Not sure I follow. You are saying you can have a voice chat in ever other channel, just not... not which ones? Or do you mean the voice chat does not work but other forms of communication like text chat and EVE mail do work?

and who's fault is that? Not CCP's for your lack of research. Hell I have only been playing EVE now for almost 2 months and I know more about DUST 514 and EVE than most season vets because of one of the many things people fail to do......research. Try it some time.

Hey CCP FoxFour, I prettied up your Bunny NPC table... wasn't sure of each corp's empire affiliation so I used the station they were housed in... You might give it a gander and see how you like it (and check it for accuracy).

Hello. Umm apparently when a Dust player is add to a corp. The dust player brings in a 0 standing to everything the corp is in standing with. Even though their isnt a standing system with Dust players. Can you please make Dust members N/A for standing and not count towards equal member of a corp so that the dust player doesnt bring down the standing average.

*** Sorry i'm french and I've not read the text I posted a second time ... So

Dust players and Eve Players can chat via text in communication channels created by both Eve Online players and Dust 514 players even in Corporation Communication Channel (Corp).
Dust players and Eve Players can have a Eve Voice/PS Voice conversation via Microphone and headphone in communication channels created by both Eve Online players and Dust 514 players.

BUT

Dust players and Eve Players cannot have a Eve Voice/PS Voice conversation via Microphone and headphone in Corporation Communication Channels (Corp Chan), even if Eve online client is perfectly set and Dust client have a TVU.

I have been looking everywhere, and I have found some forum posts but nothing official. If I missed something I appologise.

We want to start adding our bunnies to our eve corp, but we require a api key to do so to work within our ecm system. I have seen information saying that dust uses a crest api system but I cant find anything anywhere about where someone can get there crest api from. Is this something that is not implimented yet, or am i missing something, or does dust not have a api system at all ?

I appologise for wasting your time on something like this, but thanks for the work on the dust system and look forward to shooting them at some time soon.

Oh and also, is there a timeframe in ccp's mind to when dust will effect fw sov, or is it too early to have a rough idea ? Im sure everyone is working hard at bugfixes now anyhow...

I have no idea if this is related to the recent patches, or a pre-existing issue that is just now coming to my attention (although it seems to me it wasn't an issue in the past)

I purchased a legion today, and cannot view it in the station, in the ship model viewer in the information tab, or in space. It is the same when trying to click the 'look at' option to view someone else in space when they are flying any T3 cruiser. This leads me to believe my client is not loading the model for any t3 ship. I've tried clearing the settings and the cache, with no results.

hoping someone has had a similar problem, or can offer a solution for me that doesn't involve reinstalling 500gb of eve again.

thanks in advance

There's a daily cap on the amount of SP you can receive. After that point you gain 50 SP per match played.

Missiles impossible as attack weapons due to laser defense?

If missiles are targets -- then armed ships should be targets even sooner.

I think we should stick with the original suggestion that disputed worlds rely on EVE ships to protect them from space borne attacks. Once CCP has basically said regional planetary politics have locked planetary defenses and militia out of the picture it should apply to everything. Stable unified planetary government does not exist and most frontier worlds cannot afford planetary defenses or trust them not to shoot down shuttles and shipping of rival factions (harming overall planetary growth).


I think Fozzie should just come out and say "I don't like missiles & won't have them in my game. Missiles are not FPS and do not market well in MMO IMHO" (LOL) At least that would be an out in the open position like those RL military extremist who feel their weapon system will supplant all other weapons systems in the future. (No tanks vs all tanks and submarines vs surface aircraft carriers is fun enough but the Marine Infantry guys who expect anti-matter infantry rifle and AI UAV to supplant all other weapons are a scream.)

Why would planets have anti-missiles defense that ships do not have? CCP has no anti-missile phalanx option in space where its a perfect environment (vacuum = no atmospheric irregularities to throw off shots). 7 km/sec missiles are not out maneuvering 300000Km/sec laser beams after firing.

I can see making the guided missiles consume double volume to hold more decoys and countermeasures.

I can also see making the rockets split out as 100s of fairly dumb MIRV arriving from multiple directions over large area...making individual targeting impractical due duty cycles.

Speedwise keep in mind that projectiles and hybrid ammo is subject to the same atmospheric issues as missiles.
Realistic RL proposals for space bombardment at over Mach 15-25 or lasers usually involve firing several sacrificial lead projectiles or missiles or charged beams to create a short lived vacuum tunnel through most the atmosphere - through which subsequent projectiles, missiles or lasers are fired for effect.

Plus the leading tip of the cheapest hypersonic missiles will probably always be basically the same as slugs used as projectile or hybrid ammo...the part that makes it a missile is made "safe" behind the bow wave of that simpler tip. But even a slight advance over RL high end Mach 7-8 missiles would be adequate.

And lasers...well ignoring that EVE has no anti-missile lasers when the simplest physics say that would be ideal in space even for fastest missiles of 7km/sec (versus light speed 300000km/sec)

Lasers fire for effect are also slowed by atmospheric complications even if only by a few seconds...the weaponized beam is fired based on feedback from a target beam that measures variations in air refraction that bend and diffuse laser path. Further while atmosphere slows a missile and reduces the effectiveness of pure maneuver (speed obviously not being the reason anti-missile lasers are not used in space) -- atmosphere adds a number countermeasures not available in space. Ionization masking and blurring of real missile from decoy warheads being one in real life use since the 1970s. Mini-chaff and flare charges can be fired ahead a short distance to disperse light absorbing clouds. Short lived active decoys. Persistent ionized charges (ball lightning) . And number of other effects can mislead, deflect, or ameliorate planetary defense.

Would there be any way that a filter could be placed on the guests tab in the station the Dust players show up in? Or possibly creating a separate infantry tab? It's hard to find the 1 or 2 players I'm trying to trade with amongst the 150+ Dust players.

Thank you. :)

Eve and Dust players cannot have a voice conversation via eve voice even if Dust Players bought a TVU. It's really annoying because it's working in every other channels of communications

im Having ui problems, my inventory closes when i enter and leave the station, this is happening since the merge with dust.

The crime watch system is nice, but changing the gate/dock flag so it stays after your ship is destroyed is something that should be changed. There should be no reason your pod should keep the same crime status especially since it is fragile and unarmed.