| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
781
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 15:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
celebro wrote:Remove implant loses from pod kills. I hate to clone jump in a low implant clone just to transport some goods or have a peek at low sec to fool around. I am sure there are many players who would like to enter low sec for a few hours, at lower risks, without the inconvenience to change clones. It would also encourage those who don't have a clone too.
I don't mind losing my ship, I always take what I can afford to lose and usually its just an impulse or spur of the moment thing, and not something I plan a whole day to do.
Then don't plug in implants.
Ah yeah right , we want the benefits but not the hassle it can bring right ?
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
781
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 15:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pandora Barzane wrote:always find it funny when someone has a legimate suggestion to get more highseccers into low/null they always get hammered by the same nullbears who dont want any change. But at the same time are whining they arent enough highseccers leaving for low/null.
Seriously guys, make up your mind.
you'll then be surprised how many of the naysayers here actually are empire players then ...
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
781
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 15:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Diamond Bull wrote:Dear CCP,
The people in Low actually don't want more people in Low unless those people are hindered by the game in ways that makes them easily exploitable. The people of Low only want more easy ganks to pad their killboards. They do not actually want more people to fight. They want more people to kill. In order to improve the population of Low you must get rid of these people who are interested in only easy high profit/low risk kills. I have no idea how to do this. Maybe by increasing the risk that Pirates must experience in order to set a trap on a gate or a station?
Nah, that wouldn't work.
Moral of the story? Low is only broken because of the asshats that have populated it.
Toodles!
Same goes for you as the guy above .. it is not because people find the idea bad that they are low-wsec or null-sec habitants.
You are not forced to plug in implants on all your clones , it is your own choice to do so.With that choice comes consequence.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
782
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 16:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Olga Ivanovna wrote:I am ALWAYS against ALL changes, and as soon someone suggests something, let's hammer it down!
This is really a helpful post, don't you think? Just like some others already in this thread.
I ALLWAYS blame it on BITTERVETS and EVE COMMUNITY when a stupid change get's hammered down.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
782
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 16:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
celebro wrote:Chandaris wrote:Congratulaions OP, you just failed to grasp the entire point of the game: consequences. I'll take the consequences when I see more rewards. edit: Its official now, low seccers care more about the implant market than actually have more players active in low sec, this is not all about me but all players like me who refuse to lose implants.
So far i mostly see null and empire people responding so YET AGAIN for the third time in this thread it is not because someone disagrees with your idea that they are habitants of low-sec.
MY GOD , lill stubborn are we or trolltastic ?
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
782
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 16:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:flakeys wrote:celebro wrote:Chandaris wrote:Congratulaions OP, you just failed to grasp the entire point of the game: consequences. I'll take the consequences when I see more rewards. edit: Its official now, low seccers care more about the implant market than actually have more players active in low sec, this is not all about me but all players like me who refuse to lose implants. So far i mostly see null and empire people responding so YET AGAIN for the third time in this thread it is not because someone disagrees with your idea that they are habitants of low-sec. MY GOD , lill stubborn are we or trolltastic ? i fail to see the connection between the location of the poster, and the fact that this idea is terrible?
Wich is what i'm saying dave but somehow the ones who support this idea think anyone who is an empire boy MUST be a supporter of the idea.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
784
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 20:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
celebro wrote:
The rewards are no where close to risk +5 implants. Anyways if its so easy to get away, what difference would it make to the podders, if i get to keep my implants. Something fishy going on, I see pods kills in low sec all the time on the eve map.
EDIT:Anyways I want to see whats out there from time to time, not for the isk, just to explore and have some fun. Maybe I spend an hour maybe 10mins, not enough reason to Clone jump.
SIGh , BUT WHY DO YOU NEED +5 IMPLANTS ALL THE TIME ?
Appearantly getting through that thick skull takes caps. Keep one clone with +2 or +3 , does not cost much and you can do in lowsec as you please.What difference does it make timewise if you are gonna be playing eve for a long time?And if you are not gonna play for a long time then it would make even less a role if you had them plugged in or not.
What is so hard about understanding the risk is what YOU make of it.You HAVE the option to create more clones , yoou HAVE the option to keep 1 clone without implants or with cheap implants as such the PROBLEM is being made by you not by low-sec or it's inhabitants.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|
| |
|