Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
444
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:06:00 -
[91] - Quote
Xython wrote:Kehro Urgus wrote:Lose a hulk recently? Nah, Apostle is just a one issue wonk, hates goons and is very likely Riverini of EveNews24 posting under a sock puppet account. However, It is nice to see all these blubbering crybaby threads talking about how the big bad goonies blew up your ice miner bots, though. Keep it up, it's delicious forum pornography. ~ Your rage inspires us to greatness. ~
riverini has to get all of his rage out somewhere since he can't write it up on evenews24 heh |

Demon Azrakel
Defiant.. Narwhals Ate My Duck
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:08:00 -
[92] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Malcanis wrote: They don't have to do any mining. They just have to buy up all the available stocks and then stop anyone else mining them.
I rule out the economic argument as total BS. Alway have. Firstly, the G**N's campaign would have cost 100's of millions, if not billions of isk. The amount of ice needed to be sold to get that back would be staggering. Secondly, 0.0 POS holders will simply change towers. Sure Gallente towers have moongoo bonuses but it just means more work in the short term. Last 0.0 corp I was in we had 3 months supply on hand. Minor blip. Thus no immediate or short term market for Gallente ice. (most price changes have been speculators) Lastly, all empire POS holders can just change faction. Again, no market for Gallente ice. Other reasons? Restricting Oxy using cap fuels may have a strategic effect but only if the G**N's campaign was sustained for the long term AND they had a view to invade someone. Both is unlikely.
Billions of isk, between 6961 people as of last dotlan update. Lets assume 10 billion isk. Starting ice price is 600, selling is 900.
To make back that 10 billion, they would have had to buy 33,333,333 oxygen isotopes at a cost of 20 billion isk. I am sure that with the amount of speculation and increase in isk prices, significantly more isk worth of isotopes has been moving, allowing both the average goonie, the alliance as a whole, and much of eve that had some level of intelligence to make a killing on this.
Try again. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
468
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:10:00 -
[93] - Quote
Feligast wrote:ITT: One Empire pubbie tries to claim "ALL OF HIGH SECURITY" = Gallente ice fields. Am I close?
And I'd love to meet the guy that could plan a campaign where "10k-20k" nullsec dwellers could shut down all of Empire, cause I would KILL (ingame, ofc) to be in on that.
Maybe we should talk about this. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
444
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:12:00 -
[94] - Quote
interestingly looking at the jabber channel i think we've pretty much pulverized all resistance
day 1+2 was mostly slaughtering clueless untanked macks/hulks
between then and yesterday mostly supertanked hulks
now, it seems we're mostly killing untanked ships again, I think we're nailing the people who don't know what's going on, while everyone who knows has given up and gotten out |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
355
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:20:00 -
[95] - Quote
Demon Azrakel wrote:I am sure that with the amount of speculation and increase in isk prices, significantly more isk worth of isotopes has been moving, allowing both the average goonie, the alliance as a whole, and much of eve that had some level of intelligence to make a killing on this. I was only able to make about 250mil, because I was late, lazy and only kept it up for one eveningGǪ 
GǪthey need to do this more often and when I'm in the mood for baby-sitting market orders. It's pure griefing that they did it when I wasn't ready!! GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
468
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:21:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Demon Azrakel wrote:I am sure that with the amount of speculation and increase in isk prices, significantly more isk worth of isotopes has been moving, allowing both the average goonie, the alliance as a whole, and much of eve that had some level of intelligence to make a killing on this. I was only able to make about 250mil, because I was late, lazy and only kept it up for one eveningGǪ  GǪthey need to do this more often and when I'm in the mood for baby-sitting market orders. It's pure griefing that they did it when I wasn't ready!!
To the petition-mobile! Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Di Mulle
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:25:00 -
[97] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[quote=Demon Azrakel It's pure griefing that they did it when I wasn't ready!!
Damn, Tippia is so correct - again !
You becoming boring being so true, mate 
CCP is unable to implement simpliest things. Like settting to hide signatures. So they sweep it under a rug . Children do that in their pre-shool years, CCP does it being adults. Probably because it is fearless enough. |

PyroTech03
Legion of Darkwind Order of the Void
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:37:00 -
[98] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Puppet Mas'ter wrote:EVE Stig wrote:Malcanis wrote:I can think of no reason whatsoever that hi-sec players as a whole should be totally immune to campaigns of organised violence. In fact it would be amazing if all of 0.0 rose up and decided to kill the carebears in highsec. Arent there more in 0.0 than Empire? Theres more 0.0 space right? I endorse this idea. Maybe Mittens can pull it off when all of 0.0 is one alliance Strangely enough, you have both added to why I am concerned that there is no way to prevent this. If G**N's can do it now (regardless of how poorly executed it is), what IS to stop 0.0 alliances stomping empire into wrecks? No precedent is being (or likely to be) set insofar as establishing a ruling on it. And this remains my point of contention. Empire is NOT supposed to be a stomping ground or Thunderdome per se. If it were (as many claim it is/should be) then there would be no need for Concord and no sec status hits for aggression. There is no cry for "safety" here, just a precautionary note as to lack of action against Empire stomping. If it is allowed (and encouraged) at n degree when do we decalare it has become m degree and intolerable? When it's NOT G**N's doing it? What if all of 0.0 did decide to "muscle up"? Is it still acceptable if not even a single empire player could effectively play anywhere!? It's fine to say CCP has spoken, but if so, why do we need sov chages, cap nerfs, ad infinitum when 0.0 residents say so? They scream broken mechanics and tickety boo, it's fixed. I'm wearing an empire advocate hat and I'm asking that we need CCP to put in place measures to PREVENT Empire stomping by 0.0 alliances. A precedent needs to be set and this current "op" is a great example. The intent of Empire is NOT to smash everyone and everything into the ground. But it's happening and there is nothing to prevent it happening on a much larger scale.
That's the point....it's a sandbox and no-where is completely safe. Empire is just as much a target for anything as any other region of space. The mechanics are there to give them their sec-hits and they're willing to deal with it.
The game is PvP. Market, ships, whatever. If you don't like it, go play Wizard 101 or one of those disney MMOs.
If goons gave up sov and moved to hi-sec, does that mean they can do this now? they're still just as large as they were holding 0.0...but if we're saying that, "Null alliances can't do this!" then that would fix the problem right?
Or I can take my alliance to gallente space and kill miners and it'd be ok, cause my alliance hasn't set foot in 0.0....that would be ok by your terms.
Empire is meant to give you a little bit of "control" over your situation. Like living in a big city....you can live on the good part of town, but crime does still happen.
As for not having a counter, here's one for you.
Take your corp...go mine the Ice. Have some of your corp mine, and the other part in PvP fit ships and protect your miners. If goons come in, your PvP fit ships job is to keep them busy long enough to get the miner's out. When they aggress one member, they get aggression on the whole corp. Unless your in an NPC corp....but if that's the case then you have every reason to be alone. (Go join a corp already :D)
TL;DR This is eve. Either think of a way around the problem (my suggestion above) or avoid the problem and move somewhere else or do something different. If you don't like it, go play Hello Kitty or something...
@ All goons: Why did you do this AFTER I sold off a large portion of Oxy Iso's? :( |

0ld School
SON OF RAVANA League of Reprobates
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:54:00 -
[99] - Quote
ITT: Sweet, sweet care-bear tears. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 18:56:00 -
[100] - Quote
I want EVE to keep being a place where you can be attacked at any time within the rules of:
High Sec = You get blown up by Concord (eventually) Low Sec = You get blown up Zero Sec = You carve your own empire
Fact is, CCP cannot do much about this currently. It is the players broke it, the players voted for the current CSM, who are all Goons or PL or other "large alliance players". I don't know the current stats, but I think High Sec players still outnumber them by far and should get organized instead of whining.
Vote for a different CSM next time. Otherwise I think that what the Goons do is not "griefing". They do what the game allows them to do fairly indiscriminately against all. I do not say it is necessarily right or cool. To me it looks like simple boredom.
If they had a harder time to get the money to finance such "campaigns" they would not do them. (e.g. they were involved in one of those BIG wars we keep hearing about. ) The easier it gets for the large Alliances to make cash in 0.0 the more "campaigns" they can do.
All I ever did in Zero-Sec is get a BIG wallet. I think that is why I started a new char. ;) |
|

Admiral Sarah Solette
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 19:45:00 -
[101] - Quote
The real problem here isn't that they're blowing up mining ships. Eve is a PvP game, and so this should happen. However, there is nothing the empire players can do back to the Goons. When only one side can blow up the other side's ships, there's a problem.
If miners fight back, they lose sec status. Goons don't care about Sec status, so they don't care if they get popped by concord. The game is in the goons favor, it's a flawed mechanic. Sec status, which was intended to be a deterrent for high sec killing is now a barrier working in favor of the goons.
I'm not biased in this debate since I don't mine at all, nor have I ever been popped by another player, I'm simply pointing out a flawed and stupid game mechanic. If I could fight and defend those miners from these baboons, I would, but since I need to worry about my sec status I cannot. Something needs to change. |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
113
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 19:59:00 -
[102] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:The real problem here isn't that they're blowing up mining ships. Eve is a PvP game, and so this should happen. However, there is nothing the empire players can do back to the Goons. When only one side can blow up the other side's ships, there's a problem.
If miners fight back, they lose sec status. Goons don't care about Sec status, so they don't care if they get popped by concord. The game is in the goons favor, it's a flawed mechanic. Sec status, which was intended to be a deterrent for high sec killing is now a barrier working in favor of the goons.
I'm not biased in this debate since I don't mine at all, nor have I ever been popped by another player, I'm simply pointing out a flawed and stupid game mechanic. If I could fight and defend those miners from these baboons, I would, but since I need to worry about my sec status I cannot. Something needs to change.
Let me correct you on one point. As soon as someone attacks another player in violation of CONCORD policy, they turn blinky red to everyone until CONCORD blows them up. Being blinky red means you can be attacked WITHOUT SEC STATUS PENALTY by ANYONE. So no, defending miners, and them fighting back, does not cost sec status.
Preemptively attacking a player with a higher than -5 status will, though.
Now that you've been proven wrong, care to amend your call for change there? |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:03:00 -
[103] - Quote
they could come to 0.0, where they don't lose sec status
oh, they don't want to?
i see, the problem is they're unwilling to, not they cant |

Admiral Sarah Solette
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:04:00 -
[104] - Quote
Nope, I shouldn't have to wait for them to fire on a miner to defend them. The game is still playing in the goons favor.
And I suppose they could o to low sec... but then again not everyone is a war mongering buffoon looking to get into a fight. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:04:00 -
[105] - Quote
they could wardec us?
oh, they don't want to do that cause they'll get pulverized?
see above |

Admiral Sarah Solette
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:05:00 -
[106] - Quote
War deccing costs money, and I shouldn't have to pull my entire corp into something they don't want to do. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
468
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:13:00 -
[107] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Nope, I shouldn't have to wait for them to fire on a miner to defend them. The game is still playing in the goons favor.
And I suppose they could o to low sec... but then again not everyone is a war mongering buffoon looking to get into a fight.
Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Admiral Sarah Solette
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:14:00 -
[108] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
I wish, then they biomass/move them to low sec and start another alt. =X |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:15:00 -
[109] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:War deccing costs money, and I shouldn't have to pull my entire corp into something they don't want to do. so basically its too hard so you want to quit
that's fine don't see the problem |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:15:00 -
[110] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Malcanis wrote: Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
I wish, then they biomass/move them to low sec and start another alt. =X
please peasant weaselior is -10 and still ganking your ass |
|

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:16:00 -
[111] - Quote
you know what else costs money? suicide ganking |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
468
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:17:00 -
[112] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Malcanis wrote: Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
I wish, then they biomass/move them to low sec and start another alt. =X
Your ignorance pains me.
I am petitioning you for griefing. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:17:00 -
[113] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Nope, I shouldn't have to wait for them to fire on a miner to defend them. The game is still playing in the goons favor.
And I suppose they could o to low sec... but then again not everyone is a war mongering buffoon looking to get into a fight.
So you're saying... you should be able to gank anyone, without losing sec status, in hisec, at any time, just because you don't like them?
I agree!! 
|

Admiral Sarah Solette
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:19:00 -
[114] - Quote
There's this thing called an edit button, or are you too stupid to use it? Oh.... right... Goon.
And no I don't want to quit, this stupid grief war the goons are doing has no effect whatsoever on me. I just want to defend those who can't defend themselves.
And lol, fitting T1 ships costs money? XD Pocket change.
Arguing with you dumb asses is pointless, it sucks that not even simple concepts can be grasped by you. So go ahead and act like pussies fighting against those who can't fight back. I'll be sure to look into you Weas. |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:20:00 -
[115] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:The real problem here isn't that they're blowing up mining ships. Eve is a PvP game, and so this should happen. However, there is nothing the empire players can do back to the Goons. When only one side can blow up the other side's ships, there's a problem.
If miners fight back, they lose sec status. Goons don't care about Sec status, so they don't care if they get popped by concord. The game is in the goons favor, it's a flawed mechanic. Sec status, which was intended to be a deterrent for high sec killing is now a barrier working in favor of the goons.
I'm not biased in this debate since I don't mine at all, nor have I ever been popped by another player, I'm simply pointing out a flawed and stupid game mechanic. If I could fight and defend those miners from these baboons, I would, but since I need to worry about my sec status I cannot. Something needs to change.
Yeah, remove CONCORD. All they do is protect the criminals anyways
lol why dont the goons war dec them? Thatd be a funny thought for all the high sec carebears crapping their pants at the sight of THAT mail "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

Basileus Volkan
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:21:00 -
[116] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Malcanis wrote: Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
I wish, then they biomass/move them to low sec and start another alt. =X
That isn't even needed. So far we have met laughably little resistance, which only goes to show how soft Empire dwellers are.
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
361
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:24:00 -
[117] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Malcanis wrote: Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
I wish, then they biomass/move them to low sec and start another alt. =X
'Tis true that CCP, in my experience, is somewhat lacking in enforcement of it's alt recycling rule.
I have gotten players bragging to me on my girlie characters (astounding how dumb little boys are) about their abuse of this rule. Including letting me watch and giving me the names of their mains.
I forward the chat logs to CCP and nada.
Mr Epeen 
If you can read this, you haven't blocked me yet. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:25:00 -
[118] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:There's this thing called an edit button, or are you too stupid to use it? Oh.... right... Goon.
And no I don't want to quit, this stupid grief war the goons are doing has no effect whatsoever on me. I just want to defend those who can't defend themselves.
And lol, fitting T1 ships costs money? XD Pocket change.
Arguing with you dumb asses is pointless, it sucks that not even simple concepts can be grasped by you. So go ahead and act like pussies fighting against those who can't fight back. I'll be sure to look into you Weas. why do worthless pubbies think we care about their opinions |

EVE Stig
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:25:00 -
[119] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Malcanis wrote: Once the gankers drop below -5.0 they can be attacked with impunity by anyone at any time.
I wish, then they biomass/move them to low sec and start another alt. =X
If you have proof of this petotion it that actually is an exploit, or it was during Hulkageddon, I remember seeing blues saying as much "Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"! |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:26:00 -
[120] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Arguing with you dumb asses is pointless, it sucks that not even simple concepts can be grasped by me. So I'll go ahead quit posting like a ***** who can't be bothered to work, just wants the game changed when I don't like it. I'll be sure to look into you Weas.
Translated that.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |