|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
208
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 03:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Supported.
The low sec 2/10's are some of the most vibrant pvp areas in EVE. Changing their static status would be a mistake that would kill one of the few hubs of pvp activity in many low sec regions. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
211
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 05:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:I actually find this sort of amusing. Many times it has been suggested that there should be combat arenas in Eve, areas protected by gates that filter by ship type and allow for free combat within. Every time its suggested the cry goes out:
"NO!!!!!! It will kill PvP and Eve will turn into WoW and die!"
Now it turns out that PvE content is being re-purposed for these exact arenas, and its removal is causing complaints!
+1 for areas allowing for frig only or cruiser and below only combat. Either the DED complexes, or just an empty area protected by a gate. To often people suggest arenas as single instances where honorable 1v1 PvP can not be visited by a third party. That is what people are against. Then they add in score boards and suddenly arena fighting is a thing. Also the plexs do provide income in low sec but they are not camped like the high sec ones. Only a few systems away from Heild there is a 2/10 static in a high sec pocket that always has a random camped in it. End that not this.
Yeah Sugar Kyle makes a good point.
What most players in EVE aren't against are "arena's" themselves. But arenas organised and implemented by CCP. The beauty of EVE is the freedom of it. If a large alliance or corporation wanted to set up an arena in their home system with severe rule restrictions, then they are perfectly free to do that as long as they can defend it from people who will try to grief it or use it to fish for kills. In fact alliances have held tournaments like this in null sec before.
This is similar to the 2/10 static plexes. They do have ship restrictions for the internal part of the plex, but they are not some forced arena that is coded into the game. If some corp wanted to they could quite easily come down to Heild and camp the entrance gate 24/7 with insta-locking t3's and an army of guardians, and shut down the frigate brawling entirely. Then it would be up to the residents of Heild and Molden Heath to fight back and force the campers out or move on and find another spot.
It's entirely different from a CCP supported arena that is coded into the game.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
214
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 11:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bumping for great justice.
We need a response CCP. Your actions have already displayed a substantial ignorance of low-sec culture. Please stop ignoring us and start communicating with us.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
215
|
Posted - 2012.12.14 03:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Still waiting eagerly for a response from a Dev.
Also hi Havegun, long time no see! Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
219
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 11:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Robinton Jax wrote:Bump
Getting a bit annoyed with lack of response.
I'm more than just a bit.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
221
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 02:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Thankyou for the response Goliath and Eterne.
I'll be checking this thread regularly waiting for the Dev in charge of this change to get back from holiday and come talk with us. Hopefully something constructive can come of it. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
247
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 15:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
CaiIyn Dove wrote:I just see a lot of sabre pilots ranges.
I can still recall that how I was disappointed as a noob pilot, when entered three 2/10s and saw only broken structures or empty cans.
Good job CCP, more chances to newbies, let the 2/10 camping sabres/dramiels get to low sec
To liars who talking about PVP: there are lots of FW sites there and they are much better place for 1v1 or small gang pvps than low-sec 2/10s, enjoy it or try to make up another reason to pull the high-sec veteran farms back.
Petitioning CCP for a down-vote option. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
255
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 17:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
No, Crafty Croc. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
258
|
Posted - 2013.01.01 01:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
CaiIyn Dove wrote:
FW sites has actually becoming a more progress stable(No wait for re-spawn), relatively fair (according to ship type), and reward rich low-sec gameplay that will totally make the static complexes obsolete.
Except FW is only in certain regions. A lot of low-sec is not FW space.
We're trying to keep the non-FW areas of low-sec alive. CCP's change is killing them further.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
258
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 13:49:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:EDIT after few minutes of flexing my brain muscles:
As much I would like to see our beloved 2/10 plex in Heild back on my overview I wouldn't like it to become a basis for "arenas" in Eve. Dedicated places for pvp have no place in New Eden, period. Beauty of lowsec plexes was in emergent gameplay driven by players "misusing" those beacons. And I am afraid that if you make that first step and put even a hint of "arenas" out there that would make more harm than good in the long run. I find this argument interesting. Removing existing "arenas" is bad but reintroducing them would be a slippery slope towards something harmful? Also technically everything in eve is a "dedicated place for pvp", I don't see how adding more variety of locations to pvp would be a bad thing. To be very clear, this "no NPC" idea is just that, and idea. Don't anyone go getting your hopes up I just want to have a discussion on upsides and downsides.
The 2/10's were never an arena.
They were a naturally formed food chain of pvp content. PVE Guy goes to farm it, PVP Guy 1 hunts him to the plex, PVP Guy 2 hunts PVP Guy 1 etc.
An empty beacon for PVP purposes will be nothing like what the 2/10's were. The 2/10's existed as the PVP hotspot they were because of the DED loot, because of the farming. Low-sec pvp almost always revolves around pve content. Whether its hunting of belt ratters or mission runners, setting up gate camps to catch haulers and freighters, fighting over control of POCO's. Non-FW low sec has no sovereignty mechanic, most of the PVP that happens, happens around PVE content and is initiated by Pirates.
And I still don't understand why letting some farmers farm is worse than destroying a successful and vibrant PVP eco-system in CCP's eyes. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |
|

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
259
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 16:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
VonKolroth wrote:Laktos wrote: They were a naturally formed food chain of pvp content. PVE Guy goes to farm it, PVP Guy 1 hunts him to the plex, PVP Guy 2 hunts PVP Guy 1 etc...
...PvP Guy 3 camps the same system in a fotm frig, with two boosting alts in t3's POSed up. In all seriousness, I do miss the quick fights these sites often provided, but I'd be lying if I said it was quality PvP or that they generated particularly good fights. MOst of the PvP problems would be solved if there were reasons to go to lowsec beyond capital/booster manufacturing, FW, and a handful of static PLEXes.
When I say vibrant I don't mean constant "good fights". I mean a healthy mixture of blobbing, camping, spontaneousness and 1v1's. Constant "good fights" would be nearly as stale as constant blobbing or ganking.
Their relevance should not be determined by whether they give regular "good fights" or not. It's the amount and the mixture of PVP that went on there that made them relevant. And in a sea of inactive low-sec systems, these places were relatively buzzing with PVP action.
Now those systems and areas are dieing. All because CCP wants to stop some farmers from farming. It's completely mad.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
260
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 17:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
Firebolt145 wrote: I don't know mate. I get what you're saying, but back in Heild, it was very rare for a fight to start there because 'some poor pve newbie got lost and thought he could make isk here'. It was always started because 'yo guys I feel like pvp I'm gonna get my destroyer/assault frig and warp to the plex at 50km, who wants to come?'
From that point on it became blobbing/people bringing bigger ships/lots of lulz, which is what you said too, but I'm just disagreeing about your statement that it was the pve loot that started it all in the first place.
Well, of course not every fight starts because players are hunting bears in the plex. But I highly doubt they would ever have become the pvp hotspots they did if it weren't for those initial bears trying to farm it which lures in the pirates. I'm trying to make the point that I don't think a PVP arena with no isk reward inside to lure the carebears and thus the pirates and thus the anti-pirates will ever come close to replacing what the 2/10's were.
And it wasn't just bears trying to farm those plexes. A number of pirates/pvpers roamed across regions to farm the loot from the 2/10's and hopefully find a fight in one of them as a bonus.
EVE PVP needs consensual and non-consensual parties. It needs hunters and prey. It needs greed for isk and greed for carebear killmails to motivate pilots to take risks. Without these things it just becomes a series of stalemates or boring 1v1's. I'm extremely disappointed that this was the best idea that came out of the CSM + Dev meeting.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
268
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 03:13:00 -
[13] - Quote
MrDiao wrote:Turgesson wrote:with returned plexes in LOW SEC. We can deal with drop rates, types of loot, ways to gain keys/unlocking the gates full time, variations in the respawn timers, etc..after they are returned and work on them until we are both satisfied. . The answer should be "No". Exploration system should do what it supposed to do, if you want to encourage low-sec people's activities, introduce another idea called "low-sec static deadspace to encourage low-sec pvp", not by abusing the exploration complex system, especially for what aims at helping the newbies to start the game.
Oh good, another person who doesn't live in low-sec and has no idea what they're talking about.
Just fyi, the old 2/10's were a fantastic place for newbies to get into PVP and provided a loot drop that didn't take months of training to obtain all at the same time.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
270
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 13:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
Still waiting for the promised discourse with the developer responsible. Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
271
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 17:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kane Rizzel wrote:Had a very depressing convo with Sard Caid a night or so back. Thank you CCP for destroying a vibrant and exciting PvP community and not even giving us the courtesy of a reach around. Even poking devs on twitter doesn't seem to be working no more.
It is indeed very depressing. If you ain't some big null-sec alliance, CCP don't want to hear from you.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
271
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 13:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Hey guys, we haven't abandoned reading the thread, but in this case we're not going to be able to give you a specific answer you're happy with.
I can confirm that it wasn't just farming of the highsec plexes that concerned us, we looked at the data for the number of unique characters completing the lowsec plexes as well and that number was much smaller than we wanted.
All I can really say is that we understand that this change removes a focal point for lowsec fighting that was beneficial in a lot of ways, but that the team here believes that when we look back on this change in hindsight later the benefits will outweigh the loss (in the same way that we believe the benefits outweighed the loss inherent in removing the higher tier static complexes in 2007).
Well I'm disappointed to hear that, but thanks for replying again at least.
Latest PVP Video: Perseverance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |
|
|
|