Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1330
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 08:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
Paikis wrote:Jack Miton wrote:Paikis wrote:Why do I get the feeling were going to end up with another guy from a large alliance who completely ignores anything that isn't c6 related? considering the 2 candidates currently up both live in low class WHs, this comment must be on some sort of level of genious I can't relate to... Jack... normally I like your posts, but you're making it hard... Confirming that TLost and Talocan are NOT large alliances that live in wormhole space. Also confirming that no one else is allowed to announce that they'll be running now that we have 2 guys (3 guys if you read the first page of this thread). And confirming that no one ever votes for their corp mates just because they're in the same corp. The CSM is a popularity contest where the most votes wins, and the most votes will come from those large alliances. Just like how there's a very large proportion of nullsec members, because those alliances have large numbers. I live in hope, but let's be realistic about this. Anyhow, I'll stop crapping up this thread and ask that anyone who wants to continue this please PM me. ANY csm candidate, from any kind of space, SHOULD be from a large group so that he actually represents a good number of people... i would have thought this was obvious. your comments are especially ironic since as already mentioned, both TL and TALUN have member corps in WHs ranging from C2 to C5 space and are probably the only WH entities with members living in such a large spread of WHs, unlike us evil C6 only corps...
would TL/TALUN be my first port of call if I was going to nominate a wh csm candidate? dunno, but they'd both be in my top 5 or so groups worth considering.
in any case, ANY wh csm candidate is better than no wh csm candidate. |

Bane Nucleus
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
315
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 11:52:00 -
[32] - Quote
Regardless of anything said in this thread, Transmission Lost's votes are for sale. If you can outbid Cipreh, you too can have all the votes of the largest wh space alliance. This also gives a chance for those small. do nothing C1 corps to pay for your voice to be heard. REJOICE!!!!!!!!!!... . . . . ...and pay!  Alliance CEO, Diplomat, Recruiter |

Paikis
Vapour Holdings
575
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 12:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
Bane Nucleus wrote:...and pay! 
Do you accept payment in bubble wrap? :D |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
175
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 12:30:00 -
[34] - Quote
I'm a whore. I would vote for the candidate that decides to remove nullsec scumm from wspace! |

Bernie Nator
4U Services Inc. Talocan United
519
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 18:41:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kalel Nimrott wrote:I'm a whore. I would vote for the candidate that decides to remove nullsec scumm from wspace! We tried that once. They just stayed in a pos and logged when we blew up too many of them. |

Axloth Okiah
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
37
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 18:47:00 -
[36] - Quote
I'll vote for whoever makes CCP fix that HIC/cloak/bubble nonsense... :( |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
175
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 19:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bernie Nator wrote:Kalel Nimrott wrote:I'm a whore. I would vote for the candidate that decides to remove nullsec scumm from wspace! We tried that once. They just stayed in a pos and logged when we blew up too many of them.
Till we fix the prices of wspace good, we should continue to do that. |

Royal Jedi
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
95
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 20:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
Bernie Nator wrote:Kalel Nimrott wrote:I'm a whore. I would vote for the candidate that decides to remove nullsec scumm from wspace! We tried that once. They just stayed in a pos and logged when we blew up too many of them.
YES! Lets remove all the targets from w-space! Make it even more dead than it already is! GREAT IDEA!
Anyway, off topic... |

Bronya Boga
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
86
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 23:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
Update: So we decided we wouldn't do separate interviews with each candidate since it wouldn't be very productive in our opinion. However we will schedule debates between the candidates and they will be able each talk about all the topics YOU care about.
So with that in mind I'm going to just ask you guys to put up questions you would want your future CSM representatives to answer. Keep in mind this will work just like the Two Step thread any trolls will be ignored and all good questions will be asked.
Also any discussion you want to have RELATING to the primaries\elections feel free to have in here just keep it to topic
Bronya Host of podcast Down The Pipe www.downthepipe-wh.com Podcast Public Channel is DTP Podcast @drverikan on twitter [email protected] |

QT McWhiskers
Hard Knocks Inc.
85
|
Posted - 2013.01.27 02:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
Have two questions for CSM candidates.
1. Do you plan to bring your own concerns to CCP, bring the wormhole communities concerns or a mix of both.
2. Will you keep in touch with the WH community after you are elected? Or will you simply disappear into your WH never to be seen again? |
|

Paikis
Vapour Holdings
585
|
Posted - 2013.01.27 03:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
Kalel Nimrott wrote:Till we fix the prices of wspace good, we should continue to do that.
And in this sentence, the word "fix" actually means "re-inflate."
My questions to the CSM candidates:
1. What features do you consider requirements for any "fixed" POS system? 2. What is your stance on the changes to T3s? What changes would you make? 3. Self destructing inside POS force fields, allow/disallow and why?
I'm sure I'll think of a couple more, but these will do to start. |

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
582
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 12:47:00 -
[42] - Quote
As an update, I have posted my campaign platform here on the Jita Park Speakers corner. |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
180
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 13:20:00 -
[43] - Quote
Paikis wrote:Kalel Nimrott wrote:Till we fix the prices of wspace good, we should continue to do that. And in this sentence, the word "fix" actually means "re-inflate." My questions to the CSM candidates: 1. What features do you consider requirements for any "fixed" POS system? 2. What is your stance on the changes to T3s? What changes would you make? 3. Self destructing inside POS force fields, allow/disallow and why? I'm sure I'll think of a couple more, but these will do to start.
If you want to farm for small change and scraps, go back to null |

Taz Edenrunner
The Dark Space Initiative
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 13:20:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nathan Jameson,
Should you really be posting in a CSM8 WH candidates post with the following taken directly from your JPSC post "I do not intend to advance only wormhole-related concerns to the CCP offices" or from page 2 of this thread "I actually live in Jita."
If you intend on advancing not just WH related items but other Eve-wide issues I fear that your focus on ensuring that us WHers have a voice will become diluted when you invariable get drawn into 0.0/LS/HS issues, you will lose sight of what matters to us (your voters).
I'm not going to even entertain the comment about living in jita, how are we supposed to get some stress rrelief when you screw up and we canGÇÖt come and hunt you down and provide you with a express route to HS in anger
While I wont claim to speak for most/all of the WH community, I do view the WH CSM candidate as someone who will ensure that whatever fix/new feature gets implmeneted does not impact us either completely or at very least some form of heads up that we're about to be screwed over (although it may completely fix current 0.0/LS/HS issues), if your not living daily in a WH and focusing on other issues what assurance can you give to us that you are our best choice for our WH CSM. |

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
584
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 13:31:00 -
[45] - Quote
Taz Edenrunner wrote:Should you really be posting in a CSM8 WH candidates post with the following taken directly from your JPSC post "I do not intend to advance only wormhole-related concerns to the CCP offices"
That was added because I was posting in the JPSC part of the forums, not Wormholes. I do not simply want to be "that guy that cares only about wormholes" to the rest of the community. I respect Two Step a lot, and I don't think he has that reputation either.
That being said, I will think first about any development's impact on wormholes, as I am not simply a single pilot in EVE. I am the executor of a wormhole alliance I built from scratch over the course of years. I just don't intend to have my blinders on to the point that I start suggesting no local for null sec, in other words. That would ruin the carefully-cultivated climate that makes null sec what it is.
Taz Edenrunner wrote:or from page 2 of this thread "I actually live in Jita."
In all honesty, that was so you guys could troll me. Fire away!  |

SMT008
Wormholers Anonymous Transmission Lost
504
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 14:20:00 -
[46] - Quote
Wormholes are an environment I truly discovered less than two weeks ago (after almost 2 years of nullsec), and I think that it's a very good part of the game that deserves a CSM candidate.
Those are the issues which I think are important to fix. I'll consider those first when choosing who I'll vote for :
Switching T3 subs in-space (And assembling T3s).
Nothing to be said about that. Those ships are produced, used and lost in wormholes. How come I'm forced to haul one to a station to assemble it ?
Pushing for a modular POS (Or New in-space structures system).
If you bring new POSes and/or new structures, this will bring good things to EVE as a whole. And it will be a relief to wormholers who have to deal with it every day.
Alliance bookmarks.
This is quite an important thing. Having to "trade" bookmarks through a shuttle all the god damn time is annoying. I'm part of a rather small wormhole corp, and being one of the only EUTZ guys here, I constantly have to deal with that BM-filled shuttle in order to actually move around.
Dreads/Carriers rebalance, so that we're not stuck with Archons+Moros > Everything else.
Bring the Moros in-line with the Revelation. Bring the other carriers in-line with the Archon. That'll do. I fly a Nidhoggur/Naglfar/Chimera/Phoenix, but all those 4 caps are close to uselessness in WH combat. Come on.
Low level PVE activites in every wormholes, no matter which class they are.
Basically, except Ladars (That you can do alone because they're kinda broken) and some Magnetos (that you can do alone because they're broken too), there is absolutly nothing you can do alone. I understand that wormholes and EVE as a whole is a multiplayer game, don't get me wrong. I'm just asking for "something to do when no one is online" that doesn't involve logging in an alt and do something somewhere else.
Having a few lowlevel complexes/sites wouldn't hurt. |

SojournerRover
Insidious Design
34
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 19:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:I will be running for CSM8 this year. I have been waiting to publish my platform based on whether we will have wormhole primaries or not (still waiting on word from CCP). However, I can at least state my intentions in this post. As the fundamental purpose of the Council of Stellar Management is communication between the player base and CCP, I will not be running a platform based on broad, sweeping changes to any particular element of EVE. (Well, except maybe POS's, but this is nothing new.) I will instead be focusing on two elements that are important to me. First is communication, as it was the entire reason the CSM was formed. Communication of one kind or another has always been vital to me (and is, in fact, one of my IRL degrees). To give an example, our alliance's website conveys a large quantity of information that has helped many incoming pilots adjust to wormhole space. And wormhole space can always use more pilots. No candidate can be a strong candidate if he forgets his ultimate priority. Second is a respect for diversity, something that my alliance has respected since the very start. We do not all roll in large deadspace-fit T3 gangs (although some do). Some of us like to camp systems in stealth bombers; some like to farm PI; some like to manufacture and research; some of us even like to *shudder* mine (which I have done my own fair share of). Sometimes we blob, when we feel the situation warrants it. In most cases, however, our fleets are perhaps a dozen, if not far fewer. We hunt wormhole space, low-sec, and null. We live in systems ranging from C1's and C2's to higher C5's. We are an alliance founded on diversity and mutual respect for the playstyles of others, and we have shown more than one corp the door that has breached this sacred trust. While any specific change to EVE's mechanics will always advantage one group over another, I believe it is my job to represent this mindset...to promote a wide variety of improvements that ultimately remembers everyone, from the richest, most devoted C6 pilots to those who can only sign in on weekends to run their PI. Because in the end, they all pay for their subscription. I appreciate your consideration for me as your candidate for CSM8. Win or lose, I firmly believe it is important for me to run.
I have served on the board of Talocan United and worked closely with you and your leadership and I will not be voting for you. ROVER (REDRUM)
|

Malception
Cold Moon Destruction Transmission Lost
68
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 19:59:00 -
[48] - Quote
SojournerRover wrote:I have served on the board of Talocan United and worked closely with you and your leadership and I will not be voting for you.
I find this exceedingly amusing. Thanks for laugh, Rover. |

Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
607
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 22:51:00 -
[49] - Quote
Questions for CSM candidates:
1. Why are you running for the CSM? 2. Why do you think you would be better at representing the entire community, than other candidates? 3. What one change would you make to wormholes to increase/improve pvp? 4. What one change would you make to wormholes to improve pve? 5. What non wormhole related feature do you feel strongly about? Why i play EVE:-á20% for gameplay experience, 30% for the social aspect and 50% because of CCPGÇÖs empty promises.-á |

Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
8
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 05:25:00 -
[50] - Quote
It's going to be tough to sort through all the BS, but when we do decide on a candidate. For better or worse..we need to back them fully with the entire WH community as a whole.
The small insignificant changes from the major changes can be viewed 2 ways imo..realisitic or unrealistic. At some point we need to weigh what we can realistically get improved against what will end up going back and forth. I think that some changes are extremely low priority but they might also be the easiest to improve based on degree of difficulty or investment from CCP. They are going to be paying these dev's to work on these changes. This takes resources. As much as POS 2.0 is being pushed by the wh community, CCP says it isn't worth their investment. Which sucks, but I understand their end. In a sense, I feel like maybe we should try to take advantage of this position while we do have it and push what we would seem to be most realistic until we brainstorm ways to improve poses or whatever larger changes further. Making CCP feel that it would be worth their investment because the improvements would promote more pos use, more player use, and ultimately more player subs which generates more revenue. Maybe smaller improvements on existing poses for now. I'm not a programmer/developer, but I am a businessman, I understand CCP's end. If we want to push for these changes, we need to make it work for them. After all, CCP is a business they aren't hear for the carebear tears. We need these changes to not only improve our way of WH life, it needs to work with all space. A fairly long list of easy fixes, IE (subsystem fitting in whs, alliance bm, more folders in CHA's, SD inside FF, etc etc) I honestly don't know how difficult it would be to change these, but it seems like it shouldn't be that difficult. [ I could be way off base there.] These changes would affect all of whs, not just the C6 juggernaut alliances. I understand the concern of the smaller alliances. Check out the candidates, if you don't feel like your intrests are being covered, you are free to run as CSM.
Please stop asking these open ended questions "like are you going to forget about the little guy when youre voted in" These don't help, any person with a 6th grade education would know how to answer that question, whether genuine or not, in order to improve their image.
No doubt about it, whoever is selected will have their work cut out for them. Good luck guys, I look forward to reading/hearing constructive points backed with solid arguments. |
|

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
625
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 06:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Castor Troyy wrote:Please stop asking these open ended questions "like are you going to forget about the little guy when youre voted in" These don't help, any person with a 6th grade education would know how to answer that question, whether genuine or not, in order to improve their image.
Yes.
Er, wait, I mean no. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |

Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
75
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 06:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Paikis wrote:Why do I get the feeling were going to end up with another guy from a large alliance who completely ignores anything that isn't c6 related? WH alliances are not large enough that any one alliance could push their candidate like goons could with Mittani (who got also one of my four votes :p). And there's plenty of rivalry between the larger alliances. If someone from a small wh corp would run and present a sensible platform and prove that he/she is dedicated and competent, I'm pretty sure he'd have a good shot at winning the nomination and a CSM seat. Being only a year into this game i'm actually happy to hear that. I've been reading alot lately and it worried me that it was just a more private nullsec only with the major groups running the place.
Though so far since being involved in Wspace i've noticed so far that it is no comparison to Null in terms of the players  |

James Arget
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
59
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 23:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
I'm happy to say that I, too, am running for CSM 8.
EVE has been a passion of mine for years, and I would love to represent the WH community on the CSM. I'll be pushing more publicity in the days and weeks to come, so stay tuned. |

SojournerRover
Insidious Design
39
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:56:00 -
[54] - Quote
My woodwork is being ruined with all these candidates jumping out of it. ROVER (REDRUM)
|

QT McWhiskers
Hard Knocks Inc.
94
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 08:07:00 -
[55] - Quote
Nathan Jameson
Taz Edenrunner wrote:or from page 2 of this thread "I actually live in Jita."
In all honesty, that was so you guys could troll me. Fire away! [:pirate: wrote:
You asked for it.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&view=kills&plt_id=509306&m=1&y=2013
Not a single WH kill or loss during the month of January.
AAAAAAND Not involved in the fight against us, aquila and adhoc today. In fact your last WH kill was in october against a pos... and you were flying a raptor.
So you were saying? |

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
643
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 08:33:00 -
[56] - Quote
QT McWhiskers wrote:So you were saying?
Your words sting, comrade. ;-)
BTW Raptors eat POS's alive. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |

SojournerRover
Insidious Design
39
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:12:00 -
[57] - Quote
QT McWhiskers wrote:Nathan Jameson
Taz Edenrunner wrote:or from page 2 of this thread "I actually live in Jita."
In all honesty, that was so you guys could troll me. Fire away! [:pirate: wrote: You asked for it. http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&view=kills&plt_id=509306&m=1&y=2013Not a single WH kill or loss during the month of January. AAAAAAND Not involved in the fight against us, aquila and adhoc today. In fact your last WH kill was in october against a pos... and you were flying a raptor. So you were saying?
Tower spinning Jita
=Same thing (paper pusher) ROVER (REDRUM)
|

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
643
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:54:00 -
[58] - Quote
SojournerRover wrote:Tower spinning Jita
=Same thing (paper pusher) pp
There's a lot of truth to that. And a lot of paper pushing to be done in the CSM (mails, meetings, CSM minutes, JPSC threads, etc.). I think I have my Tedious Paperwork Specialization up to at least IV by now.
Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |

SojournerRover
Insidious Design
39
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:18:00 -
[59] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:SojournerRover wrote:Tower spinning Jita
=Same thing (paper pusher) pp There's a lot of truth to that. And a lot of paper pushing to be done in the CSM (mails, meetings, CSM minutes, JPSC threads, etc.). I think I have my Tedious Paperwork Specialization up to at least IV by now.
Good Answer! ROVER (REDRUM)
|

Taz Edenrunner
The Dark Space Initiative
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 12:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
Castor Troyy wrote:It's going to be tough to sort through all the BS, but when we do decide on a candidate. For better or worse..we need to back them fully with the entire WH community as a whole.
sorting out the BS is half the fun I reckon , we should be asking the tough questions to ensure that whoever gets our votes is worthy of standing up for the WH community and our support until the next election.
One thing I would like to see if more transparency/consolidation on the topics that the WH CSM is taking to CCP and providing feedback where NDA's allow, picking up on this weeks forum threadnaught and then replying to said thread is a spotty way to do things at best. Yes there is eve search for finding a topic in the forums or the odd town hall here and there but there has to be a better way.
Q. How would you as the WH community CSM provide consolidated but structured feedback between us & CCP |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |