EVE Search - "Forcing People to Leave the Game" and "Forcing a Specific Playst...

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

"Forcing People to Leave the Game" and "Forcing a Specific Playst...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
baltec1 Bat Country 2552	Posted - 2012.10.25 08:00:00 - [1] - Quote pussnheels wrote: Thor Kerrigan wrote: Why is it that people think this game is for everyone? EVE is clearly fueled by competition and cannot survive without it. You don't need to spend 15$ per month to look at nebulae and 3D ship models. Anyone who uses "forcing me to do this" in their argument intrigues me; I have no idea why they are spending money on this game in the first place. The only thing really forcing you to anything is your own brain. If you are tired of getting your progress slowed, it's nobody's fault but your own that you do not use the tools given to everyone. If you don't like shooting ships, that's your problem. Just don't try telling me those who shoot ships have an unfair advantage when it is clearly an advantage. In fact, anything you do in this game gives you an advantage over those who don't. That is just as crazy as people moving to a different country and asking for laws to accommodate their personal needs or beliefs. Another they don t play my way i demand CCP nerf them But yes this is a game about competition, but competition on all levels and every scale But it also create alot of different playstyles so deal with it This isn t your game and if you don t like it how other people play i suggest you go and play another game or create your own game company Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like.
baltec1 Bat Country 2552	Posted - 2012.10.25 08:44:00 - [2] - Quote Azumi Zimu wrote: baltec1 wrote: Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. You guys waged a campaign against high-sec miners. You used early 20th century Anti-Semitic propaganda. You said you hated what they stood for. Not that I log in... Keep up the hypocrisy space-nerds We did it for profit. Our words were mainly in responce to the bears who campained to remove our playstyle. We infact spent most of our time giving out fitting advice to avoid being killed by us. Unfortuntly, the bears did not listen and managed to convince CCP to more or less kill off our playstyle.
baltec1 Bat Country 2554	Posted - 2012.10.25 15:24:00 - [3] - Quote Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: TheGunslinger42 wrote: Carebears have a fundamental misunderstanding of what kind of game EVE is, or how... well, anything works. Is it so hard to understand that the entire game is based around competing with others in some form or another and interfering? They want to be able to press a button, go afk all day, not have any interaction with anyone at all, come back and have a slightly bigger number in the wallet. It doesn't even make sense, I don't know how anyone could enjoy that or think that's the kind of game EVE is Undesirables plz go Replace the highlighted word with "Some Players" and you have an excellent Poast. I was going to correct your correction but after thinking on it you are indeed correct.
baltec1 Bat Country 2554	Posted - 2012.10.25 15:26:00 - [4] - Quote Jaison Savrin wrote: Is this a ganker whine thread? It feels like a ganker whine thread. I say to whining gankers "suck it up buttercup" because killing mining ships is simple. If one Tornado/Thrasher won't work add one. Repeat until miner goes boom. Was this a ganker whine thread? I think it was a ganker whine thread. You want the next thread over. This is the sandbox means everyones playstyle is legit thread.
baltec1 Bat Country 2577	Posted - 2012.10.26 14:19:00 - [5] - Quote Katran Luftschreck wrote: baltec1 wrote: Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. And this is different from null-bears how, exactly? We arnt trying to get rid of mining.
baltec1 Bat Country 2579	Posted - 2012.10.26 14:35:00 - [6] - Quote Tali Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: Katran Luftschreck wrote: baltec1 wrote: Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. And this is different from null-bears how, exactly? We arnt trying to get rid of mining. Yes you are. Find an example where anyone from our organisation has said we wish to remove mining.
baltec1 Bat Country 2579	Posted - 2012.10.26 14:46:00 - [7] - Quote Tali Ambraelle wrote: [quote=baltec1] Actions speak louder than words. Nice try to hide the facts through plausible deniability though. You mean our vast market manipulation via the killing of miners mining a single type of ice to make us billions? Why would we remove such a profitable section of the playerbase?
baltec1 Bat Country 2582	Posted - 2012.10.26 15:09:00 - [8] - Quote Tali Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: Tali Ambraelle wrote: [quote=baltec1] Actions speak louder than words. Nice try to hide the facts through plausible deniability though. You mean our vast market manipulation via the killing of miners mining a single type of ice to make us billions? Why would we remove such a profitable section of the playerbase? Because I hate you. So you want to remove mining because you hate me...
baltec1 Bat Country 2582	Posted - 2012.10.26 16:52:00 - [9] - Quote Katran Luftschreck wrote: baltec1 wrote: Find an example where anyone from our organisation has said we wish to remove mining. Remove all mining? Of course not. You simply want to remove all high-sec mining. Which, in turn, lets all of your null-sec bot fleets monopolize the entire market. Which, in turn, means everyone will have to go to null-sec to buy anything. Which, in turn, is only possible if they are willing to swear fealty to your wonderful null-sec alliance. Which, in turn, gives your CEO another pixel on his e-peen. Which, in turn, is pretty much the raison d'etre of playing EvE, right? To force everyone to play the way you want them to or not at all? That tinfoil hat seems to be cutting off the circulation to your head.
baltec1 Bat Country 2603	Posted - 2012.10.27 17:28:00 - [10] - Quote Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: Touval Lysander wrote: Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Touval Lysander wrote: Thor Kerrigan wrote: Additionally, those "ass hats" give value to good actions and without them there would be no contrast between good and evil. I read a book about this once. In chapter 1 it discussed the theory of burning your house down to redecorate the lounge. It even talked of killing people to make them better persons. In chapter 2 they discussed people who deliberately caused harm to others and then rescued them to appear good. In chapter 3 they discussed how people break the law to test that the law makers are doing their job. In chapter 4, they discussed using conscription to fight for liberty. In chapter 5, they discussed using nuclear weapons to preserve humanity. It was a great book. Want the title? Looks like you were reading the U.S. Constitution. Oddly enough, the constitution (it's gun amendment) was discussed in depth. Actually, it wasn't odd at all. The right to bear arms to protect yourself against those that bear arms was Chapter 6. It's time to build your own garage nuclear reactor Ho wait... Home protection

baltec1 Bat Country 2701	Posted - 2012.11.02 23:20:00 - [11] - Quote Dar Manic wrote: yeah. gotz meh tharz!! Go ask on a random forum board of gamers to play a PvP game where you fight with selling and trading. They'd laugh you out in a heartbeat. You are using the general term PvP to mean something specific for your own needs. No amount of flailing will get you out of this mess you got yourself into. PVP only had one meaning.
baltec1 Bat Country 2701	Posted - 2012.11.03 22:36:00 - [12] - Quote Gussarde en Welle wrote: baltec1 wrote: Azumi Zimu wrote: baltec1 wrote: Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. You guys waged a campaign against high-sec miners. You used early 20th century Anti-Semitic propaganda. You said you hated what they stood for. Not that I log in... Keep up the hypocrisy space-nerds We did it for profit. Our words were mainly in responce to the bears who campained to remove our playstyle. We infact spent most of our time giving out fitting advice to avoid being killed by us. Unfortuntly, the bears did not listen and managed to convince CCP to more or less kill off our playstyle. You keep saying this baltec. Enlighten me, as I am new. Carebears did what exactly to kill your playstyle? They got CCP to impliment an unnessesary EHP buff on macks because they refused to fit a tank. They also gave it a bay so big it wiped out jetcan baiting over night.
baltec1 Bat Country 2701	Posted - 2012.11.03 22:37:00 - [13] - Quote Dar Manic wrote: Look through the forums and see what skills are talked about when a player wants to learn pvp. Nothing more need be said. What words does PVP stand for?
baltec1 Bat Country 2781	Posted - 2012.11.12 18:55:00 - [14] - Quote Dar Manic wrote: They don't have perfect safety in hi-sec. There are plenty of ways to grief people there. Its getting ever safer as time goes by and I can assure you that nobody greifs people unless there are daft or looking to get banned. Quote: Using carebears so much really taints your thread. Shows a weakness in your arguments. Its the bears who are strangling this game. Quote: There are plenty of incentives out there now. Not everyone wants to play the way you do. Some people... dare I say it... have fun playing Eve rather than making it a job. If this was true we wouldn't be building most of our stuff in empire and grinding up a good bulk of the isk to fun our wars too. Quote: I prefer 'the leave it the f*ck alone' perspective. I'm not trying to dictate anything on anyone. I'm not saying the game is only for me. I'm not saying the game is only for hi-sec players. I'm not saying the game is only for low-sec players. I'm not saying the game is only for WH players. I'm not saying the game is only for null sec players. I'm saying LITFA before you screw it up. All we are asking for is for the damage already done to be fixed and an end to the nerfing of our playstyle.
baltec1 Bat Country 2782	Posted - 2012.11.12 21:24:00 - [15] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: TBH nerfs aren't needed, if they do anything they should buff lo & null. make them actually worthwhile so people don't need hisec alts to rake it in. Hisec doesn't need a buff, if lo & null were buffed it wouldn't seem like it needed nerfing either. That's a totally different discussion, although it does influence this one. Theres nerfs needed but nothing as drastic as headshotting Motsu.
baltec1 Bat Country 2798	Posted - 2012.11.15 10:33:00 - [16] - Quote Skydell wrote: And EVE now lives and dies by the single doctrine of barf out the biggest blob to win EVE. The blob has always existed in every human activity in our entire history of civilisation. There is literally not a single MMO that has open pvp that doesnt have blobs. Quote: They didn't nerf titans when nobody had them They knew they were over powered but they didn't do it even though were unbalanced and they knew it. Bait and switch? They waited untill a hand full of people wadded a fuckload of resources in to them (no, dickhead I wasn't one of them so stick your incoming hurr durr up your fat ass) CCP are not all knowing. It only became clear titans were horribly overpowered when they were put into action, like many things. Quote: They don't nerf on balance. They nerf on popularity. Running your own game in to the ground based on making it unpopular piece by piece has one end conclusion. No they nerf on balance issues. The fact that when something is over powered everyone uses it just just a fact of life.