Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
636
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 14:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
As it seems to be the "in" thing these days, I am also posting a declaration of intent to run for the Council of Stellar Management in the Wormholes forum. But no need to post your likes/dislikes/death threats here! Post them instead in my handy
Official CSM 8 Thread on the Jita Park Speakers Corner Forum!!!
For convenience, I'll repost my OP below.
Nathan Jameson wrote:My Fellow Capsuleers, I am hereby announcing my intention to run for CSM8. I am the founder and executor of Talocan United, a pure wormhole-based alliance that operates in a wide range of activities (though pew is always our favorite). I personally began playing EVE during the Apocrypha expansion (2009), and I have lived in or operated in wormholes since the second month of my EVE career. I would like to make use of my specific experience and viewpoint in representing both the members of wormhole space and the greater New Eden. Wormhole space, although at times brutal, is an excellent proving grounds for a progressing player. To be successful, a pilot must be able to use a wide range of in-game skills; and in my development I've learned of PVE, exploration and scouting, mining and harvesting, research, production, leadership, PVP, transportation, marketeering, and planetary interaction. But there's plenty I've learned that isn't reflected in skillpoints. I've also had the unique experience of growing an entire alliance from a one-man corp in a C4 system into a well-known, well-established 650-man alliance. Over the course of the past two years, I've had to learn the balances between patience and action, diplomacy and aggression, leniency and standards, vision and practicality, and EVE and my personal life. I would like to think I've come out on the better end of it all. Although I think my time spent in wormholes has given me a strong foundation, I do not intend to advance only wormhole-related concerns to the CCP offices. And as the fundamental purpose of the Council of Stellar Management is communication between the player base and CCP, I will also not be running a platform based on broad, sweeping changes to any particular element of EVE. (Well, except maybe POS's, but this is nothing new to fellow wormholers.) I will instead be focusing on two elements that are important to me. First is communication, as it was the entire reason the CSM was formed. Communication of one kind or another has always been vital to me (and is, in fact, one of my IRL degrees). To give an example, our alliance's website conveys a large quantity of information that has helped many incoming pilots adjust to wormhole space. No candidate can be a strong candidate if he forgets his ultimate priority. Second is a respect for diversity, something I've made sure my alliance has held from the very start. We do not all roll in large deadspace-fit T3 gangs (although some do). Some of us like to camp systems in stealth bombers; some like to farm Sleeper NPCs; some like to manufacture and research; some of us even like to mine ABC ore while we talk with friends over TeamSpeak. Sometimes we blob, when we feel the situation warrants it. In most cases, however, our fleets are perhaps a dozen, if not far fewer. We hunt wormhole space, low-sec, and null. We live in systems ranging from C1's and C2's to higher C5's. We are an alliance founded on diversity and mutual respect for the playstyles of others, and we have shown more than one corp the door that has breached this sacred trust. While any specific change to EVE's mechanics will always advantage one group over another, I believe it is my job to represent this aforementioned mindset...to promote a wide variety of improvements that ultimately remembers everyone, from the richest, most devoted pilots to those who can only sign in on weekends to run their PI. Because in the end, we all pay for our subscription. I appreciate your consideration for me as your candidate for CSM8. Win or lose, I firmly believe it is important for me to run. If you have any questions at all, such as my thoughts on particular aspects of EVE, please feel free to leave them here or send them via Eve-mail. Also feel free to contact me in-game on either this character or my alt, Thomas Broker. I look forward to your feedback, well-wishers and trolls alike. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! Profile, Articles, Viewpoints
Thank you for your support and consideration. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
lanyaie
816
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 15:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
interesting moar and moar candidates this is going to turn out to be hard...oh well not like my 1 vote matters ;) Hay |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
636
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 15:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
lanyaie wrote:interesting moar and moar candidates this is going to turn out to be hard...oh well not like my 1 vote matters ;)
Honestly, this is all in preparation for the Wormhole Primaries we're expecting to be held. After that's over, we should have one choice that the entire wormhole community stands behind. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 04:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:lanyaie wrote:interesting moar and moar candidates this is going to turn out to be hard...oh well not like my 1 vote matters ;) Honestly, this is all in preparation for the Wormhole Primaries we're expecting to be held. After that's over, we should have one choice that the entire wormhole community stands behind.
^^THIS^^ |
dark dreamur
Wormhole Exploration Crew R.E.P.O.
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
"As it seems to be the "in" thing these days, I am also posting a declaration of intent to run for the Council of Stellar Management in the Wormholes forum. But no need to post your likes/dislikes/death threats here! Post them instead in my handy
Official CSM 8 Thread on the Jita Park Speakers Corner Forum!!!"
if thats your motivation " because its the " in" thing then you can forget my vote, there are many more worthy candidates who want the position for better reasons |
Han Soleo Chelien
Prime Numbers
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
I too am a full time wormhole dweller. When I first made the plunge into wormhole life I scoured Google for all the information I could find on wormholes. Your website has been an extremely valuable tool that helped get me moving in the right direction. So for that alone I thank you for making that information readily available for all.I had even considered applying to be apart of your alliance but in the end decided to go at it solo with my corp.
Anyways, all this to say that I'm excited to see you running for CSM. I really believe wormhole life is where this game really shines, at least it has for me. I know you said in your OP that you were not just going to focus on wormhole-related concerns, which is great, but as a wormhole dweller I am curious as to what concerns you do have for wormhole space? Can you elaborate a bit on this? |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
638
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 20:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
dark dreamur wrote:if thats your motivation " because its the " in" thing then you can forget my vote, there are many more worthy candidates who want the position for better reasons
I believe you misread my sentence (or it was structured poorly). My thread in JPSC has been up since Jan. 28, making me the second to declare (after Cipreh and well before James Arget). The "in thing" nowadays I was referring to seems to be posting a thread in the Wormhole Forums as well (which isn't really the procedure). Still, getting the word out there all the same.
EDIT: @ Han Soleo. Although CSM is not game design, I do have things I'd like to see happen in wormhole space, apart from fixing POS's. I've written about them in the blog linked in my signature (or on the JPSC thread). Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
Oxandrolone
Bite Me inc Bitten.
127
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 01:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
My question would be how do you have time to run a 623 man allience and also fulfill CSM duties? TwoStep was a grunt or maybe even an officer in k162 and didnt have time.
Right now personally im considering anyone outside of the c6 circle jerk a viable candidate so id love to hear more about you :) |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
643
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 06:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Oxandrolone wrote:My question would be how do you have time to run a 623 man allience and also fulfill CSM duties? TwoStep was a grunt or maybe even an officer in k162 and didnt have time.
Right now personally im considering anyone outside of the c6 circle jerk a viable candidate so id love to hear more about you :)
I've been slowly stepping back from my alliance duties for the past few months in preparation for being a viable candidate. I have two very good leaders, Chris Elliot and Bernie Nator, who have been doing very well in molding the alliance with their own initiatives. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
Oxandrolone
Bite Me inc Bitten.
127
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 06:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:Oxandrolone wrote:My question would be how do you have time to run a 623 man allience and also fulfill CSM duties? TwoStep was a grunt or maybe even an officer in k162 and didnt have time.
Right now personally im considering anyone outside of the c6 circle jerk a viable candidate so id love to hear more about you :) I've been slowly stepping back from my alliance duties for the past few months in preparation for being a viable candidate. I have two very good leaders, Chris Elliot and Bernie Nator, who have been doing very well in molding the alliance with their own initiatives.
I see, thanks for the reply.
Are you also willing to travel to Iceland for the summits? where are you located geographically? will you buy me a beer at fanfest if i vote for you? |
|
Rennma
Orange Juice Destribution E.B.O.L.A.
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
+1 For this.
As we really need a spokesman for our wh people i will give my vote to him.
With his scientific background in communication and his day to day business in eve fine tuning those skills, i could not be more satisfied with my vote invested in Nathan Jameson.
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
643
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Oxandrolone wrote:Are you also willing to travel to Iceland for the summits? where are you located geographically? will you buy me a beer at fanfest if i vote for you?
1) I am, and will actually work to get such trips into my business contract here at work if I'm elected. 2) I'm currently working as a teacher in Taiwan, nearly on the exact opposite side of the earth from Iceland. Which explains why I haven't been able to afford getting to FanFest yet. :-[ 3) Uh, sure? Is that in my list of duties now? *checks contract* Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
3277
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 20:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
Oxandrolone wrote:My question would be how do you have time to run a 623 man allience and also fulfill CSM duties? TwoStep was a grunt or maybe even an officer in k162 and didnt have time.
Right now personally im considering anyone outside of the c6 circle jerk a viable candidate so id love to hear more about you :)
I am (and have been during both CSM terms) a director in AHARM. I certainly don't have a ton of time to play the game, but can still surf forums at work and stuff. You can see from *my* kb link (http://dontshootx.com/killboard/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=10335) that I still manage to lose triage archons just fine during my term as a CSM. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
2922
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 21:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Two step wrote:Oxandrolone wrote:My question would be how do you have time to run a 623 man allience and also fulfill CSM duties? TwoStep was a grunt or maybe even an officer in k162 and didnt have time.
Right now personally im considering anyone outside of the c6 circle jerk a viable candidate so id love to hear more about you :) I am (and have been during both CSM terms) a director in AHARM. I certainly don't have a ton of time to play the game, but can still surf forums at work and stuff. You can see from *my* kb link ( http://dontshootx.com/killboard/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=10335) that I still manage to lose triage archons just fine during my term as a CSM.
Not only that, but being in alliance leadership is hardly uncommon in the CSM. I would not consider that a reason to not vote for him.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
645
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 23:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
For those who are interested, I've been updating my blog with articles on a number of things, including this very issue.
A Platform to Remember
The Delicate Dance of Politics (in which I name-drop my favorite two politicians of all time)
Let me know if there are any topics you'd like to see me address specifically. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
Cipreh
Clann Fian Transmission Lost
250
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 01:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
Looking forward to the primary! It seems as though we have some very good candidates this year looking to represent us! |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
648
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 23:11:00 -
[17] - Quote
You can now harass me and send me death threats in a fresh, new, innovative way!
https://twitter.com/TalocanUnited
Perfect for those little thoughts or questions that don't even deserve a full forum post. Or love notes. I'm not picky. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
654
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 15:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
A couple new updates to my campaign:
The blog entry "Shaking up the Snowglobe," in which I explain why preventing self-destructing inside a force field may actually not be in your best interests.
An interview with podcast Crossing Zebras. Xander is an excellent interviewer, and it was my pleasure to work with him. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
VegasMirage
359
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 02:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
you did a great job organizing TALUN and you're consistent character is exactly what we need
you have our votes
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
655
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 02:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:you did a great job organizing TALUN and you're consistent character is exactly what we need
you have our votes
VEEEGAAAAAASSSSS
We miss you in wormhole space! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
|
VegasMirage
359
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 02:51:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:VegasMirage wrote:you did a great job organizing TALUN and you're consistent character is exactly what we need
you have our votes
VEEEGAAAAAASSSSS We miss you in wormhole space!
I'm there, you just don't see me in local... likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
655
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 02:53:00 -
[22] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:I'm there, you just don't see me in local...
whaaaAAAAAT????
And here I thought my computer was broken! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
ACreatorPT
Shiva Furnace
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 03:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Well 1st of all let me say how happy i am for you to apply to this position. I was in my second month of eve reading about wormholes and your website was my saving grace :D so much that if you remember i joined your corp!!
but serious stuff we played for a few months and in that time not only you were a teacher but also one of those rare really nice people you can meet in eve. Having returned only a few days ago to eve and notice that your are running for CSM i could not pass the chance to give you my support (even though im only gonna watch the podcasts and interviews now ^^)
you certainly have my +1 vote and i really hope you win!!
and ofc expect some messages in-game for stuffs you need to ask the devs!! |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
682
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 23:34:00 -
[24] - Quote
Some updates:
An Interview on Crossing Zebras. Xander is an intelligent interviewer who asks the hard questions. I thoroughly enjoyed this opportunity.
A Horse to PVP. My thoughts on improving warfare in high sec, and why simply changing game mechanics won't ever be enough. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
DrBmN
Axial tilt Malefic Aspects
9
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 00:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
Reading all your articles. Good luck in the CSM8 run Nathan! |
chris elliot
EG CORP Talocan United
130
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 00:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
Your link halfway down at "2) Options given to both sides of a conflict." is broken. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
682
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 00:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
chris elliot wrote:Your link halfway down at "2) Options given to both sides of a conflict." is broken.
Extra end-bracket in the link. Fixed now, thanks. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
715
|
Posted - 2013.02.22 15:14:00 -
[28] - Quote
If anyone is wondering, I've been updating my Jita Park thread more frequently. However, here is a recent update to my blog: "EVERYBODY VOTE!" Wherein I explain why the wormhole community still desperately needs a primary (of sorts).
We need voters who are as proactive as the candidates. Please read and be ready to vote on March 22nd! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
623
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 10:31:00 -
[29] - Quote
@ Nathan Jameson - Are you in the "wormholes are fine, if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp or will you be pushing for change/additions if you get elected? Is my bitter vet membership card in the mail? |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
721
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 11:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:@ Nathan Jameson - Are you in the "wormholes are fine, if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp or will you be pushing for change/additions if you get elected?
Yes. POS's are perfectly fine. Leave them as is.
To be specific, wormholes as an environment are wonderful and still function more or less as intended. The tools we have to interact with them, however, are in desperate need of improvement.
I wouldn't mind seeing some new content added (new sites, etc.) but that's pretty far down the list after game issues that actually need fixing.
(BTW, that first line was a troll.) Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
|
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
624
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 12:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Okay thanks for the reply. I consider you to be one of the "wormholes are fine" people. Is my bitter vet membership card in the mail? |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
722
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 07:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
A quick update:
Just so that everyone is aware, I am available to talk on voice comms (TS3, Mumble, Skype, etc.) for those who are interested in more direct communication. Groups that would like me to field questions from their members, for example, could take advantage of this.
As I live in Taiwan, my hours are a bit limited. Here are the general times that IGÇÖd be free to talk each day:
Sunday GÇô Thursday: 1200 GÇô 1600 EVE Time
Friday GÇô Saturday: As this is the weekend, my schedule is much more flexible. Contact me if you have a time that works for you, and IGÇÖll see what I can do!
I hope to hear from many of you in the near future! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
723
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
I've just realized that, for better or worse, I am now the executor for the largest wormhole alliance in the game. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
723
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 17:55:00 -
[34] - Quote
Eve.Stratics.com recently conducted a text interview with me (along with several other well-known CSM candidates).
Go here to read the full article! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
740
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 12:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
New blog post up: "Changing of the Guard"
A number of significant changes have happened to the wormhole political landscape recently, and I discuss the two leading causes of wormhole groups failing. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
808
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 12:40:00 -
[36] - Quote
Managed to get on some nice cap kills today. It isn't often these sorts of things happen in my TZ. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Lenier Chenal
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 15:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:VegasMirage wrote:you did a great job organizing TALUN and you're consistent character is exactly what we need
you have our votes
VEEEGAAAAAASSSSS We miss you in wormhole space!
Oh, he hasn't left :) |
Lenier Chenal
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 15:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Okay thanks for the reply. I consider you to be one of the "wormholes are fine" people.
I cannot understand why someone would be opposed to improving them. Seems stupid. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
818
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 15:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Talocan United celebrates their second birthday today! I am immensely proud of all my alliance members. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Tisisan
Hard Knocks Inc.
119
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 15:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Okay thanks for the reply. I consider you to be one of the "wormholes are fine" people. I cannot understand why someone would be opposed to improving them. Seems stupid.
Stupid is not understanding the difference between "fine, could always be improved" and "broken, needs fixing to be fully functional." I'll give you a hint. It determines priorities. |
|
Lenier Chenal
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 17:26:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tisisan wrote:Lenier Chenal wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Okay thanks for the reply. I consider you to be one of the "wormholes are fine" people. I cannot understand why someone would be opposed to improving them. Seems stupid. Stupid is not understanding the difference between "fine, could always be improved" and "broken, needs fixing to be fully functional." I'll give you a hint. It determines priorities.
Improving wormholes should be the priority if you're living here. |
Tsobai Hashimoto
Hard Knocks Inc.
124
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 04:49:00 -
[42] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:Tisisan wrote:Lenier Chenal wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Okay thanks for the reply. I consider you to be one of the "wormholes are fine" people. I cannot understand why someone would be opposed to improving them. Seems stupid. Stupid is not understanding the difference between "fine, could always be improved" and "broken, needs fixing to be fully functional." I'll give you a hint. It determines priorities. Improving wormholes should be the priority if you're living here.
out of all the things that could be worked on in wormhole space POSs are the number one
having just recently moved back to WH space ive forgotten how awful POS life is....from opening cans in hangers. lag moving between ships. not able to setup t3 ships andproduction chains? my god
that is something that would help alot of players and should be top goal for ccp
next to that id really like to see more t3 ships but i know others wouldnt..... |
Kusum Fawn
State War Academy Caldari State
301
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 01:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
I am going to ask you the same thing that i asked James Arget in his thread.
What are your thoughts on :
nullsec stagnation ~ Nullsec ore changes ~nullsec industry changes ~nullsec force projection changes Hisec vs lowsec mining Hisec miner ganking Lowsec repopulation ship / module imbalances User interface changes Inventory changes other pos changes other corp role changes other industry changes
Wh specific What changes to wh space would you want ? what would you never want to have changed? Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
854
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 04:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
Do you have specific proposed changes in mind, or is this kind of a grab-bag of open-ended questions? Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Lenier Chenal
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 05:29:00 -
[45] - Quote
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:
out of all the things that could be worked on in wormhole space POSs are the number one
having just recently moved back to WH space ive forgotten how awful POS life is....from opening cans in hangers. lag moving between ships. not able to setup t3 ships andproduction chains? my god
that is something that would help alot of players and should be top goal for ccp
next to that id really like to see more t3 ships but i know others wouldnt.....
I'd for one like to see something to push more people into lower class holes. It would drive conflict, increase their value, and make it more fun for everyone. |
Lenier Chenal
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 05:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:Do you have specific proposed changes in mind, or is this kind of a grab-bag of open-ended questions?
Don't feed the troll :) |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
854
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 05:34:00 -
[47] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:I'd for one like to see something to push more people into lower class holes. It would drive conflict, increase their value, and make it more fun for everyone. I don't think it's the lack of incentives...pilots in lower-class wormholes can make a pretty decent killing from sites and PI. It's all the hassle that goes with it that either drives them back out or discourages them in the first place. The headache of setting up a proper POS for the first (or second or third) time. Setting up and managing PI installations each day. Not bringing in more people into corp for fear of theft. Being periodically curb-stomped by larger groups because you have too few pilots.
The first thing we need to do is improve the tools the games gives incoming corps. Then we can more accurately gauge if it is indeed lack of incentive that keeps lower-class wormholes quiet. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Kusum Fawn
State War Academy Caldari State
301
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 06:45:00 -
[48] - Quote
originally it was a grab bag of things that could be responded to. not to suggest specific changes or particular ideas that i wanted addressed, but a jumping off point for thing to be addressed.
I know youve seen the James Arget thread where i have been branded a troll, and know that ive read your blog and the Jita park corner thread before posting here. the same as with James Arget
However. from you i am more interested in changes or ideas not specific to wh that you would like to see talked about in the CSM.
Notice if you will, the list deals mostly with Nullsec as an environment that i feel has grown somewhat stagnant. both in the way that alliances deal with its members and with the space. Things that i think will transfer over to some degree to wh space. I am interested in how useful a CSM member you will be speaking about issues that are universal in nature, and not just wh specific space issues.
Also, how closely do you follow the test servers changes ?and try them before they go live? Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
857
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 02:03:00 -
[49] - Quote
Talocan United decided to celebrate its two-year birthday by using BLOPs to ignite a low-sec brawl. Best party ever. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Casirio
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
446
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 02:47:00 -
[50] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:Talocan United decided to celebrate its two-year birthday by using BLOPs to ignite a low-sec brawl. Best party ever.
i cant even begin to decipher the BR but looks like fun ! |
|
Tsobai Hashimoto
Hard Knocks Inc.
124
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 05:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:
out of all the things that could be worked on in wormhole space POSs are the number one
having just recently moved back to WH space ive forgotten how awful POS life is....from opening cans in hangers. lag moving between ships. not able to setup t3 ships andproduction chains? my god
that is something that would help alot of players and should be top goal for ccp
next to that id really like to see more t3 ships but i know others wouldnt.....
I'd for one like to see something to push more people into lower class holes. It would drive conflict, increase their value, and make it more fun for everyone.
i agree with that but as said here. pos updates could fix that....
when looking for a wh corp i wanted c5 or larger or bust. i have the skill points to be of use but most cuz why leave fw with 75-100 m isk an hour and lots of small gang scrums for the same isk living out of a pos not always in control of the content i will play each day?
if im going to deal with wh logistics i want a bigger chanellge and rewards
not that everyone has this view but im guessing poor pos ui really limits lower sp or newer pilots. the ones that would live in c3s etc |
Sith1s Spectre
Sky Fighters Talocan United
105
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Casirio wrote:Nathan Jameson wrote:Talocan United decided to celebrate its two-year birthday by using BLOPs to ignite a low-sec brawl. Best party ever. i cant even begin to decipher the BR but looks like fun !
Basically here's the TL:DR version
We decided to kill as much stuff as we possibly could in one day and invited Wrong Hole along to return the favour since they invited us on one of their ops recently.
1. Started with BLOPS into Providence - lost a couple of arazus - killed a few things much lols were had.
2. Came across a POCO in lowsec coming out of reinforcement, saw it belonged to Sanctuary Pact who we still had blue balls about since they refused to fight us when we came across their C5. (and rolled one of their carriers out) Funny thing is, were involved in killing that exact same carrier pilot when that poco came out of reinforcement (and all the TEST guys came in) - we bailed on that as we hate TIDI. (there's more involved with the null alliances but well - IDC for nullsec alliance stuff)
3. The day before we had scouted a POCO coming out of reinforcement in a connecting c5 which was reinforced by a 20 toon (probably 4 man) corp who had recently moved in (and from their pos layout were new to WHs). I saw that they had a Moros and Thanatos sitting unmanned in the POS and hoped they would use them to destroy the POCO. Well let's leave it at that they didn't disappoint us. (Still waiting for Evekill to post the Thanny)
Anyways, much lols and drinks were had and it was a very successful day.
CCP please consider hats as a clothing option for our spaceship barbies.-á
Artist impression of what this could potentially be http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t66/ROBC5Z06/sithsig_zps86971c83.jpg |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
864
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 13:48:00 -
[53] - Quote
Back to the official campaigning!
I've just completed my match.eve-csm.com profile. Take a look, and promote it to your undecided friends! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
864
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 15:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
Oh, and got this nice poster commissioned by Rixx Javix. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nicola Arman
Saiph Industries Talocan United
8
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 16:06:00 -
[55] - Quote
+1
We all deserve a voice! |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
864
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 04:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
EveNews24.com just posted a recent interview about my CSM 8 candidacy. Check it out! (And feel free to troll me on the comments.) Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Lenier Chenal
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:Lenier Chenal wrote:I'd for one like to see something to push more people into lower class holes. It would drive conflict, increase their value, and make it more fun for everyone. I don't think it's the lack of incentives...pilots in lower-class wormholes can make a pretty decent killing from sites and PI. It's all the hassle that goes with it that either drives them back out or discourages them in the first place. The headache of setting up a proper POS for the first (or second or third) time. Setting up and managing PI installations each day. Not bringing in more people into corp for fear of theft. Being periodically curb-stomped by larger groups because you have too few pilots. The first thing we need to do is improve the tools the games gives incoming corps. Then we can more accurately gauge if it is indeed lack of incentive that keeps lower-class wormholes quiet.
If we start pushing now, we might have it by the 15th anniversary. |
Rengas
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 04:27:00 -
[58] - Quote
I found this quote "There's no unified wormhole vote this time, because Two Step isn't running; the w-space vote is likely to be fractured and thus irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. " from this Mittani.com article intriguing.
As I understand it though everyone decided that a WH Primary was not needed? |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
864
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 04:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
Rengas wrote:I found this quote "There's no unified wormhole vote this time, because Two Step isn't running; the w-space vote is likely to be fractured and thus irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. " from this Mittani.com article intriguing. As I understand it though everyone decided that a WH Primary was not needed?
Two Step was basically the only persona we would have entrusted with setting up a primary, and he said before the announcement of voting changes that none would be held.
The logic is that as long as ALL wormholers put ALL wormhole candidates at the top of their lists (in any order), and as long as we control at least 1/14 of the overall vote, we will get SOMEONE on the CSM, simply because of the way STV works. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
chris elliot
EG CORP Talocan United
157
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
When you lack a scalpel, sometimes a 12 gauge is an appropriate substitute. |
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Transmission Lost
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 13:49:00 -
[61] - Quote
I think it is important that everyone only set wormhole candidates on the list and no other CSM candidate. If there is a case where votes are close the other choices you would put on the list gets an extra boost. Wich could cut of on of our reps... . |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
865
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 13:52:00 -
[62] - Quote
unimatrix0030 wrote:I think it is important that everyone only set wormhole candidates on the list and no other CSM candidate. If there is a case where votes are close the other choices you would put on the list gets an extra boost. Wich could cut of on of our reps... .
Only if you put a non-WH candidate before a WH candidate. The STV system attempts to elect your top choices first, and removes candidates only one at-a-time.
Also, there is the fact that you will likely HAVE to pick 14 candidates. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Trinkets friend
Minmatar-Amarr Man-Boy Love Association
988
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 12:58:00 -
[63] - Quote
You can pick your CSM Candidates but you can't pick your nose.
Or something.
No one will elect Nathan Jameson. he's in AU TZ and will be asleep when everyone else is bitching on the forums and tryig to convo him about "zomg POS's are broken" or "wormhole stabilisers, do it nau, farghot." Taking submissions for "Trinkets friendly Advice Column" via evemail or private convo in-game. Anonymity sorta guaranteed. http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
868
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 13:25:00 -
[64] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:No one will elect Nathan Jameson. he's in AU TZ and will be asleep when everyone else is bitching on the forums and tryig to convo him about "zomg POS's are broken" or "wormhole stabilisers, do it nau, farghot."
Sounds like a bonus to me.
Actually, I've been in contact with the current CSM and have double-checked that their regular meeting times are during my awake hours. So I'm good there. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
868
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 07:41:00 -
[65] - Quote
Rhavas had some interesting things to say in a recent address to wormhole voters:
http://themittani.com/features/csm-pre-election-unaffiliated-wormhole-votes Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Arianazz
The Industrial Consortium G a l a c t i c Industries
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 15:09:00 -
[66] - Quote
You will have my vote. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
872
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:14:00 -
[67] - Quote
At present, there are five candidates who have put their names forward for representing wormhole space on the CSM. They are (alphabetically):
Ayeson Cipreh Chitsa Jason James Arget Nathan Jameson
James Arget recently posted the following on his CSM blog:
Quote:I had a fun chat with the other wormhole candidates this weekend. The Pre-Election has been delayed, and as a result we had a bit more time to do some collaboration. I kicked things off, and after a few evemails we all spat in our hands and shook on an agreement. Each candidate only needs 200 votes in the pre-election. Any votes above and beyond this are just cake, but if youGÇÖre short those 200, you may fail to be listed on the final ballot. There will be no public count as the votes come in, but we were told that Xhagen would let us know when we passed the threshold.
Therefore, as soon as I hit 200, IGÇÖll be calling for anyone who was goign to give me their pre-election vote to pass it on to another WH candidate. In particular, Ayeson and I have mutually endorsed each other. After that, Chitsa, Cipreh, and Nathan round out the Wormhole 5. This may skew the GÇ£front-runnerGÇ¥ count when the pre-election results are posted, but itGÇÖs more important to keep all our cards in play. The wormhole candidate field is very strong this year, and I think it speaks volumes that weGÇÖll happily kill each other in game, but weGÇÖre all in agreement that when it comes to the CSM we need to work together to get the best odds of winning a seat for wormhole space.
The Pre-Election should be going live any hour now on the CSM website, so go out and get your vote in!
I am re-posting it here to confirm that I will be supporting the GÇ£Wormhole 5,GÇ¥ and that I will be sending out a public announcement if and when I have reached the 200 votes needed for the final election. Players are encouraged to send their votes towards the other candidates should this occur.
Up with wormhole space! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
872
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:17:00 -
[68] - Quote
And the pre-election voting is live!
Click here to endorse me as your CSM 8 candidate! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
315
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:21:00 -
[69] - Quote
First off, you've got my vote. I already planned to arrange the wormhole candidates at the top of my voting list, and have advised my corp to do the same! Whether or not they will though, is up to them! You're posts seem the most thorough of the wormhole candidates, and your views are the most direct and clear. Not to mention my deep respect, and dare i say fear, of the mighty Talocan United.
One thing i wanted calification on, was your view towards smaller corporations living in wh-space. Corporations such as mine who have carved out a home for themselves, whilst more than willing to fight and die to protect their space, rely heavily on the home-field advantage that the lower classes bring. In a typical higher class 5 or 6, a small group such as ourselves would be quickly steamrolled by larger alliances. Whereas i see the lower classes of wormhole space being the last, true, bastion for small corporations, many feel that these wormholes are too difficult to invade. What are your thoughts, specifically, regarding smaller corporations in wh-space? Do you agree with other peoples suggestions regarding this, such as the reduction of ECM effectiveness, or the quite mad idea of tower-size limitations?
The closest i could find to these opinions was in the article Shaking up the Snowglobe, you hinted at possible effects of changes to smaller corporations. Whilst i'm not against the prevention of self-destruction within a force-field, as the spoils of war should be the right of any successful attack, you did raise a good point regarding the potential stratification of wormhole space. Of all my many concerns, my primary is that wormhole space is the only place in all of new eden where a single corporation can effectively "claim space", and imo anything that ultimately seeks to allow wh-space to be completely dominated by larger alliances would kill one of the best aspects of EvE.
Your campaign statement stated: "We are all players, and we all deserve a voice." I look forward to you representing the interests of the wormhole community, both large and small, and continuing to make wormhole space the best part of EvE! Post with your main, like a BOSS! |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
872
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:24:00 -
[70] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:Whereas i see the lower classes of wormhole space being the last, true, bastion for small corporations, many feel that these wormholes are too difficult to invade. What are your thoughts, specifically, regarding smaller corporations in wh-space? Do you agree with other peoples suggestions regarding this, such as the reduction of ECM effectiveness, or the quite mad idea of tower-size limitations? The closest i could find to these opinions was in the article Shaking up the Snowglobe, you hinted at possible effects of changes to smaller corporations. Whilst i'm not against the prevention of self-destruction within a force-field, as the spoils of war should be the right of any successful attack, you did raise a good point regarding the potential stratification of wormhole space. Of all my many concerns, my primary is that wormhole space is the only place in all of new eden where a single corporation can effectively "claim space", and imo anything that ultimately seeks to allow wh-space to be completely dominated by larger alliances would kill one of the best aspects of EvE.
Although I personally would love to see reasons again for alliance like my own to start invading others (we stopped doing this months ago because it simply wasn't worth it), I mentioned in the article that a CSM candidate should look at both sides of the issue. If you hand one side a better weapon (or a reason to use it), then you'd better give the other side something to compensate. I am strongly against nerfing ECM on POS's, as deterrent is the best defense against invasion in C1-C4s. Same with limiting POS sizes; complete no-go for me. In fact, I'd like to see code written that speeds up the process of placing defensive batteries on new POS's, to help fledgling corps through one of the most annoying parts of claiming their new homes. An "auto-place" option, and ways to get in more defenses more quickly, instead of 4-6 batteries a trip.
I also wouldn't mind seeing the ECM bonus on the Caldari Tower changed from a time cycle bonus to a lowered CPU/PG need specifically for ECM batteries. There is really no good way to fit a Caldari tower for anything useful in WH space...either it's all ECM and no guts, or all industry and no defense.
I hope this helps address your questions. Please reply if you have any more! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
872
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:31:00 -
[71] - Quote
Quote:Greetings,
You have met the 200 vote endorsement thresh-hold in the CSM8 pre-election. You will be included in the full election ballot.
Best Regards,
CCP Dolan
Loving my inbox lately. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 14:55:00 -
[72] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:I am strongly against nerfing ECM on POS's, as deterrent is the best defense against invasion in C1-C4s. Do you think that even the off-racial jamming strength is satisfactory/acceptable? In other words, is the ability for a Grav ECM battery to easily jam an Amarr ship is the way things should work and should not be modified?
Nathan Jameson wrote:I also wouldn't mind seeing the ECM bonus on the Caldari Tower changed from a time cycle bonus to a lowered CPU/PG need specifically for ECM batteries. There is really no good way to fit a Caldari tower for anything useful in WH space...either it's all ECM and no guts, or all industry and no defense. Different tools have different purposes. A Caldari tower has high CPU for the CPU-heavy industry. The current ECM bonus makes up for this as you're more likely to be jammed due to the faster cycle time. You also don't need to run three polymer chains just because you can :)
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
873
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 15:27:00 -
[73] - Quote
Meytal wrote:Nathan Jameson wrote:I am strongly against nerfing ECM on POS's, as deterrent is the best defense against invasion in C1-C4s. Do you think that even the off-racial jamming strength is satisfactory/acceptable? In other words, is the ability for a Grav ECM battery to easily jam an Amarr ship is the way things should work and should not be modified?
The jamming strength IS different if it's off-race. ECM mods shouldn't be AS effective, but they shouldn't be a complete wash-out against an attacking force that fits against them. Most small corps either will not have the people online to man their weapons or will not have enough online with Anchoring V + POS Defense (a tough train) to make them really count. Groups like mine know how to take advantage of it.
My alliance has taken down dickstars in C2s before with sub-caps. It took a week to take down 8 towers and was hardly easy. However, it was for settling a deep score we had with the defenders, and I don't see a reason to make invading C2s any easier.
Meytal wrote:Nathan Jameson wrote:I also wouldn't mind seeing the ECM bonus on the Caldari Tower changed from a time cycle bonus to a lowered CPU/PG need specifically for ECM batteries. There is really no good way to fit a Caldari tower for anything useful in WH space...either it's all ECM and no guts, or all industry and no defense. Different tools have different purposes. A Caldari tower has high CPU for the CPU-heavy industry. The current ECM bonus makes up for this as you're more likely to be jammed due to the faster cycle time. You also don't need to run three polymer chains just because you can :)
Faster jam cycles only matter if the POS mods cycle through targets more quickly, which they won't. Remember, fledgling corps either won't be online or won't be able to man their defenses. Which means they'll be relying on the automated POS defenses. I'd rather give automated Caldari towers more ECM mods to play with than change target cycling time for ALL towers. Smaller overall change for the same effect. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
174
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:24:00 -
[74] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:The jamming strength IS different if it's off-race. ECM mods shouldn't be AS effective, but they shouldn't be a complete wash-out against an attacking force that fits against them. Most small corps either will not have the people online to man their weapons or will not have enough online with Anchoring V + POS Defense (a tough train) to make them really count. Groups like mine know how to take advantage of it. My point was that even off-racial jammers are strong enough that unless you're not worried about guns or defenders, you bring far more Guardians than the number of Radar jammers, up to and even surpassing the total number of ECM mods regardless of race. They're that effective. Naturally, few or no guns mean you can roll with drone boats, etc, but let's assume some sort of competence in POS setup.
I was just asking whether you thought the off-racial strength was too strong, and it sounds like you do not thank so :)
Meytal wrote:Faster jam cycles only matter if the POS mods cycle through targets more quickly, which they won't. Remember, fledgling corps either won't be online or won't be able to man their defenses. Which means they'll be relying on the automated POS defenses. I'd rather give automated Caldari towers more ECM mods to play with than change target cycling time for ALL towers. Smaller overall change for the same effect. If a corp does not have the manpower to defend their POS against a fleet large enough to counter a dickstar, a few more ECM mods won't help. If they do, the extra ECM would make them near-inpenetrable. Simply throwing more ECM isn't a good idea, because while it can benefit the smaller corps, the benefit scales much higher for larger corps and alliances, especially considering the strength of off-racial jams.
Stront-checking a small or medium that looks juicy and has far too few defenses is one thing and takes no time at all, but few people want to slog through even a lightly-defended large Caldari in C1-C4 just because of the sheer boredom and the increased danger of waving your exposed butts in space for such a long period of time. More ECM makes it less enjoyable, but there isn't much enjoyment in it already. Do it for fun or to stront-check, no. Do it for a reason, yes.
It does sound like, though, that the POS mods on Caldari towers need to have the potential to cycle targets faster to keep up with the ECM bonus. That sounds like a small change worth supporting on the way to incrementally improving the situation, rather than throwing one bonus away for something new. Caldari towers need to keep the risk: you're getting improved industry capacity, but you can't fit the defenses that you could in a Minmatar tower.
I am responsible for a (large) Caldari tower, and I'd love to run three+ polymer chains and research and manufacturing together with a full suite of defenses, but I know that's not balanced. So I make trade-offs to achieve some sort of acceptable equilibrium. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
878
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 04:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Meytal wrote:It does sound like, though, that the POS mods on Caldari towers need to have the potential to cycle targets faster to keep up with the ECM bonus. That sounds like a small change worth supporting on the way to incrementally improving the situation, rather than throwing one bonus away for something new. Caldari towers need to keep the risk: you're getting improved industry capacity, but you can't fit the defenses that you could in a Minmatar tower.
I am responsible for a (large) Caldari tower, and I'd love to run three+ polymer chains and research and manufacturing together with a full suite of defenses, but I know that's not balanced. So I make trade-offs to achieve some sort of acceptable equilibrium.
If that can be coded easily, then yes, that is a preferred way to go. I suggested the bonus mostly because I suspected that would fool with the POS code less.
Just as an aside, if a group is large enough to defend a dickstar with a substantial fleet on the side, they usually find C1-C4 too confining and move up to a C5-C6, where dreads care not one wit about ECM. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
885
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 08:00:00 -
[76] - Quote
Update on the pre-elections and the "Wormhole 5."
tl;dr: It's a good time to be a wormholer. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 11:38:00 -
[77] - Quote
I've been given good recommendations by some of the best-known EVE blogs out there!
Jester's Trek
EVEoganda
Interstellar Privateer
Confessions of a Starship Politician
Check out what they have to say about me. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
894
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 15:56:00 -
[78] - Quote
CCP Fozzie's just published a very exciting devblog about POS improvements in the upcoming Odyssey expansion, all of which have their eye on the wormhole dweller!
Click here to read my initial reactions! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
894
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 16:53:00 -
[79] - Quote
James Arget just put together this great poster, advertising the "Wormhole 5"!
Vote for the Wormhole 5! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
894
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 15:23:00 -
[80] - Quote
My personal recommendations for the CSM 8 ballot have been published.
Also, I've received a few more recommendations from the following blogs:
Mangala at RvBganked
Unforgiven Storm at thelazypilot Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
|
Domoso
Trimen Explorations
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 15:43:00 -
[81] - Quote
Congrats Nathan for getting on the ballot. I'm looking forward to having you as a CSM member. As one of those "former" C2 inhabitants I have to say that they burned us completely down with the utmost professionalism which is why I joined Talocan after it was all over.
Nathan is the coolest headed guy I know in the game. He'll be good on the CSM and for the game in general, not just w-space. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
895
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 04:37:00 -
[82] - Quote
The pre-election results are up!
Thank you all for your support so far, and I hope I can count on you in the final election. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
895
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 17:34:00 -
[83] - Quote
The official CSM voting page is live!
GO VOTE!!!
(Also, kind words from current CSM7 member Alekseyev.) Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
895
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:08:00 -
[84] - Quote
Many have complained that the new 14-slot voting system is a GÇ£dragGÇ¥GÇôparticularly painful if you have multiple accounts you need to vote with.
Ironically, we have members of Goonswarm to thank for a javascript application that will auto-fill the options for you with a pre-selected list of candidates. CCPDolan has given candidates the green light to modify this code and send it out to their constituents, hopefully saving much time and hassle.
Follow the instructions linked here if youGÇÖd like to take part in the elections but want to save a bit of hassle on your end.
Remember, no matter whom you vote for at the end of the day, don't forget to vote! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
895
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 12:06:00 -
[85] - Quote
Just got done with a piece on netgamerradio.com. Go Aussies! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
895
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 18:32:00 -
[86] - Quote
Some updates:
The CSM candidates are ALREADY having an effect on CCP. Thanks to our efforts, CCP has already revamped the voting process to be easier on multiple account holders.
I will be on Lost in Eve Podcast tomorrow, at 20:45. Check your calendars, and hope to see you there!
The UI is a bit wonky, but there is now a community spotlight on each of the candidates. Pretty cool.
Also, a number of us have been donating some funny propaganda posters for CCP's facebook page. Check them out! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Olias Sunsoo
Nebula 9
26
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 02:26:00 -
[87] - Quote
+1 Resubbed just to vote for this guy. He gets it done. Good job, Nate. Keep it up. My concern can be measured in micro giv-a-*****. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
902
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 16:54:00 -
[88] - Quote
Thanks, mate. The support is well appreciated.
BTW, some interesting new developments on the POS iterations! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
904
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 15:18:00 -
[89] - Quote
The elections are now halfway over! Click here for an updated voting-made-easy(er) link! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Tsobai Hashimoto
Hard Knocks Inc.
125
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 02:02:00 -
[90] - Quote
you are second on both of my accounts votes just behind ayeson
good luck qnd cant wait to see the results. wish they had exit polls like real elections
sorry about the typos. on my droid at work |
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
905
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 04:13:00 -
[91] - Quote
Thanks, mate!
Obviously, Ayeson comes first for you. Thank you for the support for both me and the WH community. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Jump The H
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 21:50:00 -
[92] - Quote
After reading all this, Id rather vote for Bush |
Frying Doom
2312
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 00:03:00 -
[93] - Quote
Jump The H wrote:After reading all this, Id rather vote for Bush Which one?
There were two of them, and a fair number of people must have voted for them, as they got elected.
Those were the glory days. They gave the rest of the world so much to laugh about. Vote Now! My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras 11. Roc Wieler And remember not voting is the same as voting for Null. |
Jump The H
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 12:30:00 -
[94] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Jump The H wrote:After reading all this, Id rather vote for Bush Which one? There were two of them, and a fair number of people must have voted for them, as they got elected. Those were the glory days. They gave the rest of the world so much to laugh about.
The dumber one of course. |
Frying Doom
2317
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 14:00:00 -
[95] - Quote
Jump The H wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Jump The H wrote:After reading all this, Id rather vote for Bush Which one? There were two of them, and a fair number of people must have voted for them, as they got elected. Those were the glory days. They gave the rest of the world so much to laugh about. The dumber one of course. There was a dumber one?
Hell I just enjoyed the years of laughs
Clinton was a funny president as well the but at least he just got the world laughing at him, the bushes got the whole world laughing at the USA Vote Now! My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras 11. Roc Wieler And remember not voting is the same as voting for Null. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
907
|
Posted - 2013.04.13 14:09:00 -
[96] - Quote
Have you voted yet, Jump? Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:07:00 -
[97] - Quote
Lose a few
Win a few
That's WH life! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
915
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 10:46:00 -
[98] - Quote
Some encouraging words from Marc Scaurus on mittani.com!
I sure hope I'm as successful at being elected as everyone thinks I'm going to be. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
921
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 17:04:00 -
[99] - Quote
A new devblog on the impact of the CSM! Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
928
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 17:01:00 -
[100] - Quote
Last chance to vote!
GIT ER DONE. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |