| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
2866
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 09:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ioci wrote:
Funny thing though, Goons had their freighter full of Zydrine reimbursed when someone popped it in low.
CCP will now punish you for lies about GM actions now. Just a little heads up |

baltec1
Bat Country
2866
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 09:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ioci wrote:
Is there something I should know about your account?
I fly megathrons and am a member of one of EVEs most destructive terrorist organisations. I can also provide some rather fun numbers on high sec ganking ativities and I am one of a number of Bat scientists working on the next high sec campain. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2866
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 09:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tarvos Telesto wrote: Also a lot people atack freigters just for lulz.
Nobody ganks these things just for the "lulz". Its always for the isk. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2866
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 10:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ioci wrote:
Gratz, thread derailed.
It's still about a freighter full of Trit being ganked in High Sec for no other reason than to smother everyone out of the game.
I assume you are talking about the Akna kill. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2868
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 11:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:
Or countered.
Use webs? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2868
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 11:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nar Zandev wrote:Tah'ris Khlador wrote:
You can scout yourself, web yourself, and fly safer loads. Ball has actually been in your court the entire time.
So you`ve seen the balls up close then. Please then tell us what you`ve already said one more time, with your mouth full, 400 mil gank, is able to push down 1.5-5 bil ship in high sec just for lolz. http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=17641147http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=17644123And these are only a couple of lolz killz :D. I don`t feel sorry for them. Ppl should fly only things they can afford to loose. But still a 400 mil gank vs 1.5 bil, the rates don`t match.
A ships tank should never be based upon their isk value. Hence why the vindicator doesn't tank 7 times that of a megathron. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2869
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 11:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:
I bet baltec does.
Isotopes I belive. We gambled and lost on that rhea unfortunatly. However more number to follow. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2869
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 11:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:
To some degree but EVE is an old game and has a very bad reputation for being full of antisocial misfits. Like you.
You damage EVE when EVE needs new blood. You are selfish. You could be in any 0.0 sec doing roams, not to take Sov, just for PvP. No, you chose to sit in one system and exploit human flaw and ruin a game for others. You won't be missed. You won't be welcome in any other MMO either. They would put you out on your ear in the blink of an eye.
You twist EVE in to something it wasn't supposed to be. A place with a complete lack of common sense or dignity.
Keep your stuff. Donate it to one of the people you griefed.
Im sorry did you just say that EVE, a game not only designed as a place where scamming, ganking and piracy is ment to happen but praised by CCP, the people that make this gloriously terrible game, is not ment to have piracy ganking and scamming? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2871
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 12:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:Lord Zim wrote:
tldr: long winded rant about angry entitlements
No You hide behind this illusion that EVE is going to become some evil carebear incarnation of itself. It will be Hello Kitty and Trammel and all this other alarmist, drama queen nonsense. All to justify antisocial behavior in a virtual world because you lack fundamental empathy required to see you are wasting someone elses time. Don't let the door smack you in the ass.
It will become an evil carebare incarnation if people such as yourself get your way. CCP have already tried to nerf stupidity when they upgraded the mining barges. People still fly stupid in them but thats ok because there is no isk to be made in blowing them up anymore!
So we ended up with two lines of piracy all but removed, even more afk barges with no defencive mods fitted at all and a barge lineup just as unbalanced as before. Yep, sounds great for a game that sells itself as a dark, cold and harsh universe. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2873
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 12:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:
No Never Goons have never taken a ship from me and they won't. This is about empathy. About seeing the frustration they cause other people. I know it's unimaginable in a game like EVE but it really isn't about me.
In a game in which you can be a pirate why are you so shocked there are pirates? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2873
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 12:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:baltec1 wrote:Ioci wrote:
Is there something I should know about your account?
I fly megathrons and am a member of one of EVEs most destructive terrorist organisations. I can also provide some rather fun numbers on high sec ganking ativities and I am one of a number of Bat scientists working on the next high sec campain. What would make your corp return ganking barges again?
Macks need to have their tank reduced to that of the hulk. Still very tankable but if you fit nothing we can make enough of a profit to make it last over a long enough timescale to make our isk. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2875
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 12:26:00 -
[12] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:
Pirates were shot on sight. You fail to see the point in High Security space.
You are a pirate? Why are you there?
No I think it is you who does not get high security space. Highsec is not ment to be 100% safe.
As to why we are in high sec? Well good sir, we are are pirates and we want all of that isk. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2877
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 12:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Let me be more specific.
How much - in terms of ISK would a mass suicide gank event require per average mack killed, considering losing the gank boats, selling the drops etc? IE what's the "deficit"?
I am thinking about sponsoring some Hulkageddon revival but the expense has to be within a budget.
10 to 20 million per mack when attacking them in a 0.7 system which is where most of them live.
Hulks need no subsity.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2877
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 12:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:
And I still make more sense than you, clinging to this half baked idea that EVE can work when people don't use self control to restrict the damage they do. I'm out numbered here, being ganked in to the ground and while I do care, not enough to fight battles CCP have chosen not to fight.
If it's OK with them, it's OK with me. You still missed the point in me debating you. Maybe EVE is healthy as a horse. If so, carry on. Maybe this is what they want.
Its worked for the past decade so I am willing to bet it will continue to work. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2877
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 13:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Well I for one am very much looking forwards to winter and its all new ways to inflict chaos in high sec. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2879
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 13:45:00 -
[16] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
i'm not so sure.
mining barges needed rebalancing, regardless of hulkageddon and ganking. also the crucial difference is that an EMPTY exhumer was profitable to gank. is an empty freighter profitable to gank?
there are some subtle but important differences.
Barges were only profitable if they fitted no tank and full rack of t2 mining lasers and MLU. Just about every subcap can be ganked for profit if they fit no tank and have a t2 fitting.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
2879
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 13:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lorna Mood wrote:Xinivrae wrote:Lorna Mood wrote:I've lost a freighter to this exploit, and yes, using the bumping mechanic to get the kill IS an exploit. I'll just leave this here... I am fully aware that is not against the rules so the use of the word "exploit" was probably misleading. What I meant is that being able to bump a freighter with a ship the size of a spec of dust is quitely frankly ludicrous and it's this game mechanic that needs looking at. I'm not in any way suggesting making hi sec 'safer' or stopping anyones fun who wants to shoot things.
Or you can use one of the many ways currently in game to deal with bumping. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2879
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 13:58:00 -
[18] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
yes, however to gank most of those other ships you need something other than a 14 day old character in a catalyst.
i doubt you'd be able to take down an untanked damnation with the same setup. could you?
I can take down heavy assualt ships. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2879
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 14:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
I really hope the Devs are reading this.
You clearly don't appreciate how fucken stupid that sounds.
Or you can split the load and do multiple runs, or you can use a blocade runner for the very expensive items, or you can use a heavily tanked deep space transport, or you can escort the ship with logistics.
There are more but I should think you are getting the idea. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2879
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 14:06:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
Jita is a different bag of bolts. They don't gank there for a reason. More Sentry that hit a lot harder and instant response from concord. EVE has always been in gross favor of offense over defense. I was looking at one of the kills and 6 guys took down a Providence. They even scrambled it so as to disrupt the warp. The thing with a freighter is, you can take 90 seconds to get to warp out but if you lose your wapr status you drop to near 0 speed almost right away. It's also what makes bumping so good. Bump and it isn't that it breaks the alignment, it's that it kills your speed climb back to stand still.
Goons are exploiting very old mechanics. Plain and simple.
Please link the text that states bumping is against the rules. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2879
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 14:10:00 -
[21] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
Don't politic me. You are sploiting.
Again, plese show us what rules we are supposedly breaking. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2886
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 08:44:00 -
[22] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:i'm impressed this waterfall of tears is still flowing.
Its amazing how much more effort these people are willing to put into there forum whines yet are unable to do a task as simple as not transporting 6 billon in the hold while AFK through the most well known piracy hotspot in EVE. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2886
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 09:05:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ioci wrote:[quote=Powers Sa]
Sorry CCP, I lost all faith tonight. The blob just has too much projection. We can't stand up to it. I surrender.
Did you just say that 12 ships should not be able to kill one? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2889
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 10:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
FDIC Agent wrote:My corp and I recently encountered a group of suicide gankers. Knowing we needed to move a freighter ourselves we explored several options.
- Make sure the cargo was only a couple (2-3) billion worth in goods.
- Avoid known hot spots according to kill boards.
- Escort the freighter with scouts.
- Bring along a few ECM ships to try and minimize the incoming damage.
- Pay attention to local for anyone that is known to be with suicide ganker gangs.
In the end we still lost the freighter to a log on trap. When the frighter landed on the gate a suicide gang was landing on it from all directions and did not come from any of the other systems, we know because we had scouts in all directions. When they landed they engaged and forced our freighter to jump the gate or die. We tried to ECM some, but they had far too much DPS. And of course the other group was on the other side of the gate to finish off the freighter, logging in as well. So kindly take all your advice on how these things are avoidable and shove them directly up your basement dwelling fat ass!  I QUIT!
You got outsmarted and rather than learn you quit. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2889
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 11:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
Abu Tarynnia wrote:
I doubt that .. just too many psychos and sociopaths :) I have better ways to spend my money :) btw .. who do you think are paying the plex with real money ? The causual gamers you don't want in this game or you .. these all sooooooo hard and tough and 30cm rider of doom and peril gangsters sitting infront of you pc 24h a day ? :) Without real money and not isk .. the problem will solve anyway in a year or two :) So bye bye .. enjoy our stay as long as it lasts :)
Its almost as if you have no idea what kind of game this is. |

baltec1
Bat Country
2889
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 13:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
McBorsk wrote:Could change Nijara and Uedama to 0.9.
Why? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2889
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 13:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
Newsflash wrote:
why should he keep playing for your pleasure. and for all others who also get their jollies from blowing up unarmed ships in high security space? it doesnt matter if concord kills ships that participate in attack. damage is done and risk has been calculated. also it doesnt matter if you have scouts and escorts cos your freighter will still get popped with huge alpha dps.
lastly. you say if people would haul less they wouldnt get ganked. i call bullshit. if everyone would start doing that people would still gank them just because "lol its so funny to blow up highsec carebears and ruin someones day" besides losing one BC per head is hardly much anyone needs to grind for isk and get new and go gank some more..
Given that we dont want to spend the isk on blowing up untanked macks what makes you think we are going to spend a billion on blowing up random freighters for no gain? |

baltec1
Bat Country
2889
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 13:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Double. Wrap. seriously. I moved 10+ full freighter loads this weekend, no issues. Gypsy Band and The Initiative. were around. This is just a ploy to get more frighters carrying 10bil+ worth of goods. Touch+¬ powers.
Or double wrapped tritainium |
| |
|