Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1569
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 23:22:00 -
[121] - Quote
Xessej wrote:POS and corp management affect a lot more people than the ones who directly manage POS or corps.
My corp lives in wspace and we like it. It fits our playstyle very well. The problem is attrition and recruiting. real life happens and some players left or have less time. But recruiting replacements runs into the hassles of POS and corp management. To let a new player have enough access to do much of anything gives him way too much access. So instead of our corp recruiting some new like minded players who we gradually give more access to our corp will soon pack up and move back to hisec.
CCP needs to fix POS and corp management to make all of wspace better and it will make a lot of null bears happy too. It would benefit the game as a whole.
High, low, null, WH. It's not just a WH issue. Even high sec players could use better PoS's and corp management. |
Alexander Renoir
State War Academy Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 07:41:00 -
[122] - Quote
For me, the best part was:
Soundwave @ CSM7 Meeting Minutes wrote: Soundwave clarified that he doesnGÇÖt mind people being bothered by it, because no EVE player has the right to be shut off from the rest of the world. He sees bounty hunting as something thatGÇÖs impacting players playing EVE as a single player game in a way nothing they tried before, and was glad they were interacting with the community whether negatively or positively. He suspected most people complaining were annoyed because they were not used to being able to be GÇ£pokedGÇ¥ by other players.
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: Alek praised this statement: AMEN SOUNDWAVE!
THAT shows me two things: First is, that it is strange and hypocritical from Soundwave that he GÇ£doesn`t mind people being botheredGÇ¥ with this new bounty system. And on the other hand the whole CCP Team (GM; Dev; CCP and Volunteer etc.) is excluded from the new bounty system at once! DidnGÇÖt he said that no one GÇ£has the right to be shut off from the rest of the worldGÇ¥?
The second thing is, that Alekseyev Karrde does not know this and praises Soundwave as new messiah!
And another thing: [quote= CCP Solomon] The goal would be to ensure they understand that having a bounty doesnGÇÖt make them attackable in highsec, which Solomon confirmed was a point of confusion on the forums even for experienced players. [Solomon]
Solomon.. you are wrong or just want to play down the problem. We all know that a bounty does not make a pilot a legal target. It is the bounty itself that is the problem! As good guy you do not wish to have a bounty. Especially if you have good standings to CONCORD GÇô WHO has control of the bounty system (pool). If you have never done some harm to another player NO ONE should be able to spend a bounty for nothing on his head! |
Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
543
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 07:52:00 -
[123] - Quote
Alexander Renoir wrote:For me, the best part was: Soundwave @ CSM7 Meeting Minutes wrote: Soundwave clarified that he doesnGÇÖt mind people being bothered by it, because no EVE player has the right to be shut off from the rest of the world. He sees bounty hunting as something thatGÇÖs impacting players playing EVE as a single player game in a way nothing they tried before, and was glad they were interacting with the community whether negatively or positively. He suspected most people complaining were annoyed because they were not used to being able to be GÇ£pokedGÇ¥ by other players.
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: Alek praised this statement: AMEN SOUNDWAVE!
THAT shows me two things: First is, that it is strange and hypocritical from Soundwave that he GÇ£doesn`t mind people being botheredGÇ¥ with this new bounty system. And on the other hand the whole CCP Team (GM; Dev; CCP and Volunteer etc.) is excluded from the new bounty system at once! DidnGÇÖt he said that no one GÇ£has the right to be shut off from the rest of the worldGÇ¥? The second thing is, that Alekseyev Karrde does not know this and praises Soundwave as new messiah!
You are either a very persistent troll, or seriously too frustrated over a non-issue. You also keep posting and yet ignoring people who are responding to you with non-troll responses.
Here, send me 500mil isk, and I will make sure it gets placed on Soundwave's head. I figured out how, but it's a secret. Lestatra: Eve is now fully committed to pvp . |
Gelatine
EverBroke Geeks
1
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 08:00:00 -
[124] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Alexander Renoir wrote:Listen CCP. Two Accounts canceled! Two from me. I know many others that also canceled during your daft new bounty system! Perhaps it is a rage quit.. But I want to see it as a last chance to tell CCP how I think about their bad work! Grow up. Retribution was releaesed over a month ago. If there was problem with people quitting over the bounty system they'd know by now. Here's a hint, people aren't. Except you and a couple others. So you're SoL guy.
The impression I got from the minutes was CCP haven't got a damn clue if anyone is quitting or not. For me at least, above all else this is something CCP should be finding out. I know a lot of people who have quit since retribution (but the bounty system was only a problem for one of them - I'll give you that.) I could quit right now, but CCP wouldn't pay any attention to that until my subscriptions ran out.
I've made three new accounts in the last month, but they're not going to make up for some of the people who have gone from my community; corp chat is dead in every player corp I'm in, and it's been consistently like that since two days after Retribution. Market trading has never been easier - for me a clear sign that less people are playing. Most high sec mining fleets are one player multi boxing, and every small gang roam I've been on has been comprised of a few players multi boxing and myself fighting people who were clearly multi boxing too (I suck at PvP and should have been podded many times, yet I haven't been recently.)
-
While EVE has many problems that need resolving, one problem has persisted and actually gets worse the longer I play: I am paranoid, I don't trust anyone and nobody trusts me. Please CCP, when you start tracking humans (I'm overjoyed to hear you'll be doing this,) allow CEOs to request information about the players within their corp to ease the rampant paranoia within EVE's community - I want to be able to prove I have no ties with any reds and I want CEOs to have a means to ask players to prove how many accounts they have and their corp histories - a human bound api or something.
If that's too much to ask, then limit the number of player corps a human can be in to one, regardless of the number of accounts owned until a better solution can be found. I want to recruit good people for my corp, but I can't trust anyone with things as they are. We have spies in other alliances, they have spies amongst my alliance - this just prevents good fights from happening and wrecks the illusion that we are immortal and fearless, because thirty seconds to hot drop either we or they find out... more often than not, one or the other runs away like pansies. |
Lost True
Paradise project
2044
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 10:28:00 -
[125] - Quote
What about the wis, you stuped bitches... Damn, i'm so tired of all these boring expansions. How boring is this... |
Alexander Renoir
State War Academy Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 10:37:00 -
[126] - Quote
Gelatine wrote: The impression I got from the minutes was CCP haven't got a damn clue if anyone is quitting or not. [...] I've made three new accounts in the last month, but they're not going to make up for some of the people who have gone from my community; corp chat is dead in every player corp I'm in, and it's been consistently like that since two days after Retribution. Market trading has never been easier - for me a clear sign that less people are playing.
Hello Gelatine,
If you want to let CCP know how you are thinking about Retribution, try their survey via http://retribution.questionpro.com/ Please let them know what you like or dislike or what they should do better. Thanks.
Additional: YOU are right! From patch day for Retribution (04.12.2012) and the days for CSM 7 meeting (12.12.-14.12.2012); there was barely enough time between these two events to give a valid statistik or funded and reliable statement, if you take the meeting minutes as resource. |
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
583
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 11:07:00 -
[127] - Quote
Alexander Renoir wrote:For me, the best part was: Soundwave @ CSM7 Meeting Minutes wrote: Soundwave clarified that he doesnGÇÖt mind people being bothered by it, because no EVE player has the right to be shut off from the rest of the world. He sees bounty hunting as something thatGÇÖs impacting players playing EVE as a single player game in a way nothing they tried before, and was glad they were interacting with the community whether negatively or positively. He suspected most people complaining were annoyed because they were not used to being able to be GÇ£pokedGÇ¥ by other players.
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: Alek praised this statement: AMEN SOUNDWAVE!
THAT shows me two things: First is, that it is strange and hypocritical from Soundwave that he GÇ£doesn`t mind people being botheredGÇ¥ with this new bounty system. And on the other hand the whole CCP Team (GM; Dev; CCP and Volunteer etc.) is excluded from the new bounty system at once! DidnGÇÖt he said that no one GÇ£has the right to be shut off from the rest of the worldGÇ¥? The second thing is, that Alekseyev Karrde does not know this and praises Soundwave as new messiah! And another thing: CCP Solomon wrote: The goal would be to ensure they understand that having a bounty doesnGÇÖt make them attackable in highsec, which Solomon confirmed was a point of confusion on the forums even for experienced players.
Solomon.. you are wrong or just want to play down the problem. We all know that a bounty does not make a pilot a legal target. It is the bounty itself that is the problem! As good guy you do not wish to have a bounty. Especially if you have good standings to CONCORD GÇô WHO has control of the bounty system (pool). If you have never done some harm to another player NO ONE should be able to spend a bounty for nothing on his head!
The bounty system is fine. It has nothing to do with if you are a "good guy" or a "bad guy" it just mean someone wants you dead. Why do you fail to understand that?
How does the bounty system affect your gaming experience?
Why i play EVE:-á20% for gameplay experience, 30% for the social aspect and 50% because of CCPGÇÖs empty promises.-á |
Wes Magyar
Ex Con Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 11:46:00 -
[128] - Quote
My thoughts on the Null Sec problem.
I just got done reading the CSM minutes in regards to 0.0 and all of the solutions mentioned in that meeting wouldnGÇÖt do much to address the current problem as I see it. The problem is there is no incentive to be a small alliance. The rewards are to great for coalitions to exist. More pilots/Alliances in a group the better it is. More people = larger fleets, Larger Fleets = I win button. I Started playing eve in 2006, I quickly joined a small alliance and we successfully held a region of space for almost 3 years with a Capital fleet of maybe 30 pilots. Our alliance had maybe 400 Pilots in it. Of that maybe 100 would show up to a CTA. Out of that maybe 30 where regular pvpers. For the most part we Did small gang engagements and gate camps. The problem is an alliance like that just couldnGÇÖt exist now a days. A prime example is, For awhile I was a member of a small alliance that held 4 systems in geminate A few years ago. And by small I mean small. We did OK for a few months until Red Alliance, Or was it Solar fleet... I cant recall... caught wind of us. They came in with 200 man capital ship fleets and no less then 5 titans to take us out. We had maybe 25 active pilots. Needless to say we where crushed. There needs to be some sort of force multiplier/Equalizer employed to make an alliance like this have a hope. Maybe penalties imposed on the larger fleet in system. Or bonuses for the smaller alliance. IGÇÖm not sure how this would work but its an idea.
I Think maybe instituting penalties on the Sov space of alliance based on the number of people they have with positive standings would be an interesting mechanic to implement, And along with that bonuses to the sov space of people with less positive standings. I know this might be hard to enforce but it could be something to look into. The number one thing we need to do is get rid of passive income all together. Its kinda hard to Battle the CFC when they have enough isk built up from Technetium mining that we could destroy a 200 man cap fleet of theirs each day for months and not even make them blink. I Think Ring mining is a step in the right direction. The one problem with that being is CFC and the other major alliances are so entrenched and have enough isk reserves that even if you where to implement the changes today it would be months before there could be a change. But as I said its a start. I liked that there was talk of rewarding small gang warfare but a lot of the talk along those lines really just looked like ways to grief ratters, and hurt the rank and file members of alliances isk generation. This is a major problem for smaller alliances. Most of the smaller alliances donGÇÖt have Ship replacement programs and when there are constant harassment tactics employed by the major alliances and coalitions on a regular basis those alliances donGÇÖt stand a chance. They cant afford to stay in ships. A prime example of this is the tactics being employed by RZR and CFC against IRC. Most IRC pilots can barely afford drakes let alone Maelstroms. And goons are coming in with 70-100 man Tengu and Munin gangs. Sure this is a sandbox but there needs to be some kind of Balancing mechanic implemented.
The other huge problem is SuperCaps. Small alliances cant really compete because unless you have multiple super caps you are boned. Plain and simple. SuperCaps are so overpowered its ridiculous. And the barrier to entry is to large for small alliances to surmount unless they become someones Pet, And this just perpetuates the large coalition problem. The genie is out of the bottle on SuperCaps so I donGÇÖt know how to fix it short of just removing all of them from the game and I donGÇÖt see that happening. Maybe make T2 Carriers or something that have special abilities to combat and or stand up against Supers but have them not cost as much? Make the barrier of entry lower so a small alliance with 2 year old or younger pilots can even stand a chance... The other problem as I see it is 0.0 is to small. One of the joys of eve when I first started was it was so big. There where regions of 0.0 where no one lived. I remember when most of the drone regions laid unclaimed. Maybe doubling or even quadrupling 0.0 space would help with this. It would add new frontiers for colonization and open up more space for people to occupy. I have more idea's but this is what I am going to put down for now as its 4am and I've been awake for over 24 hours at this point and I'm not even sure I'm making any sense in this post already.
-Wes- |
Finarfin
Immunity Syndrome
23
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 14:26:00 -
[129] - Quote
I am outright disgusted at the POS part. Small part of the community? WTF? CCP, you may wanna check how many POS exist and how many parts of EvE they touch daily. For 6 years I hear hollow promises of improvements now. I am really disappointed. |
ctx2007
Wychwood and Wells Beer needs you
266
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 14:57:00 -
[130] - Quote
My eyes, my poor eyes.
That was a long read, but interesting. You only-árealise you life has been a waste of time, when you wake up dead. |
|
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
486
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 15:34:00 -
[131] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:...How does the bounty system affect your gaming experience? Well, I lost two ships after coming back thanks to it .. that single tickbox's added in OV settings had everyone around me only appear visually in space, do you realise how bloody hard it is to do anything without a functional OV?
In short: With everyone and their dog having a bounty, tick the box by default!
|
Beckie DeLey
Living From Scraps
284
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 19:41:00 -
[132] - Quote
Lost True wrote:What about the wis, you stuped bitches...
Hasn't killed himself lately and is still mining away with a fleet of Macks. Also, don't diss The Wis, bad things happen to those who do. So... i started an industry blog at www.derbk.com/eve There i am preparing a guide to all things related to manufacturing. Check it out!
|
Galatea Galilei
Profoundly Inquisitive Exploration
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 23:01:00 -
[133] - Quote
The wonderful thing about EVE is there are so many diverse things you can do. Not everyone does everything in EVE, and many of us do things that only a small portion of the community really does. The game has a huge variety of small niches. That's what makes EVE great.
If CCP is going to from now on only concentrate on adding or improving things that affect the majority, they will strip away from the game its greatest feature. It will certainly make the game much more homogenous, and probably reduce their work-load a lot, and allow them to devote more attention to features that affect more people. But the game will rapidly lose its depth, if this is to be the future direction CCP takes. It's disappointing to hear that kind of talk coming from CCP... |
Dusty Meg
Bioco Industries Bioco Empire
69
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 23:48:00 -
[134] - Quote
Externally control of your PI planets should really be thought about, would be soo much easier to use it.
Also cant wait for CREST to come out with market order editing going to be playing with that alot Creater of the EVE animated influence map http://www.youtube.com/user/DustMityEVE |
Gevlin
Dropbears with Kebabs SpaceMonkey's Alliance
208
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 00:11:00 -
[135] - Quote
I am not sure the argument for needing the skill que required to Make people log in. This argument will also weaken over time.
The purpose for the skill que was to have players "interact" with eve. keeping the game on the top of their mind, with porting eve to other devices ... Eve can be picked up almost anywhere.
Longer skill que beyond 24 hr, no. but access my skill que to change on my iPhone yes.
I would like to export chats channel so I can have them on my I pad in real time
Some day I will have the internet and be able to play again. |
Andy Landen
Exploring Eagles
86
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 18:08:00 -
[136] - Quote
To save time and space, I will just assume that CCP understands that the POS rework need is more than just management and aesthetics; it is functional for every player who could use pos services without having to dedicate 8 million hours to set-up and take down the pos. Ever been in a player station and then kicked out of corp? Better to have stuff in a personal pos at that point. Corp would have no power over a personal pos, except to attack it. Ever been in a corp pos and had a corp thief? Better to have a personal pos at that point.
Would division of the hangars for player exclusive access solve the issues? If the only option is corp control of the pos, you still have the issues (when you leave corp) of losing the powers to refit, to repair, to gain access, and to leave securely. You risk everything, including your pod, by utilizing a corp pos or station. These are risks that I refuse to accept. The simplest option of allowing a pos to be anchored for the player only with no corp control, is probably the easiest and fastest fix CCP could hope for.
We all know that the pos can be so much more than what it currently is, and that larger project is something we are willing to wait for proper development, despite the many year wait already. The short term fix of allowing the pos to be anchored for the player only without any corp ties or control is something that needed to happen yesterday. I doubt that the quick fix of making the pos actual be able to be a "player owned starbase" instead of being a "corp owned starbase" is NOT likely to consume much time from CCP devs. If the pos is like a giant ship, then setting it up should be like fitting a capital ship. Development of that kind of system adds a lot of possibilities, but can be expected to take some time for the development and transition. |
Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 20:34:00 -
[137] - Quote
Alexander Renoir wrote:Gelatine wrote: The impression I got from the minutes was CCP haven't got a damn clue if anyone is quitting or not. [...] I've made three new accounts in the last month, but they're not going to make up for some of the people who have gone from my community; corp chat is dead in every player corp I'm in, and it's been consistently like that since two days after Retribution. Market trading has never been easier - for me a clear sign that less people are playing.
Hello Gelatine, If you want to let CCP know how you are thinking about Retribution, try their survey via http://retribution.questionpro.com/Please let them know what you like or dislike or what they should do better. Thanks. Additional: YOU are right! There was barely enough time between these two events for patch day for Retribution (04.12.2012) and the days for CSM 7 meeting (12.12.-14.12.2012) to give a valid statistik or funded and reliable statement, if you take the meeting minutes as resource. NOTE: at least 40 petitions concerning the bounty mechanic within the first 8 days of Retribution. Issue with the bounty system emerged the moment Retribution went live.
Anyone that would have quit due to the bounty system would have done so in the first week. Players are not stupid. We are never left quessing when CCP is taking steps to correct something. It took them 3 days to correct a UI issue that made it pretty much unbearable to play after Retribution. I posted about my issue, and CCP responded directly; indicating there was a fix incoming.
There was no question that the almost trivial issue I had with the UI change would have resulted in a cancellation of subs, and not just from me. An incredibly meaningless change to the way that the UI windows took priority was making EVE unbearable to people that maintained a large number of market orders. Many of us had a problem playing EVE with that change; if CCP didn't have any intention of correcting the issue, EVE simply wouldn't have been playable for a lot of people. CCP knew this, and they knew it was also something they couldn't NOT let us know they were fixing.
Anyone that had a problem with the bounty system, and was going to cancel their sub due to it, would have done so in the first week. It was obvious that CCP had NO INTENTIONS of changing it. No one needed a month to figure that out, and that amount of time isn't neccessary for someone who truely has an issue with it to decide to cancel their sub.
It would be silly of CCP to not be monitoring player activety on a daily basis for the week or two following the release of an expansion. It doesn't require them to wait a month to see that a large number of people quit, or to figure out why. When a large number of people quit EVE, CCP knows pretty much at moment it happens. They do not need a month to see how many people cancelled a subscription on the 5th of december.
Player activety did not go down in the days following the change of the bounty system. Either I'm imagining things, or player activity has actually gone up a little.
I'll bet you that the guy complaining about cancelling his two subs didn't even cancel his subs.
They aren't quitting because they aren't really uipset with the bounty system, and they know that the bounty system isn't making them get ganked. They're upset that the words WANTED are splashed over thier name, and that other people can see that they have a bounty.
Some people are upset over what they see as the implications of the bounty system, that having one on you makes you LOOK like a criminal to others.
Ironically enough, there are some people who have a problem with how being wanted can have some impact on their reputation; in a game where reputation means something. I can't say that I hold it against them; they're just going to have to RP their way around it. |
Aineko Macx
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 21:24:00 -
[138] - Quote
I was negatively surprised about CCPs changed views on empire wardecs. Them being non-consensual (in most cases) for the decced party is and should remain integral part of the eve experience. My carebearcorp getting decced multiple times when I was a noob was ultimately one of the best things that could happen to the corp, because it forced us to organize, experiment with tactics and finally made us beat our aggressors. Taking that away would be a big loss IMO.
And that change of heart about the POS rework... seriously?? "it doesn't affect many players"? WTF How about all 0.0 and wormhole players all other groups that use POSes?
Thinking one moment more about the quoted statement lets you infer that CCP is looking at the POS revamp in a too small way, with only revamped management/setup UI. |
Ms Michigan
Aviation Professionals for EVE
11
|
Posted - 2013.01.20 03:00:00 -
[139] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:You promised us POS revamps at the last fanfest and again at last CSM summit now all that has been pissed away because you feel we are not enough of a player base to spend the time on. We have long been patient on this issue this affects the whole WH community day to day as well as HS industry, LS research and industry and Nullsec living in the far reaches. At the very least the pos security issues need to be addressed in the short term to make small corporations have viable safe options to recruit and grow, this only needs to be personal ship storage. In the Med term we deserve a well overhauled system to allow greater flexibility with modular POS design. You say its business breaking to do POS revamp, we say its business breaking to ignore us yet again. Take a look https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194625
THIS!
I CANNOT believe CCP would downplay POS/CORP SECURITY concerns! WOW - STUPID. Like Winthrop said - AT LEAST - IN THE SHORT TERM - add some security to POS's or more corp divisions to make it easier for small groups to grow and EVE to move along. Conflict to exist.
PLEASE FOR CRYING OUT LOUD do this. How hard is it to take divisions to 14 instead of 7. Or to password protect a CHA or MTX array. It is thousands of years in the future...we have faster than light travel...BUT ....We don't have a lock on the ship array.
Gimme a break. |
Civire Desire
MinMatar Mining Manufacturing and Mayhem Wootang Clan
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.20 07:07:00 -
[140] - Quote
Haven't been arsed to read the minutes yet, but, having read all the responses, I would like to say this about POS's: THEY SUCK! Perhaps, JUST MAYBE? this might be why "only a small group" uses them?
They are a pain to set up. They are a pain to take down. They (and corp management) are a pain to set roles for. They are nothing more than a speed bump for supercaps. They are absolutely and totally insecure. If you want to lose something, put it in a POS!
If I had all the ISK back that I've lost from theft from POSes, all 12 of my toons (4 accounts, 3 chars each) could probably afford to be flying the supercap drake (The Nyx, I call it so because "everyone's flying one"). As a result, I will NEVER live out of a POS again until changes have been made.
CCP, Please, for the Love Of The Emperor of Amarr, PLEASE make POSes usable. Who knows? If they are usable, they just might get used. Rather like "Fire on Friend" Missiles: NO ONE uses them because, well, they DON"T WORK! |
|
cBOLTSON
Star Frontiers THORN Alliance
136
|
Posted - 2013.01.20 19:59:00 -
[141] - Quote
Does anyone else see the irony in this? I thought when it was talked about last, pos`s were going to be something partly modular and that everyone would want at least a small one. (Or had the easy option to have one)
Something that would expand with more resources and extra modules into full deathstars. "Were not elitists, were just tired of fail" - The Sorn |
Tian Jade
Bad Bumblebee Incorporated
58
|
Posted - 2013.01.20 23:22:00 -
[142] - Quote
Looking at EVE I feel tired, often not finding even any motivation to dock off and do something.
I think it started in 2009 with a important POS lost because a player I considered a friend took money from a hostile alliance. Then real life issue that prevented me from playing for almost 6 month. Returning to EVE but finding my corp and alliance had imploded, as I still was not sure who actually did the stuff I lost any trust despite offers to join other corps and alliances.
Fast forward to 2013 a few half arsed attempts to get back, seeing a lot of orphaned features just makes me feel sad. Tyrannis had almost all promised features removed. Incursions were interesting, but lately the incursion channels seem to fill with more and more hate.
WIS only 10% complete at the release and now CCP added it to the effectively forgotten and abandoned features. The modular POS system is going the same way now, I can assume that the ring- or comet mining mentioned is also in development hell.
I loved the game but I can't stand it to see it being condemned to a slow death so 1 account is already gone, another will be due in february and this one a few month later. I doubt that I will return and no, you can not have my stuff. |
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers R O G U E
173
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:51:00 -
[143] - Quote
Quote:Prototype Feedback Session Present: CCP Veritas, CCP Bayesian The CSM was given the opportunity to test several early prototypes of a possible revision of existing gameplay mechanics. The contents of this session are covered under NDA.
I hate you CCP some times >_>
lol |
Aprudena Gist
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 19:53:00 -
[144] - Quote
After reading all of these all i can see is the csm is totally useless without the mittani at the helm because none of you stupid ******* understand what to do. |
vagy
Dicta Boelcke
13
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 07:50:00 -
[145] - Quote
WIS? |
Lyndsey Love
True Human Design
20
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 10:36:00 -
[146] - Quote
It seems some topics missing, like WiS, PVE.
It seems CCP fear from the playerbase and fear to implement any new idea on his own. It is feel like a band asking the fans about what new album they want. There is too much fear from stupid veteran nullsec carebear forumtrolls and some assholes who shooted a statue when WiS was on topic.
CCP should do what they want and imagine, and don't give a **** and don't fear. |
Diva Ex Machina
Pwn 'N Play Nulli Secunda
10
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 13:57:00 -
[147] - Quote
Quote: Two step expressed many player's desire to be able to build a ***** in space.
Srsly?
Edit: at that word being filtered. |
Uthgaard
Reputable Gentlemen
14
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 17:17:00 -
[148] - Quote
Two step wrote:The CSM will also be doing another town hall meeting to talk about the minutes in the next few weeks or so.
CCP opens with some productive discussion of direction, trying to involve you all, and you all turn it into 50 pages of whining about not being involved; wanting to be the ones to announce changes so you feel more important; and then top it off with a childish catfight where the people dominating the conversation cry for making their privileges more exclusive.
The position on the CSM is there for you to impact the game in a positive manner, it isn't there for you all to waste time scrambling like maniacs in an attempt to appear as important as possible.
I'm unsure what value the CSM is actually creating here, but you all should be more embarrassed than the US congress. |
Acus Umbra
Omnia-Tech
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.27 21:08:00 -
[149] - Quote
As i understood , CCP wan't do WiS as EvE online content, but as a separate "game" or "app" such as PI under cell phone ha ha. For me its not the direction of building greater EvE but doing other app like dust514 in world of EvE and those are very different ways to see the game. As I see it - All magic of walking in station is leaving pod and going to "station hall" or "cantine" to interact with others Without loging to another aplication .Same in case of Atmospheric flight - sry Unifex but it's true bullshit comparing EvE online atmotpheric flight ( like in "Frontier" ;) - Again same magic here - flying in atmosphere directly from planet orbit.) with flying with some crap barge in dust 514 in PS3... have mercy ... If U CCP need vision of future - I want WIS and planet flight in EVE online. I may risk opinion that not only me. And before shitstorm of oldfashn old gamers that EvE isnt shooter or wow - yes i love EvE that way too . but why not keeping that and add more ?
IMO WIS was disaster because it was not ended - what is value of MMO game content if it have no player interaction ? End it CCP 4 christ sake- stop wining !!! |
Mitauchi
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 08:01:00 -
[150] - Quote
Still no release of the Dust 514 section of the minutes? Hmmmmmmm...... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |