Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Anell
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 02:34:00 -
[181] - Quote
I'm skipping most of this thread, but I just wanted to say that I liked your choice of music so much I instantly bought it off amazon. Excellent song!
Also I dig your crazy mining fleet. Every time I think I can ballpark the diversity of gameplay in EVE I get surprised. |

The Wis
Fise Corp War and Pestilence
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 03:00:00 -
[182] - Quote
Anell wrote:I'm skipping most of this thread, but I just wanted to say that I liked your choice of music so much I instantly bought it off amazon. Excellent song!
Also I dig your crazy mining fleet. Every time I think I can ballpark the diversity of gameplay in EVE I get surprised.
Thanks.. It gets hard to chose I think I have a little over 2000 different songs on my drive. A little bit of everything.
|

The Wis
Fise Corp War and Pestilence
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 17:14:00 -
[183] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:See, that's WoW. Everyone knows there aren't any girls that play EVE.
Well I am happy to say I have never even thought about downloading WoW.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
153
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 17:42:00 -
[184] - Quote
The most important question to me is why hasn't this fleet been ganked yet?
If this person enjoys some sort of griefer-immunity due to the fanfest incident (which was deplorable, but whose shelf life has run its course imo,) then that's not fair to the rest of us and isn't in the spirit of EVE. That immunity needs to be lifted.
If it's because nobody can be arsed to fleet a half dozen (overkill?) smartbombing bs's and get the most epic suicide gank of all time, then shame on the eve griefer community. |

Aralieus
Shadowbane Syndicate
84
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 17:49:00 -
[185] - Quote
The Wis wrote:Brandon Syne wrote:The Wis wrote:silens vesica wrote: Holy gankbait, batman! Somewhere, a belt is about to die. Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Shows video of massive mining fleet undocking to prove hes not a botter....shows no proof of hardware beyond what is typed on screen.
I can take a vidoe of the Jita undock and type whatever I want on the video...and I guess we will all just have to believe that all of Jita is just me controlling 450+ accounts. Heh. All true. Still an impressive freight train of barges. James 315 must be spinning like a top. Thanks. I am working on getting my guys ready for another one.. I want to do 140 Battleships.. Not sure if I want to do all the same or some of everyone.. Aren't battleships slightly harder to control effectively than Mackinaws? Are you planning on using some software like ISBoxer? Well I do not plan on using them to fight. But Just to make a video.. ALlot you can do with fleet comands. Just looking for something cool to do.. Also if you have any drone boat and launch drones and assign them to 1 guys. Well that is allot of drones going at one target.
Or train everyone up to carriers and assign fighters  Oderint Dum Metuant |

The Wis
Fise Corp War and Pestilence
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 18:14:00 -
[186] - Quote
AkJon Ferguson wrote:The most important question to me is why hasn't this fleet been ganked yet?
If this person enjoys some sort of griefer-immunity due to the fanfest incident (which was deplorable, but whose shelf life has run its course imo,) then that's not fair to the rest of us and isn't in the spirit of EVE. That immunity needs to be lifted.
If it's because nobody can be arsed to fleet a half dozen (overkill?) smartbombing bs's and get the most epic suicide gank of all time, then shame on the eve griefer community.
Oh I have had allot of ganks.. That is part of the game.. No Immunity yet. Last good gank attempt was 20 BS's and they killed 3 retrivers.
Also you say it has ran its course. Well that it has not I still get crank phone calls daily and e-mails in my personal e-mail. They are just not in game so nothing CCP can do about that.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
154
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 18:40:00 -
[187] - Quote
The Wis wrote:AkJon Ferguson wrote:The most important question to me is why hasn't this fleet been ganked yet?
If this person enjoys some sort of griefer-immunity due to the fanfest incident (which was deplorable, but whose shelf life has run its course imo,) then that's not fair to the rest of us and isn't in the spirit of EVE. That immunity needs to be lifted.
If it's because nobody can be arsed to fleet a half dozen (overkill?) smartbombing bs's and get the most epic suicide gank of all time, then shame on the eve griefer community. Oh I have had allot of ganks.. That is part of the game.. No Immunity yet. Last good gank attempt was 20 BS's and they killed 3 retrivers. Also you say it has ran its course. Well that it has not I still get crank phone calls daily and e-mails in my personal e-mail. They are just not in game so nothing CCP can do about that. I'm glad to hear that you're still a valid gank target and sorry to hear about the rl harassment. |

Calapine
Xeno Tech Corp
143
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 05:12:00 -
[188] - Quote
Thanks for the video.
Seeing all those retrievers fly off into the sunset was impressive. And good choice music...I might never heard of Robbie Robertson else. GÇ£The intention that man should be happy is not in the plan of Creation.GÇ¥-áGÇö Sigmund Freud |

Arronicus
Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made.
156
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 05:55:00 -
[189] - Quote
Impressive. Perhaps it was already said, and I missed it, but how much an hour do you figure you make doing this? Including login times, and time actively transporting isotopes, as they are part of acquiring the isk... Seems like a ton of work, but the longer you mined per stretch, well, I can imagine 10-12mil per, with boosts, if you had some efficienct system of hauling, ie a couple freighters. so that'd put you at a bil per hour, or more. if you reduced the number to 20 miners, a rorq, and a freighter or 2 for hauling, you could make that same amount in 0.0, get ganked less, and do it in grav sites =) |

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC
36
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 08:43:00 -
[190] - Quote
You should consider to apply at guinness book of world records gamer's edition. Also CCP for making a software that allow something like this on a PC. /facepalm |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
550
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 14:38:00 -
[191] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:warpwarwarwarwarawrawrawrawrarwrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrwarawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawr warwawrearwawrawrawrawrawrawrwarawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrawrarwawrawrawrawr awrawarp drive active. best contribution so far...
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|

Yim Sei
Ontogenic Achronycal PLC
53
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:29:00 -
[192] - Quote
Why cant anyone see that this is a big, big problem with this game?
Whats the point in whining about bots when one player can do this? surely this is far worse for the economy than botting.
So all we are hearing at the moment are about the coalitions (CFC) KEeping all the goodies and having trillions of isk / ships etc stashed.
So how many guys do you think in these controlling bodies are doing this?
And everyone whines about RMT pff.
Someone needs to get their head out of their ass and stop this ****. Even though it is already too late.
Sure pay for as many accounts as you want, no problem.
....but restrictions should be in place to only allow what is HUMANLY POSSIBLE for one player to achieve.
Multiboxing software needs to be against the eula and bannable.
I mean 100 'actions' in the same belt from the same IP? - really? this cant be 'seen'?
I love this game and use 2 accounts myself .. hell its humanly possible to use 5 or maybe more but there is goint to be delay between 'clicks' and thus easlily identified.
Come on CCP, actually look like you are trying to stop this so this game really does play the way you market it to us. Post with my main? This is my main - I just overtrain and overplay my alts. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1131
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:15:00 -
[193] - Quote
Get over it. He has the freedom and right to play as he sees fit. He's paying enough to buy a small car each year to do it.
|

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2576
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:19:00 -
[194] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Get over it. He has the freedom and right to play as he sees fit. He's paying enough to buy a small car each year to do it.
Or other people are paying him* enough to buy a small car in exchange for doing it. PLEX is a funny thing.
*Well, paying CCP on his behalf. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1131
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:20:00 -
[195] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Anslo wrote:Get over it. He has the freedom and right to play as he sees fit. He's paying enough to buy a small car each year to do it. Or other people are paying him* enough to buy a small car in exchange for doing it. PLEX is a funny thing. *Well, paying CCP on his behalf.
And do you have evidence that this miner is engaged in RMT?
|

Demolishar
United Aggression
775
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:21:00 -
[196] - Quote
Yim Sei wrote: Come on CCP, actually look like you are trying to stop this so this game really does play the way you market it to us.
I don't think you understand just how wide-spread this is. CCP would lose many, many subs. Usually, people with this many accounts pay with PLEX, and a good metric of whether this sort of thing is "out of control" is if PLEX experienced extreme inflation. However it currently sits at a completely acceptable 550M. |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2576
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:23:00 -
[197] - Quote
Anslo wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Anslo wrote:Get over it. He has the freedom and right to play as he sees fit. He's paying enough to buy a small car each year to do it. Or other people are paying him* enough to buy a small car in exchange for doing it. PLEX is a funny thing. *Well, paying CCP on his behalf. And do you have evidence that this miner is engaged in RMT?
Um.....
Come on Anslo, you're not that bad of a poster. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Yim Sei
Ontogenic Achronycal PLC
53
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:28:00 -
[198] - Quote
Demolishar wrote:Yim Sei wrote: Come on CCP, actually look like you are trying to stop this so this game really does play the way you market it to us.
I don't think you understand just how wide-spread this is. CCP would lose many, many subs. Usually, people with this many accounts pay with PLEX, and a good metric of whether this sort of thing is "out of control" is if PLEX experienced extreme inflation. However it currently sits at a completely acceptable 550M.
Seriously dude this is either a 'player driven market' or it is not.
The OP is a good reason it is not.
Theres only one reason anyone would defend this.
I have stated my opinion on the matter. Dont care how many 'defenders' of this want to troll - anyone with any RL intelligence who wants to play the game 'as marketed' will understand.
If what you are saying is that CCP are openly encouraging this behaviour for additional subscriptions - well I guess not many would disagree with you.
We're just living the lie bud. Living the lie. Post with my main? This is my main - I just overtrain and overplay my alts. |

TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace That Red Alliance
370
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:45:00 -
[199] - Quote
yey, playing a multiplayer game soloe, wooooo
I look forward to your next video where you show yourself playing battlefield with no other real players and just you, and you bot army running around. |

Demolishar
United Aggression
775
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:52:00 -
[200] - Quote
Yim Sei wrote:[quote=Demolishar][quote=Yim Sei]
Seriously dude this is either a 'player driven market' or it is not.
The OP is a good reason it is not.
What difference does it make if there's 100 players flying a Mackinaw each, creating 100 Mackinaws worth of mineral supply and otherwise no content whatsoever for anyone, or 1 player flying 100 Mackinaws doing exactly the same? Some things in EVE were practically desgined to be multiboxed. |

March rabbit
Aliastra
518
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 17:05:00 -
[201] - Quote
someone said it already and i can repeat: this is the best EVE Online video i have seen for 2 years.
Good content (caravan of miners undocking to go to work), good music (something makes good mud). No stupid techno/electro/rap/etc music or "color" language in local chat/on sound track.
Good work. I'm looking forward to see something new from you |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
2153
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 17:22:00 -
[202] - Quote
Eric Ryan wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote: Geez, in 45min this morning I had made 250mil already
Hate to burst your bubble but after he logs them he should be able to pull over 800 mil per hour. Everyday. All day. Good luck keeping pace with that with your 250 million. No he doesn't. He drives the price of his ice flavor of choice further day by day, lowering his own real income considerably.
That said, your statement's truthiness is apparent. Until the ice market bottoms out, he makes lots of ISK.
He also devalues ice mining as a profession for incoming rookies. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

DEFIER ORILIS
DEFIANCE FRENETIC REGIMENT
59
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 17:26:00 -
[203] - Quote
Gzzzzz, I need to join your corp or something!
Anyway, great video. EVE the way it should be! Massive solar invasion to belts and other.
So to understand. You got 5 PCs running about 25 paid EVE Online accounts each and skill trained high enough to get them to undock with these barges. If so I am totally impressed.
Cleaning up that ice belt should go fast but how do you tell them to stop mining when your cargo is full. 100 clicks should take quite a while to do?
Great job on that work, video and organisation. |

No Alibi
Shadow Brokers
23
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 18:48:00 -
[204] - Quote
I remember when you wrote you name in an Ice belt not that long ago....HAHA! I fly by the seat of my pants, No wonder my-áass is always on fire! |

No Alibi
Shadow Brokers
23
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 18:53:00 -
[205] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:Whitehound wrote:Get your guys into drone boats and jump into low-sec and make a gate camp. Set all drones to assist one guy and burn everything that comes through. Have all ships rep the lead ship, too.  Holy face-melt, batman! That'd be like jumping into a blizard of flaming snow! It would be that scene from Star Trek all over again. I fly by the seat of my pants, No wonder my-áass is always on fire! |

Remiel Pollard
Intergalactic Trade and Harm
1323
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 18:58:00 -
[206] - Quote
The Wis wrote:Gogela wrote:I can't believe this is allowed  ..... Why would it not be allowed. Look at what CCP makes. Plex's are not seeded in the game someone had to pay real money for them. So CCP makes about $20,000 a year off me alone. Why would they not allow that?
Because then it becomes a "pay-to-win" game. It's not CCP that allows it, it's the players, and not just on this game. Gamers all over are falling for this crap and allowing it to perpetuate, and even propagating it by continuing to do nothing about it. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Demolishar
United Aggression
775
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:02:00 -
[207] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:The Wis wrote:Gogela wrote:I can't believe this is allowed  ..... Why would it not be allowed. Look at what CCP makes. Plex's are not seeded in the game someone had to pay real money for them. So CCP makes about $20,000 a year off me alone. Why would they not allow that? Because then it becomes a "pay-to-win" game. It's not CCP that allows it, it's the players, and not just on this game. Gamers all over are falling for this crap and allowing it to perpetuate, and even propagating it by continuing to do nothing about it.
If too many people try to "pay to win", the PLEX price drops too low and it becomes less attractive, causing people to grind in game for their ISK. It's a nice and self regulating system that is governed only by what players are willing to tolerate.
Put your money where your mouth is and stop paying your PLEX each month if you want to see the "p2w crowd" getting less value for their money, and perhaps being dissuaded from such activities.
|

Remiel Pollard
Intergalactic Trade and Harm
1323
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:04:00 -
[208] - Quote
Demolishar wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:The Wis wrote:Gogela wrote:I can't believe this is allowed  ..... Why would it not be allowed. Look at what CCP makes. Plex's are not seeded in the game someone had to pay real money for them. So CCP makes about $20,000 a year off me alone. Why would they not allow that? Because then it becomes a "pay-to-win" game. It's not CCP that allows it, it's the players, and not just on this game. Gamers all over are falling for this crap and allowing it to perpetuate, and even propagating it by continuing to do nothing about it. If too many people try to "pay to win", the PLEX price drops too low and it becomes less attractive, causing people to grind in game for their ISK. It's a nice and self regulating system that is governed only by what players are willing to tolerate. Put your money where your mouth is and stop paying your PLEX each month if you want to see the "p2w crowd" getting less value for their money, and perhaps being dissuaded from such activities.
No because you and I both know that won't solve anything. The REAL solution is making life miserable for miners with too many accounts :D You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

bbb2020
Carebears with Attitude
31
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:19:00 -
[209] - Quote
Personly I think CCP should put a max on the number of characters you should be allowed to multibox, course this is just insane. I have no problem with OP doing it, as he is just one man, but think of all the others that is doing it too. Maybe not with 100 characters but you only need 100 OPs with 50 characters and you will have an impact on ice prizes.
Also I don't think OP should have posted this in the forum. Think what will happen when chribba finds out he is not the king of mining anymore. I feel a "rage quit" comming up.
Great videos. looked awesome. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
2154
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:20:00 -
[210] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Demolishar wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:The Wis wrote:Gogela wrote:I can't believe this is allowed  ..... Why would it not be allowed. Look at what CCP makes. Plex's are not seeded in the game someone had to pay real money for them. So CCP makes about $20,000 a year off me alone. Why would they not allow that? Because then it becomes a "pay-to-win" game. It's not CCP that allows it, it's the players, and not just on this game. Gamers all over are falling for this crap and allowing it to perpetuate, and even propagating it by continuing to do nothing about it. If too many people try to "pay to win", the PLEX price drops too low and it becomes less attractive, causing people to grind in game for their ISK. It's a nice and self regulating system that is governed only by what players are willing to tolerate. Put your money where your mouth is and stop paying your PLEX each month if you want to see the "p2w crowd" getting less value for their money, and perhaps being dissuaded from such activities. No because you and I both know that won't solve anything. The REAL solution is making life miserable for miners with too many accounts :D No.
The real solution is for CCP to consider the properties that impart value to virtual commodities when they make any change whatsoever to Eve Online:
Value = Demand / Supply
That is the "real" solution. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |