Sylthi
Coreward Pan-Galactic
Holy Empire of The Unshaven
12
   |
Posted - 2011.10.18 07:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
So..... "Dreadnoughts are not good enough".....
and you are going to FIX it by REMOVING all the Drone bays and adding NOTHING.
This is a "FIX" how, EXACTLY!?!??
Just so you have your vocabulary straight, REMOVING something, and adding NOTHING; yeah, that's a NERF not a FIX. And NO, adding something that works ONLY when you are in Siege mode does not count as "adding something" when you take AWAY something that you can use any time. Because removing drone bays makes dreads a HELL of a lot more vulnerable than is even closely compensated for by the SLIGHT increase in Siege DPS. You would lamost have to DOUBLE the DPS bonus to come even CLOSE to the worth of what you are taking away. I mean seriously, how many dread pilots would trade the 75% additional siege DPS for their drone bay back? I took a poll from the dozen or so dread pilots I know and NONE of them would trade their drone bay for the siege dps as proposed. NONE. Not a single one. But, here is comes anyway. Yet another nerf by CCP shoved down our throats.
Just checking in with that little point.
Oh, yeah, and HOW, again, EXACTLY, is NERFING the HELL out of CARRIERS (with the fighter 'FIX") going to fix SUPER-CARRIERS???!!??
Just CCP playing Russian roulette with our thousands of paid days of account time and millions of skill points.... AGAIN..... I guess....
F-ing JERK-OFFS!!!!
When is CCP going to STOP taking AWAY from the players and actually GIVE something to us..... NEVER I guess..... Time for a NEW GAME if you want that little "feature" of getting something BACK from the company you pay I guess.....
...out....
|
Sylthi
Coreward Pan-Galactic
Holy Empire of The Unshaven
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 12:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
[/quote]
I could understand the "no time to read blog properly, must post!" approach if this had just been released and you were rushing for the first reply, but we're on page 114.
[/quote]
I could undertand your need to quote me a reply if you actually had a point or something to say.......
Quotes? Page Numbers? Other DEV posters quoted in YOUR post that apply to what I had to say or proves my points have already been covered multiple times?
Kind of noticed you didn't have any of those..... because as far as I have read no DEV has talked about these topics specifically.
So again, I don't see your point.
Just saying.
Thank you for your participation in the discussion.
edit: put in the "Dev" requirements. |