|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
180
   |
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Not sure if this will be read, but...
To CCP Tallest:
With the recent proposed changes to Dreads (removing drones, increasing damage when in siege to 700% as well as the 5% bonus to the Moros), will this see the Moros supplant the Naglfar as the Dread with the (potentially) most DPS?
If so, why should i spend the extra time training for Projectile weapons AND a whole host of missile skills, when i could just train for Blasters and be better?
IMO the nag SHOULD be the premier DPS Dread because of the extra training time involved.
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Stealthiest wrote:How about a rename and some resizing. A super carrier that is not a carrier, but is the same size as a carrier?
As a 2 titan, 1 mS owner I say bout f**king time for most of this, But no dd on Sub-caps at all? No drones on a Super carrier?
I mean really!!!!!
I think CCP Tallest is investigating a tracking bonus to x-large weapons, i got my fingers crossed for that 
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mavric wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:If you enjoyed these changes and things happening to spaceships IN SPACE I guerantee you'll love the rest of the stuff we have lined up for winter  Keep an eye out for the blogs. Is it just me or does this look like a bot post? Really? We need cheerleaders now??
Nah it's just CCP Cashflow lookin to hustle lol
Seriously though, am looking forward to see what else is on offer!
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 04:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Di Mulle wrote:Simetraz wrote:
What are you talking about ?
In a situation you described there was no aggression. Nor even a recent session change, as proposed by others. So where is the problem ? Nothing changes at all. You are gone in 1 minute.
Oh jesus.
Go and re-read what he quoted before he said that...
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 04:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think this sure opens the door to a potential sub-capital-brawler-cap, something that sits between a dread (out of siege) and a titan in terms of DPS and HPs, with bonuses to tracking rather than damage
[img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
701
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 00:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Well i think CCP are on the right track for SCs. Remember this is the first attempt to re-ballance them, so more may happen down the track.
Taking away the ability of smaller drones from them may seem like a bad mistake. It WILL farm out that role to normal carriers and support ships. Net effect? Less SCs on the field, as alliance members now move to close the gaps in the fleet, or they just hope for the best and be at further risk.
I think a decent move by CCP after this happens, would be to reduce the cost of a SC, cut BP requirements by up to 1/2. Net effect? More SCs for smaller alliances, easier to carve a niche out for themselves
The Apostle : I want a kangeroo
Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians
Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US?
Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
Headerman
Quovis
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
701
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 23:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
So any news on the Minmatar capital reballancing?
The Apostle : I want a kangeroo
Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians
Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US?
Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
|
|
| |
|