What needs fixing?

Throwing out the logistical ease item and industry, sorry but different issue if one at all.
Even if you did cut them in half people from null would still produce in high-sec because that is where the most stable market is.
Nobody goes shopping in war zone unless they don't have a choice.

Once again we are talking actual ISK faucet.
So the question is does High-sec ISk faucets excede those of null when compared to the sinks.

And as high-sec does not have any alliances you have to base it on per character which makes things , well rather nasty.
And the best ISK faucet in High-sec is once again Level 4 missions.
And we are really only talking about one particular mission style as well the fighting missions.

Oh look we are back to that old arguement.
So where is the data that shows what percentage of characters are upsetting the balance ?

THey are the sov belts that are already in the game.
The only things Null needs from high-sec is Trit and Pyerite and maybe some mex from time to time.
Everything else is gotten simply by mining the large belt.

I see a lot of people talking but nobody still is stating where the problem is.

Everyone is saying High-sec is making stupid ISK.
And it needs to be balanced.

How does the NPC corp player get the ISK to begin with.
Industry is the same across the board, why should the rules be any better for null sec.
OH wait they already are.
FREE refining and FREE production in null-sec stations.
THe ability to make capital ships.
Don't try and hand me a line about but it cost me blah blah when I produce my own station, talk to the owner about that, they are the ones who ripping you off, not anyone else.

Ah now I have your attention and perhaps you will stop talking around the subject now and get down to what you really want ?
Saying something needs a nerf doesn't really say much.

Cherry picking is once again a internal problem.
If you can't manage your own people or they are willing to knock it off then get rid of them.

And the idea that null can't provide enough minerals to build super capitals is completely false.
And I know this because I used to build them.

See there is the problem.
You have no way of knowing how many of those high-sec players are really alts of null-sec players.
I can go to null make lots of ISK to front a high-sec operation.
In fact I can even undercut other player knowing I have a secondary source of income.
How are you going to force out those players ?
Any tax with work across the board, it it will get rather complicated to implament if you want to target specific player who are doing the same thing as the masses just with better backing.

And by stopping a certain player group you are essentially forcing them to do something else ?
Call it what it is the player base refuses to change and people consider it a problem so you want to change the way they play there game so you have to force them to do something.

People produce in high-sec cause that is where people sell there items.
It is nautral ground for the null sec alliances.
It also keeps BPO's safe as players spent time and ISK to aquire and research them.

And let be honest it is very easy for a player to get goods from high-sec to null and back again.
In order to change things so null produces and sells in null.
1 - give null the production lines to implement it (improve null station)
2 - give null the market to sell items (this is practically impossible given human nature)
3 - remove easy access of goods from null to high-sec and the reverse.

Number one is easily fixed.
Number two the the lynch pin that makes everything fall apart (no real way to do this)
Number three is well a nasty thing and you boards are filled with people trying to fix it to no avail.

In some respects 3 could be fixed by making null a lot farther out then it already is.
A change in the geography of EVE could help.
What I am talking about is either increasing low-sec systems and or increasing the distance capital jump wise between high-sec and null.
If you have to jump 3 times with a capital just to get to a low-sec system on the border of high-sec, producing in null would look more attractive.

See where I am going, try not to nerf but change dynamics of the situation without having to once again tweak the mechanics

Because High-sec doesn't NEED T2 items.
T2 items are a luxury item for high-sec.
T2 items are needed for null and null produces there T2 items in high-sec because it makes the most sense.
That really is the heart of the problem.
Any nerf you place on high-sec will hit null as well.
The 2 economies are tied together.
You can't nerf one without hitting the other.

See that is what is so interesting about the whole nerf high-sec.
To some extent it will cut null's throat.
You crash the high-sec economy and high-sec will continue as before just at a slower rate.

Null is not in that position they depend on the economy to sell items for pay for monthly expenses.
SOV is not cheap.

Although it would be an interesting way to reset null.
Cause all the alliances would go bankrupt which means they would have to implode or leave null to just survive opening up regions for others or for those that say had a huge ISK reserve set aside.
A little tinfoil for fun

They are in the normal belts in most places but like high-sec they are quickly drained, just like high-sec.

The SOV belt show up as a grav site.
There are 5 different belts based on how much you mine in a system.

Once you deplete a belt you leave it and wait five minutes and another one identical to the one you just cleared will spawn again. (in a different location in the system)
If I can find the link to it I will post it here.

Well one of the reason I picked the replacing the Spod with a scordite is the ratio in scordite is very good but not perfect.
And most null miners only use the large. This would force them to mine the small belt as well.
So there is already a price for the trit and pyrite they must now rotate 2 belts to get what they want.

Like I said early most won't in preference to simply sell to high-sec and purchase the low ends there.
Up to a point.

And to be honest I was trying to cut down on what CCP has to do.
Switch rock and watch what happens.
IF it is too much they can always make another change.

Sadly this is all talk anyways, I don't see CCP making changes anytime soon.