| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Grim Vandal
   |
Posted - 2005.07.04 08:54:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Grim Vandal on 04/07/2005 08:53:55
try it out on SISI...
my crow goes sustained 14km/s ...
a cruiser goes over 5km/s sustained ...
my advice:
fix asap ... we dont need that crap again...
last note: YES it is fun to fly around that fast (I enjoy it myself on SISI) but hell this would unbalance things again so REMOVE the ability to fit oversized ABs cuz overall the agility changes are FINE!
Greetings Grim |
Darius Shakor
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 09:18:00 -
[2]
Are you referring to putting a large AB on a cruiser and a medium AB on a frigate? Because that was supposed to be impossible now. I did see that my Muninn was faster last night on Sisi, but that was with a T2 10mn, and I got about 800m/s or so. A far cry from 5km/s. Where did you get the number 5km/s and with what ship?
------
Analysis[Ceasefire]....Complete - 'Term given to the act of firing, causing the ceasation of the life it is directed at |
Monty Burns
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 09:32:00 -
[3]
Doh!
Looks like an old "bug/feature" has crept back in 
Version control ftw!
Darwin 4tw
|
Azaeren
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 09:35:00 -
[4]
OMG its on the test server it MUST be being implemented in the game 
---------------------------------------------
|
Monty Burns
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 09:38:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Azaeren
OMG its on the test server it MUST be being implemented in the game
If its not a CODE mirror of old patches as well then whats the point? Old broken code mixed with new does not equal a test environment.
Darwin 4tw
|
Darius Shakor
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 09:44:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Azaeren
OMG its on the test server it MUST be being implemented in the game
That was a little pointless sarcasm. How come there is always at least one of these answers to every thread?
The guy was pointing out that a previously removed ability in the game has shown back up on the test server and was asking for clarification. He was not saying that the world is coming to an end, that CCP will go out of business for this stupidity and that this is a giant step backwards for all MMORPG's out there. Nothing usefull and constructive to say?
<< There is the door.
------
Analysis[Ceasefire]....Complete - 'Term given to the act of firing, causing the ceasation of the life it is directed at |
Anatalia Timmerov
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 09:52:00 -
[7]
Finnaly!
Something good to die for
|
Athis
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:00:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Darius Shakor
Are you referring to putting a large AB on a cruiser and a medium AB on a frigate? Because that was supposed to be impossible now. I did see that my Muninn was faster last night on Sisi, but that was with a T2 10mn, and I got about 800m/s or so. A far cry from 5km/s. Where did you get the number 5km/s and with what ship?
It was not impossible. They had just changed it and nerfed the effect. You could always fit oversized. Probably some change to other aspects denerfed and boosted the effect of oversized abs.
|
Zameela
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:01:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Darius Shakor
Are you referring to putting a large AB on a cruiser and a medium AB on a frigate? Because that was supposed to be impossible now. I did see that my Muninn was faster last night on Sisi, but that was with a T2 10mn, and I got about 800m/s or so. A far cry from 5km/s. Where did you get the number 5km/s and with what ship?
It was never impossible, it just didn't work very well. I've noticed that everything is faster on SiSi, even with the right-sized modules.
|
Darius Shakor
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:06:00 -
[10]
I meant it was impossible to go much faster with oversized mods, not impossible to fit them. Sorry Wasn't clear on that because I forgot a sentence since I was being pestered by family when I was typing and I haven't had coffee yet.
------
Analysis[Ceasefire]....Complete - 'Term given to the act of firing, causing the ceasation of the life it is directed at |
Zarquon Beeblebrox
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:14:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Monty Burns
Originally by: Azaeren
OMG its on the test server it MUST be being implemented in the game
If its not a CODE mirror of old patches as well then whats the point? Old broken code mixed with new does not equal a test environment.
Thats exactly how new bugs ... ehh patches get implemented on TQ
--
Lady Beeblebrox
Teddybears: Forum - movies |
McBane
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:19:00 -
[12]
As far I was aware, it's always been and still is to fit oversized burners/mwd, they just nerfed it so that and oversized mod takes about 3 hours to reach top speed.
They also nerfed the use of multiple burners/mwd - this is how the urber speed were achieved before.
So the question is, is the multiple activation and acceleration nerf of oversized mods still in place on the test server. If not, then there is a problem, otherwise there is no issue.
|
Gabriel Karade
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:25:00 -
[13]
Its not just the oversized stuff, people are getting 5-7km/sec interceptors with MWD's
Apparently its been bug reported (neither ship mass, module thrust/speed boost have changed) 
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) "That's no ordinary rabbit!...that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on" |
Avon
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:42:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Gabriel Karade
Its not just the oversized stuff, people are getting 5-7km/sec interceptors with MWD's
Apparently its been bug reported (neither ship mass, module thrust/speed boost have changed)
My ceptor goes that fast on TQ already ... gotta go try it on Sisi :)
______________________________________________
Pay or pray..er..prey..yeah, pray you aren't prey. Er, just pay. |
Wonk
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 10:51:00 -
[15]
dunno if u guys botehr reading patch notes, but this cold war patch incraeses cruiser speeds, probly some nice hidden features coming as well. would b nice to have oversized ABs back.
Dreadnought AB on ur Raven any1? 
|
Gabriel Karade
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 11:15:00 -
[16]
It's not just cruisers, everything is going much faster...
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) "That's no ordinary rabbit!...that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on" |
jukriamrr
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 11:25:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Gabriel Karade
It's not just cruisers, everything is going much faster...
If so (and my claw went up to 5.8km/s on sisi) then so much for the missile 'patch'.
Why make missiles faster, with the motive of making them more 'insta damage' if ships can still outrun them, and receive no damage at all if they get hit.
This makes no sense. Hope it's bug or something...
|
Gabriel Karade
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 11:54:00 -
[18]
Example:
Megathron, Navigation V, Acceleration Control IV
on TQ: 156m/sec, 405.23m/sec with a 100MN AB II
Sisi: 156m/sec, 526.68m/sec with a 100MN AB II
Note AB II Stats:
162% Velocity boost, 150,000,000N thrust (on both TQ & Sisi)
Megathron Mass: 152,500,000 Kg with AB active, 102,500,000 without.
It can't be applying the mass increase correctly, even though it is displaying it.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) "That's no ordinary rabbit!...that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on" |
Troezar
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 12:06:00 -
[19]
Just hope my Mammoth speeds up, like flying a damn slug
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 16:16:00 -
[20]
Its's not applying the extra mass correctly.
As far as I can tell, the extra mass (from your ab/mwd) is being applied after the top speed calculations.
Ive reported it, and so have others im sure but...
Have you noticed painters dont affect MWD'ing targets on SISI?
That was reported ~2 weeks ago. 
So, dont hold your breath.
-------------
|
pardux
|
Posted - 2005.07.04 16:48:00 -
[21]
BUG REPORT IT!!!!
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |