing and it's ill-advised.
Is this opinion wrong? Maybe. Are you offended by it? Maybe, if you're easily offended by random opinions (which is a distinct possibility considering).
What I'm concerned about it why you think I shouldn't be able to express it.
There are many ways to interpret "trolling" and it seems like CCP and the ISDs have determined it means anything that they don't agree with... or isn't "friendly" enough.
This is precisely the kind of input we want into the discussion thread I started about our moderation techniques. Instead of telling you to go there with this information, I will attempt to answer your observations here. I still ask that you direct further criticism to the moderation thread, here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=163320
Now. There are rules that forbid speaking falsities and slandering employees of CCP and the ISD members. We remove false statements that sometimes pop up, one of those being that we are too lazy to do our job. That is your opinion, yes, but you will need to go to other sites to discuss that statement as it is false and we don't tolerate false statements here. That has nothing to do with sensitivity. I am asking for your opinions and that includes ones that might be perceived as negative.
And regarding the trolling. Our forum rules define trolling as "a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players. " I myself am not in the habit of removing threads that I don't agree with. I hope to spread that outlook to the rest of the team. To be absolutely clear, I do not know about anyone on the team that thinks it is okay to delete something just because it is on an opposite place in the spectrum of opinions. CCP Gargant | Community Representative |
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
348
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 17:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
CCP Gargant wrote:[quote=Becka Goldbeck]
And regarding the trolling. Our forum rules define trolling as "a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players. " I myself am not in the habit of removing threads that I don't agree with. I hope to spread that outlook to the rest of the team. To be absolutely clear, I do not know about anyone on the team that thinks it is okay to delete something just because it is on an opposite place in the spectrum of opinions.
Are you for real???? "Angering or insulting the players?"
Based on that criteria, why are goons and their ilk allowed to post calling high sec players "pubbies", or some other equivalent slur? Heck, the sole intent of probably a third of the posts on the forums is to anger and demean other players.
If you are truly standing by the definition of trolling you just posted, then it must mean one of 2 things:
1. You guys are incompetent at your jobs since I can probably find 10 posts in 10 minutes that meet the criteria you laid down.
OR:
2. You selectively enforce that criteria to eliminate posts that don't match the personal views of the game held by the various members of the censorship team.
I would LOVE to see a true breakdown of what area of the game each of the members of the censorship team hails from. Of course, any statement of player background can be stated as fact, and no way to refute it, so such a breakdown becomes immediately worthless.
|

Bane Necran
526
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 17:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Based on that criteria, why are goons and their ilk allowed to post calling high sec players "pubbies", or some other equivalent slur?
That's the least of what they do. Easily the most abrasive and abusive group of players here, but they're CCPs darlings. Therein lies the problem with this entire thing.
I wouldn't be surprised if the ISD sees all the goons mad at someone and decide the person they're mad at is the one who is causing trouble. Everything is so peaceful as long as everyone just agrees with the goons. "It's no use crying over spilt milk, because all the forces of the universe were bent on spilling it." ~William Maugham |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
348
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 17:39:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Based on that criteria, why are goons and their ilk allowed to post calling high sec players "pubbies", or some other equivalent slur? That's the least of what they do. Easily the most abrasive and abusive group of players here, but they're CCPs darlings. Therein lies the problem with this entire thing. I wouldn't be surprised if the ISD sees all the goons mad at someone and decide the person they're mad at is the one who is causing trouble. Everything is so peaceful as long as everyone just agrees with the goons.
Bingo. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |