| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ErrorS
   |
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:11:00 -
[1]
Edited by: ErrorS on 16/04/2005 20:11:43
As soon as possible, PLEASE. I'm in love with my Ferox but it's damn near useless with HACs out.
Make this ship useful, i beg of you.. we need 2 more bonuses and better stock resists.
edit: another med slot would be appreciated as well.
________
I'm strict Caldari
"The grass is always greener on the other side" - Maybe they're not as uber as you think?
-ErrorS |
Blind Man
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:20:00 -
[2]
Tech 2 . . . Ferox . . . /drools
tech 2 destroyers would would be cool  
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
Meridius
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:20:00 -
[3]
No
________________________________________________________
|
Hyey
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:23:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Meridius
No
yes
~~
Hyey
I just payed 15 dollars this month just to be able to respond on the forums... stupid cancellation error.
|
Nomen Nescio
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:23:00 -
[5]
Lets see new missles first:)
But tech2 destroyers......mmmmm. cormorant.... looks good
|
Elve Sorrow
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:24:00 -
[6]
2005.04.12 15:31:00
Training of the skill Heavy Assault Ships to level 5 has been completed
No
/Elve
New Video out! Watch me!
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:26:00 -
[7]
Battlecruisers are a very new class of ship that isn't even a proper class.
We need more tech 2 cruisers and finally, tech 2 battleships.
________________________________________________________
|
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:29:00 -
[8]
Tech II Ferox? ::orgasm::
SIGNED!!!!!
___________________________________________
^^^***---All things serve the Beam---***^^^ |
Lygos
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:31:00 -
[9]
There's really not much point to a specialized sort of battlecruiser in the vein of frigate or cruiser specializations. If a novel sort of special purpose platform were conceived then yes. But specialized platforms do rather poorly in EVE. Logistics cruiser anyone?
Amplifying the role of battlecruiser makes even more hairsplitting distinctions between the cruiser and battleship world. Until the classes are shoved farther apart stat-wise in their base roles, such things will remain largely superfluous.
What we do still need is a fast, nimble, low sig, alpha strike cruiser to specialize in frig removal after nerfing the ability of battleships and improperly fitted (beams, rails) cruisers to do the same.
|
Gariuys
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:37:00 -
[10]
Originally by: ErrorS
Edited by: ErrorS on 16/04/2005 20:11:43
As soon as possible, PLEASE. I'm in love with my Ferox but it's damn near useless with HACs out.
Make this ship useful, i beg of you.. we need 2 more bonuses and better stock resists.
edit: another med slot would be appreciated as well.
Yeah cause everyone can fly a HAC right. Just as easy to fly as a battlecruiser a HAC is. Apples and oranges. Tech 2 battlecrusier would be cool. But guess what if it's a assault like you seem to be wanting. Flying a HAC would be easier.
~{When evil and strange get together anything is possible}~
A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it. - ActiveX
The grass is always greener on the other side. - JoCool |
Antic
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:45:00 -
[11]
tech 2 cruisers require that you frist train assult ships for tech 2 friggs, then heavy assult ships for the cruisers. so i dont see why not tech 2 BCs would require you to have lvl 5 heavy assault ships before you can pilot em. and tech 2 BS requiring lvl 5 of the tech 2 BC skill.
of course, people will whine about more skills yada yada but better than than people whining about tech 2 BCs suddenly owning HAC without much skills needed
|
LUKEC
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 20:46:00 -
[12]
i perfectly agree with t2 hac, if racial cruiser lvl 5 is required... else you get 4 races t2 ship = nonsense... if HAC pilots had to specialize, so should you.
|
Hllaxiu
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 22:22:00 -
[13]
I think tech 2 destroyers should be anti-cloak. :)
|
Lanu
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 22:34:00 -
[14]
I would kill my self if I see those out soon  just got HAS lvl 5 and i'm in love with my deimos.
boo
"You are most like the Cat, lazy and quiet. You aren't very exciting yet everyone notices your presence."
|
Jonsemann
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 22:44:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Blind Man
Tech 2 . . . Ferox . . . /drools
tech 2 destroyers would would be cool
t2 Destroyers sounds better!
for gods sake if u make them, put more med slots on Amarr destroyer!
plz
Jonsemann
---------------------------------------
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
|
Nyxus
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 23:44:00 -
[16]
OMG........Yes, yes, yes, yes!!!!
Tech 2 Prophecy......and ferox. Oh dear lord yes.
We need T2 Battlecruisers and Destroyers. Now! Those are the correct answers to t2 frigs and cruisers.
Nyxus
|
Zyrla Bladestorm
|
Posted - 2005.04.16 23:48:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Nyxus
OMG........Yes, yes, yes, yes!!!!
Tech 2 Prophecy......and ferox. Oh dear lord yes.
We need T2 Battlecruisers and Destroyers. Now! Those are the correct answers to t2 frigs and cruisers.
Nyxus
Can we maybe get the Cyclone and Brutix on par with the prophecy and ferox first ? theres such a gap between the good ones (amarr+caldari) and the poor ones (cyclone+brutix) at the moment.
.
-----
Apologys for any rambling that may have just occurred.
|
ErrorS
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 00:08:00 -
[18]
i got more combat SP in this ship then in any other. I hate that I'm storing it right now.. I could fly an Eagle if I wanted to, but I DONT WANT TO. I want to fly a Ferox that is better or as good as an eagle.
i'm perfectly fine with training lv5 BC.. make me train tactical shield manip 5 and medium gun specialization to 5 as well, i don't care.. i would train 2 months non-stop from current skills just to fly a T2 Ferox. Hell, I dont' care.. just release the damn things.. for me, please :D
Ferox is my favorite ship
________
I'm strict Caldari
"The grass is always greener on the other side" - Maybe they're not as uber as you think?
-ErrorS |
Antic
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 00:11:00 -
[19]
what kind of setup do you use on it for it to deserve all that loving? heavy missles sucks in PVP so i take it you go with Rails? :p arent rails kinda craptastic?
|
ErrorS
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 00:50:00 -
[20]
medium rails are good
________
I'm strict Caldari
"The grass is always greener on the other side" - Maybe they're not as uber as you think?
-ErrorS |
JoeSomebody
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 01:45:00 -
[21]
i rather get more t2 variations of frigs and cruisers...
They dont even have to have different look - just be stronger in general and add couple nasty bonuses...
As of right now im really ****ed that there is no t2 version of BB for instance.
Same thing with frigs - they dont have to be a totaly new class of ship (like bombers or cover ops), but more variation in assaulties would be nice.
I also always wanted to say that giving t2 ship new look not only slows down the procccess of getting them ready, but also dumb in general. I say t2 ships should look exactly like their t1 counterparts (maybe with _slightly_ different painting).
____
When flying by Concord Customs Commander's Dominix I distinctly heard him saying "... world domination..." |
Cracken
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 01:55:00 -
[22]
Yes an assault version of the tristan would be awesome I spent 3 months in 1 and loved every minute of it.
|
Streetrip
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 01:58:00 -
[23]
T2 catalyst...holy ****
8 neutrons
MWD, Web/scramb
3 Mag stabs...
helloooooo tank killer
|
Sadist
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 02:29:00 -
[24]
Signed.
Make the battlecruiser skill useful...C'mon make the tech 2 brutix have another 5% bonus to armor repair. And give it uber base resistances. BS tank in a medium ship, anyone?
_______________________________________________
|
Lilane
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 02:56:00 -
[25]
Personnaly i don't want any T2 Brutix, i fear it could be as "good" compared to Deimos or other T2 BC as the T1 Brutix is to Thorax or other BCs... 
|
kessah
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 03:05:00 -
[26]
devs confirmed t2 battlecruisers but not for a long time i dont think.
guys read the eve-i webbie they got the whole convo with dev's on there 
--------------------------------------------------------
Im Your Huckleberry ;-)
|
Max Payne
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 04:40:00 -
[27]
hmmm thorax 6 mil brutix 30 ... 5 times. Deimos 80 5 times 400mil for a ship that shoots with medium guns... and can be killed by a BS smart enough to drain it's cap... sure why not , just make em heavier and slower so I can catch em easier...
|
Jane Vladmir
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 04:48:00 -
[28]
IM GOIGN FRO MROE BERE
|
Aldanor
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 07:06:00 -
[29]
Victim: Censored
Corporation: Censored
Destroyed Type: Vagabond
Solar System: Censored
System Security Level: 0.4
Involved parties:
Name: Aldanor (laid the final blow)
Security Status: 2.2
Corporation: Celestial Horizon Corp.
Ship Type: Cyclone
Weapon Type: 650mm Artillery Cannon I
Surely a ferox with its much more effective ship bonus can do better..... |
Lagar
|
Posted - 2005.04.17 08:25:00 -
[30]
Tech 2 ferox? i'd rather take a Tech 2 raven anyday
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |