EVE Search - Players controlling the forums?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Players controlling the forums?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 8 post(s)
Kris Longknife	Posted - 2005.07.22 14:59:00 - [1] Ever noticed there are 23 players that attempt to control the fourums? If an idea is made they do not like they hammer that thread till it becomes a flame fest and it gets locked. They constantly hijack a thread till again it gets locked. If the Original poster is not liked by these people they hammer his thread untill it gets locked. I dont know about the rest of the forums readers but this just kinda stinks to me. In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. If you dont like an idea say so, and then let the thread alone.
Zaldiri	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:04:00 - [2] To be honest The people the you say control the forums are the people who spend the most time on the forums. So when the same idea or issue keeps popping up over and over again it's understandable they get boared and just hammer the thread.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:19:00 - [3] Many ideas are hammered because they suck. - Lets have a Concord response in all .1 to .4 systems - Lets be able to choose how many high, med and low slots our ships have - Lets increase PG of all ships by 25% and the same for CPU. - 0.0 How to make it easy for the lazy and risk averse casual player : A daily Derisor topic (TM) The list is endless. I love this game and would hate to see retards ruin it. The 23 people you refer to (and I can guess them too) are mostly in favour of balance over their style of gameplay. They generally address the issues even though its usually in a caustic way.
SlightlyMad	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:19:00 - [4] Originally by: Kris Longknife Ever noticed there are 23 players that attempt to control the fourums? If an idea is made they do not like they hammer that thread till it becomes a flame fest and it gets locked. They constantly hijack a thread till again it gets locked. If the Original poster is not liked by these people they hammer his thread untill it gets locked. I dont know about the rest of the forums readers but this just kinda stinks to me. In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. If you dont like an idea say so, and then let the thread alone. Its actually CCP mods with alts moving discussions in the direction thats best for the company. Much the same as the governement controls ppl with fake news and mindcontrolrays from the TV. And ohh! That bloody tax thing. * -"get real"
Jessa	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:23:00 - [5] Originally by: SlightlyMad Originally by: Kris Longknife Ever noticed there are 23 players that attempt to control the fourums? If an idea is made they do not like they hammer that thread till it becomes a flame fest and it gets locked. They constantly hijack a thread till again it gets locked. If the Original poster is not liked by these people they hammer his thread untill it gets locked. I dont know about the rest of the forums readers but this just kinda stinks to me. In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. If you dont like an idea say so, and then let the thread alone. Its actually CCP mods with alts moving discussions in the direction thats best for the company. Much the same as the governement controls ppl with fake news and mindcontrolrays from the TV. And ohh! That bloody tax thing. yay for conspiracy theories \o/
Rod Blaine	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:24:00 - [6] I imagine I'd be one of those 23 ? If so, look better and think up a better story to tell us. So what If I nudge some threads here and there :p Haven't seen them get worse because of it yet. _______________________________________________ Yes yes, blogging is passÚ I know. Rod's Ramblingz on Eve-Online Solutions to your issues.
Burnhard Brutor	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:25:00 - [7] Originally by: Deja Thoris Many ideas are hammered because they suck. - Lets have a Concord response in all .1 to .4 systems - Lets be able to choose how many high, med and low slots our ships have - Lets increase PG of all ships by 25% and the same for CPU. - 0.0 How to make it easy for the lazy and risk averse casual player : A daily Derisor topic (TM) The list is endless. I love this game and would hate to see retards ruin it. The 23 people you refer to (and I can guess them too) are mostly in favour of balance over their style of gameplay. They generally address the issues even though its usually in a caustic way. Thats the most arrogant thing I've ever read on these forums.
Gungankllr	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:25:00 - [8] I don't know about there being a magical number of 23, but I am convinced that there are several people who don't pay their monthly subscription to play, they just pay for the forum access to wave their "Look at me, look at me, I'm an attention *****" card around. But I think there are quite a few people that if they left I wouldn't feel bad in the slightest. www.hadean.org
Viceroy	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:27:00 - [9] Who's taking bets that this thread was started by a very bitter alt of Derisor? __________________________ Finite Horizon Your end is our beginning.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:28:00 - [10] Originally by: Burnhard Brutor Originally by: Deja Thoris Many ideas are hammered because they suck. - Lets have a Concord response in all .1 to .4 systems - Lets be able to choose how many high, med and low slots our ships have - Lets increase PG of all ships by 25% and the same for CPU. - 0.0 How to make it easy for the lazy and risk averse casual player : A daily Derisor topic (TM) The list is endless. I love this game and would hate to see retards ruin it. The 23 people you refer to (and I can guess them too) are mostly in favour of balance over their style of gameplay. They generally address the issues even though its usually in a caustic way. Thats the most arrogant thing I've ever read on these forums. Insulted by an alt

Monty Burns	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:28:00 - [11] /me pulls out a really big hammer We can't help it, works sooooo boooooring ..... and since they made me take my wiz bang pc home and gave me this pants work laptop, forum hammering is all i can do /sniff /sob I suspect there are many others of the 23 ... hey what a great corp name that is "the 23" ... in the same boat Darwin 4tw
Winterblink	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:28:00 - [12] Originally by: Burnhard Brutor Originally by: Deja Thoris The 23 people you refer to (and I can guess them too) are mostly in favour of balance over their style of gameplay. They generally address the issues even though its usually in a caustic way. Thats the most arrogant thing I've ever read on these forums. You may have missed that last paragraph, I'll repeat it for clarity. I disagree with the term "caustic", though... I'd probably change it to "passionate". Frack, I hope I'm not one of those 23. :) ___winterblink/warp_drive_active/eve_nature_vraie//
Demarcus	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:29:00 - [13] I post a lot but I don't think I am in the 23. Some of us that post a whole lot are just bored at work and this forum is our way of staying in the game when we can't be playing the game. ------------------------------------- You are all worthless, and weak.
Demarcus	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:30:00 - [14] Originally by: Burnhard Brutor Originally by: Deja Thoris Many ideas are hammered because they suck. - Lets have a Concord response in all .1 to .4 systems - Lets be able to choose how many high, med and low slots our ships have - Lets increase PG of all ships by 25% and the same for CPU. - 0.0 How to make it easy for the lazy and risk averse casual player : A daily Derisor topic (TM) The list is endless. I love this game and would hate to see retards ruin it. The 23 people you refer to (and I can guess them too) are mostly in favour of balance over their style of gameplay. They generally address the issues even though its usually in a caustic way. Thats the most arrogant thing I've ever read on these forums. Then you must not read many of the threads here. ------------------------------------- You are all worthless, and weak.
Rodj Blake	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:31:00 - [15] Who are these 23 people? Name names! Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori
Dust Puppy	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:32:00 - [16] Originally by: Kris Longknife In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. If you dont like an idea say so, and then let the thread alone. Release the list, I'm very curious
Monty Burns	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:34:00 - [17] Originally by: Kris Longknife ...In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. ... You ACTUALLY compiled a list Man, people tell me i have too much spare time Darwin 4tw
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:39:00 - [18] Originally by: Monty Burns Originally by: Kris Longknife ...In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. ... You ACTUALLY compiled a list Man, people tell me i have too much spare time Get Smithers to do it for you
TheMoog	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:41:00 - [19] Originally by: Burnhard Brutor Originally by: Deja Thoris Many ideas are hammered because they suck. - Lets have a Concord response in all .1 to .4 systems - Lets be able to choose how many high, med and low slots our ships have - Lets increase PG of all ships by 25% and the same for CPU. - 0.0 How to make it easy for the lazy and risk averse casual player : A daily Derisor topic (TM) The list is endless. I love this game and would hate to see retards ruin it. The 23 people you refer to (and I can guess them too) are mostly in favour of balance over their style of gameplay. They generally address the issues even though its usually in a caustic way. Thats the most arrogant thing I've ever read on these forums. That's also the closest thing to the truth I've read on these forums...
mahhy	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:44:00 - [20] Originally by: Kris Longknife In intrest to protect the guilty (they know who they are) I wont list the names I have collected in the last few days. Oh c'mon, name 'em! List 'em! Shame 'em! errrr.... wait. Wheres the shame part?

Bonaventure Augustus	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:48:00 - [21] Originally by: Deja Thoris Originally by: Burnhard Brutor Thats the most arrogant thing I've ever read on these forums. Insulted by an alt Ah yes, the old 'my imaginary avatar is more credible and legitimate than your imaginary avatar' principle. To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
j0sephine	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:50:00 - [22] "Oh c'mon, name 'em! List 'em! Shame 'em! errrr.... wait. Wheres the shame part?" I second the motion, really curious to see who those mods' alt characters are :s
Bhaal	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:55:00 - [23] Quote: Who's taking bets that this thread was started by a very bitter alt of Derisor? I'd buy that for a dollar... ------------------------------------------------ Current Hobby other than EVE
Winterblink	Posted - 2005.07.22 15:55:00 - [24] Originally by: Bhaal Quote: Who's taking bets that this thread was started by a very bitter alt of Derisor? I'd buy that for a dollar... Robocop quotes, woot! ___winterblink/warp_drive_active/eve_nature_vraie//
Srewolf Bane	Posted - 2005.07.22 16:05:00 - [25] Point proven... look how fast them ppl just hijacked this thread and started bashing... ------------------------------------------------ "I feel sorry for people who don't drink, when they wake up in the morning that's the best they will feel all day" - Frank Sinatra
Kris Longknife	Posted - 2005.07.22 16:07:00 - [26] Well 7 of the 23 have posted already. Lets see if we can get all 23 to post.
Gariuys	Posted - 2005.07.22 16:09:00 - [27] Edited by: Gariuys on 22/07/2005 16:10:28 Originally by: Viceroy Who's taking bets that this thread was started by a very bitter alt of Derisor? Put me down for a fiver. Oh and yeah there are a handful of people on these forums with a clue, and I got the funny feeling, your list covers most of em. ~{When evil and strange get together anything is possible}~ A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it. - ActiveX The grass is always greener on the other side. - JoCool
Winterblink	Posted - 2005.07.22 16:09:00 - [28] Originally by: Kris Longknife Well 7 of the 23 have posted already. Lets see if we can get all 23 to post. Which are the 7? Come on... :) ___winterblink/warp_drive_active/eve_nature_vraie//
Monty Burns	Posted - 2005.07.22 16:13:00 - [29] Originally by: Kris Longknife Well 7 of the 23 have posted already. Lets see if we can get all 23 to post. C'mon man, be honest ... this is like putting sweets in front of a kid. Darwin 4tw
Marcus Aurelius	Posted - 2005.07.22 16:27:00 - [30] Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 22/07/2005 16:28:33 Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 22/07/2005 16:27:29 I love riddles. Soo, let me go back quickly and list the 7 you mean for you. 1. me/Rod Blaine 2.Viceroy 3. Winterblink (yeah you too buddy SHAME !) 4. Mahhy 5. J0sephine 6. hmm, getting lost here. rest I'll edit in.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.