| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
baltec1
Bat Country
4826
   |
Posted - 2013.01.19 12:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Cyprus Black wrote:You seem to confuse can't and wont. They can, they just choose not to. Drastically altering game mechanics for players who already choose not to participate is bad design.
Players would participate if they had some options for doing so. IDK why I even respond to you here. Eve will continue to evolve and change, some of those changes will be hard on you.
They have all the options we do. |
baltec1
Bat Country
4826
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 12:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:
]
That's not all the options that should exist in a sandbox. Lets open the doors a bit and see just how far the sandbox goes.
And what options do we lack exactly that stops these people? |
baltec1
Bat Country
4827
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 12:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:
POS's that cause expensive modules to blow up, the ability to manufacture modules that may self destruct when used in combat, The ability to hire NPC mercs, sovereignty that denies enemies certain ships or skill sets, mines, kamikaze ships.
The type of combat that the bears will enjoy is denied to them in Eve. It would be so much more interesting if they had some enjoyable options to strike back.
POS will not only blow up expensive modules but also the ship around them
The point in such a module is?
NPC mercs will never happen. However you can hire player mercs in several different ways.
That sov idea is bad and you should feel bad and will never happen because it will fix nothing and break a great many things.
We used to have mines but they caused game breaking problems and were removed.
Kamikaze ships already exist.
|
baltec1
Bat Country
4828
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 12:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:
No...I don't know what else to say. Just "No" that's not at all what I mean. Those systems just funnel isk back to the enemy. There should be some options that allow bears to kill and destroy and attack the PvPers.
There is, they just chose to ignore them like you just did. |
baltec1
Bat Country
4829
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 13:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:
Actual industrialists would develop options to attack their opponents.
As an industialist I can safely say we have all the options that everyone else has when it comes to fighting. If you chose to ignore these options then you have only yourself to blame for your lack of options. |
baltec1
Bat Country
4830
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 13:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:
You are not an industrialist. Your a Goon and one of Bat Country and you gank freighters.
You now want everyone else believe that when you talk of "we" that you are now a carebear?
You are here only to cause drama. What's new about that?
I own a POS dedicated to building ships and POS fuel that I sell in high sec. Every day I manage my industrial affairs.
Just because I am a goon and go around killing fools with too much isk doesn't mean I cant enjoy insdustial activities. Infact I am trying to get in contact with battleclinic because their manufacturing tool needs updating. |
baltec1
Bat Country
4831
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 13:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:
And you also go into orphanages every weekend where you tell the kids your stories?
I see my activities have sent you into a downward spiral of "does not compute". I better not tell you that most of us Bats have industrial interests because it might just melt your mind. |
baltec1
Bat Country
4832
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 15:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:
Just like baltec1 do you post only to crap this thread into inexistence, unless someone like me comes along and points it out to you. You have similar inabilities like everyone else. It makes us individuals as well as somehow equal. Accept it, embrace it and become someone greater, or don't and be sad and bitter. That's the choice you have.
Given that my posts mostly have facts in them and yours all have insults Id say that you were the one sending this topic to the pile. |
| |
|