| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

OSGOD
TASSIE DEVILS OMEGA.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why would yuo do this i have a lot isk and time in skills invested in mining ice for my POS ,if you take out ice from high sec is is no longer viable to mine for my POS i dont give a rats ass about price if you whining **** wits that are carrying on about the market mine the ice urself ,i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums :
1: i pay 260+ dollars a year for this game and the last time i payed my sub i never ticked any box that siad all my time a sp invested in ice mining to fuel my pos are now going to be wasted becuase ice is going to low sec or WH`s .
2: every body knows that low sec is where the low lifes live and the price of ice would far excede that for making a POS even isk stable
3: those that make low sc a pain in the ass are the same people that make high sec Wh ing not worth it .
4. certain people in this game like ******* with people that just play for thier own reasons other than that of PVP and profitteering from others loss.
and the main reason THIS WILL BE ANOTHER MOVE EXACTLY THE SAME AS AURUM AND VANITY CRAP, IF YOU MAKE IT UNPLEASANT OR CHANGE THE STATUS QUO 2 MUCH BYE BYE SUBSCRIPTION OF INDUSTRIAL TOONS AND BYE BIG CHUNK OF THE PEOPLE THAT MAKE **** SO pvp CAN BE FUN .
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS BULLSHIT CCP STOP ******* WITH THE CORE OF THE GAME AND FIX WHAT IS ******, |

Anya Ohaya
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums :
Professional advice couldn't hurt. |

mechtech
SRS Industries SRS.
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ice mining is one of the lowest paying industries in the game, and that's because bots probably do 75% of the ice mining. Are you really lamenting the loss of this activity in high-sec?
You could run lvl 4s and buy 5 hours of equivalent ice yield for each 1 hour of missioning that you do.
As for my opinion, I feel that the risk vs reward aspect of the game is at the low point of the entire game's existence. Moving ice to null or low-sec would be one small part in restoring the higher scarcity of resources that the game used to have. |

warsong nerds
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quote: i have a lot isk and time in skills invested in mining ice for my POS
You can do that in 0.0 too unless your a bot ,then YES you need to be in High Sec Proud Member Of Homeland Defence of GoonSwarm
|

Etherials
StarFox Enterprises The Lucian Alliance.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Would there really be a major difference in bot mechanics between Hi and null sec?
Surely the only change to the bot would be 'if friendly in local continue mining, if non friendly return to station' friendly being donated as corp/alliance/blue and non friendly being everybody else. Fear accompanies the possibility of death. Calm shepherds its certainty.Ka D'Argo |

Xearal
SOL Industries Black Thorne Alliance
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
OMG LOL. I think I'm going to link this post to the C&P forum where it can be trolled properly...
Seriously though, low sec is NOT dangerous if you know what you're doing. I've spend quite a few hours mining in low sec, or exploring or simply flying around and hauling goods.
Though ofcourse unlike you, I'm not a carebear, I'm an industrialist.
Thile I do think that moving ice to null would be a bad idea, it's not for the same reasons.
The biggest reason for me is, that if ice is only found in low and null, prices for iso's will go up a lot, causing a lot of POSses to become less profitable, and also causing moongoo mining to be more expensive, which in turn will make ships more expensive.
|

Efraya
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
The butt hurt is strong in the OP.
WSpace; Best space. |

Xuse Senna
Ducklings
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
Too Easy, Next Loser. http://tinyurl.com/Qucked
|

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 12:04:00 -
[9] - Quote
So it there any official infor about it if
|

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 12:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
0/10 too obvious to be a good troll . . . nobody is really this stupid. . . |

Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow The Revenant Order
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 12:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:Why would yuo do this i have a lot isk and time in skills invested in mining ice for my POS ,if you take out ice from high sec is is no longer viable to mine for my POS i dont give a rats ass about price if you whining **** wits that are carrying on about the market mine the ice urself ,i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums :
1: i pay 260+ dollars a year for this game and the last time i payed my sub i never ticked any box that siad all my time a sp invested in ice mining to fuel my pos are now going to be wasted becuase ice is going to low sec or WH`s .
2: every body knows that low sec is where the low lifes live and the price of ice would far excede that for making a POS even isk stable
3: those that make low sc a pain in the ass are the same people that make high sec Wh ing not worth it .
4. certain people in this game like ******* with people that just play for thier own reasons other than that of PVP and profitteering from others loss.
and the main reason THIS WILL BE ANOTHER MOVE EXACTLY THE SAME AS AURUM AND VANITY CRAP, IF YOU MAKE IT UNPLEASANT OR CHANGE THE STATUS QUO 2 MUCH BYE BYE SUBSCRIPTION OF INDUSTRIAL TOONS AND BYE BIG CHUNK OF THE PEOPLE THAT MAKE **** SO pvp CAN BE FUN .
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS BULLSHIT CCP STOP ******* WITH THE CORE OF THE GAME AND FIX WHAT IS ******,
Stuff a tampon in it, you're bleeding all over the forums.
You're crying about a game, because suddenly it is becoming too hard for you. I suggest growing a pair, and or jumping up and down hard enough that yours actually drop so that you can quit your emo raging and move on with life.
Ever consider learning to actually defend yourself? Or here's another suggestion, make friends, as hard as that may be for you, because you apparently have a severe antisocial personality disorder, and have them pull security so that you can cut ice in WH or low sec.
Ooh, accusing someone of making something unpleasant, you're making your own life unpleasant because you're playing to victim and crying to a Corporation that has more important things to worry about than someone with a sense of entitlement going "ME ME ME!" Examples: Time Dialation (thus reducing lag), other server side issues to fight lag, and increase security for all player accounts, the rework of nullsec, Faction Warfare, and the rest of the lovely things associated with Flying in Space.
This is EVE Online, not Carebears Online, so lose the sense of entitlement, stop crying, and actually do something productive to solve your "problems." "War is not measured in terms of who wins or loses, who is right or wrong.-á It is measured in terms of who survives." |

Invictra Atreides
Toward the Terra
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 13:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
I buy ICE from market and I don't care where you ppl get it from. |

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 13:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
I came expecting tears and left satisfied.. I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
391
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 14:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
you're welcome |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
391
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 14:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
i will be your space lawyer however i'll require a 10b retainer sent to weaselior |

Krixtal Icefluxor
The Scope Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
Seriously.
It's just another move by the NullBears to absolutely gain control of the price of all POS fuels.
Remove Ice from High Sec and put it in their hands ??
Those HelioTopes will be 3,000 ISK per unit PERMANENTLY I can PROMISE it. Say goodbye to any POS in High Sec unless you lick their boots.
THIS IS real. God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved.
-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
392
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
also where was this finally announced |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
392
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
and nullbears is the most hilarious word ever continue mining ice worthless slaves |

Krixtal Icefluxor
The Scope Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:also where was this finally announced
Not. Just being 'thought about'.........albeit idiotically.
Also, your GoonSpam Forum Campaign sucks. God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved.
-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
392
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
no war but forum war
and ice war |

Orlacc
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:39:00 -
[21] - Quote
So OP is blaming everyone else because he is a coward.... |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
96
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:52:00 -
[22] - Quote
The OP did an extremely poor job of explaning why removing ice from high sec is a horrendously bad idea. However, that doesn't change the fact that it is indeed a horrendously bad idea, and I trust that when CCP actually pauses to consider all the cause-and-effect ripples this would have throughout the game they'll decide to simply leave well enough alone. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Galadriel Vasquez
Bright Paradigm
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 17:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
I think Mr OP needs to take a breath. Its well known Bots mine Ice in High Sec - sending them to Low Sec will be Gankarama for the people that populate there. The resultant losses of many Mackinaws will cause a spike for the ship building Industrialists. Also there will be losses from Macks being used as bait by clever folk - ganking the gankers. Its a merry-go-round. As for you taking legal action - surely you are not serious? But hey your post made me laugh and spit my Coffee all over the place and for that I salute you. |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
58
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 17:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
Since this thread is really low in facts and high in alarmist BS posts:
CCP Greyscale wrote:RG Sneaker wrote: Will Ice mining in hi sec end? I might just close my hi sec POS then :-( Thinking about it a bit, not sure where we're going to go. We might not change it at all, we might just make hisec belts deplete (and regen as normal) so they can roughly meet hisec demand. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1565827&page=2#55 |

Satav
Latinum Exports
49
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 20:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
All i hear are carebear tears.......
Dude, games change. If you'd rather sit in empire and rot be my guest.
You could have seen it as an opportunity to make tons of iskies in 0.0. but nooooooooooo. It doesn't fit into your little box of what you think eve should be. Roll with the punches dude. |

Obsidiana
White-Noise
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 21:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
The people who will be complaining about ice removal from high sec will be the low/null sec people who need the product. Every so often the prices sky rocket because demand goes way up. It isn't from highsec wars. Call it a "seasonal item" of sorts.
As for bots, they are in lowsec too. They will adapt and survive like cockroaches.
Btw, I really donGÇÖt care either way. I will say that, as it stands, the system has a unique balance that is interesting to observer. |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 21:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
you pay to play eve |

Woo Glin
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 21:55:00 -
[28] - Quote
and then you mine ice |

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 22:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Actually, removing ice from high sec would probably only make ice mining harder for legitimate players - bots would thrive in low and null sec.
HINT: if programmed properly, bots don't make mistakes provided that Monkeysphere isn't hanging around. |

Cipher Jones
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 22:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
Cerisia wrote:I came expecting tears and left satisfied..
I came too. No tears involved tho.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Cipher Jones
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 22:23:00 -
[31] - Quote
Woo Glin wrote:you pay to play eve
That's almost as stupid as paying to join an alliance.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 01:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Removing ice for high sec is a monsterly bad idea. Many pos's are run in high sec.. so removing the ice would make high sec dependant on low sec or null for for ice fuel.. The trouble with this is null sec ice would not get to high sec in enough quatity for supply the need. and low sec ice.. nearly never goes anywhere for the hassle it is to run it.
I believe whoever had this brain dead idea needs to rethink it. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 01:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
Etherials wrote:Would there really be a major difference in bot mechanics between Hi and null sec?
Surely the only change to the bot would be 'if friendly in local continue mining, if non friendly return to station' friendly being donated as corp/alliance/blue and non friendly being everybody else.
are you really giving advice based on breaking the EULA?
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

DigDoug
Amber Lamps Labs
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 04:49:00 -
[34] - Quote
The thing that is funniest in this thread is the people who brush off or justify a change like this by saying, games change or you will have to change blah blah blah. While the angst is high on a proposition like this by those in high sec I simply have a couple of observations. First, is the patronage of players in high sec somehow inherently less valuable to CCP in some way that their game experience is so easily dismissed and relegated as some kind of experimental test monkey? Second, if the roles were reversed and a devblog was published where they were talking about moving high end moons to .2 and .3 space and ABCM minerals to highsec, the flood of tears would be enough to drown the world. |

Emma Royd
Maddled Gommerils
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 21:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Satav wrote:All i hear are carebear tears.......
Dude, games change. If you'd rather sit in empire and rot be my guest.
You could have seen it as an opportunity to make tons of iskies in 0.0. but nooooooooooo. It doesn't fit into your little box of what you think eve should be. Roll with the punches dude.
So sitting in empire doesn't fit with how you think eve should be played?
If you're going to have a standard, make it a single, not a double
Ice is known as low paid, but so what? what business of it is anyones if people want to do the low paid profession, people mine ice for pos's and they're happy with that, if they do remove ice from high sec, then it will have massive impacts across a lot of eve, isotopes will go up in price, logistics into 0.0 will be more expensive due to the higher fuel costs, running towers anywhere will be more expensive, instead of messing around with high sec belts they could focus their efforts into bot detection.
It's all speculation anyway, so wait and see what happens, if they take it out they take it out, there's nothing we can do about it, ccp work in mysterious ways after all.
|

Kiran
Knights of Azrael
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 10:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
DigDoug wrote:The thing that is funniest in this thread is the people who brush off or justify a change like this by saying, games change or you will have to change blah blah blah. While the angst is high on a proposition like this by those in high sec I simply have a couple of observations. First, is the patronage of players in high sec somehow inherently less valuable to CCP in some way that their game experience is so easily dismissed and relegated as some kind of experimental test monkey? Second, if the roles were reversed and a devblog was published where they were talking about moving high end moons to .2 and .3 space and ABCM minerals to highsec, the flood of tears would be enough to drown the world.
This guys says it all.
Removing ice from high sec will be a bad move for the industries in New Eden and the markets. Who ever thought this would be a good idea needs to have their one remaining brain cell taken off them. And anyone who thinks this is good needs a shotgun putting to their head to have an air conditioned brain. Its the real life equivelance of removing all the pine trees in Scandinavia "OMG no more Ikea"
As for the OP getting legal aid on this one I think you should read the EULA CCP states they can change the game anytime they like whether you like it or not. Nothing you can do about it, or you could just quit and forget about this game.
|

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
88
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 13:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
First removing ice from high sec was a idea put forward bu CCP greyscale a few months ago about giving nulsec aindustry a boost If you had taken the time to read the feed back posted about these ideas which can be found here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1565828 you would know there is serious opposition against removing all ice from high sec with some really good arguments against it
So calm down i don't expect they will be taking ice away from high sec and give it to the nullsec idiots and let the whole economy go into a deep ressecsion it will never recover from
But indeed something needs to be done to make it much harder to use bots for ice mining
Goons Delenda Est I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Maeda Toshiie
Diverse Endeavors
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 13:40:00 -
[38] - Quote
Kiran wrote:
This guys says it all.
Removing ice from high sec will be a bad move for the industries in New Eden and the markets. Who ever thought this would be a good idea needs to have their one remaining brain cell taken off them. And anyone who thinks this is good needs a shotgun putting to their head to have an air conditioned brain. Its the real life equivelance of removing all the pine trees in Scandinavia "OMG no more Ikea"
One of the few games I know of where the rules just change.
I suspect "balancing" actually costs more in player attrition then it delivers. Folks adapt to the current rules, spend a lot of time and effort learning how to be successful, then the rules arbitrarily change, wiping out their investment. This one won't hurt me much, but I do see the frustration. People get annoyed with games who's rules are so malleable. |

seanb29
Killer Koalas
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 19:07:00 -
[39] - Quote
can i ask why some people think if someone is mining in high sec,that person is a bot? i mine in both high sec and low sec and am not a bot,and for certain people calling any miner in high sec a bot is alittle unfair. |

kyrv
McWOOKIE'S REVOLOUTION
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 19:10:00 -
[40] - Quote
Don't you think making 0.0 empires mine their own ice is worth watching? Belligerent Super cap pilots may still be. |

Altair Raja
Colonial Marines EVE Division
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 20:40:00 -
[41] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:2: every body knows that low sec is where the low lifes live and the price of ice would far excede that for making a POS even isk stable Does this mean im a low life?? My main system is a 0.7 but i roam low sec all the time...and what are the null sec people?
Also I've never heard this before but i hope ice is low sec only... then maybe it might be worth the time and effort... Mining is already pointless unless you need the minerals...
|

Xuse Senna
Ducklings
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 09:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
DOES EVERYBODY KNOW IM A HOMO http://tinyurl.com/Qucked
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 12:00:00 -
[43] - Quote
Just take all the ice from the game and make it NPC item
Take all the roid belts away from the game and make it NPC item
End of mining bots, well big alliances would still have their bot alts in tengus/carriers cleaning 0.0 rat belts but that's another stuff.
Ho wait, take rat belts away from the game too. Make every zone like 0.0 !! That's it, this is how eve should be: 100 stupid nerds shooting each other and 80% actual players leaving for other games.
You guys ideas rocks.... |

Victor Dathar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 12:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:
Ho wait, take rat belts away from the game too. Make every zone like 0.0 !! That's it, this is how eve should be: 100 stupid nerds shooting each other and 80% actual players leaving for other games.
That implies that 100% of people playing an internet spaceship game are not nerds. |

Liev Dleg
Deutsche Recycling GmbH In Lumine Stellarum
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 12:16:00 -
[45] - Quote
Very Interesting! I have 2 questions: Why should all the players go into 0.0? It is not so smart you think? Why do you not accepting players would like to be in a "save" place to make there ISK?
I'm an Industrial and mining is a part of it, Ice or Ore i'm not interested in it. If the Prices are raising it's all fine, but to many people are don't know what it is worth. We keep your POS in every way running, because you are to lazcy. Don't bite the hand feeding you! |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
105
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:43:00 -
[46] - Quote
Cause and effect.
If you remove ice from high sec, only the richest players will be able to afford T3 ships. Prices will spike pre-emptively as wormhole residents now scramble to survive. Many people, having had their playstyle decimated for no viable reason will simply unsub, having no desire to go to null in the first place. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:48:00 -
[47] - Quote
Why do I think that you're concerned mostly about your own profits ?
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
105
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:58:00 -
[48] - Quote
Karim alRashid wrote:Why do I think that you're concerned mostly about your own profits ?
Probably because you're not very bright. It doesn't require a whole lot of thought to trace out the consequences if there's a massive spike in pos fuel prices. When you make pos's in high sec and wormhole space dependant on fuel coming from null... everything they produce will spike in price, and only those that can continue to afford fuel will be able to keep going. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Anachronic
Abacus Industries Group Knights Of Freedoms
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 19:15:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Why do I think that you're concerned mostly about your own profits ?
Probably because you're not very bright. It doesn't require a whole lot of thought to trace out the consequences if there's a massive spike in pos fuel prices. When you make pos's in high sec and wormhole space dependant on fuel coming from null... everything they produce will spike in price, and only those that can continue to afford fuel will be able to keep going.
Adapt or die...I'm pretty certain this is the way that eve was meant to be played. I think that POS setups are all too common right now and that we need to have something to curtail it. Everyone and their mother should not be able to run a pos just because. |

ohno riceagain
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 21:57:00 -
[50] - Quote
Anachronic wrote:Ingvar Angst wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Why do I think that you're concerned mostly about your own profits ?
Probably because you're not very bright. It doesn't require a whole lot of thought to trace out the consequences if there's a massive spike in pos fuel prices. When you make pos's in high sec and wormhole space dependant on fuel coming from null... everything they produce will spike in price, and only those that can continue to afford fuel will be able to keep going. Adapt or die...I'm pretty certain this is the way that eve was meant to be played. I think that POS setups are all too common right now and that we need to have something to curtail it. Everyone and their mother should not be able to run a pos just because.
Im pretty certain your d**k and your brain is really small. ( Adapt or die is for the real world where there is a food chain)
What do you care if me or my mom has a POS. Thats the way I like to play "F" you.
Just because you dont have the intelligence to set up much less manage a POS doesnt mean those with an IQ higher than a Veldspar roid cant do so if we please in Hi-sec or anywhere else.
Its hi-sec because its civilized and the knuckle draggers like you cant stand the thought of nice people doing nice things.
This is internet spaceships where we ALL are supposed to have fun, not YOUR idea of fun.
So because you pay more than I do every month your fricking opinion about what I can and cant do in this game matters?
Its people like you that keep people like me from wanting to go to null sec in the first place.
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
110
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 22:56:00 -
[51] - Quote
Anachronic wrote:Ingvar Angst wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Why do I think that you're concerned mostly about your own profits ?
Probably because you're not very bright. It doesn't require a whole lot of thought to trace out the consequences if there's a massive spike in pos fuel prices. When you make pos's in high sec and wormhole space dependant on fuel coming from null... everything they produce will spike in price, and only those that can continue to afford fuel will be able to keep going. Adapt or die...I'm pretty certain this is the way that eve was meant to be played. I think that POS setups are all too common right now and that we need to have something to curtail it. Everyone and their mother should not be able to run a pos just because.
Spend a little time hopping around through wormholes. Take note of the abundance of failed pos's you come across. Not everyone can maintain a wormhole pos as it is. This wouldn't be an 'adapt or die' thing... this would border on CCP sanctioned wormhole genocide.
Of course... when people start having to pay well north of a billion isk for a tengu... Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:02:00 -
[52] - Quote
ohno riceagain wrote:Anachronic wrote:Ingvar Angst wrote:Karim alRashid wrote:Why do I think that you're concerned mostly about your own profits ?
Probably because you're not very bright. It doesn't require a whole lot of thought to trace out the consequences if there's a massive spike in pos fuel prices. When you make pos's in high sec and wormhole space dependant on fuel coming from null... everything they produce will spike in price, and only those that can continue to afford fuel will be able to keep going. Adapt or die...I'm pretty certain this is the way that eve was meant to be played. I think that POS setups are all too common right now and that we need to have something to curtail it. Everyone and their mother should not be able to run a pos just because. Im pretty certain your d**k and your brain is really small. ( Adapt or die is for the real world where there is a food chain) What do you care if me or my mom has a POS. Thats the way I like to play "F" you. Just because you dont have the intelligence to set up much less manage a POS doesnt mean those with an IQ higher than a Veldspar roid cant do so if we please in Hi-sec or anywhere else. Its hi-sec because its civilized and the knuckle draggers like you cant stand the thought of nice people doing nice things. This is internet spaceships where we ALL are supposed to have fun, not YOUR idea of fun. So because you pay more than I do every month your fricking opinion about what I can and cant do in this game matters? Its people like you that keep people like me from wanting to go to null sec in the first place.
This but you are wasting your time.
|

Joshua Aivoras
Tech IV Industries
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 04:18:00 -
[53] - Quote
A buddy of mine made a nice comparison of no more High Sec ice to the current Goonswarm Gallente ice Debacle.
Don't know what I mean? Check the market history on Oxygen Isotopes.
The same thing would happen to all Isotope types, were this to be implemented.
No more WH POS's, no more high sec research POS's. |

Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 04:29:00 -
[54] - Quote
pussnheels wrote: So calm down i don't expect they will be taking ice away from high sec and give it to the nullsec idiots and let the whole economy go into a deep ressecsion it will never recover from
How can you have a recession with perfectly elastic wagerates? |

Ender Sai
Foetus Mart
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 10:16:00 -
[55] - Quote
Trolls trolling trolls.
It seems OP is very confused, ice mining must be an unhealthy addictive activity that forces people to sit at their computers 23/7. Clearly goons are just on a humanitarian mission with only the good health of their fellow players in mind.
You only reap the rewards of a cooked goose after thanks giving, so for now he'll have to live with cold turkey. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 10:28:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ender Sai wrote:Clearly goons are just on a humanitarian mission with only the good health of their fellow players in mind. This guy gets it.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

pooper stain
Adventurers Matari Visionary Coalition
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 17:55:00 -
[57] - Quote
I would LOVE for them to move ICE to null/low WITH some conditions:
A.) ICE must spawn at all grav sites and scaned out, NO ice patch on overview period.
B.)Cycle times be reduced
C.) Macks get a +2 warp stab built in
It would give miners some nice isk/hour finally with some kind of servivability. |

Kiran
Knights of Azrael
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 21:52:00 -
[58] - Quote
kyrv wrote:Don't you think making 0.0 empires mine their own ice is worth watching? Belligerent Super cap pilots may still be.
Oh now that would be just evil. But they would just use bots.
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
140
|
Posted - 2011.10.16 18:00:00 -
[59] - Quote
pooper stain wrote:I would LOVE for them to move ICE to null/low WITH some conditions:
A.) ICE must spawn at all grav sites and scaned out, NO ice patch on overview period.
B.)Cycle times be reduced
C.) Macks get a +2 warp stab built in
It would give miners some nice isk/hour finally with some kind of servivability.
This does nothing to alleviate the incredible stupidity of such a concept however. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.16 18:18:00 -
[60] - Quote
From a "is it profitable" standpoint, removing ice from hisec is a GOOD thing. Too damn many bots as it is.
Now, if CCP goes through with it, here's what we'll see happen:
1. the buyers will cry 2. the botters will cry 3. enterprising corporations and alliances will make bank as they move to lowsec to obtain the ice.
Now, from looking at dotlan, I haven't seen a SINGLE lowsec system that has ice without a station. That's a "bad thing" in the "safety" department, as it's nearly impossible to kick someone out of a system with NPC stations...
If they're really going to go through with this, I'd like to see CCP move at least some of the "permanent" ice fields (assuming there will still be "permanent" belts... regardless of whether or not they can be depleted) to deeper lowsec that doesn't have a station (i.e. not right next door to hisec). If it's going to be in grav sites (and a relative ***** to find... ), then it would be nice to get some of the nullsec variants as well... |

muxacb12
Ministry of Destruction P I R A T E S
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.16 18:26:00 -
[61] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS BULLSHIT CCP STOP ******* WITH THE CORE OF THE GAME AND FIX WHAT IS ******,
They are fixing **** as you put it... they are taking ice out of highsec so macroers can't macro it,...
btw YOU MAD BRO and can i haz your stuff...
|

Emma Royd
Maddled Gommerils
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 04:55:00 -
[62] - Quote
I just wish CCP would make their minds up and announce what they're going to do, either confirm or deny the removal of ice from high-sec and then people could make their minds up and start planning what to do.
Knowing my luck, they'll probably do it just after I re-sub again ... |

Goddess Ishtar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 06:30:00 -
[63] - Quote
Removing ice from highsec would go a long way towards fixing the game. CCP has my blessing |

Vastek Non
State War Academy Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 10:25:00 -
[64] - Quote
2 things if this goes ahead:
1/ Botters will still bot - many of the HS bots belong to null sec/wh corps feeding their POS already - now they will simply have to add a 'red/neutral enters system - warp to POS' command. In actuality the chances of bots getting ganked in Alliance null is probably lower than in empire.
2/ Null sec alliances would have a stranglehold over wormholes and High Sec. Do I really need to explain why this is a bad idea, particularly given the contemptuous attitude many in null seem to have for all others?
The stupidity of CCP even contemplating this as a genuine idea to 'fix' the game pefectly shows the attitude that led to the summer of rage. Perhaps they should do something about bots instead?
The nullsec types bleating about bots in high (and there are many bots in high it cannot be ignored) should probably look in their own backyard first. I suspect GS/TEST for example are conveniently overlooking lowlifes such as 'Leetcheese', their very own botting legend, who perfectly encapulates the attitude. This genuis had the nerve to complain about his ban/isk confiscation as 'he didn't even RMT it, it was only to keep him in Maelstroms for fights'. The amounts involved seem to have been mere billions per week. There are many more out there like him.
CCP - kill the bots. Don't punish players for your half decade long failings to stem the problem. |

Habaticus
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 14:02:00 -
[65] - Quote
It's really a bad idea. If I can't mine my own ice I'll drop the POS; just the way I do things - There'll just be an initial 30/35 day delay in my manufacturing flow. Don't know why all these knee jerk reactions and 0.0 asskissing actions.
God I love this hide function - reading the forums are interesting and informative again :) |

VaMei
Meafi Corp
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 14:53:00 -
[66] - Quote
This is only a rough idea that is part of CCPs long term (as in years) vision for future of the game, and that vision is subject to change dozens of times before that vision becomes a plan, and then subject to change again before that plan becomes action.
Don't get your panties in a bunch yet. Rather be glad that players are being given some insite into the vision process. For that matter, I'm glad that CCP is showing that there is a vision for the future of Eve vs playing Space Barbie or worse, emo Barbie. |

Goddess Ishtar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 20:04:00 -
[67] - Quote
Habaticus wrote:It's really a bad idea. If I can't mine my own ice I'll drop the POS That's fine.
|

Vastek Non
State War Academy Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 21:36:00 -
[68] - Quote
Habaticus wrote:It's really a bad idea. If I can't mine my own ice I'll drop the POS; just the way I do things - There'll just be an initial 30/35 day delay in my manufacturing flow. Don't know why all these knee jerk reactions and 0.0 asskissing actions.
God I love this hide function - reading the forums are interesting and informative again :)
Well from the nullseccers point of view that is exactly what its about of course. Clearly the average nullsec alliance has a 0 care factor about bots, and their members are happy to state just how little they care about ice mining, and miners, soo... the only message that can be inferred is that it is about killing off competition.
Hopefully CCP will ignore the real world precedent of small, noisy, greedy interest groups owning their ears and pushing through incredibly bad policy that will be detrimental to the game as a whole, even if said greedy, short sighted interest groups profit in the short term.
Edit: CCP have indicated that it seems more likely they will just make ice roids deplete in a similar manner to other ores. I doubt this will do anything from a botting point of view, but at least it seems to be a more sensible and equitible decision. |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
153
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 22:14:00 -
[69] - Quote
Goddess Ishtar wrote:Habaticus wrote:It's really a bad idea. If I can't mine my own ice I'll drop the POS That's fine.
What's unfortunate is that you likely lack the capacity to fully grasp why it actually isn't. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
128
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 23:16:00 -
[70] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Goddess Ishtar wrote:Habaticus wrote:It's really a bad idea. If I can't mine my own ice I'll drop the POS That's fine. What's unfortunate is that you likely lack the capacity to fully grasp why it actually isn't. Dazzle us with your insight then.
|

Kato Matsu
Unshameless
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 23:37:00 -
[71] - Quote
This topic is quite controversial. Should CCP move ice to low/null sec? The theory being that it will promote more "carebears" to move to low/null sec, creating more ship/module losses, causing more ships/modules to be built, keeping the eve-conomy flowing. It is also believed that moving ice to low/null sec will stop bots from mining 24/7 relatively safely in high sec.
Unfortunately, neither is true.
When it comes down to it a player will play EVE exactly how they want to play EVE. If I was a POS owner and I didn't want to visit low sec to mine ice I simply wouldn't do it. For some players I would imagine having their style of play changed so much would encourage them to get their kicks in another MMO. To draw a parallel: suddenly CONCORD arrives in low sec, albeit extremely slowly, destroying the aggressor just like in high sec. Pvp players would be upset beyond reason. This interferes with their play style. Without a doubt a lot of low sec residents would leave EVE for greener pvp pastures.
As for bots. Bots will always exist. Paraphrasing another poster: a new command will get added to the bot's script to warp away when a non-blue jumps in their belt. Ice would continue to be harvested by bots in low sec. With their constant activity they would more than make back any losses they could suffer. Basically, moving ice to low/null sec would lower the profit margin of being a bot a little. "A little": I'm using that vague term because the loss of profit is so small that it's not easily measured. |

SC0T1SH WARRIOR
Zero For 0wned
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 01:43:00 -
[72] - Quote
As a person who spends the majority of their time in highsec and watching the same numbered ALTs go back and forth, back and forth to Ice belts in Mackinaws, Orcas and pods. i personally think everywhere in Eve should be like nullsec.
Us highsec people have it too easy, for too long have people cowered behind concord protection in the hopes that you can go read a book while you set your char to do the most menial job in the game..
No chance, if there was no concord protection, if everyone lived in a null type system, then that would mean people would have to work together, bigger corps using game mechanics to take care of their industrial wings, protected mining ops with the constant threat of a drop. NEEDING other players to take care of the corp/alliance income, dedicated pvp wings escorting indys to a well scouted system and deploying in the hopes all goes well.
The prices for everything would rise that is true, but so would the rewards. if you had to be alive and awake to actually go out into space and (heaven forbid) watch what is happening then you would feel like you accomplished something when your fleet of industrialists clear out a belt or fill up enough ice to make profit/fuel everything, while your intel channels and scouts have done their job well and you can pack up that rorq and gtfo back home.
if you people dont want to play together, and you only want the easy ISK then you're doing it wrong. the whole concept of "eve is real" should be knowing that at any time, you may be attacked for your goods, just as you are in real life.
And again, i spend a lot of time in highsec, and even when i first started in eve and learned of concord, i thought it was too easy.
this is not WoW, new players should have to learn how to survive if they want to survive. and if they cant do that, then they shouldn't be playing. Dont mind me, -ájust touching your stuff. |

Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
139
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 10:47:00 -
[73] - Quote
SC0T1SH WARRIOR wrote:As a person who spends the majority of their time in highsec and watching the same numbered ALTs go back and forth, back and forth to Ice belts in Mackinaws, Orcas and pods. i personally think everywhere in Eve should be like nullsec.
Us highsec people have it too easy, for too long have people cowered behind concord protection in the hopes that you can go read a book while you set your char to do the most menial job in the game..
No chance, if there was no concord protection, if everyone lived in a null type system, then that would mean people would have to work together, bigger corps using game mechanics to take care of their industrial wings, protected mining ops with the constant threat of a drop. NEEDING other players to take care of the corp/alliance income, dedicated pvp wings escorting indys to a well scouted system and deploying in the hopes all goes well.
The prices for everything would rise that is true, but so would the rewards. if you had to be alive and awake to actually go out into space and (heaven forbid) watch what is happening then you would feel like you accomplished something when your fleet of industrialists clear out a belt or fill up enough ice to make profit/fuel everything, while your intel channels and scouts have done their job well and you can pack up that rorq and gtfo back home.
if you people dont want to play together, and you only want the easy ISK then you're doing it wrong. the whole concept of "eve is real" should be knowing that at any time, you may be attacked for your goods, just as you are in real life.
And again, i spend a lot of time in highsec, and even when i first started in eve and learned of concord, i thought it was too easy.
this is not WoW, new players should have to learn how to survive if they want to survive. and if they cant do that, then they shouldn't be playing. This guy gets it. Nice post.
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
166
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 13:14:00 -
[74] - Quote
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:SC0T1SH WARRIOR wrote:... self-righteous crap... This guy gets it. Nice post.
No he doesn't. It's a small minded post that fails completely to fully consider the ripple effects this has on the entire game. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Emma Royd
Maddled Gommerils
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 05:06:00 -
[75] - Quote
SC0T1SH WARRIOR wrote:As a person who spends the majority of their time in highsec and watching the same numbered ALTs go back and forth, back and forth to Ice belts in Mackinaws, Orcas and pods. i personally think everywhere in Eve should be like nullsec.
this is not WoW, new players should have to learn how to survive if they want to survive. and if they cant do that, then they shouldn't be playing.
So why aren't you in nullsec the majority of times if you want everywhere to be like it?
you clearly fail to grasp the whole idea of nullsec / lowsec / highsec.
Highsec is safe(ish) where new players can find their feet, carebears can reside, and I guess the vast majority of industry takes place. Lowsec is the borderzone, there's still penalties for shooting other players, concord moves around with 1 eye closed. Nullsec is anything goes, no police, no rules, no nothing, everybody non-corp/alliance is out to kill you.
What do you think would happen if they scrapped the whole sec system and made everywhere lawless?
For the short term, the 'leet pvpers' who gank empire carebears would be lulzing, targets everywhere with no repercussions - that is until they run out of ships to fly as they get ganked by slightly more leet pvpers.
Most Industry would collapse as mining would stop in empire, who's going to risk mining in hulks knowing there's gangs of gankers flying around all the time just waiting to fire on pretty defenceless ships? Maybe eventually some industry would start again small scale, but prices would be astronomical as there would be far more demand for ships, modules etc.
New players on the trial would get killed a few times and quit, leaving an ageing population of bitter vets, subscriber numbers would go down, and ccp would either have to put prices up, or start the microtransactions to get cash in. - You want a battleship sir? hmm, yes we have this apoc in, yours for $-ú30.00
Existing players who don't want the hassles of nullsec and lowsec would also quit, getting bored of being ganked by everyone.
Sec system works as it is, the rewards for living in them could maybe do with some adjustment, increase the rewards for living in lowsec, and there's already plenty of rewards for living in nullsec.
I've lived in all 3 for substantial periods of time, and now I prefer empire, it suits my game play at this time.
|

Alikchi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 05:45:00 -
[76] - Quote
I think CCP should remove ice from space altogether and sell Oxygen Isotopes for aurum. This is the best solution |

Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
163
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 07:32:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Skunk Gracklaw wrote:SC0T1SH WARRIOR wrote:... self-righteous crap... This guy gets it. Nice post. No he doesn't. It's a small minded post that fails completely to fully consider the ripple effects this has on the entire game. That's hilarious coming from the guy who only considers game mechanics from the pov of a wh resident. Leave your hole every once in a while...there's a whole big game world out there.
|

SC0T1SH WARRIOR
Zero For 0wned
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 10:06:00 -
[78] - Quote
Emma Royd wrote:So why aren't you in nullsec the majority of times if you want everywhere to be like it?
because there is plenty of people who do still think of highsec as safe so they risk their shiny ships daily, and i like to relieve them of that burden.
88% of Eve is in highsec which means more targets. so i stay where the money is.
i am not adverse to moving to null, but i wont go blindly into it until i am self sufficient enough or can provide something to a corp/alliance to justify my move.
Emma Royd wrote:What do you think would happen if they scrapped the whole sec system and made everywhere lawless?
more people would have to work together to make what they have secure, you would learn to fit your ships better, you would learn to use the parts of the game that only the lawless use. it surprises me how many people dont know how to make safespots or even use the DSCAN. they dont understand manual flight, burning out of range, baiting, and i am not talking about brand new people i am talking about people who have played the game much longer than i have and they have never used them because they dont have to, they think if they want to undock in their shiny ships, if any "bad person" comes along then concord will protect them.
you will never learn to protect yourself if you dont have to. Dont mind me, -ájust touching your stuff. |

Alice Saki
Ducklings
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 10:13:00 -
[79] - Quote
Erm... the Game needs the Ripple.... Lol. http://tinyurl.com/RifterDeath
My Rifter Adventure in Null |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
178
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 13:34:00 -
[80] - Quote
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:Ingvar Angst wrote:Skunk Gracklaw wrote:SC0T1SH WARRIOR wrote:... self-righteous crap... This guy gets it. Nice post. No he doesn't. It's a small minded post that fails completely to fully consider the ripple effects this has on the entire game. That's hilarious coming from the guy who only considers game mechanics from the pov of a wh resident. Leave your hole every once in a while...there's a whole big game world out there.
Someone needs to add that perspective, and I'm not seeing enough others willing to do so. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Emma Royd
Maddled Gommerils
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 15:45:00 -
[81] - Quote
Freaking forum ate my post I'm sick of this forum, I spent ages comprising a reply, and it's disappeared, I should have ctrl+c'd it but meh.
Basically, there's no rationale for removing sec status, otherwise CCP would have done it already, but they know where their bread is buttered. They know that if they removed it, they'd lose loads of subscribers as the majority of players live in empire (hell, there's probably more in jita than in a lot of 0.0 regions )
You could tank a mack, but with no police there's no point, once you're scrammed you're screwed.
D-Scan is useless, it reports what the scan picked up at that time, so the cloaky ship, sat next to you won't show and unless you're watching the screen 100% of the time, you'll probably miss the 5-10 seconds it takes to uncloak, lock and scram you while his mate comes in and kills you.
Safespots are useless, unless you know you're going to get attacked, you can't warp off. It's not like exhumers are agile ships, even if you're aligned They still take time to get up to warp speed.
People will get bored of replacing ships and not being able to earn a honest buck, so will quit.
If you're going to make everything nullsec, remove local, and make it a giant free for all.
Death to all botters and macroers, ccp should spend more time working out how to stop them.
erm, I think that was about it, in a condensed form. |

Mal Nina
The Red Circle Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 18:20:00 -
[82] - Quote
If you really want Ice removed from Hisec then it should be added to WH space. I mean why not... why not have a grav field with ice in it?
For those complaining about bots - they exist is null as well so this would do nothing to change that. If you want to solve some of the botting just remove local from null. I have yet to see bots in WH space...maybe there is a reason But I strongly suspect all the null sec alliances would cry about that... afterall none of them bot anything.
|

Angelo Doelman
Bacon Diplomacy Project
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 23:50:00 -
[83] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:**** wits that are carrying on about the market mine the ice urself ,i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums :
1: i pay 260+ dollars a year for this game and the last time i payed my sub i never ticked any box that siad all my time a sp invested in ice mining to fuel my pos are now going to be wasted becuase ice is going to low sec or WH`s .
Here is your legal opinion (courtesy of a game lawyer who gave a presentation on this at Eve Vegas 2011): You pay CCP for game time. In fact CCP makes it VERY clear you are simply purchasing TIME and nothing else. (Read the fine print for the terms of service.)
Since TIME is all you purchase, an often used example of threatening to sue a game maker is: if your ship gets ganked in highsec and you cry that you are going to sue CCP for allowing your uber leet pee vee eee nightmare to be ganked.. youGÇÖll get laughed out of court because CCP will say GÇ£we provided you your time in the game. The fact that you were logged into the game and were flying it when it was ganked is proof enough.GÇ¥ And that will be the end of it.
Same will go if they move all ice out of highsec. TheyGÇÖre still haven't stopped providing you your paid for time in the game world.
So. Good luck.
|

Orion Auros
Quantum Flux Industries Nostradamus Effect
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 16:33:00 -
[84] - Quote
Angelo Doelman wrote:OSGOD wrote:**** wits that are carrying on about the market mine the ice urself ,i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums :
1: i pay 260+ dollars a year for this game and the last time i payed my sub i never ticked any box that siad all my time a sp invested in ice mining to fuel my pos are now going to be wasted becuase ice is going to low sec or WH`s .
Here is your legal opinion (courtesy of a game lawyer who gave a presentation on this at Eve Vegas 2011): You pay CCP for game time. In fact CCP makes it VERY clear you are simply purchasing TIME and nothing else. (Read the fine print for the terms of service.) Since TIME is all you purchase, an often used example of threatening to sue a game maker is: if your ship gets ganked in highsec and you cry that you are going to sue CCP for allowing your uber leet pee vee eee nightmare to be ganked.. youGÇÖll get laughed out of court because CCP will say GÇ£we provided you your time in the game. The fact that you were logged into the game and were flying it when it was ganked is proof enough.GÇ¥ And that will be the end of it. Same will go if they move all ice out of highsec. TheyGÇÖre still haven't stopped providing you your paid for time in the game world. So. Good luck.
To add to this. The EVE Online Terms of Service state the following:
"CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED.
THESE RULES MAY BE REVISED AT ANY TIME. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW THEM OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES, POLICIES AND AGREEMENTS DESIGNATED BY CCP.
BY SUBSCRIBING TO EVE ONLINE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU ARE AT LEAST 18 YEARS OF AGE.
YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU AGREE TO THESE RULES AND WILL ABIDE BY THEM."
Here is a link to said Terms of Service.
Though I don't think it would be a good idea to move Ice to Null, I believe that your post is nothing more than whining. Please read the fine print of what you're agreeing to before you start threatening. |

Flurk Hellbron
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 00:33:00 -
[85] - Quote
Hmmmmm.....
Leave the ice belts where they are, but make it less possible for them botters. First, make them ice roids deplete like all other ore-roids. The way it is now, you can mine te same rock for years. I don't think I ever saw a bot miner in a ore belt mining veldspar or scordite. Second, make the complete belt show up after downtime on another spot in the system or random in a few systems next to each other, real miners will search the belt. Botters will get problems with their programs. Third, although I'm not mining 23/7, I'm almost every day a bit of time in a ice belt. But the hour varies due to my irl job. But still I see always a number of the same names in their Mack's/orca's. Usually they don't respond when I type in Local. I guess CCP can have people of their own to search it out who them are. That's not my job, don't have the right tools.
Taking ice to Null / low should be a wrong way to deal with bot miners. But maybe there are other reasons why they would change this ice mining thing? I guess a good part of the bot miners do this for a nice income to buy their plex aka play time............. |

Jiska Ensa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 00:51:00 -
[86] - Quote
Quote: i have a lot isk and time in skills invested in mining ice for my POS
Well, at the very least... Exhumers V - 1,280,000 Mining Barge V - 1,024,000 Astrogeology V - 768,000 Mining V - 256,000 Ice Harvesting V - 256,000
For the sake of your arguement, assume: Hydromagnetic Physics IV - 226,000 Refining V - 256,000 Refinery Efficiency V - 768,000 Ice Processing V - 1,280,000 (why?) Cybernetics V - 768,000
Total skill points: 6,882,000
I've got more than that in Gunnery alone and I can barely hit anything.
Right. Real lot invested there, isn't it. Especially since none of those skills (at all, not even just two out of the bunch!) can be used in other areas of gameplay... |

Owho
Playing God Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 11:54:00 -
[87] - Quote
I don't mine and I perfer to kill miners, but removing ice from hi-sec will only make CCP lose subs. All CCP needs to do is add a mini game to ice minning. Like having to adjust the mining beams modulation to get full yield. Make the game be something that is random so botters will not be able to just record mouse movements and clicks or sniff pixles. The fix wouldn't completely stop botting as they could ignore the mini game for less yield. CCP could also make it so if you fail you take damage to your miners so in the very least the botters would have to repair every so often making Ice even less profitable. This would also make the whole idea of ice mining a little more enjoyable as you would have something to do for the 10 min cycle. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
36
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 13:20:00 -
[88] - Quote
Jiska Ensa wrote:Quote: i have a lot isk and time in skills invested in mining ice for my POS Well, at the very least... Exhumers V - 1,280,000 Mining Barge V - 1,024,000 Astrogeology V - 768,000 Mining V - 256,000 Ice Harvesting V - 256,000 For the sake of your arguement, assume: Hydromagnetic Physics IV - 226,000 Refining V - 256,000 Refinery Efficiency V - 768,000 Ice Processing V - 1,280,000 (why?) Cybernetics V - 768,000 Total skill points: 6,882,000 I've got more than that in Gunnery alone and I can barely hit anything. Right. Real lot invested there, isn't it. Especially since none of those skills (at all, not even just two out of the bunch!) can be used in other areas of gameplay...
point of interest -- Hydromagnetic Physics is used in T2 stuff, but otherwise yeah, nothing can be used outside of mining (and/or industry in the case of refining skills) |

Chief Guns
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 14:47:00 -
[89] - Quote
Continuing the mini-game idea, why not tie ice mining with probing mechanics?
Keep ice in high-sec but make ice belts a type of mag site. These sites would spawn in the same ice constellations as today and would have a limited amount of ice, respawning in another system in the same constellation once depleted. The sites would be guarded by moderately strong npc's that respawn but have a 5 minute aggro timer. While this is not a foolproof solution to the bot problem (I'll leave it to you to come up with ways for bot handlers to bypass this) it would skew things more in favor of the human player.
To spice things up a bit, low-sec and null-sec fixed ice belts could be kept as is and these ice mag sites made exclusive to high-sec. The backstory justification could be that all the known high-sec ice belts were long depleted and only scattered ice fields remain to be exploited by those who can find them. Since low and null have yet to be tapped, fixed ice belts are still available. |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
479
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 16:30:00 -
[90] - Quote
Chief Guns wrote:Continuing the mini-game idea, why not tie ice mining with probing mechanics?
Keep ice in high-sec but make ice belts a type of mag site. These sites would spawn in the same ice constellations as today and would have a limited amount of ice, respawning in another system in the same constellation once depleted. The sites would be guarded by moderately strong npc's that respawn but have a 5 minute aggro timer. While this is not a foolproof solution to the bot problem (I'll leave it to you to come up with ways for bot handlers to bypass this) it would skew things more in favor of the human player.
To spice things up a bit, low-sec and null-sec fixed ice belts could be kept as is and these ice mag sites made exclusive to high-sec. The backstory justification could be that all the known high-sec ice belts were long depleted and only scattered ice fields remain to be exploited by those who can find them. Since low and null have yet to be tapped, fixed ice belts are still available.
You're forgetting what the stated intent was with regards to taking ice our of high sec... to get more people into null space. Changing how ice is harvested in high has nothing to do with that... that's not the perceived problem. The perceived problem is not enough people in null, and the imagined solution was "resource redistribution" in order to get people into null. Of course, they forget that people are in null becauase they want to be and in high because they want to be. Taking away ice won't make null attractive to those with no desire to go there. They'll either do something else or quit. Then when pos fuel supply crashes taking the economy with it... well, it won't be good for subscriptions. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 18:34:00 -
[91] - Quote
Emma Royd wrote:Freaking forum ate my post  I'm sick of this forum, I spent ages comprising a reply, and it's disappeared, I should have ctrl+c'd it but meh..
that's why I always use notepad to type out my post now.. I'll clean it up in the forum edit.. but the forums have just eaten my posts too many times. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 18:36:00 -
[92] - Quote
Chief Guns wrote: Keep ice in high-sec but make ice belts a type of mag site. .
Mag site? shouldn't they be grav sites? [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

Wind Slave
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 13:49:00 -
[93] - Quote
I see a lot of i***ts that use the expression "carebear tears"... but hey, this game is full of not so bright ppl...
Some (I don't really think so...) miners in 0.0 would make some money out of this.. but 0.0 Alliances are not built around mining, and will probably never be. They might rent the system, but they will definitively not protect it properly therefore most of the carebears that would or will move to 0.0 will move back to high sec and do something else.
Mining Ice in 0.0 or low sec is expensive and risky, most of the miners will not find that interesting Moving Ice out of 0.0 is pretty hard due to the m3... A jump freighter is not really useful for doing that due to the low capacity. These all will result in an undeserved market and prices will double or triple or more. (just look at what effect goons had with their campaign against ice miners in Gallente systems, prices doubled over night)
All of the above will result in much higher prices for T2. I'm not ice mining, but, I'm producing T2 stuff. I need an POS to do inventions, manufacturing, copying and so in. If the prices of ice will go up... I will have to pay more to keep my POS running in order to produce the goods (and everyone will).
The math would be (in my opinion) like this: At best, 1/3 of the miners will move to low sec or 0.0.. that will happen slowly, probably we will reach that in 6 months or so.. So, because of the above we might see a price at around 1500 per isotope.
Then consumtion... a lot of ice is needed in 0.0 and low sec, and it will stay there... probably 1/3 of the total ice is used in 0.0... so.. another 3-400 isk to the price resulting in a price per isotope of around 1800.
Then logistics.. not many people can afford of have the skills for jump freighters.. moving ice will have a significant cost attached to it. Let's say another 30%-40%, also due to the unavailability of so many jump freighters and pilots that can use them. Price: 2520 per isotope.. and this is once the market is rather stable..
Risk: moving ice out of 0.0 or low sec is risky.. some ice might be lost... due to ships destroyed... that can add another 10%.. resulting in something around 2800 isk per isotope.
Now, moving back to T2 prices... they will rise due to several factors: - More expensive to produce T2 Inventions and then manufacturing (manufacturing lines at stations are not enough and are not efficient) (an increase of about 100% in manufacturing costs, not all costs) - more expensive to mine T2 materials (an increase in material costs... don;t know, maybe a lot more than 100%... since the main price driver for t2 materials is POS fuel) - impact in logistics of moving t2 materials out of 0.0... basically capacity will be decreased due to people moving ice out..
and you can fill in the blanks... I'm getting bored of writing this now..
The conclusion, this simple change might impact EVE's economy severely and will impact everyone, not just carebears... also the frustrated guys that always use the expression "carebear tears".. use you're brain for a while and think... |

Sephiroth CloneIIV
Vitriol Ventures BLACK-MARK
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 20:14:00 -
[94] - Quote
This won't necessarily help nullsec people either, sure each would be part of a monopoy of one ice type, but who holds all the others?
Also the low number of static ice belts in NPC space will be permacamped 24/7, no other way around it. Minning ores in lowsec in belts is a cakewalk compared with ice.
Ice prices go rocketing. Evidence, gooncusion in gallente space. Now imagine that long term, every space.
Though..... would make using capitals and POS more expensive be good or bad?
If they remove it from highsec then they really need newer less static sources, im willing to trade using limitless resources in one spot for multiple safer spots that deplete over time.
It would change allot of things, it would create chaos. It wouldn't make the game boring encouraging less bots for key resources.
|

Ryllic Sin
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:50:00 -
[95] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote: You're forgetting what the stated intent was with regards to taking ice our of high sec... to get more people into null space. Changing how ice is harvested in high has nothing to do with that... that's not the perceived problem. The perceived problem is not enough people in null, and the imagined solution was "resource redistribution" in order to get people into null. Of course, they forget that people are in null because they want to be and in high because they want to be. Taking away ice won't make null attractive to those with no desire to go there. They'll either do something else or quit.
Exactly. It doesn't appear to of been thought through at all.
There is a thread somewhere that bascially asks why people mine when it earns relatively little in ISK, the answers were along the lines of:
- It fitted in with peoples RL when they couldn't give full attention to the game. - It is a great activity if they want to chat.
Moving the Ice is not going to move miners, as it basically ruins their playstyle, so most will either mine something else, do something else in hi-sec or most likely quit, and with Skyrim, SWTOR, BF3, etc they are already enough reasons to quit, they don't need another reason.
Nor will is solve the bot problem as bots are not restricted to hi-sec, despite what certain hypocrites who are members of alliances that run bots or rent out space to botters would have people believe. |

Soldarius
Peek-A-Boo Bombers
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:25:00 -
[96] - Quote
My cup o' tears runneth over. "How do you kill that which has no life?" |

Shadow Lord77
Shadow Industries I
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:17:00 -
[97] - Quote
Removing ice from high-sec would just make low-sec more interesting and low-sec ice mining corporations would become visible.
Why do you not want Ice fields moved to Low-sec? Forget botting; It's just not good for the game. |

DigDoug
Amber Lamps Labs IMPERIAL LEGI0N
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 01:01:00 -
[98] - Quote
The part that annoys me to no end is this whole CCP is trying to get people into Null Sec. They should trade mark that instead of "Coming Soon", as it has been pushed and pushed and used as a justification for changes (enacted and merely suggested since 2003).
I live in Null Sec. I have operations in High Sec and I travel between the two worlds consistently. I say this so that my viewpoint isn't misconstrued as a coming from someone who wishes to only live in highsec and be left alone.
That being said, letGÇÖs take a look at the whole "Trying to get more people into Null Sec".
The assumption implied by this statement is that there are not enough people in Null Sec. I challenge the validity of that statement. I challenge it because the term 'enough' is relative, i.e., in the eye of the beholder. From my perspective and point of view, there are plenty of people in Null Sec. In fact, sometimes I wish they'd go away. You may think that from your point of view there aren't enough, and it's valid, nobody can prove you wrong because quite simply, "enough" isn't a tangible variable that can be defined.
My real angst at this over the years is that I do not like it when people I pay money to attempt to make me do something. I pay money, I choose what I do, and if anything, CCP should respond to my wants and desires, not the other way around. I don't pay for Eve Online so that the developer and push me into playing the game in a way I do not want to play the game. After all, is this a sandbox or is it not a sandbox. You can't be 'sort of' in terms of being a sandbox. You are, or you aren't. Right now they're a sandbox with a giant cat turd in the middle of it. They like to throw the term around and use it to define Eve, but in actuality, what is sand boxy about pushing people into Null Sec. I went into Null Sec when *I* wanted to go there, not because of some change CCG made. Trying to make your customer do something you want them to do is an inherently flawed and eventually doomed business model.
What this reminds me of are those people who have to talk bad about someone else in an attempt to make themselves look better. In much the same way CCP seems to think they have to take something away from High Sec in order to make Null Sec more appealing. To operate in this way is in essence just laziness. Basically, they can't be bothered to invent new Null Sec specific activities, so instead they tinker around with the idea of taking things from somewhere else.
What is really sad about this kind of thinking is that it is pervasive at CCP and you can see the effects of it in their oft championed 'Winter Expansion'. Look at the super cap nerf. It's just being lazy. You don't have to nerf Super Capitals. Instead, be creative, inventive. Add to our options to deal with things that have been shown to be unbalanced, don't limit what is already in place.
The other thing that is sad is that this post which attempts to convey something meaningful to CCP, in the end is pointless and will amount to absolutely nothing as it is lost in the shuffle, dismissed, critiqued and ultimately flamed without ever really being read by anyone at CCP with an open mind. Just like thousands of other forum posts. And they can't figure out why a lot of us are angry. It's a mystery.
|

Red Teufel
Eternity Inc
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 01:53:00 -
[99] - Quote
lremember if you buy a plex it's because someone bought it with money and put it on the market. if everyone was buying plex with isk then there wouldn't be very many plexes on sale. so in other words someone else is just paying your subscription fee. ccp isn't taking a hit at all or gaining anything by removing ice from high sec. infact it will give you ice miners more profit. |

Brisco County
The Shadow Plague Gentlemen's Agreement
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 05:39:00 -
[100] - Quote
I hope to god they go through with removing ice from high-sec.
Now they just need to nerf drone poo and mission loot reprocessing and I MIGHT actually mine something. |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 15:22:00 -
[101] - Quote
The only reason ICE products are so cheap is because they can be easily mined, even afk mined in high sec. Moving all ice to low/null will drive prices way up as there will no longer be anywhere near enough ice products to support the number of POSes in the game.
For those of you who think this is a good idea, give your head a shake. There are many PVP null sec corps that buy ice in high sec to fuel their POSes. A lagre POS uses a butt load of ICE products per month. If ICE was removed from high sec than all the Null sec PVP corps with POSes will either have to start mining their own ice or hire indy corp to come do it for them. either way it will cut into there PVP roaming time.
Mine your own ice in Null, or learn to live without POSes. At the current prices you can easily spend 2-300 mil per month on buying ice products to maintain a large POS if you do not mine them yourself. if ice is removed from high sec that price will go up at least 10 times. more likely 20-30 times. How many players will continue to maintain POSes producing the goods PVPers need to fight if the cost of maintaining the POS goes from a few hundred mil a month to a couple billion isk per month. Bye Bye profits and hello massive inflation of everything.
In the populated parts of high sec it is hard to find a moon that does not have a POS anchored at it. There is a massive amount of research and manufacturing done in high sec POSes. The prices of everything in game are based on the effort and isk required to manufacture it. If you you eliminate the ice that makes those high sec POSes possible, the entire game will change. ICE is the life blood of EVE. If the price of ICE goes up 20 times, it will not be long before the price of everything is up 20 times. It would be funny to see low level PVP limited to noob starter ships because nobody can afford to lose a ship they actually had to pay for.
There is not near enough indy activity in low/null to support the entire game economy. And there never will be. Most high sec indy players will just quit, rather than try to move to null. A move like this would kill EVE. Nobody will PVP if the prices of everything built in a POS reflect the risk involved in maintaining a POS in Null sec. |

marie claude
deep space forge Silent Infinity
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:14:00 -
[102] - Quote
tbh ccp seams determined to close this game completely removing hi sec ice is just one more act of ccp bowing to the gankers bot miners dont bother me i applaud the ingenuity it takes to write and run it. the nerf will drive the price of ice sky high wich will shut down many hi sec pos more than a few low sec ones drive the price of items that are pos only made back up or just wreck them for profit |

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 04:12:00 -
[103] - Quote
Oh my god, I thought whine threads like this were reserved for GD and C&P.
I have more places to troll now! |

Via Shivon
Kriegsmarinewerft Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 10:58:00 -
[104] - Quote
marie claude wrote:tbh ccp seams determined to close this game completely removing hi sec ice is just one more act of ccp bowing to the gankers bot miners dont bother me i applaud the ingenuity it takes to write and run it. the nerf will drive the price of ice sky high wich will shut down many hi sec pos more than a few low sec ones drive the price of items that are pos only made back up or just wreck them for profit
yeah you can get 100m per/h in high sec and 300m per pos is to expensive? lol
who said ccp will remove ice from high sec? |

Jurinak
Copy Hunter's Conglomerate
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 11:46:00 -
[105] - Quote
Via Shivon wrote:marie claude wrote:tbh ccp seams determined to close this game completely removing hi sec ice is just one more act of ccp bowing to the gankers bot miners dont bother me i applaud the ingenuity it takes to write and run it. the nerf will drive the price of ice sky high wich will shut down many hi sec pos more than a few low sec ones drive the price of items that are pos only made back up or just wreck them for profit yeah you can get 100m per/h in high sec and 300m per pos is to expensive? lol who said ccp will remove ice from high sec?
there was a brainstorming about what to do with Eve in the future, but nothing more then that. And thats it no more then 10% of a brainstorming come into the final product so no worries, the thread is senseless
|

Via Shivon
Kriegsmarinewerft Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 12:35:00 -
[106] - Quote
Jurinak wrote:Via Shivon wrote:marie claude wrote:tbh ccp seams determined to close this game completely removing hi sec ice is just one more act of ccp bowing to the gankers bot miners dont bother me i applaud the ingenuity it takes to write and run it. the nerf will drive the price of ice sky high wich will shut down many hi sec pos more than a few low sec ones drive the price of items that are pos only made back up or just wreck them for profit yeah you can get 100m per/h in high sec and 300m per pos is to expensive? lol who said ccp will remove ice from high sec? there was a brainstorming about what to do with Eve in the future, but nothing more then that. And thats it no more then 10% of a brainstorming come into the final product so no worries, the thread is senseless
a i remember this black(white)board ^^ |

Dele Anneto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 13:59:00 -
[107] - Quote
Alikchi wrote:I think CCP should remove ice from space altogether and sell Oxygen Isotopes for aurum. This is the best solution
/thread |

Party Lips
Blackened Skies
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 14:49:00 -
[108] - Quote
I think this is a wonderfull idea removing ice from high sec. it makes mining in 0.0 / low sec more relevant and rewarding. this will by no means kill the game but actually grow the eve economy. |

Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
302
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 19:06:00 -
[109] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums :
1: i pay 260+ dollars a year for this game and the last time i payed my sub i never ticked any box that siad all my time a sp invested in ice mining to fuel my pos are now going to be wasted becuase ice is going to low sec or WH`s Humour posts are the best posts.
EVE Online: Incarna - New Coke EVE Online: Winter Expansion - Coke Classic |

Xerxes Ceasar
Lone Gunmen
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 09:56:00 -
[110] - Quote
Woo Glin wrote:and then you mine ice
...and then you grief... |

Celgar Thurn
Department 10
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 14:39:00 -
[111] - Quote
Via Shivon wrote:[quote=marie claude]
who said ccp will remove ice from high sec?
I believe CCP Soundwave was the original person at CCP who put forward the idea of removing ice belts from high sec. I don't know whether anyone else from CCP seconded the idea. Nothing is shocking nowadays so I won't be surprised if CCP did go ahead with this ridiculous idea. |

Titania Hrothgar
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 23:19:00 -
[112] - Quote
I hate bots. I loathe them. I think removing ice from high sec is a wonderful idea. Want to know how to beat a bot? Park an unfriendly in their sector. The bot will hide all day... that means no money. If the player wants to earn a profit then they will have to come out and play.
Bots are like huge flags saying "come destroy me". God I hate bots. I was on the fence about ice being moved until I saw the posts about bots mining ice. That made me all for the idea.
Titania Hrothgar |

Borun Tal
One More Corp
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 23:56:00 -
[113] - Quote
OSGOD wrote:i for one will seek legal advice on this issue if it goes any further than the forums
No, you won't. You sound like just another failquitter getting read to not quit.
If one of the attorneys I work with had a client ask what you just did, he would laugh in your face, and you'd become popular as the joke of the week. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 00:30:00 -
[114] - Quote
Wow
It is amazing you can get 6 pages out of one blip from a dev brainstorming blog. To be fair they also discussed just making ice in high sec deplete like asteroid belts. (which seems the more likely change IMO)
|

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
144
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 02:15:00 -
[115] - Quote
Proof that nobody read this thread.
Waaay back on page 2, message #24...
Tau Cabalander wrote:Since this thread is really low in facts and high in alarmist BS posts: CCP Greyscale wrote:RG Sneaker wrote: Will Ice mining in hi sec end? I might just close my hi sec POS then :-( Thinking about it a bit, not sure where we're going to go. We might not change it at all, we might just make hisec belts deplete (and regen as normal) so they can roughly meet hisec demand. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1565827&page=2#55 /thread |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 08:02:00 -
[116] - Quote
Seems a mix of opinions between carebears that just want to mine in empire in peace, null sec players eager to increase their player base, and the gankers looking to continue to collect tears in low-sec.
Personally, i think removing ice from high sec is another attempt to force people from the safety of empire. Though i think its important for people to do this, by no means do i think that everyone will be interested. I think everyone knows that there is much better isk to made in low and null sec systems, but many people will simply never take the risk, because they are more than happy doing what they do in high-sec. Not everyone needs exploding ships, or more importantly, wants to see their ships exploding to the delight of the pirates.
Making ice belts deplete seems a logical solution. Prices would stablize over time to reflect the new system, and those more daring could make more profitis from mining low sec (Assuming they don't get ganked of course).
Lets face it, some people will NEVER leave empire. Accept it. Its an important part of the eve universe, and more importantly, has the most players. Drasticly effecting their little game bubble will only result in many rage-quits.
But im sure the low-sec gankers will continue to rant for new methods to force people into low and null sec. Afterall, they need that fresh supply of victims to keep themselves happy.  |

Kiree Chancel
Phantom Squad Nulli Secunda
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 03:38:00 -
[117] - Quote
...and higher prices for everything is bad why? |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:37:00 -
[118] - Quote
Brisco County wrote:I hope to god they go through with removing ice from high-sec.
Now they just need to nerf drone poo and mission loot reprocessing and I MIGHT actually mine something. Remove all ore from highsec but veldspar (basic, no 5% or 10%) and all roids from .5 to 1.0 are like 1.0. ******* terribad, but enough to keep newbs going at it. All highsec stations have their manufacturing slots removed, all researched removed (plus no BPO in station, has to be in POS now), and all stations from null to highsec take 11% after refine calculations so you will always loose something to get you to use a POS. POS is the way to go if you (BTW, bare minimum is .4 or less to anchor a POS cause "There must be MOAR RISK NAO!!!) want to make any sort of money with reprocessing (POS will refine better) , manufacture, or research. You will now be at dangerously high blood pressure level of risk and will be tied into that mother ****** 23.5/7. Enjoy it, cause you will need alot of maintence to keep up that production line and with the buff to dreads you will be set back when you loose everything.
And you wanted ice removed from highsec, lol when you forget the casual convenience without the ulcer inducing risk of null/lulsec that highsec has when it comes to a POS and why some people will mine it . Don't forget, it will kill the entire profession of ganking and some people will loose out (Goons perhaps ? ) cause they won't have much in the way for targets. |

Esunisen
Les Tueurs de Killer Une Pour Tous
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 04:58:00 -
[119] - Quote
You guys are all wrong, best way is to remove all Empire   
Now seriously, the first annoyed will be 0.0 alliances, cause they use all isotopes, don't they ? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |