|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
   |
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP - can you buff carriers, just a little bit?
Up the fuel bay from 3 to 5k m3 so they can carry a bit more fuel and stront for triage.
Up the cargo bays to 1k.
Up the CHA to 15k.
Make Liquid Ozone a charge so that it doesn't need to be constantly moved in and out of ships in the SMA.
As it is, capital modules are just too damn large to be moved around nicely. |
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cedric deBouilard wrote:Quote:Fighters
- Increase signature resolution to 400
that's x4 increase from 100 to 400. isn't that a bit too much? 250-300 is ok. but 400 is overkill.
Yeah this is a little extreme. It relegates fighters to fighting capitals. And in that situation, fighterbombers are going to be preferable (for supercarriers at least). This needs a slight change so that Carriers are still able to hit BS and (maybe) battlecruisers. |
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Raid'En wrote:ovenproofjet wrote:You kinda just nerfed the standard carrier there with the change to the fighter sensor res, carriers are gonna have trouble doing what you say here: "If you want to deal with sub-capitals, you should bring your own sub-capitals or a carrier"
Perhaps add the sensor res reduction as a penalty to supercarriers so as to avoid a knock on effect on the ordinarty carrier
Other wise good changes, especially to the Dreads, siege timer change is long overdue this. don't nerf the normal carriers with supercarriers
Not empty quoting. |
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 23:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
August Hayek wrote:good nerf, but please:
1. buff dreads --> 20% more tank, better tracking
2. buff carriers --> 20% more tank, more fuel bay
3. let fighters as they are now, with the nerf they get somewhat useless
CCP, do this.
|
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 00:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Baron vonDoom wrote:Don't nerf fighters - they're fine.
Gonna keep quoting the truth until someone at CCP recognises it. Might be here a while  |
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 01:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:Ok so here is a tl;dr of the first 32 pages. 11.  Finally to the devs - BEFORE YOU IMPLEMENT THIS, please post a second dev blog about community suggestions on these changes and talk more with us about what changes will be final and which ones will be left on the floor, or changes we can meet each other half way.
Excellent summary, quoting the most important section. |
Svennig
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
73
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 13:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers.
The poor performance of Minmatar capital ships is being looked at and was already being looked at before the blog was posted.
Pointing out flaws and issues with the balancing plan is very much appreciated. I will look into the issues and make changes where they are needed.
Once this hits SISI, I will start a thread in the test server feedback forums. Your concerns will be listened to and acted upon if necessary.
Have my babies. This is a proper two-way dialog between the players and CCP. I'm.. This is brilliant. If I go to fanfest you're not paying for a drink the entire ******* time, do you hear me? |
|
|
| |
|