| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
201
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi, I'm a candidate to CSM 8.
This is a resume of my official candidacy post. For more details read the complete post here .
Disclaimer: The first thing I want to make clear - IGÇÖm a Non-bloc Candidate, IGÇÖm running as an independent, so please donGÇÖt dismiss me due to my alliance affiliation. I bring experience and valid proposals to the table, read me out and make your own mind about my candidacy based on what I have to say and propose.
About Me
I live in Portugal and IGÇÖm a Software Developer. In Eve, IGÇÖm in Eternity INC. that is one of GSF Member corps. I've been playing EVE for 4 years and have done everything in this game. I started in empire, played solo for 1 year and was about to quit when a director from Portuguese 0.0 corp found me and took me in. They helped me learn about everything regarding to PvE and PvP. Later I moved to Eternity, they introduced me the wonderful world of Industry and Capitals PvP.
Experience and Knowledge
In each election cycle, candidates see the CSM as a political office and will promise you the stars, but every year nothing is delivered. Why? Because the CSM is not about game design nor the Product Owner of Eve. CSM is a Stakeholder, they are the ones who have desires, needs and wants about Eve.
While the Stakeholders are the most important source of validation for the project, the most important person on the Scrum Team is the Product Owner. The Product Owner works with the Stakeholders, represents their interests to the developers Team. Understanding this is very important to be able to perform the role of a CSM member. I develop software for 12 years, 5 following scrum methodology. I have the experience, I understand how CCP works as a business, I know what are the boundaries the CSM has and its role in the development cycles of Eve.
My Platform
The CSM members aren't game designers, but that doesn't mean we have no solutions for problems this game faces. I personally have a lot of them, what will come in handy, because another role asked from the CSM is to be a soundboard for feedback and ideas. I will grab those moments to push my platform ideas and my constituent player base wishes.
I will not lie to you, IGÇÖm not everybodyGÇÖs candidate. If I get elected I will not advocate the interests of all EVE players. That is an impossible task because everyoneGÇÖs interests are often in opposition to each other. I will focus and narrow down my effort to particular issues and areas of game play I describe below. But donGÇÖt worry I will not hinder other people and their opinions, I will just follow a simple rule, GÇ£donGÇÖt talk about issues I donGÇÖt know nothing aboutGÇ¥.
My platform issues and experience:
- Planet Interaction
- Invention
- Ship Manufacturing
- T2 Production
- Moon Mining and Reactions
- POSes
- Sovereignty Warfare and 0.0
I have 3 years experience on those areas of the game play, I know about their problems, I know what needs a fix first. I will push these issues in the CSM and with CCP. I will make detailed posts about each one of them in my blog in the next weeks. I consider myself an expert on these game play areas.
If you live of PI, Moon Mining and reactions, if you set up an invention POS and live of research and T2 invention, if you manufacture something: IGÇÖm the perfect candidate for you to vote for, I know and share your problems. I will fight for you, I will fight for us and our common interests!
Now, that doesn't mean I donGÇÖt have a say on other issues like PVE, PVP, low or high sec, I have, I do PVP, I did PVE, I use low and high sec for many of my industrial activities, but I will put my platform issues first and will do my best to motivate other people to focus on them, to keep them in the CSM agenda and to to prioritize them above other issues. Remember that CSM and CCP cannot focus in every problem and issue at the same time, and this is where I come in, my experience and knowledge will be important and determinant to move the agenda of this platform forward.
By now some candidates are shaking their heads and saying NO ! but they do not understand that the reason why CCP elects 14 Players to the CSM is because each person brings specific experiences and defends different platforms, and it is the sum of all its members that make the CSM a true and complete representation body of the Eve community. Anyone saying it will defend all sides and issues of this game impartially and represent ALL the players is fooling themselves and trying to fool you. If that was true and possible, CCP will not need 14 people, they would just elect 1 of us.
Communication
My real life work and experience made me a good communicator. I have the experience and the maturity needed to perform the Job required of Member of CSM and to communicate with CCP on a daily basis, to focus, to keep a constructive and ongoing conversation, to negotiate and be persuasive when needed.
Communication with the community is also an important task and something that needs to improve. We need more, we need an official CSM website with an official CSM blog, where we speak as One. We need to be able to make posts and pools, independent of the Jita park and CCP forum rules, scrutiny and control.
Final Words
The CSM has become a powerful tool of player advocacy. The CSM has a power never held before. It can accomplish great things in the future but only if the correct people are voted in. As someone said, with great power comes great responsibility! We need responsible, knowledgeable, mature and experienced people in the CSM. IGÇÖm the man for the job.
Vote for me.
I need you.
I look forward for your feedback. Unforgiven Storm for CSM 8 |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
201
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
reserved Unforgiven Storm for CSM 8 |

Surothe
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 03:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
screw this guy vote for Scooter McCabe CSM8!!! |

Javajunky
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 03:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
+1 |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
224
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 14:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
What is your position on stew?
This is important. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
852
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 14:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:What is your position on stew?
This is important. Specifically, can venison and chili work together?
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Commander ChiChi
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 22:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
i do not endorse you. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
855
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 22:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Commander ChiChi wrote:i do not endorse you. I bet he's devastated.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
340
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 03:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:What is your position on stew?
This is important. Specifically, can venison and chili work together? Anything ca work with chili, so long as you mix the proper ratio of cheeses, can't have chili without cheese, and nothing is better than venison in a cheddar blanket. |

vege
Computronic Vendetta
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 08:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
This dude sounds more level headed than the others I've looked at so far. |

Jericho159
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 11:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
+1 |

Bubbles9001
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 20:10:00 -
[12] - Quote
+1 |

Xander Phoena
Zebra Corp Gentlemen's Agreement
40
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 01:21:00 -
[13] - Quote
Just finished the eighth Crossing Zebras CSM8 Election Interview with Unforgiven Storm. You can find it here
http://c-z.me/csm8unforgivenstorm |

Sawhorse
EvE Cookie Collective
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 17:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
Good interview. I think you clearly represent the Industrialists in EVE, you get my vote! |

Nevryn Takis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 18:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Sawhorse wrote:Good interview. I think you clearly represent the Industrialists in EVE, you get my vote! Couldn't agree more +1 from me as well |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
986
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 18:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:What is your position on stew?
This is important.
Irish stew is the best. This is not a signature. |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
209
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 19:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
Last night I made a new post.
Not exactly on the subject but I needed to warn other candidates to not make the same mistakes I did before it was too late...
CSM, Ruining Candidates Sex Life Since 2008
http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/unforgiven-storm-for-csm-8/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
209
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 12:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
new post:
Solving the Hauling Problems http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/unforgiven-storm-for-csm-8/ |

Sukaara
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
Seems to have the heart of an industrialist. |

Amyclas Amatin
EVE University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 01:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
What is your position on carebears and casual players?
I'm interested in carebear conservation... and preservation of their natural habitats (high-sec) |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
210
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:What is your position on carebears and casual players?
I'm interested in carebear conservation... and preservation of their natural habitats (high-sec)
From my understanding you are making 2 questions; what I think of carebears? what is my position on high sec?
1 - I'm neutral about carebears. In my opinion every person plays this game like they want. To be honest, we have more carebears living in null sec than the ones I've seen when I lived in high sec, so their natural habit is New Eden! Each person plays this game the way they like and makes them happy, that is what makes Eve a sandbox.
You are probably looking to my alliance name and thinking that I'm a goon so I'm trying to force people to play in a specific way, you would be surprised how many carebears are in GSF and how many only login casually to have some fun and log out after...
2- High sec is not bad, I will not advocate any nerf if that is what you are thinking. If people say that null or low sec are bad, the solution is not to nerf high sec to make the other areas became good, the solution is to buff the other areas to become better than high sec is. High sec should be looked as the standard and we should build the other areas using high sec as a start point.
About high sec but having in mind my industrial platform point of view, hauling needs love (as in any area of space, its not exclusive to high sec). I expect that the tiercide initiative fixes the industrial ships in the same way they fixed mining ships to equilibrate the relation between the gankers and their "friends". read my position on hauling:
http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/hauling-development-stagnation/
Many other industrial activities need love but all of them are transversal to all areas of space not only high sec: I want CCP to fix industry by revamping invention and manufacturing, I want a new industry UI window / tabs, I want less clicks, I want more queues, I want the moon mining problem fixed in a way that CCP removes it from the hands of alliances and puts it the hands of the players (I will explain how this in a post soon) and above all I want POSES fixed.
About specifics on my industrial position I'm preparing a dozen of posts were I will explain the problems and lay out some solutions to fix industry in new Eden. Follow my blog and soon I will post my positions in more detail, I already started...
http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/
Hope I clarify my positions on your concerns. http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/unforgiven-storm-for-csm-8/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
210
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:57:00 -
[22] - Quote
Just posted something new about UI in Eve Online:
CCP is Not Winning the UI War http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/unforgiven-storm-for-csm-8/ |

Amyclas Amatin
EVE University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:01:00 -
[23] - Quote
Good positions, and nice blog by the way.
http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/csm-ruining-candidates-sex-life-since-2008/
That's just epic... Hope it wasn't you replying to my posts 
I might just support you and ruin your life further by helping you become a CSM.
EDIT: Probably none of my business, but you can try sneaking out after she falls asleep... That's how I got my gaming time as a pre-teen... |

Catherine Hekki
Something Unique
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 11:26:00 -
[24] - Quote
Finally someone thinking about industry.
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
212
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:35:00 -
[25] - Quote
IGÇÖm debuting a new column in my blog called GÇ£This Will Never HappenGÇ¥ that will be published every Wednesdays.
Check it out: http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/this-will-never-happen/ The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Sofia Wolf
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
154
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 18:02:00 -
[26] - Quote
You say you have interest in capital warafere. What is your position on power projection and capital blobs? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7751
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 18:14:00 -
[27] - Quote
I read that. I take issue with a basic assumption: that "difficulty" equates to skillpoints required. Skillpoint requirements are a good gating system; they stop initial content being obseleted too quickly, for instance. But actual difficulty should come through improved gameplay. All you're asking for in your blog is to be able to train some more skills on your 6th and 7th alts, the opportunity cost of which won't even touch you, to make more ISK. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
215
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 23:10:00 -
[28] - Quote
Sofia Wolf wrote:You say you have interest in capital warafere. What is your position on power projection and capital blobs?
First point I'm a industrialist, so 90% of my platform is about industry. I did wrote in the end of my platform list of issues that I also have interest about Sovereignty Warfare and 0.0 because I live there. I never said I have an interest in capital warfare. Sovereignty Warfare and 0.0 has large scope than just capitals or blobs.
My biggest concerns about Sovereignty Warfare and 0.0 are the structure grinding, the lack of reasons for people to shoot each other, the fact that people holds space that does not use, the problem of moons being in the hands of alliances instead of the pilots and finally the lack of content for small gangs or small alliances to do and disrupt bigger alliances.
But I will try to respond to your questions and clarify my position on the subjects you raised.
About the blobs nobody can do nothing to prevent them, its human nature for people to group up and fight together, there is nothing CCP can ever do to avoid people to group up and blob somebody.
About the capitals, we have 2 types, supers and lets called it "standard" ones.
Since titans and supers were nerfed, you have notice that they barely leave their poses, they are huge dead ships with no use other than shoot at stations or TCUs. You can not use them without 1 or 2 full support fleets and even so they die, we lost 3 titans a couple of weeks ago and we had 700 men support fleet, they are useless now. Supers have no use in the field of battle anymore, they will make any difference in any future war.
So supers is not a issue anymore nor a blob of supers.
About the blob of capitals (dreads and carriers). These capitals are at the price range and skill training range of most if not all the 0.0 residents that want to fly one, so there is no injustice of disparities saying that this of that alliance has an advantage because it has more isk than others, nerfing capitals will just hurt everyone, since everybody has them in 0.0 and will not solve the problem nor the blob use of them, because like I said, is human nature to group together and cannot ever be avoided.
So in resume, in my opinion capitals use can not be avoid, its use is so much widespread that any nerf will cause a cry so loud that we could have another summer of rage do deal with. About the blob of capitals, since we can not touch capitals nor avoid blobs there is nothing we can do to avoid them directly, but there is something we can do indirectly!
Now what we can do and solve is the capital projection problem. Forget the blob, forget the capitals, we solve the capital projection problem and we reduce the capitals use and the blob to a non problem since you cannot project your force anymore.
I'm in favor of capital projection review and I think is a problem and CCP should look at it. My opinion is that capital projection should be solved not by nerfing range, because that will just make people to jump more times to reach a destiny, but by creating a delay between jumps. If it takes 1 hour to reach the other side of eve and another to come back people will think 10 times before commit to this trip and projecting any type of force in other places other than is area of residence.
Hope it clarifies my position and answers to your questions. The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
215
|
Posted - 2013.02.22 00:14:00 -
[29] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I read that. I take issue with a basic assumption: that "difficulty" equates to skillpoints required. Skillpoint requirements are a good gating system; they stop initial content being obseleted too quickly, for instance. But actual difficulty should come through improved gameplay. All you're asking for in your blog is to be able to train some more skills on your 6th and 7th alts, the opportunity cost of which won't even touch you, to make more ISK.
Hello Malcanis, how are you. Pleasure to talk to you for the first time.
You found my thread and my blog. Good, I'm having problems with twitter and I was getting worried that my tweets with the post links weren't getting out.

There is a specific question you want to ask or you just want me to comment your opinion about my blog post?
Anyway, let me talk a little bit about that post content and the reasons behind it.
That post idea is simple, there are many PI industrialists out there, like me, that created and pay for accounts just to do PI. These alts are called Planet industrialists.
I choose to follow this path and this specialization, it's an option. In not doing PvP in these accounts and just train 10 days of PI on the side to make some money and continue with the PvP training in the next week. They only do PI, they only train PI skills!
These are specialized alts that only do PI and specialization is a good thing in EVE, CCP supports it, I supported it, and must be rewarded!
Eve is a game of specification, not a train all do all game. You specialize in something, you do your part in the sandbox by performing a specific profession.
In Eve specialization is only achieved thought skills, so I propose more skills. An planetary Industrialist must have a reward by specializing in PI and not doing or training anything else. And I'm not proposing a game breaking thing, if you check the numbers I propose, that is a 5-10% improvement over people that does not specialize.
If you read CCP interviews and Dev blogs in the last 2 years, CCP says all the time that the game has many specializations and people should specialize. To do that CCP has to give perks to people to specialize or I would ask myself the question, "If I specialize and the guy next to me doesn't, if we have the same end results, where is the specialization and so why bother?"
Now, about improved game play in PI, I'm preparing a post for this weekend (it was suppose to be for tomorrow, but I'm sick with the flu and I'm in bed) were I will talk about the PI problems. This post your refer to is just ONE solution for ONE of the many PI problems -> the lack of specialization options and rewards for PI Industrialists! There are many other problems and I will not post a solution for all of them, for many I can only point the problems I don't have a solution. I'm counting on the Eve Game Designers to find them, that is why they are there, the CSM main job is point to the problems.
When and if I ever get into the CSM I will tell CCP just that, this is a problem in PI (the lack of specialization path) that I would like to see solved. I will not propose a solution since Its not my place. I'm not and CSM members are not Game Designers! I will wait to see their answer(s) to solve the problem I reported and we start the discussion from that point forward and try to find a solution for this issue.
Now if for some reason, CCP just asks me, "what is your idea to solve the problem you just raised", them I will give them this link: http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/this-will-never-happen/
On a side note, I'm an industrialist, what motivates me is the will to build things, to see and end result of something that I created and the ISK it makes me when I sell it to others. So more ISK is good for any industrialist and any industrialist that specializes should be rewarded for that commitment. I'm not taking about creating a game imbalance, but just a little more to differentiate from someone that is not specialized. The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
217
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 10:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
After 5 days of being sick and being able to accomplish nothing but lay in my bed and drool, i'm back.
I have a new post to share:
Development Strategy For Industry In Eve Online
The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Endeavour Starfleet
842
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 07:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Hello there!
I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)
POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?
Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)
Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?
The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.
The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.
Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.
Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.
Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet. |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 10:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Hello there!
1. POS - My position are pretty clear here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2475989#post2475989 and https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2478254#post2478254. Please go and read them.
--
2. AFK cloaking - OiGǪ this is controversial!
Personally afk cloaking doesn't affect me because I and my Corp found a way to deal with them a long time ago. Every day, in the system I live, I have 1 AFK cloaker living there with me and my friends. For a long time that we know how to fight back: first thing we do is to online a jammer to take out the hot drop out of the equation; second thing we do is to get everybody in fleet, doesn't matter you are dock in station, you get in fleet; them all the people that is ratting starts to rat with a special mod, a point; the others just fit a PVP ship and do whatever they were doing before; in 95% of the situations people continue to do what they are doing and nothing happens, and we are not afraid, we created a secure environment that counters the afk cloaker; in the 5% the cloaker was active and it ends bad for him.
Now letGÇÖs go a little deeper and talk about the technique we are discussing, being cloak in a system to scare off and shut down operations is a valid tactic! Assuming you are at the keyboard, even if doing something else, you are present so you have some sort of control and attention over your cloak ship making this a valid game play action. I compare it with a sniper situation, a sniper take a high position over an area, shots something and everything stops because is there watching; itGÇÖs an old war tactic, a valid static, that I have nothing against it. Now about the AFK part, yes I have some problems with it.
One thing is to play with 2 accounts, have 2 screens and put one char cloaked in a system watching, only giving some of my attention and doing something else, doesn't matter, IGÇÖm present so itGÇÖs ok! Other thing is to Log On and then go to work. I don't think CCP wants us to play the game a few kilometers from our keyboards !!!
Everything in game should have a counter.
Now what you propose, scanning cloakers, defies de idea of cloaking, if you are cloaked, you are invisible, if you are invisible you cannot be scan down, no discussion there, I do not agree in scanning down cloak ships.
What CCP can do is use physics and logic!
An cloaking system if existed in RL will spend energy to keep its cloak up right? So there you have it, that is the solution. Cloak is ok but it should spend cap. Doesn't need to spend much, but it should spend some. Second thing that also makes sense is, when you are cloaked, energy signatures should be lower down or you risk being scan down, so having this logic in mind, when cloaked cap recharge should stop. With these 2 small changes you solve your problem of AFK cloaking. If done correctly a cloaky ship has to uncloak at least once (for 1 minute or 2) every half hour to cap up, when that happens its vulnerable and can be scan down, if the person is at the keyboard no problem, if he was afk, ups...
--
3. Moon mining - I'm finishing writing something about that subject today, check my blog here http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/, I should post something until the end of the day about moon mining. In a nutshell, Ring mining is nice, sounds cool, but I don't think CCP can pull resources for this anything soon. Implementing this will scale up to something like implementing wormholes, itGÇÖs a expansion theme almost. I don't see this happening anytime soon since CCP already said: no Jesus features! But there are solutions, easy ones that can fix moon mining. Check by blog, in a couple of hours I will present one of many solutions to fix moon mining.
--
4. Local - End it? never! I'm totally against that! If people don't want local they have wormholes with 2500 systems without local to play at, go there.
Now that doesn't mean local doesn't need some attention. In my opinion it needs it. My person take on local is this:
CCP should revamp local UI, separate it from the chat, only intel is show in the client; no chat merged with local.
Then we need to make local more dynamic without remove it or delay it, I do not support that. We can create a local that is dynamic in the way it shows intel to you, creating something similar to a fog of war, this is, it can show you more or less information about the people that are in local based on standings with the sov owner, but it always show you there are people in system, how many and always in real time! Just the information about them might or not, be hidden.
For example: I have a good standing with the owner of the system, I can see a picture, a name and the standings of everybody in local. I have no standings I can only see a ? picture in local, I know there is someone in local but itGÇÖs unknown to me who he is, he will be presented has neutral and have no name. The idea is that in empire, I can see all people, In NCP Null you only see local details of pilots depending of your standing with the NCP owner and in 0.0 sov areas you can only see details if I you have standings with the sov owner.
Main purposes of these changes: make sov matter. You own sov, you defend it, you have perks. Second goal of these changes, make null look a little more scary than really is, give a perception of fear and unknown (without losing local, I say this again just to clarify). Third goal to create farms and fields for small groups to burn, how? CCP makes the 0.0 sov owners local detailed intel to be something that is an upgrade mod, an a mod that has a paper thin shield that can be shot at and deactivated if you do not defend it, making local loose detail for everybody in it for a couple of hours. just an ideaGǪ
(continues...) The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 10:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
One more detail, when I say everybody is neut to you, your corp mates, your alliance mates, have beacons and transmitters you can see who they are in local, always, that is the only exception to local detail that is always show.
--
5. Missions - these are not my specialty at this moment, I don't do them for 3 years now, but my opinion the way to go is the wormhole way: Strong AI, few ships more pvp focused and less pve focused, improved payouts because of difficulty and time you will have to put with these improved missions. CCP should do a couple of prototypes for each type 1-4 levels and release them to see people reaction and collect data. Once CCP sees people reaction and have more data on how to do them, it should replace them all and start a 2 or 3 years program were in each expansion replaces ~20 missions until all of them are out the game, that is my view on this subject.
--
6. incursions - I did those for 6 months in low sec, we had a sig in GSF federation, I was in the group that got the only BPC of the super, I got 500M of my share of that BPC. Good times.
I loved incursions, best PVE ever, this is the PVE model to follow in this game. I stop before the nerf, because 6 months was too much for me, I got bored, I did it all, seen it all, became repetitive and boring, I did more for the challenge an group chat than the money.
When later the nerf bat hit, hit hard, but you have to concur that things were a little out of control for high sec, that was too much money for low risk. I have no problem of people doing that money in low sec or 0.0, because there is risk, we got ganked more than 10 times and I lost a couple of ships, I win good isk but I also risk a lot every time I log in. CCP took some nerf action, I agree with a nerf, now if you ask it went too far? I say yes, a little too far!
But the nerf is only one problem, the content, the background story, all need to be reviewed! I would like to leave a question here: Incursions are nice and all but it makes any sense a pirate faction is trying to attack new Eden all the time forever?
Maybe is time for CCP to rethink incursions, maybe pull out the pirates and rethink incursions has something that comes from another type of wormholes what it makes more sense, and instead of pirates have takmahl or tacocan or yan jung NPCs?!
And when doing this rethinking then CCP should fix/Unerf incursions, but having in mind always that bigger rewards comes with bigger risk!
I don't mind high sec people to have access to incursion big money like before but them we have to re-think the risk. One question for example: it makes sense for concord to show up inside an incursion site?
--
7. logis - "They need to be able to tell who is locked" - I do not agree with this, this is too much information, people that are flying a ship know who is locking them, itGÇÖs their responsibility to broadcast for help, they are not dumb!
About the watch list, I agree is too small for logis, who is flying a logi ship should have a bigger list, at least 10 more slots.
"broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right" - this is part of the game, if you say the UI sucks and broadcast button are too small, not intuitive, I agree, the entire broadcast system needs to be reviewed and we should have big buttons in the bottom near the cap/shield/armor UI to press and ask for help, not in the fleet window, but the knowledge about the system and how it works is part of the game and we have to teach people and not destroy the concept because some people canGÇÖt figure out how it works or donGÇÖt like it.
The entire watch list UI needs a pass, information about cap should be there, in my opinion, more visual warnings and sound warnings need to be put there, but lock information I think is too much.
--
8. Logis in Kill mails - As a logi pilot I'm 100% behind this, I want this for so long. I have no idea what are the technical problems that CCP faces, but I will ask for sure, if I get in the CSM.
The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Endeavour Starfleet
843
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 17:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
Thank you for your responses! I hope you will spend some time thinking on logi and rethink your position in the future but I am glad to see you have been thinking about the other issues.
Just a note tho I don't often click on links that go outside of forum so could your post the relevant bits of your wordpress blog here please? |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 18:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Thank you for your responses! I hope you will spend some time thinking on logi and rethink your position in the future but I am glad to see you have been thinking about the other issues.
Just a note tho I don't often click on links that go outside of forum so could your post the relevant bits of your wordpress blog here please?
The reasons I prefer my blog to post my campaign information instead of Eve-O, is format, is all about the format.
I don't like eve-o forum limitations. It has few format options, can't post pictures, its limited on the size of the post..
I will try to post a small resume here with the link but I ask you to follow the link, the reading experience is better in my site than here. The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 18:09:00 -
[36] - Quote
double post The Lazy Pilot - http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/ |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
220
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 19:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
Just created my Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ page in my blog. Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 *-áMy Blog -+ The Lazy Pilot
|

Migrant workers
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 14:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
This looks good, will vote :) |

Jacque Custeau
Knights of the Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 14:49:00 -
[39] - Quote
Its about time we have a candidate who will make industry his number one agenda. I read your position on hauling and I had a few comments:
- The number of haulers per race should go up but only if they get unique roles. If you look at the Wreathe, the only thing it is used for is to manufacture Prowlers! No pilot is not going to spend a little time (hour or two) to train Minmatar Industrial to 2 and just use the Hoarder. There needs to be something worthwhile the Wreathe can do that the Hoarder can't!
- The freighter was gimped to emphasize the need for pvp escort. The fact is, in high sec the assaulter has the initiative, escort cannot do anything until the suicide gankers fire, which by then is too late. I know this issue is a hot potato but its unavoidable when talking about hauling.
- We have rising costs for office space in hubs, but no rising cost of manufacturing slots. If people had to use cheaper slots further away from the market, the need for hauling would increase.
The other issue for me relates to stagnation in manufacturing, and the BPO 'advantage'. I don't want to get into specifics but I would like to see BPO holders getting additional advantages over people producing from copies. |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:06:00 -
[40] - Quote
IGÇÖm back from some well deserved vacation with my family.
And I have a couple of new posts in my blog.
Vacation is Over! Back to EVE Online
The Planet Interaction Nightmare, Part I Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 20:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Yesterday I started to write a two part article about Planet Interaction (PI).
The first part can be found here, if you didnGÇÖt read it, go, I will wait for you.
Done? Excellent. Now the second part is here:
The Planet Interaction Nightmare, Part II Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1797
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 21:22:00 -
[42] - Quote
What is your stance on AFK skill training? Amarr Militia - Fweddit - http://fweddit.com Poetic Discourse - http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.com |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
227
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 09:57:00 -
[43] - Quote
You know what "the pivot" concept is? Let me make a demonstration.
I can promise you that if I take a seat in CSM 8 I will think about your concerns about AFK skill training and if I find it to be a problem I will talk about it with the remaining CSM members, but above all I will talk to them about the Industry problems like PI, moon mining, reactions, inventions, POSes, T2 invention and manufacturing. I will defend our common interests on these areas. I will use my Real Life work experience to help the CSM communicate and persuade the Product Owner of EVE Online to focus development in solving these problems, making improvements.
See, it was easy. 10 years of marriage does that to you, with time you start doing it without even making an effort.
Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1768
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 10:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:You know what "the pivot" concept is? Let me make a demonstration.
I can promise you that if I take a seat in CSM 8 I will think about your concerns about AFK skill training and if I find it to be a problem I will talk about it with the remaining CSM members, but above all I will talk to them about the Industry problems like PI, moon mining, reactions, inventions, POSes, T2 invention and manufacturing. I will defend our common interests on these areas. I will use my Real Life work experience to help the CSM communicate and persuade the Product Owner of EVE Online to focus development in solving these problems, making improvements.
See, it was easy. 10 years of marriage does that to you, with time you start doing it without even making an effort.
you missed "Yeah, Yeah, I will get it done later" We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
229
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 15:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
posted something new:
http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/phoenix-is-now-the-only-pure-utter-dread-left-in-eve/ Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
233
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 15:58:00 -
[46] - Quote
Just posted something: A Solution to Fix Moon Mining Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
272
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 12:19:00 -
[47] - Quote
I wrote some new words about Nullsec Trade Hubs in my blog.
Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Seniae 0n3
17
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
+1 vote |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
273
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 15:05:00 -
[49] - Quote
good afternoon Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
276
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 21:06:00 -
[50] - Quote
I made a new post in my blog http://thelazypilot.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/catching-up/ Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Madeline Amelana
Mixotroph Industry and Tech.
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 23:49:00 -
[51] - Quote
+1 and Endorsed. I really like your hauler/industrial ship post on the blog. |

Stray Bullets
Perkone Caldari State
38
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:35:00 -
[52] - Quote
You got one of my votes.
You should rethink your position regarding logistics between null and empire being too easy. It's the main driver to almost zero industry in nullsec. Why build in nullsec if you can haul everything in from empire, faster, cheaper and with less effort? ;)
Think about it!
Also ... Portugal!  |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8341
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
Stray Bullets wrote:You got one of my votes. You should rethink your position regarding logistics between null and empire being too easy. It's the main driver to almost zero industry in nullsec. Why build in nullsec if you can haul everything in from empire, faster, cheaper and with less effort? ;) Think about it! Also ... Portugal! 
Nullsec doesn't have the capacity to even build it's own ammunition, let alone ships, modules, sov structures etc etc.
There are 5 systems in Caldari hi-sec that have 13% more naufacturing slots than the whole of sov null combined.
Cutting off the logistics capability before this issue is thoroughly addressed will simply cut nullsec's throat. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8: Read about my platform here
Please endorse my candidacy here |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1101
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
Endorsed, and I only go to null to die. This is not a signature. |

Stray Bullets
Perkone Caldari State
38
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 13:14:00 -
[55] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Stray Bullets wrote:You got one of my votes. You should rethink your position regarding logistics between null and empire being too easy. It's the main driver to almost zero industry in nullsec. Why build in nullsec if you can haul everything in from empire, faster, cheaper and with less effort? ;) Think about it! Also ... Portugal!  Nullsec doesn't have the capacity to even build it's own ammunition, let alone ships, modules, sov structures etc etc. There are 5 systems in Caldari hi-sec that have 13% more naufacturing slots than the whole of sov null combined. Cutting off the logistics capability before this issue is thoroughly addressed will simply cut nullsec's throat.
I never made such suggestion! :) In fact, if you look up some of my posts (too lazy to find the links), you'll see I'm all about increasing the capacity and efficiency of nullsec industry and nerfing / taxing NPC industry. One can't exist without the other ... or a very big POS change that tips the balance ;) |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
276
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 13:31:00 -
[56] - Quote
Stray Bullets wrote:Malcanis wrote:Stray Bullets wrote:You got one of my votes. You should rethink your position regarding logistics between null and empire being too easy. It's the main driver to almost zero industry in nullsec. Why build in nullsec if you can haul everything in from empire, faster, cheaper and with less effort? ;) Think about it! Also ... Portugal!  Nullsec doesn't have the capacity to even build it's own ammunition, let alone ships, modules, sov structures etc etc. There are 5 systems in Caldari hi-sec that have 13% more naufacturing slots than the whole of sov null combined. Cutting off the logistics capability before this issue is thoroughly addressed will simply cut nullsec's throat. I never made such suggestion! :) In fact, if you look up some of my posts (too lazy to find the links), you'll see I'm all about increasing the capacity and efficiency of nullsec industry and nerfing / taxing NPC industry. One can't exist without the other ... or a very big POS change that tips the balance ;)
Before we address the logistics of null sec in anyway, we have to build a foundation for null sec industrial independence. This will take more than a year, null sec is badly broken at the moment.
Resources availability need to be balanced up; sov system needs to be fixed; alliances income needs to change to a bottom-up aprouch; null sec residents income needs to be balanced up; manufacturing and invention needs a huge buff in null; ... this will take much more than 1 year to fix... only after all this is done and the dust settles we can look at logistics and decide where to touch it. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8351
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 14:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
Also I'm not sure why it's bad for nullsec to be able to import from hi-sec. Or, come to that, why it would be bad for hi-sec to be able to import from an industrially revitalised 0.0. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8: Read about my platform here
Please endorse my candidacy here |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
564
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 10:52:00 -
[58] - Quote
You will be a very good CSM, that represents the important "industrial side" of the sandbox. Also, Portuguese do it better , so you will get one of my votes . |

Sugar Kyle
The humbleless Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 23:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Woo! Go Storm! Tilde soaked words from something kinda like a pirate. |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
278
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 00:34:00 -
[60] - Quote
I've made a new Post: The CSM Election Circus
enjoy Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Arydanika
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
285
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 15:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
Congratulations reaching the qualifying number of endorsements and good luck on the final ballot. It's going to be a very interesting election this year and it's just getting started.
Thank you for appearing on the second Voices from the Void CSM 8 candidate panel. It was a n insightful discussion and your participation is appreciated. Your current and future supporters can find the episode by going to this link. It was a pleasure to have you on the Voices podcast and I hope to have you back again soon. Good luck in the upcoming final election. Runner of Voices from the Void podcast, Eve Online Pod Pack & DJ on eve-radio.com Sundays at 1800.-á Organizer of the ATX Eve Online Meet. GÖÑ |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 08:13:00 -
[62] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:...If you live of PI, Moon Mining and reactions, if you set up an invention POS and live of research and T2 invention, if you manufacture something: IGÇÖm the perfect candidate for you to vote for, I know and share your problems. I will fight for you, I will fight for us and our common interests!... I listened to your interview on crossing zebras... you do sound like someone who will advocate on behave on industrialists. I will bring your interview to the attention of people in my corp and alliance. Good luck. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2801
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 11:17:00 -
[63] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm will be on my recommended ballot.
Pre-Election has begun! Click to endorse Trebor for CSM8 * Candidate thread * CSM Blog |

Frying Doom
2093
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 03:13:00 -
[64] - Quote
At this time I would like to ask the candidates to think carefully about any endorsements that they give.
By putting other candidates on your ballot you are effectively giving them any excess votes you may have if you become elected or all of your votes if you are knocked out of the election.
So the choice of who you endorse and in what order you endorse them on your proposed ballot is very important.
Remember that these people are voting for you and a lot of people will rely on your proposed ballot.
We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
279
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 10:22:00 -
[65] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:At this time I would like to ask the candidates to think carefully about any endorsements that they give.
By putting other candidates on your ballot you are effectively giving them any excess votes you may have if you become elected or all of your votes if you are knocked out of the election.
So the choice of who you endorse and in what order you endorse them on your proposed ballot is very important.
Remember that these people are voting for you and a lot of people will rely on your proposed ballot.
Personally I will endorse a few people that I think are will be excellent CSM Members and will help this game become better.
I'm not going to suggest an order and this list is my personal list, not something I want others to follow blindly.
I think that everybody should have free will and should choose its candidates and the order they want them in their list and not follow other people lists just because. One thing I hate is having people tell me what to do, I like to think for myself.
I like to read what others have to say, who they endorse and why. Most of the times they raise issues I missed, sometimes those opinions clarify issues I have. They bring to the table different perspectives that helps me build a better and more complete opinion about candidates and that is always good.
The final word about who to put in the list and the order belongs to the voter not the candidate they support in first place. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
290
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 10:17:00 -
[66] - Quote
Today CCP announced the list of planned POS iterations for Odyssey.
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/odyssey-summer-expansion-starbase-iterations
These are changes clearly pointed at the wormhole community and the industrialist community is once again ignored and have to wait until the next Expansion.
Maybe In The Next ExpansionGäó
IGÇÖm sorry but IGÇÖm not going to share the joy and go to the party tonight.
This is why we need an Industrialist in the CSM to help level out these fixes when they happen and help spread the love for all types of game play.
These changes are pretty underwhelming for an industrialist and anyone who says the contrary never moon mined, done reactions or refined anything in a POS his entire life!
The industrialists only get one fix, they will be able to access any array inside the shield. All other main problems that the industrialists have, still remain to be addressed, for example:
- The fact we have to disconnect silos every time we need to access them. When can someone fix this and spare us all the clicking?
- The refining arrays suck. When can the penalties be removed? When the UI and functionality can be improved?
- The advanced ship assembly arrays sucks. When can the penalties be removed so we can manufacture hulls in a POS?
- Where is the moon mining and reactions UI fixes? For example where can I have an Apply button that changes color when I
- have changes that arenGÇÖt applied or when can I get a warning if I try to leave this window without applying the changes? Also when can I have different signs and colors when I have silos or reactors online / offline?
- Where is a centralized input / output hangar for labs? Why can the tower be the central access location for all hangars, and the modules just increase the available size?
I donGÇÖt ask for much for the summer expansion, just these bare minimum fixes, so we, the Industrialists, arenGÇÖt once again discriminated for one more expansion. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Madeline Amelana
Mixotroph Industry and Tech.
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 10:41:00 -
[67] - Quote
I have a quick question, which I hope you do not think is rude, because that is by no means the intention of it.
As you are through to the next round, where we have to select a number of candidates based on our order of preference, I was wondering if you could clarify the following for me:
You stated that you are a non-bloc candidate, and I realise you are running as an independent, however, you are a member of Goonswarm Federation, and as such, have the potential to be included on their bloc listing.
I intend to vote so that the non-bloc candidates which I support have the highest listings on my preferences (In all honesty, there are not many industrial candidates, so you will be fairly near the top either way), so I was wondering if you could let us know whether you are aware if you are on the bloc-voting list. I know there are many many null focused candidates, so it could be that you are way down their listing due to your lower focus on PvP/Sov.
I apologise for the crappy way in which I am phrasing this question, but, basically, I want to ensure that my votes are as useful as possible, and if you are already a shoe-in, then whilst I will still have you fairly high on my list, I would prefer my first few place votes to go to others, so that we get the most versatile CSM possible.
This sounds like I am not going to vote for you, that is not the case, I very much like your platform, but want to ensure the other indy or new player or whatever non-pvp/SOV candidates get a decent look-in.
God I suck at posting.
Thanks in advance for your answer,
Madeline |

Apricot Baby
caldariprimeponyclub
52
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 10:43:00 -
[68] - Quote
The Caldari Prime Pony Club endorses this product and/or service.
Goodluck! CSM Participation Reward Program - www.tinyurl.com/caldariprimeponyclub Earn rewards for taking part in this year's CSM Elections |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
292
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 12:14:00 -
[69] - Quote
Madeline Amelana wrote:I have a quick question, which I hope you do not think is rude, because that is by no means the intention of it.
As you are through to the next round, where we have to select a number of candidates based on our order of preference, I was wondering if you could clarify the following for me:
You stated that you are a non-bloc candidate, and I realise you are running as an independent, however, you are a member of Goonswarm Federation, and as such, have the potential to be included on their bloc listing.
I intend to vote so that the non-bloc candidates which I support have the highest listings on my preferences (In all honesty, there are not many industrial candidates, so you will be fairly near the top either way), so I was wondering if you could let us know whether you are aware if you are on the bloc-voting list. I know there are many many null focused candidates, so it could be that you are way down their listing due to your lower focus on PvP/Sov.
I apologize for the crappy way in which I am phrasing this question, but, basically, I want to ensure that my votes are as useful as possible, and if you are already a shoe-in, then whilst I will still have you fairly high on my list, I would prefer my first few place votes to go to others, so that we get the most versatile CSM possible.
This sounds like I am not going to vote for you, that is not the case, I very much like your platform, but want to ensure the other indy or new player or whatever non-pvp/SOV candidates get a decent look-in.
God I suck at posting.
Thanks in advance for your answer,
Madeline I don't have access or talk with leadership of my alliance. Any information I have is by talking with one of my corp directors, he is my point of contact when I have questions. I only talk with him 3 times about my candidacy, one was when I decided to run, I didn't want to cause a problem to my corp so I ask them if it was ok, if the alliance will not create them problems.
I got the green light, I was told that my alliance didn't care about me I can do whatever I wanted but I was on my own, I cannot use the alliance name or count on them for nothing.
Second contact was last week, my director contact me and told me there was going to be created a NULL sec list and I had no place on it, I wasn't an official null sec candidate and The Mittani hates industrialists, he even post that 2 days ago:
http://www.tentonhammer.com/eve/spymaster/88
Quote:Ignore Industrialists: In an alliance or corporation, industrialists are completely irrelevant and should never be allowed a voice in anything. Sound extreme? It isnGÇÖt. An industrialist is not a logistician, but a GÇÿproducerGÇÖ. Producers live in hisec in countless numbers, and anything that is built there can simply be imported from Jita with a jump freighter - by a logistician. Logisticians matter in alliances; so do financiers, diplomats, and most of all warriors. Producers do not. There has never been a war in the history of EVE which was won by an advantage in local production; the hobbits of ASCN believed their own propaganda and assured each other that production mattered, but they were crushed utterly by Band of Brothers. Take after the words of House Greyjoy: GÇÿWe Do Not SowGÇÖ. Be particularly wary of capital/supercapital producers, who are often wealthy and consider themselves to be above alliance rules. Alliances have no need of GÇÿindustrial wingsGÇÖ, GÇÿindustrial directorsGÇÖ - none of it.
My last contact was on 1st April, my director told me that the alliance wasn't supporting some 0.0 candidate for whatever reason and 1 spot between the 10 and 14th place in the list had open and they were considering putting me there to close the hole. Now I have to say I don't know if he as pulling a prank on me or not, but even if it is true, being in that spot, 10th or lower will make no difference...
If that happens I will not be in a position that gives me any vote at all.
I run as an independent, my alliance doesn't support me. My platform is industry, my love is industry, I want the best for all. I want to fight and defend industry in the CSM, I don't care if it is high-sec, low-sec or null-sec. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Madeline Amelana
Mixotroph Industry and Tech.
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 12:19:00 -
[70] - Quote
Thank you for your very frank reply, it answers my query and concerns perfectly.
I look forward to voting for you very soon! |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 14:58:00 -
[71] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:I don't have access or talk with leadership of my alliance. Any information I have is by talking with one of my corp directors, he is my point of contact when I have questions. I only talk with him 3 times about my candidacy, one was when I decided to run, I didn't want to cause a problem to my corp so I ask them if it was ok, if the alliance will not create them problems. (...) Man, I know sov null-sec is serious spaceship biz, but I'd be f-ing leaving if I got devalued like that. Don't know why you put up with it.
Either way, industrialists *do* matter, they should have a voice, and I'm putting you somewhere in my top 2-5.
|

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC 9th Company
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 17:44:00 -
[72] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:... and The Mittani hates industrialists, he even post that 2 days ago: ...
I run as an independent, my alliance doesn't support me. My platform is industry, my love is industry, I want the best for all. I want to fight and defend industry in the CSM, I don't care if it is high-sec, low-sec or null-sec. You guys should put again a funky hat on Mittani, give him some alcohol and send him loose on the fanfest, so we can have some quality time again. I'm sure you will have a lot of votes from the big boys in your alliance and also from others in null sov just because null industry need some serious fixes. And I had read some very good ideas posted by goons regarding how to fix the null-low sec industry and I would love to see those ideas go live. Goons know stuff, maybe much better than others. |

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
93
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 17:53:00 -
[73] - Quote
By your reply in post 70 made me wonder why on earth you are in that alliance still?
As an industrialist you should be more than able to find a better home, or even go solo and socialize and network as an independent. If you end up with an actual seat on CSM your risking a sudden love shower of attention from you ralliance..
I was just wondering if you should not cut your ties before the next round of election at least if nothing else to show you are truly independent and not part of the blocks.
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
294
|
Posted - 2013.04.03 20:25:00 -
[74] - Quote
Bantara wrote:Unforgiven Storm wrote:I don't have access or talk with leadership of my alliance. Any information I have is by talking with one of my corp directors, he is my point of contact when I have questions. I only talk with him 3 times about my candidacy, one was when I decided to run, I didn't want to cause a problem to my corp so I ask them if it was ok, if the alliance will not create them problems. (...) Man, I know sov null-sec is serious spaceship biz, but I'd be f-ing leaving if I got devalued like that. Don't know why you put up with it. Either way, industrialists *do* matter, they should have a voice, and I'm putting you somewhere in my top 2-5.
Please don't take conclusions about things I didn't said or implied.
In any large organization there is an hierarchy / chain of command. Look at the army, a soldier doesn't go to speak with a general when it has a problem does he? he speaks with his Sargent. This is not much different, we are 10000 players, if we didn't had a chain of command chaos would have destroyed the entire organization. So my "Sargent" are my corp directors, my "lieutenant" is my CEO... I'm a soldier.
There is no devaluation at all, in my RL job I'm one employee in 30000, I don't know my CEO personally, or my R&D director or my Area Manager, nor they know me. I know and talk with my line manager. Its no devaluation, its hierarchy and I'm down there and I have no problems with that.
Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
294
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 16:09:00 -
[75] - Quote
Its time!
I'm the only industrialist candidate in the ballot.
If you want the CSM to have an industry representative, now is the time to vote for me.
I need you, every vote counts!
Vote for me.
https://community.eveonline.com/community/csm/vote/
Thank you all for your support. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2333
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 18:32:00 -
[76] - Quote
I strongly endorse this candidate! Good luck!!
Issler |

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
1108
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:55:00 -
[77] - Quote
An industrialist with deep knowledge and no hidden make-highsec-safer agenda. Embrace The Storm, Endorse The Storm "Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á -Arydanika, Voices from the Void
Hero of the CSM Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
295
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:00:00 -
[78] - Quote
IGÇÖm counting on you.
IGÇÖm the only industrialist candidate in the ballot. By voting for me youGÇÖll be able to impact the priorities of development in 2013 and 2014 by placing industry on the top 3 issues to be fixed, so we can keep moving this game forward.
These are going to be two busy election weeks! We need to work together to bring your friends and your corp mates to the voting page and ask them to vote for me.
All things are possible, you just need to believe.
Vote for me here.
Even if you donGÇÖt vote for me, itGÇÖs OK, I will never give up on you, I will defend you and your interests in the CSM no matter what. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8486
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:56:00 -
[79] - Quote
I unreservedly recommend Unforgiven. Find him a place on your voting lists, because if EVE's economy isn't working right, nothing else will either. Please vote for me for CSM8-áhere
My recommended voting list |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 15:21:00 -
[80] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:Please don't take conclusions about things I didn't said or implied.
In any large organization there is an hierarchy / chain of command. My apologies, looks like I didn't quote the right part. I'm more concerned with how industry players don't matter to them.
You're on my slate, though lower than you would have been had it not been for the major null-sec voting plan.
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
296
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 16:05:00 -
[81] - Quote
Bantara wrote:Unforgiven Storm wrote:Please don't take conclusions about things I didn't said or implied.
In any large organization there is an hierarchy / chain of command. My apologies, looks like I didn't quote the right part. I'm more concerned with how industry players don't matter to them. You're on my slate, though lower than you would have been had it not been for the major null-sec voting plan.
Quote:industry players don't matter to them.
Yes, that is true, but my corp loves me and I love my corp so if the alliance doesn't like industrials I don't care.
about being in the null sec voting plan, please not that Malcanis, 2 high sec candidates and a wormhole guy are in there. What they did was, the first 7 are null, and the last 7 non eligible votes they filled with people they like or think will be good csm candidates.
While I thank them for being recognized as a good candidate and be in the null list, I'm not in a position to take any benefit from it, I didn't ask to be in there and I would like to ask to the players not to read more than that is: an endorsement.
Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC 9th Company
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 17:59:00 -
[82] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm, it's time to stand up and drop the looser seat. Goons had a lot of good idea about how to fix null inldy. You stand up now or loose. And none love looser. Drop the tie, ur a goon!! |

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC 9th Company
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 18:00:00 -
[83] - Quote
. |

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC 9th Company
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 18:01:00 -
[84] - Quote
]Unforgiven Storm, it's time to stand up and drop the looser seat. Goons had a lot of good idea about how to fix null inldy. You stand up now or loose. And none love loosers. Drop the tie, ur a goon!
|

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC 9th Company
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 18:02:00 -
[85] - Quote
double post pls delete |

Mhax Arthie
Pagan INC 9th Company
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 18:05:00 -
[86] - Quote
. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1110
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 18:19:00 -
[87] - Quote
Well, I voted for you.
I am sure you will be elected.
Try to be useful and enjoy your time on the CSM. This is not a signature. |

Laura Castelli
Something Unique
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 16:16:00 -
[88] - Quote
You got my vote. Good luck! |

Javajunky
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 16:30:00 -
[89] - Quote
Obviously as a corp mate I fully endorse Unforgiven. But I'm not endorsing him for alliance purposes there's plenty of wind baggage on that train for all of null sec. I'm a strong advocate for him because his industry focus is universal, empire to null sec.
Unforgiven has the grasp of Industry, he will be a solid advocate for risk, reward and mechanics. This is a delicate balance.
Obviously I've got street cred as an industry guy, feel free to read my posting history, I don't really do the bittervet nerd rage alliance stuff, they are just fun to troll and spin up. Industry people across Eve should really focus on getting the true industry representation. ADHD PVP will have its representation so should you. Do your research. Cheers. |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
298
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 15:53:00 -
[90] - Quote
On The Campaign Trail
These 4 last days have been busy. Most of my time I spend campaigning one-o-one with other players by eve-mail or chat. Looking to my excel file I sent out more than 5000 eve mails for a total cost of 16M in CSPA changes.
Most of the feedback was good, I got more or less 200 replies, but I also got the usual hate mail against goons; the casual insult or the smart ass that thinks it can scam some money from me by selling his votes; I also got two emails in my gmail account with death threats, what is a first and I was a little socked, I wasnGÇÖt expecting them at all, some people just take this game too serious. One was pissed about a lost industrial ship 3 years ago to a goon gank, the other payed some security deposit and didnGÇÖt pass the GÇ£GSF Newbie Security Background CheckGÇ¥ recently and GÇ£lostGÇ¥ it. /facepalm
I could try to spend some time explaining the difference between meta gaming and the CSM and how nothing has to do with it each other, but I would be loosing my timeGǪ
I also spend some considerable time on several forums, reading, not only my threads but also keeping track of some other candidates threads. There are funny stuff out there.
On Saturday I spend 2 hours recording a Lost in Eve Podcast with Mike, Kaleb and Nathan but unfortunately Jade Skype crashed in the end and we lost it. NSA is now the only entity that has a copy and this was one of the best debates ever! Kaleb gave out juicy secrets of GSF diplomatic team and the secret pact with PL to conquer EVE. Nathan show us compromising evidence that puts his direct adversaries in a middle of sexual wormhole scandal and Mike confessed that he is James 315! The best podcast ever and we lost itGǪ /sigh
I also got new endorsements to join Jesper, Trebor and Ali Aras ones, from Alekseyev_Karrde, Rhavas, Issler Dainze and Malcanis. The STV actively encourages inter-candidate recommendations and that is always good. A Special Thank You for recognizing me, my ideas and the platform I defend has one of the 14th that should be in the CSM 8. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Powers Sa
601
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 00:55:00 -
[91] - Quote
How do you feel about highsec freighter kamikazee/suicide ganks? This is a very important issue. Vote Nullsec for CSM8 Mynnna Kesper North-á Kaleb Rysode Malc00nis |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
313
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:17:00 -
[92] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:How do you feel about highsec freighter kamikazee/suicide ganks? This is a very important issue.
Suicide freighter ganking is part of the background atmosphere of risk and sudden violence which makes EVE the enthralling game it is.
In the arms race between the ganker and those who are ganked, the large gunned short range battlecruiser currently has the upper hand over the T1 freighter. Yet a T2 freighter with tens of billions in cargo can simply skip past any hisec camped as if it didn't exist. That balance is regularly upset by CCP game mechanics tweaks, some well thought out, others with unintended results.
I look forward to providing my own input both as an industrialist and with a detailed understanding of the mechanics used in organized freighter blockades during the next change to this increasingly important battlefield between the alliances of EVE. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7425
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:28:00 -
[93] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:In the arms race between the ganker and those who are ganked, the large gunned short range battlecruiser currently has the upper hand over the T1 freighter.
well to be fair so did tempest gank fleets, mega gank fleets, armageddon gank fleets and typhoon gank fleets when those things were in vogue mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 13:08:00 -
[94] - Quote
Wrapping Up...
Monday, when I returned to my mailbox I had dozens of emails pending with questions and people pledging support. My blog during the weekend also hit a new record of page visits and most of the traffic originated from the CSM 8 candidate page.
I later found out the reason behind it, CCP Dolan send out an EVE mail to all active accounts with information about CSM 8.
To close this up, I want to write a small Q&A to address some of the major issues raised in the emails I received this weekend.
Q: What is your position about scamming?
EVE is a sandbox, CCP doesn't interfere unless you do something really really bad like threaten someone real life, post some nasty porno pics in local or say something really racist, for example.
Everything else is OK, players have the will to do whatever they want, for bad or good, its up to each one. Remember that if a person scam, you can go and gank him, kill him, hire mercenaries to go kill them, if you are a pacifist you can create a Google excel file with their names and blacklist them so other people don't fall for the scam, you can do everything you want. This is what makes EVE different from all other MMOs. The day CCP interferes this game will die, it will not be EVE anymore, its going to be a theme park WOW game and what is the fun of that?
Remember also that everything you own on this game is not yours, belongs to CCP, the isk, the ships, everything, so legally if someone takes it, is not taking it from you, they still belong to CCP, so no real world crime happened. I know its difficult to separate ourselves from real life ethics, I have that problem up to a point, but in the end this is why we play EVE, because its different, its dangerous, we have that rush when we pvp a player and risk losing that 200 M ship, we get a rush when we rob a POS or we giggle like a kid when someone accepted your 1 unit of carbon thinking it was a Charon and payed you 1,5 B.
That is what makes this game different and cool to play. Its hardcore, yes, but you are here and we are few, most of the people are afraid to play this game, run from it and here we are, you and me, we are special, we are better, we play the coolest bad ass game around and we survive and thrive and most people don't.
Q: You are the null sec, low sec industrialist by excellence but for high sec what do you propose?
Industry is not a specific area of space discipline. Most of the things I want apply to high sec, like a new industry UI window and tabs for invention, PI and manufacturing (dead to spreadsheets windows); I want a queue system similar to the skill queue for invention, research and manufacturing; the Industry POS improvements I want, apply to poses in high sec; I want less clicking; I want drag and drop in industry windows; I want job profiles and options saved so we can redo jobs with minimal clicks; I want multiple selection and bulk job creation in the industry windows; etc...
I want many things and most of them apply to everybody that does industry in high sec.
Q: What is your stance on missions?
Missions is not directly related with industry, unless we are only looking at the salvage part of it. For that I want to revamp salvage T2; I want T2 salvage dropping from other sources other than only T2 ships; I want to review T2 rigs inventions to easy the process; I want to have capital rigs; I want exploration sites to drop more datacores and invention related stuff everywhere, including in high sec, so they become useful for invention at reasonable prices;...
I could be here all day.
Q: What do you propose to improve mining?
Kill it! Mining cannot be improved!
I want a total revamp of the mining system, a new concept, something people like to to play and have fun, not something you press a button and became a human bot.
I want to launch a global discussion about the need to revamp mining from scratch. Should we do it? Everybody agrees? How can we make something else that is fun to play around mining?
I have some ideas to revamp it but I need to present them first to CCP for development validity before I present them to the players so we don't get the hopes up and then later get the ideas killed because its technically impossible to implement them. Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|

Frying Doom
2387
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 22:15:00 -
[95] - Quote
Before the polls close
How do you feel about the new STV voting system?
Do you understand it?
How do you feel about fact we can only identify 2 members of CSM7 who supported it?
Do you want it removed for a better or simpler system, while voting numbers are so low? Vote Now! My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras 11. Roc Wieler And remember not voting is the same as voting for Null. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |