| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Haratu
   |
Posted - 2005.03.20 14:30:00 -
[31]
Last time I checked it was not allowed by Amarrian policy to put living creatures inside boxes as they suffocate and die.
I do notice however that Minmatars are happy to destroy ships so that slaves are left floating in small boxes.
How cruel.
I roleplay... there is this computer game called "Earth - The First Genesis" where i play a character in the early 21st century. |
Nooey
|
Posted - 2005.03.20 15:22:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Kendar Zek
Aphoxema G, have you met Captain Mordax Ibrium? I think the two of you would be a match made in Heaven.
*Waves to Kendar*
You're so right!
I must pass it on to Mordax that stories of his insanity have travelled outwards into the laughing stars beyond.
*Clears his throat*
NO TO BOXES!
|
Astarte Nosferatu
|
Posted - 2005.03.20 15:25:00 -
[33]
I actually tried these boxes you speak of, and I was stunned to find out I could fit 7 of them in one box. 
Many thanks for the good tip of using boxes to move slaves  . You just saved me a bundle.
Sani Sabik. |
Bastables
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 05:36:00 -
[34]
Say yes to boxes, the new vitoc!
For God, Empire, and Sarum. |
Bastables
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 05:43:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Bastables on 21/03/2005 06:00:41
Due to realising that there is a market for boxes I offer you
Wild new Sarum Boxes, not Khanid, not Ammatar, but an entirely new and different slave storage treat that's waking up the Empire. Wake up to Sarum and be wild!
Safe when operated as directed,
For God, Empire, and Sarum. |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 09:34:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Bastables
Edited by: Bastables on 21/03/2005 06:00:41
Due to realising that there is a market for boxes I offer you
Wild new Sarum Boxes, not Khanid, not Ammatar, but an entirely new and different slave storage treat that's waking up the Empire. Wake up to Sarum and be wild!
Safe when operated as directed,
I would be very interested in inspecting these accomodation units. If they are as good as you say, and conform to SPCS standards, I might be interested in a bulk order of around five hundred of them.
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Kendar Zek
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 09:39:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Nooey
*Waves to Kendar*
You're so right!
I must pass it on to Mordax that stories of his insanity have travelled outwards into the laughing stars beyond.
*Clears his throat*
NO TO BOXES!
I have always enjoyed Captain Ibrium's brand of lunacy. It has been a long time since I've spoken to him, but I hope he is doing well.
|
Vera Liskrii
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 10:04:00 -
[38]
I like boxes ... especially when there's cake inside; of course, slaves don't taste as nice as cake so I can see why you don't like boxes. Imagine finding a box that you thought was full of cake, only to find it's actually full of human ... 
"Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you what you are" - Vera Liskrii, Goddess of Ni-Kunni Cuisine |
Bastables
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 10:55:00 -
[39]
1st mockup of advert for new sleek Sarum Boxed Slaves.
Watch this space for new features!
For God, Empire, and Sarum. |
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 11:01:00 -
[40]
Oh, man.. Bastables... that's kinda mean, but I can't help but to be drawn to your offer through your incredible advertising! I'll buy two, but I want you to free them instead of delivering them! And if you have to deliver them, then I'll free them instead, but I'd rather you did it so I don't have to be a middleman.
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
Bastables
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 11:38:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Bastables on 21/03/2005 11:51:15
You cannot free boxed slaves, it's bad.
There are three rules and the third rule is: Never, never, leave them out of the box for 24hr. Bad things will happen, chaos. blood, fields of the lord.
Remember these slaves are stored in a small dark place, they start talking to themselves... Use as directed.
It's not the same but, for you, buy two get one free.
For God, Empire, and Sarum. |
Tatsue Nuko
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 12:42:00 -
[42]
Ehm, am I seeing boxed slaves as a collectors item, there?
Boxes can be fun though, or what do you think Aphox cutie?
|
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.21 19:57:00 -
[43]
Boxes are scary.
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
Cerryh
|
Posted - 2005.03.22 14:30:00 -
[44]
You think so? Had recent bad experiences?
|
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.23 00:49:00 -
[45]
*looks in irritation at Cerryh, narrowing her eyes*
I may have.
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
Jobe Katarn
|
Posted - 2005.03.23 15:24:00 -
[46]
I have a box specifically set aside for Lord Plush.
I have one for you too.
In arduis fidelis
Steadfast in Adversity
|
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.23 15:34:00 -
[47]
*stares at Jobe a moment, and then breaking out in sudden tears*
You're mean... 
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
Jakk Graiseach
|
Posted - 2005.03.23 16:34:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Aphoxema G
*stares at Jobe a moment, and then breaking out in sudden tears*
You're mean...
*Passes some tissues*
Ignore him - he can't box you as long as you fly free.
--
** All accounts cancelled - have fun guys ** |
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.23 16:47:00 -
[49]
*Smiles*
Yeah, I'm'a beat him bleen if he messes with me.
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
Jobe Katarn
|
Posted - 2005.03.24 11:14:00 -
[50]
I'm coming for you Aphoxema. I'm coming for you and Lord Plush. Time to teach you the reality of that which you would suborn.
Enlightenment takes many forms.
In arduis fidelis
Steadfast in Adversity
|
Cerryh
|
Posted - 2005.03.24 12:28:00 -
[51]
You will not box my corp mates. I won't let you take away my fun...
|
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.24 14:49:00 -
[52]
Mmmm... Jobe? EAT JAM! HAH!
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
EtherealPain
|
Posted - 2005.03.25 02:44:00 -
[53]
SAY NO TO BOXES!
Say YES to chairs! 
--------------------------------------
I saw a hobo once, he was holding a sign that said: Parents killed by ninjas, need money for samurai lessons.
i gave him everything i had.... i hope he killed those damn ninjas |
Dulsoi Ku'Huiol
|
Posted - 2005.03.28 13:57:00 -
[54]
yes to boxes
|
Skilari
|
Posted - 2005.03.28 14:15:00 -
[55]
boxes are good for many thing. they can store things or be use as an home for the homeless. SO I say yes to Boxes
|
Sentriax
|
Posted - 2005.03.28 21:18:00 -
[56]
I too oppose Box use for storage of slaves, and wish to help abolish the wretched Amarrian slave practices.
I feel the only way to successfully accomplish this is by abolishing the entire Amarrian race!
Lets see how funny they think it is when their fat toes stick out at odd angles from the boxes, cylinders, or spheroids.
|
Shira d'Radonis
|
Posted - 2005.03.28 21:26:00 -
[57]
I say no to storage of slaves in boxes, and I say no to slavery at large, but I still feel that Star Fraction's cause against slavery is, to say the least, inconsistent and disingenuous.
-----------------------------------------------
ōąquod ad ius naturale attinet, omnes homines aequales suntö
|
Aphoxema G
|
Posted - 2005.03.28 21:52:00 -
[58]
Do you have any idea how often I have to point out that Star Fraction isn't directly against slavery?
----------
-------
|(\_/)|
|(O.o)|
|(> <)|
\-----/Bunny'as been Emboxed cause'e made Lord Plush mad! |
Jasmine Constantine
|
Posted - 2005.03.28 22:06:00 -
[59]
hmmmm, well I think slavery sucks to be honest. But I'm not convinced that joining Archbishops merry slave care committee is the way of best getting rid of it. The problem's at the top. I think we should probably shoot the emperor and chief cleric and get Athule to announce that Slavery is heretical. But seriously, its one of those things that you can either confront a few ships at a time (like the Ushra'Khan) or by hitting at the state infrastructure for the big money-shot and universal revolution. Both approaches have plus and minus points.
The majority of Star Fraction agrees that state slavery is wrong. But we also agree that an alliance philosophy can't overrule individual choice of worship or we'd be going down the same dogmatic dead end as the empires we oppose. End of the day slavery is just a sign of the disease of nation states and territorialism and all that rot about appearing important cos you control other people.
Me I'd rather feel important because of my own life rather than the oppression I've brought to a few thousand others.
Star Fraction
|
Marie Trudeau
|
Posted - 2005.03.29 00:55:00 -
[60]
Star Fraction opposes first and foremost the slavery imposed on virtually all of humanity by the current hierarchical, territorialist structure of all the empires and the spillover of these outdated and outmoded mindsets into the areas outside the current empires, where the hierarchical/territorialist paradigm has largely been replicated by various groups. The practice of human slavery is but a manifestation of this more pervasive problem and, as such, is not our beef as an *alliance* per se, regardless of the personal opinions of some of our number, including myself. Our quarrel with CVA is not about human slavery in itself, but rather with CVA's efforts to extend the political and cultural influence of one of the empires (together with tha associated hierarchical and territorialist structures and mindsets) into 0.0 space which, to our way of thinking, is something that must be resisted and fought against in order for humanity to move into the next phase of its development and break free of the stranglehold of fundamentally outmoded ways of thinking. Bringing the practice of human slavery to 0.0 space is simply an external manifestation of this effort to "empirize" 0.0 space, and it's mainly for this reason that we find ourselves at odds with CVA.
---------------------------
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |